
GTRI Cautions Against Imports Of GM Farm Products From US; May Affect India's Agri Exports
PTI
GTRI says allowing the import of GM products such as soybean meal and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) for animal feed would affect India's agricultural exports to EU.
Economic think tank GTRI on Saturday cautioned that allowing genetically modified (GM) farm products from the US under the proposed trade pact would have implications for India as it may affect the country's agri exports to regions like the European Union.
India and the US are negotiating an interim trade pact, which is expected to be announced before July 9.
The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said that allowing the import of GM products such as soybean meal and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) for animal feed would affect India's agricultural exports to the European Union (EU), a key destination for Indian exporters.
DDGS is a by-product made during ethanol production, usually from corn or other grains.
The EU has strict GM labelling rules and strong consumer resistance to GM-linked products. Even though GM feed is permitted, many European buyers prefer fully GM-free supply chains.
India's fragmented agri-logistics and lack of segregation infrastructure make cross-contamination likely, risking trace GM presence in export consignments, GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said.
'This could lead to shipment rejections, higher testing costs, and erosion of India's GMO-free image, especially in sensitive sectors like rice, tea, honey, spices, and organic foods. Without robust traceability and labeling systems, GM feed imports could hurt India's export competitiveness in the EU," he said.
For instance, the BT gene from the bacterium Bacillus Thuringiensis enables the plant to produce a protein toxic to certain pests. Other genes, including those from soil bacteria, have been used to make crops resistant to herbicides, he said.
He added that while GM crops are biologically plant-based and function as vegetarian food, the fact that some contain genes of animal origin means they may not be acceptable to communities or individuals that adhere strictly to religious or ethical definitions of vegetarianism.
Srivastava further said research suggests that GM DNA is broken down during digestion and does not enter the animal's meat, milk, or produce.
'Therefore, foods like milk or chicken are not classified as GM, even if the animals were fed GM feed. However, critics argue that this blurs the line for consumers who wish to avoid GM-associated products entirely," he said.
On whether seeds harvested from genetically modified crops be reused for future sowing, he said GM seeds are generally not reusable due to legal and biological reasons.
'They are patented and sold under contracts that prohibit saving and replanting. Even if reused, many GM crops are hybrids, and their saved seeds often perform poorly. In India, Bt cotton is the only approved GM crop, and while farmers have tried reusing its seeds, results are substandard," he said.
Further, he said the risk of contamination remains a concern worldwide.
Srivastava said that GM and non-GM crops can intermingle at various points in the supply chain, especially during transport, storage, or processing.
He added that in India, the current policy is relatively conservative and only one GM crop – Bt cotton – is approved for cultivation.
'No GM food crop is commercially cultivated, although experimental trials are ongoing. Import of GM soybean oil and canola oil are permitted," the GTRI said adding imports of GM grains, pulses, oilseeds, fruits, and similar food/feed products are not allowed.
