The US needs Australian beef for hamburgers, Littleproud says
American beef imports have emerged as a key negotiating item in the Albanese government's efforts to secure a tariff carve out.
The Trump administration has been pushing for Australia to loosen import rules to include beef from cattle originating in Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US.
The Prime Minister has confirmed biosecurity officials were reviewing the request but vowed his government would not 'compromise' Australia's strict bio laws.
But the prospect of changing laws has sparked unease among cattle farmers worried about keeping bovine diseases well away from the country's shores.
With beef imports seemingly key to securing a US tariff exemption, Mr Littleproud on Monday said there needed to be some 'perspective'.
'The United States does need Australia and other countries to import beef to be able to put on their hamburgers,' he told Sky News.
'They don't have the production capacity to be able to produce the type of beef that goes on their hamburgers.
'So this is a tax on themselves that they put on Australian beef.'
Despite being subject to the blanket 10 per cent tariffs on foreign imports, Australian beef into the US has risen by 32 per cent this year, according to Meat and Livestock Australia.
Meanwhile, the cost of domestically produced beef within the US has been climbing, as cattle farmers struggle with drought.
Mr Littleproud said the Nationals were not against importing American beef provided that it was from cattle 'born in the United States and bred all the way through to their slaughter in the United States'.
But beef from cattle originating in third countries was a risk because 'we don't have the traceability that we have over the US production system'.
'And that's why Anthony Albanese needed to rule out straight away that he would not open that up to those cattle that were born in Canada, Mexico, or anywhere else in the Americas, because that poses a significant risk unless we can trace those cattle,' Mr Littleproud said.
Mr Albanese has been clear in saying he would 'never loosen any rules regarding our biosecurity'.
But he has also said that if a deal can be struck 'in a way that protects our biosecurity, of course we don't just say no'.
Mr Littleproud acknowledged Mr Albanese's words but said 'when you see reports from departments saying this is what's on the table in terms of negotiations – where there's smoke, there's fire'.
In addition to the baseline 10 per cent duties on foreign goods, Australia has also been subjected to 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium.
Only the UK has been able to secure a partial exemption from the Donald Trump's tariffs.
A key UK concession was scrapping its 20 per cent imposts on American beef and raising the import quota to 13,000 metric tonnes.
But with many British goods still subject to tariffs, analysts have questioned whether the deal was worth it.
The US has trade surpluses with both the UK and Australia.
Though, Australia also has a free-trade agreement with the US, meaning goods should be traded mostly uninhibited.
The Albanese government has repeatedly criticised Mr Trump's decision to slap tariffs on Australian products as 'economic self-harm' and 'not the act of a friend'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
a minute ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Texas governor orders arrest of Democrats who fled Trump-backed gerrymander stoush
Australia's most well-known example of gerrymandering was under Queensland's Nationals premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen, who oversaw a system – more accurately described as malapportionment – in which many rural seats contained far fewer people than urban seats. Gerrymandering has a long history in the US, with both sides of politics implicated. Earlier, in an interview on Fox News, Abbott conceded the proposed map constituted electoral gerrymandering, but said it was legal. 'Gerrymandering can be done, or drawing lines can be done, on the basis of political make-up, as in Republican versus Democrat, and there's nothing illegal about that,' Abbott said. 'We have the authority, legally under redistricting law, to draw districts that align with the voter preferences of the voters of the state of Texas.' Democrats who fled to New York and Chicago scoffed at the governor's threats of arrest, noting subpoenas in Texas would not affect them interstate. Loading But they also pressed the seriousness of the situation, arguing the Republicans' push to redistrict electorates was a dark moment for the country. 'When a president can pressure a state to rig maps in favour of one political party, we've lost touch with the democratic process,' the Texas arm of the Democrats party said on social media. Democrat representative James Talarico said Republicans talked tough and made threats on social media, 'but when Donald Trump comes calling, all they can do is bend the knee, all they can do is bend over'. The stoush over electoral boundaries comes as Texas continues to recover from devastating floods last month that killed more than 135 people, including dozens of children. Loading In Washington, Republicans are defending a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives and would ordinarily be expected to lose seats at the midterm elections under a Republican president. In 2018, Democrats won 41 seats and control of the chamber. Trump currently enjoys a Republican majority in the House and Senate, but his agenda would be frustrated for the remainder of his term if the House were to flip. Australian election analyst Ben Raue said US political parties were getting more sophisticated in their partisan gerrymandering, using computer programs with large amounts of data that often produced boundaries that were highly unusual in shape. 'As the norms of American democracy are broken down, it's become more acceptable to more brazenly attempt to distort the playing field,' Raue said. Loading Elissa Slotkin, a Democratic senator from Michigan, said it was time for the entire US to abandon the partisan gerrymander and adopt an independent civic commission to draw 'rational lines' based on geography, as her home state did in 2018. 'This is something that both parties do … blue states and red states often engage in partisan redrawing,' she acknowledged in a video. 'This to me is a real problem for democracy.'
