Possible 2028 Democrats target Vance on GOP megabill tiebreaker
From Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) to former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, the Democratic hopefuls placed blame squarely on Vance, who could launch his own bid to succeed Trump in 2028.
'JD Vance was the deciding vote to cut Medicaid across the country,' Ocasio-Cortez wrote in a post on the social platform X. 'An absolute and utter betrayal of working families.'
'VP Vance has cast the deciding vote in the Senate to cut Medicaid, take away food assistance, blow up the deficit, and add tax breaks for the wealthiest,' Buttigieg, a former 2020 presidential primary candidate, wrote in a post on X.
'This bill is unpopular because it is wrong. Congress votes this week, but it's our voices – and our votes – that will have the final say,' he added.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), who often serves as a foil to the president, similarly took to X, telling supporters to 'Bookmark this' in response to news that the 100-seat legislative body passed the bill in a 51-50 vote. The vice president, in his constitutional role as president of the Senate, is called in to cast a vote in the event of a tie.
'JD Vance is the ultimate reason why 17 million Americans will lose their healthcare,' Newsom said.
The final Senate vote on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act came on Tuesday after hours of tense negotiations that lasted through the night. Lawmakers worked through the weekend before launching a 27-hour marathon of amendment votes on the floor, during which Republican leaders sought to win the support of holdouts.
GOP Sens. Thom Tillis (N.C.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Susan Collins (Maine) voted against the measure, along with every Democrat.
The bill includes the largest cuts to Medicaid since the program began in the 1960s, a move expected to cause a spike in the number of uninsured Americans over the next decade.
Almost 12 million lower-income Americans would lose their health insurance by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The bill is projected to cost more than $3 trillion over the next decade, but it would be partially paid for with about $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid.
Trump and most congressional Republicans say the reductions aren't true cuts. They argue nobody who should be on Medicaid will lose benefits.
'We're cutting $1.7 trillion in this bill, and you're not going to feel any of it,' Trump said at the White House last week.
It still needs to pass the House again, where some moderate Republicans have expressed concerns about the cuts.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
This Is... Our Independence Day (For Climate Solutions)
The end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end Despite some last-minute successful rescue efforts on some small but crucial points, climate investors in the United States are reeling this week from the passage of the new federal law which not only rolled back prior incentives for renewables and other clean energy and transportation projects, but in some ways imposed new penalties on them. This is decidedly not good news for climate investors in the United States, to be clear. But we've been here before, and this time we have some key advantages that our sector has not had in prior such retrenchment episodes. Let's look at the last twenty years of the residential solar industry in the U.S. When I was first getting started as an investor, it was fascinating to attend solar industry conferences, because the sector was clearly at a transition point. Walking through the exhibitor halls, you could see investment bankers in full suits rubbing elbows with guys in Birkenstocks and wearing ponytails. One can only imagine what the latter conference attendees must have felt about the 'suits' invading what had been a small niche industry until then. The thing is, this was before any large-scale federal incentive program for solar had been put into place. This was even before a Republican president declared 'America is addicted to oil.' And it was before the costs for rooftop solar made sense without incentives. The industry was still far from 'breaking a buck' (ie: getting the cost of panel manufacturing below $1/watt). But the investors could all see the trend lines as well as anyone else, and understand the basic logic: That as solar PV and other renewable power continued to see dropping manufacturing costs, and significantly lower operating costs than thermal power generation, distributed clean power production was going to become important. And they were right. As the prices continued to drop, financiers took the baton and figured out ways to turn a 'total cost of ownership' ("TCO") advantage into an overall cost advantage, and solar adoption flourished. The thing is, as mentioned above there still wasn't some massive Federal subsidy system for solar. Yes, a limited solar tax credit was implemented. But investors who were around at the time will remember that the industry really wasn't taking off because of this federal tax credit – instead, there were various state-level incentives that the solar industry utilized. As one state after another implemented new incentives, the industry jumped from state to state and the early movers found strong advantages by being flexible and entrepreneurial. I'm old enough to remember when New Jersey was the focus of industry activity, for example. And that patchwork of state-level programs was enough to support strong industry growth that eventually became a nationwide trend and a multi-billion dollar market. So here the climate solutions sector is again, with the federal rug pulled out from underneath the industry. But this is the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end. 1. It's not just a solar and wind industry anymore. It's certainly overstating things to suggest that 'cleantech' (as it was termed back in 2005) was just a solar and wind game. There were robust efforts around energy efficiency, waste treatment, electric vehicles, water treatment, and many other sectors. However, solar and wind was the focus. Now, climate solutions investors have