GM feed materials such as soybean meal and DDGS are currently banned.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
25 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
When tactical successes don't translate to peace
On June 13, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion with a spectacular attack targeting Iran's top military commanders and nuclear scientists. In the currently popular Indian parlance, it would be called ghar mein ghus ke maarna (roughly translated as 'hitting the enemy in his den') – a policy that has all along evoked admiration among a section of opinion in India and an urge to emulate in May, India had put up its best yet publicised performance of the above policy by launching Operation Sindoor targeting top symbols of Pakistan's brazen terror. Both attacks were followed by an aerial war. However, barring a key aspect examined at the end of this essay, the similarity between the two situations ends Israel has lived in a perennial state of conflict and spends around 9% of its GDP on defence. In contrast, India spends barely 2%, admittedly with a larger GDP, but also much larger security challenges. Second, there is no parallel between the two situations from the moral and international law angle. India's legitimate fight has been against Pakistan's attempts from its inception to change the territorial status quo and destabilise India through overt and covert warfare. On the other hand, Israel's policy, especially in respect of the Palestinians, has violated all norms of international Israel is up against militarily far weaker adversaries and at best a nuclear threshold state in Iran, but one that is no match for the technological superiority of the US-supplied Israeli war machine. India, on the other hand, faces two nuclear-armed neighbours. Pakistan's war machine is not much inferior to India's and its backer – China – possesses formidable military power. This imposes limitations on India's ability to the Israeli attacks, combined with the US bombardment of key nuclear facilities, caused considerable damage in Iran after its air defences were largely neutralised. The damage caused by India to Pakistan's military installations was no match. According to the information from official sources, India was able to neutralise Pakistan's air defences sufficiently to be able to successfully attack airbases in the early hours of May 10. Our official discourse also maintains that Pakistan was chastened enough by this stage to ask for a ceasefire. Why India did not press home this advantage remains unclear. In raising this aspect, I have in mind further degradation of Pakistan's war machine and not unrealistic expectations generated by our political and strategic discourse, such as taking back PoK or Haji Pir etc. that were voiced in the wake of the in the UN debates and voting on resolutions, Israel appears isolated. But it is militarily the most powerful country in its region and no longer faces any meaningful opposition from the Arab world. It enjoys solid US backing. Other Western countries may disagree with it on Palestine, but share its goal of preventing Iran from going contrast, we are now pretty much on our own in dealing with the security challenge from Pakistan. While there was widespread condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack, no country named Pakistan as the perpetrator, and there were multiple calls for restraint from the international community wary of a wider war between two nuclear-armed countries. China's support for Pakistan was palpable during the conflict, and India's bugbear Field Marshal Asim Munir was the toast of the White House not too long China's iron brother Pakistan continues to be valuable to Washington too, albeit transactionally, because of its geographic location. Further, if we are aiming at reviving the level of international focus on terrorism that prevailed for a decade plus after 9/11, we may be in for disappointment. The global agenda has moved on. While robust deterrence and coercion are indispensable in dealing with Pakistan, the foregoing provides a reality check for those with the desire to emulate Israel..A measured over the years, Israel has notched up several brilliant tactical successes against its adversaries, but has no peace. The Palestinian problem continues to fester, and estimates of a setback to Iran's nuclear programme range from a few months to a few years. Most credible observers believe that only diplomacy can achieve its enduring capping. Israel has shunned diplomacy in dealing with its adversaries for several years now and has followed a policy, euphemistically described as mowing the grass, to degrade their military capabilities our case, notwithstanding the brilliant tactical success of Operation Sindoor, we are nowhere close to putting an end to Pakistan's terror, much less resolving our larger Pakistan problem. Pakistan's terror infrastructure is largely intact. Asim Munir's position has strengthened, at least for now. Following the Mumbai terror attack, we progressively abandoned bilateral diplomacy with Pakistan, castigating it for having failed to change the conduct of the Pakistani state. Pakistan's hardline posture under Asim Munir, combined with the justified anger of the Indian public at Pakistan's conduct and Pakistan's salience in our electoral politics, makes its resumption extremely security-centric approach over the last few years has also failed to achieve the above goal. But for want of any other instrumentality, we cannot afford to dilute it. Therefore, we too may be faced with the need to mow the grass periodically, albeit in a field strewn with nuclear weapons. This is integral to the new normal announced by Prime Minister Modi on May 12..(The writer is a former High Commissioner to Pakistan and author of India's Pakistan Conundrum: Managing a Complex Relationship)