Sydney Morning Herald
a minute ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
This is angry England – and it demands to be heard
The concerns about crime are based on British reports that spread fast on social media. An Afghan asylum seeker was charged last week with raping a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, near Coventry. An Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged last month with assaulting a young girl in Epping, north-west of London. Both deny the charges, which are yet to be tested in court. With cases like these in the news, the English air has the whiff of petrol. One year ago, the awful murders of three young girls in Southport set off riots when rumours spread that the killer was an asylum seeker. The rumours were false. He was born in the UK. But at least 100 people were charged in the riots – an example of the explosive emotions around migration. 'Where are the women and children? If there was women and children first, we'd be happy. The community would be happy to take them in.' Nicola, Canary Wharf protester Jackie Sheldon, a mother of eight children, has lived in the Canary Wharf area all her life. 'They're coming here, and they're committing disgusting crimes,' she says of the migrants. 'We want to protect our community from that. That's not OK. We want these people gone.' There are no face masks in this group. The protesters are local and they know each other. They have a banner to challenge the idea that they are right-wing extremists. 'We're not far right – but we're not far wrong,' it says. 'Don't gamble with our lives. Stop the boats.' Nicola, 47, is a third-generation member of the community. 'I don't mind immigration, as long as it's done legally,' she says. She is concerned that the asylum seekers are mostly young men – a fact borne out in government statistics as well as the news broadcasts that show people on the boats when they leave French beaches. 'Where are the women and children?' she asks. 'If there was women and children first, we'd be happy. The community would be happy to take them in.' There is a strong feeling here that Britain will break if it takes too many more people, so the overwhelming mood is that the country is full. 'If you have a boat that holds 300 people and you put 600 in it, it's going to sink,' says Lorraine. 'And that's what's happening to us, right? Our infrastructure cannot cope with the amount of people that's coming in. 'People here, I wouldn't know when the last time they was able to get a dentist appointment. The doctors' appointments are all online. People have been told it's a minimum 12 years to even be considered for a flat on the Isle of Dogs.' She is referring to the waiting list for public housing in a council flat – and she says her children cannot afford to buy a home in the community where they were raised. 'It took a long, long time' One of her children, Ben, a scaffolder, says the Isle of Dogs accepted women and children from Ukraine in the past few years. He says it integrated a large Bangladeshi community over a longer period. 'It took a long, long time, but now we co-exist with each other, we get on with each other,' he says. 'But now you're obviously putting up undocumented men, which we know nothing about, into a community that is already struggling financially. You're gonna see a bit of unrest.' That is what happens when a lone asylum seeker walks out of the hotel and down the street. He is a young black man, and says nothing, but the protest changes instantly. Women who were talking quietly to each other suddenly turn and yell at him to go home. Men jeer as he runs the gauntlet of the protest. Tempers are frayed, but there is no violence. So far. One reason is that the protesters are not confronted by any opposition. Things were different one day earlier, when protesters outside an asylum hotel in the Barbican district of London were met by masked protesters dressed in black and chanting 'we are anti-fascist' – one of them vocally supporting Palestine Action, which the government has banned as a terrorist group. In the violence between the groups and authorities at the Barbican, the Metropolitan Police arrested one of the anti-immigration protesters for a racially aggravated public order offence. It arrested one of the anti-fascists for supporting Palestine Action, and it arrested seven other counter-protesters for breaching orders aimed at separating the two groups. Loading At Canary Wharf, however, the protesters against the asylum hotel have the street to themselves. Their star speaker is Young Bob – a student who posts by that name on X and is a member of Turning Point UK, an offshoot of an American right-wing group. He is critical of Muslims and multiculturalism, but he says he is not racist. His message is that migration is destroying working-class jobs by making it easy for big companies to use cheap contract migrant labour. He wants people to boycott services like Deliveroo. He is only 17, but he taps into a deep anxiety about the loss of old British ways. The protest drags on with long speeches. It is deliberately noisy and confronting for the asylum seekers inside the hotel, being told they are not wanted, but there are no faces at the windows. There is no trigger for violence. Until a dozen young men arrive in black masks. The police brace and prepare for impact. They harden their line to prevent the men from getting to