more broadly embraced these other solution areas and more. There are many sectors like waste-to-value that have been growing quickly without any real federal support at all, and in many cases without any state-level incentives either.2. Despite the political rhetoric at the federal level, states governments are more supportive of a wide range of climate and clean technology solutions. Waste-to-value solutions, for example, are really not a 'red state / blue state' issue. Landfill capacity constraints and a desire for clean food and water (see Exhibit A: PFAS concerns) loom larger for local-level legislatures versus the grandstanders in Congress and the White House. And for many of these solutions, especially those related to the circular economy, localization is a key success factor in any case. Waste diversion and re-use, for example, is not a national issue nearly as much as it is a local issue.3. The underlying economics of these new solutions make sense now regardless of incentives, for many applications. TCO is a real thing, and the financial industry has now figured out how to unlock overall cost advantages by 'spreading out' the higher upfront costs of cleaner solutions across many of these sectors. In electric vehicles, for instance, many consumers now recognize that an electric sedan or pickup truck may cost more up front, but will save them money (and in many cases simply provide a better driving experience) in the long run. Commercial fleet owners for the most part haven't yet figured this out. But they will, and an entire industry dedicated to helping companies profitably electrify their vehicle fleets is now in place and downside of not having consistent federal-level support is also clear from observing the past two decades of the growth of the solar industry in the U.S. – it wasn't a smooth growth curve. As the sector grew in fits and starts, there have been successive waves of fast growth followed by industry consolidation – some of us call it 'the solar-coaster'. We are currently seeing the same thing in fleet electrification, for example. But on the other hand, contrarian, long-term investors may find right now to be a really attractive time to be placing bets on these industries and solutions, while investment values are depressed. The long-term climate change megatrend remains in place. Other countries aren't throwing such obstacles in front of their own market growth, costs continue to decline, and state-level incentives remain in place across many U.S. regions. Investors and entrepreneurs interested in U.S.-based climate solutions across the energy, food, water, waste and transportation sectors should look forward, knowing that the industry is more resilient than ever. Yes, better federal support would make a lot of sense in terms of innovation, economic growth, and the climate change crisis. But we don't need the federal support to keep moving forward. In many ways, this is our independence day.
The Verge
17 minutes ago
- The Verge
Slate Auto's electric pickup is no longer ‘under $20,000' — thanks, Donald
Slate Auto's American-made electric pickup — the one with no paint, no stereo, and no touchscreen — is no longer priced 'under $20,000.' The increase is a result of Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill,' which will end the federal EV tax credits on September 30th when signed into law later today. That sub-$20,000 price for the Indiana-built pickup was a big selling point for the EV startup backed by Jeff Bezos, and was only possible after applying the $7,500 tax credit to the retail price. The price promotion was scrubbed from the Slate Auto site as recently as yesterday, according to TechCrunch. The website now shows an expected price of 'mid-twenties.' Slate's under $20,000 price tag for a vehicle it won't start delivering until late 2026 was always accompanied by an asterisk, with fine print highlighting federal incentives that were 'subject to change.' And change was certainly expected: Trump campaigned heavily on the promise to end President Biden's fictitious 'EV mandate,' because electric cars are for socialists in MAGA world. Trump's embrace of oil and gas, while simultaneously dismantling incentives meant to spur the adoption of EVs and clean energies, is a gift to Chinese makers of electric cars, solar panels, and batteries. The US is now on course to own the past while China is firmly positioned to dominate the future.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Soybeans Rally on Wednesday
Soybeans were in rally mode on Wednesday, with contracts up 20 to 26 cents on the day. The cmdtyView national average Cash Bean price was up 23 3/4 cents at $10.12 1/2. Soymeal futures were $2.90 to $4.10 higher on the day, as Soy Oil was up 110 to 140 points. Thursday will be the last trade day of the week due to Independence Day on Friday. Arabica Coffee Prices Are Falling. How Much Lower Will They Go? Brazil Coffee Harvest Pressures Weigh on Prices Coffee Prices Fall as Pace of Brazil's Coffee Harvest Accelerates Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Ahead of Thursday morning's Export Sales report, analysts surveyed by Reuters are looking for between 300,000 and 700,000 MT of old crop beans booked in the week of June 26. New crop sales are expected to total between 0 and 300,000 MT. Soybean meal sales are expected to total 100,000 to 650,000 MT, with bean oil bookings in a range of net reductions of 10,000 MT to sales of 26,000 MT. Earlier today, President Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam, stating the country is charging no tariffs on US goods. Nearly 5.7% of all US soybean meal export commitments for 2024/25 have been for Vietnam, with 2% of all bean commitments to the country. The 7-day QPF from NOAA shows rains up to 1.5 inches in parts of NE, IA, MN, WI, and the Dakotas. The ECB is showing expectations for lighter totals. Jul 25 Soybeans closed at $10.50 1/2, up 25 3/4 cents, Nearby Cash was $10.12 1/2, up 23 3/4 cents, Aug 25 Soybeans closed at $10.53 1/2, up 23 3/4 cents, Nov 25 Soybeans closed at $10.48, up 20 3/4 cents, New Crop Cash was $10.00, up 21 cents, On the date of publication, Austin Schroeder did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