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Dinhata farmer gets ‘illegal migrant' notice from Assam, TMC slams BJP
A notice to a farmer in Dinhata in Cooch Behar district from Assam's Foreigners Tribunal, declaring the 50-year-old an 'illegal migrant' has ignited a fierce political slugfest in West Bengal. Uttam Kumar, a resident of Sadyaler Kuthi in Dinhata subdivision, said he was stunned when he received the notice in January, accusing him of entering India 'illegally through Assam between 1966 and 1971.' 'I have never left Cooch Behar in my life. I was born and raised here. How can I be an illegal migrant? ' he told mediapersons, recalling that he only grasped the charge's seriousness after neighbours explained the tribunal's ruling. 'I was served the notice in January. I don't read things well, so I showed it to my neighbours. That is when I learnt Assam has charged me with being an illegal infiltrator,' he said. The notice alleges Kumar failed to submit required documents during police verification and now stands classified as a suspected illegal immigrant. Foreigners' Tribunals in Assam alone adjudicate such citizenship disputes. The Trinamool Congress (TMC) was quick to denounce the development as proof of the BJP's 'anti-Bengali' bias. Assam is ruled by the BJP. Calling the notice 'outrageous', TMC leader and North Bengal Development Minister Udayan Guha said: 'All residents of the Brahmaputra basin, who migrated before 1971, are Indian citizens as per the Assam Accord. Even if we assume someone entered before 1971, they are legitimate Indians. Uttam is a Rajbanshi, a son of this soil. The BJP is trying to repeat Assam's NRC chaos here.' On social media platform X, TMC Rajya Sabha MP Samirul Islam accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah of first deporting Bengali-speaking workers and now targeting lifelong residents. 'Despite documents showing his father's name on the 1966 electoral roll, Uttam is being hounded. But our leader Mamata Banerjee will fight this in court and on the streets,' he wrote. The BJP, however, rejected the accusations and instead blamed the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government for the confusion over identity documentation. A party spokesperson described it as 'one or two stray cases' and insisted that the state administration must answer for blurred lines between real citizens and those using forged documents. 'We hold the Mamata Banerjee government accountable for the situation. The lines between real citizens and those using forged documents have become increasingly blurred,' he said. Thousands of infiltrators, the BJP leader alleged, have created fake papers to pose as Bengal residents. Sushil Chandra Barman, BJP MLA from Mathabhanga, also questioned the state administration's role. 'This is another baseless campaign of TMC. There is no truth in it. If this happens, the West Bengal government has to take responsibility for this,' he said. —WITH PTI Inputs


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tripura rally seeks identification, deportation of illegal immigrants
Agartala: Civil Society Organisations and NGOs held a rally here on Monday, demanding the state govt identify and deport illegal migrants from Bangladesh and Myanmar. The demonstration, featuring a national flag, aimed to draw attention to the issue of illegal immigration in the state. Notable figures from various tribal bodies and community leaders attended the rally, including BJP's ally in the govt, TIPRA Motha MLA Ranjit Debbarma. Debbarma appealed to all political parties to unite in combating illegal immigration to ensure greater unity and secure the future for the next generation. The organisers alleged a significant influx of Chakma tribes from the Chittagong Hill Tracts into the state. In the hills, these migrants have constructed Buddhist monasteries and established settlements over the years. In Agartala, a Chakma colony emerged rapidly, housing individuals from Bangladesh with illegal documents, they added. A substantial number of Chakmas secured govt jobs, including executive positions, by managing illegal documents within the state. Most mango orchards in Gandacherra of Dhalai district are owned by Chakmas who reside in other Indian cities or Chittagong, enjoying dual citizenship. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Il gioco di fattoria più rilassante del 2025. Nessuna installazione Taonga: la fattoria sull'isola Gioca Undo Areas such as Bamutia and Mohanpur near Agartala have multiple families of this nature, but no action has been taken, NGO leaders claimed. Addressing the gathering, Debbarma said that shortly after the creation of Bangladesh in 1971, the Centre issued orders to all states and territorial administrations to eliminate illegal immigrants, but these efforts failed in Tripura. Subsequent orders in 2017 and 2021 by the then Left Front and BJP govt, respectively were neither publicised nor executed. On May 19 this year, the MHA issued directives to all state govts following the Pahalgam incident to identify and deport illegal migrants to their respective countries. Consequently, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Haryana began implementing the order. "Unfortunately, the Tripura govt sat on the direction, making the indigenous people angry. These people are infiltrating Tripura and managing forged documents, buying lands, creating imbalance to our employment opportunities and resources," Debbarma said. "We should not engage in vote-bank politics regarding infiltration. Everyone must unite against illegal immigration," he asserted, adding that his party does not support community-based politics.