the front of the hotel. These protesters want confrontation, so they let off flares, chant about shutting down the asylum hotel and move up so they are inches away from the police, eyeballing the officers. It takes less than a minute for the protest to turn into a scrum of police and angry men, swarming over the street as some try to get into the hotel. The flares cover the crowd in smoke. One protester, waving an English flag, strides toward the barricade but is intercepted before he can break through. The crowd supports them, but does not join them. If tempers were hotter, the crowd could use its numbers to rush the hotel. But the men seem to want to vent their anger and make a point for the media, without throwing punches. When one goes too far, a handful of police pin him to a wall and arrest him. He is later charged with assault, the Met Police tell me. Another man is charged with failing to obey an order to disperse. The men in masks walk away. Some of the women seem to know them. 'Good on you, boys,' calls out one. The crowd cools down. Young Bob takes the microphone again for another long speech. Then, in a sudden change in mood, the loudspeaker starts playing Sweet Caroline. The women in pink dance in the street, singing Neil Diamond. They own this neighbourhood, and they have made their point. Every protest is different. This one ends with people drifting home. The Barbican protest was more violent. The riot in Epping three weeks ago reached a fever pitch, with police assaulted and their vehicles damaged. And there are demonstrations every weekend, at asylum hotels up and down the country. Loading I leave the protest to return to Canary Wharf tube station, where families are enjoying the sunshine on the lawns around the shopping mall. Young people are paddleboarding on an inlet of the Thames. Parents are buying ice cream for their children. You could make a film here about modern, multicultural, harmonious Britain. This peace, however, is easily shattered by economic and social pressure. Polling firm YouGov found last month that 38 per cent of UK voters wanted asylum seekers immediately removed from the country if they arrived by boat. Another 43 per cent said they should have their claims assessed and decided on a case-by-case basis. Migration is now a basic test for Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
The Age
a minute ago
- The Age
Texas governor orders arrest of Democrats who fled Trump-backed gerrymander stoush
Australia's most well-known example of gerrymandering was under Queensland's Nationals premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen, who oversaw a system – more accurately described as malapportionment – in which many rural seats contained far fewer people than urban seats. Gerrymandering has a long history in the US, with both sides of politics implicated. Earlier, in an interview on Fox News, Abbott conceded the proposed map constituted electoral gerrymandering, but said it was legal. 'Gerrymandering can be done, or drawing lines can be done, on the basis of political make-up, as in Republican versus Democrat, and there's nothing illegal about that,' Abbott said. 'We have the authority, legally under redistricting law, to draw districts that align with the voter preferences of the voters of the state of Texas.' Democrats who fled to New York and Chicago scoffed at the governor's threats of arrest, noting subpoenas in Texas would not affect them interstate. Loading But they also pressed the seriousness of the situation, arguing the Republicans' push to redistrict electorates was a dark moment for the country. 'When a president can pressure a state to rig maps in favour of one political party, we've lost touch with the democratic process,' the Texas arm of the Democrats party said on social media. Democrat representative James Talarico said Republicans talked tough and made threats on social media, 'but when Donald Trump comes calling, all they can do is bend the knee, all they can do is bend over'. The stoush over electoral boundaries comes as Texas continues to recover from devastating floods last month that killed more than 135 people, including dozens of children. Loading In Washington, Republicans are defending a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives and would ordinarily be expected to lose seats at the midterm elections under a Republican president. In 2018, Democrats won 41 seats and control of the chamber. Trump currently enjoys a Republican majority in the House and Senate, but his agenda would be frustrated for the remainder of his term if the House were to flip. Australian election analyst Ben Raue said US political parties were getting more sophisticated in their partisan gerrymandering, using computer programs with large amounts of data that often produced boundaries that were highly unusual in shape. 'As the norms of American democracy are broken down, it's become more acceptable to more brazenly attempt to distort the playing field,' Raue said. Loading Elissa Slotkin, a Democratic senator from Michigan, said it was time for the entire US to abandon the partisan gerrymander and adopt an independent civic commission to draw 'rational lines' based on geography, as her home state did in 2018. 'This is something that both parties do … blue states and red states often engage in partisan redrawing,' she acknowledged in a video. 'This to me is a real problem for democracy.'
