logo
Musk blasts Trump's insane bill, vows to launch new party if Senate approves it

Musk blasts Trump's insane bill, vows to launch new party if Senate approves it

India Today7 hours ago

Elon Musk, once a close Donald Trump's ally and advisor, is fiercely criticising the US president's massive One Big, Beautiful Bill again, calling it insane and a massive burden on taxpayers. Musk accused Republicans of betraying fiscal conservatives and urged the creation of a new party that "actually cares about the people."He also vowed to create a new "America Party" if the bill passes. The Senate is now engaged in a marathon vote series as Republicans attempt to pass the key piece of legislation for Trump's second term.advertisementMusk, who has previously supported Trump and contributed over $250 million to his campaign, has been constantly lashing out at the tax bill. In his latest post, he accused lawmakers of passing a bill that he says will severely harm ordinary Americans.
"It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!! Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," Musk posted on X.The Senate is working to pass the bill before the self-imposed July 4 deadline. The House narrowly passed the bill last month. Once the Senate finalizes its version, the House must approve the changes before it can be signed into law.advertisementTitled "One Big, Beautiful Bill," the legislation is a part of Trump's second-term agenda. It demands more funding for defence, energy production, and border security. Budget cuts for nutrition and healthcare programs are also included. The Congressional Budget Office reported that over the next ten years, the bill would increase the national deficit by almost $3.3 trillion.MUSK ATTACKS REPUBLICANS OVER DEBT AND SPENDINGMusk didn't stop at criticising the bill itself. He also directly targeted prominent Republican lawmakers, including House Freedom Caucus Chairman Rep. Andy Harris."How can you call yourself the Freedom Caucus if you vote for a DEBT SLAVERY bill with the biggest debt ceiling increase in history?" Musk asked on social media.He continued his tirade, warning that voters would hold lawmakers accountable. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!" Musk added. "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth."
He also wrote on X : "If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE."MUSK BREAKS WITH TRUMP OVER BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILLEarlier, Musk was tapped to lead a newly created Department of Government Efficiency, but the partnership eventually collapsed following public disagreements over government spending.Once-political power partners, Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, have been locked in a testy back-and-forth that shows no sign of cooling.Elon Musk, the billionaire mogul who left the White House last month with a ceremonial key in hand and praise from President Trump, is now embroiled in a bitter public spat with the man he claims would have "lost the election" without him."Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk posted on June 5.On June 11, Musk posted on X stating, "I regret some of my posts about President Trump last week. They went too far." He deleted his most inflammatory posts, including the Epstein claim and an endorsement of a call for Trump's impeachment.advertisementTrump initially doubled down on his claims, saying Musk was "disrespectful" to him and he had no desire to mend ties, warning of "serious consequences."However, Trump's tone eventually changed, and he spoke positively about Musk at an event, calling him a "wonderful guy" and a "smart guy" who campaigned with him.- EndsMust Watch

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big, beautiful fallout: Donald Trump slams Elon Musk; says without subsidies he'll 'head back home to South Africa'
Big, beautiful fallout: Donald Trump slams Elon Musk; says without subsidies he'll 'head back home to South Africa'

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Big, beautiful fallout: Donald Trump slams Elon Musk; says without subsidies he'll 'head back home to South Africa'

Photo/Agencies US President Donald Trump on Tuesday hit back at billionaire Elon Musk , saying that without subsidies from the American government, Musk would "probably head back home to South Africa." "Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one. Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!" Trump said in a post on Trush Social. This comes after Musk strongly criticised president Trump's "big, beautiful bill," calling it "political suicide for the Republican Party."

Trump's lawyer says no immediate deportations under birthright citizenship order, as judges to decide on challenges
Trump's lawyer says no immediate deportations under birthright citizenship order, as judges to decide on challenges

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump's lawyer says no immediate deportations under birthright citizenship order, as judges to decide on challenges

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Also Read: US Supreme Court may rule on allowing enforcement of Trump birthright citizenship limits Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in NRI Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads President Donald Trump 's administration will not deport children deemed ineligible for US citizenship until his executive order curtailing birthright citizenship takes effect on July 27, a government lawyer said on Monday after being pressed by two federal separate hearings in lawsuits challenging Trump's order, US District Judges Deborah Boardman in Greenbelt, Maryland, and Joseph LaPlante in Concord, New Hampshire, set expedited schedules to decide whether the order can be blocked again on grounds that the US Supreme Court 's ruling on Friday curbing the ability of judges to impede his policies nationwide does not preclude injunctions in class action judges asked US Department of Justice lawyer Brad Rosenberg, who represented the government in both cases, for assurances that the Trump administration would not move to deport children who do not have at least one parent who is a US citizen or legal permanent resident at least until the executive order takes said it would not, which Boardman and LaPlante respectively asked him to confirm in writing by Tuesday and the Maryland case, immigrant rights advocates revised their lawsuit just a few hours after the 6-3 conservative majority US Supreme Court on Friday ruled in their case and two others challenging Trump's executive order. The New Hampshire lawsuit, a proposed class action, was filed on Supreme Court ruling did not address the merits or legality of Trump's birthright citizenship order, but instead curbed the ability of judges to issue "universal" injunctions to block the Republican president's policies while the Supreme Court restricted the ability of judges to issue injunctions that cover anyone other than the parties appearing before them, Justice Amy Coney Barrett's opinion held out the possibility that opponents of a federal policy could still obtain the same type of relief if they instead pursued cases as class Powell, a lawyer for immigration rights groups and pregnant non-citizen mothers pursuing the case, told Boardman at a hearing on Monday that an immediate ruling was necessary to address the fears and concerns migrants now face as a result of the Supreme Court's decision."They want to see how fast we can get class relief because they are afraid about their children and their babies and what their status might be," Powell executive order, which he issued on his first day back in office on January 20, directs agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of US-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" Friday's ruling, the high court narrowed the scope of the three injunctions issued by federal judges in three states, including Boardman, that prevented enforcement of his directive nationwide while litigation challenging the policy played judges had blocked the policy after siding with Democratic-led states and immigrant rights advocates who argued it violated the citizenship clause of the US Constitution's 14th Amendment, which has long been understood to recognize that virtually anyone born in the United States is a rights advocates in the hours after the Supreme Court ruled swiftly launched two separate bids in Maryland and New Hampshire to have judges grant class-wide relief on behalf of any children nationally who would be deemed ineligible for birthright citizenship under Trump's Supreme Court specified the core part of Trump's executive order cannot take effect until 30 days after Friday's ruling. Boardman on Monday pressed Rosenberg on what it could do before then."Just to get to the heart of it, I want to know if the government thinks that it can start removing children from the United States who are subject to the terms of the executive order," Boardman said at the end of the scheduled further briefing in the case to continue through July 9, with a ruling to follow. LaPlante scheduled a hearing for July said the Trump administration objected to the plaintiffs' attempt to obtain the same relief through a class action. He stood by the administration's view of the constitutionality of Trump's order."It is the position of the United States government that birthright citizenship is not guaranteed by the Constitution," he said.

'You'll Hear From Trump Soon' US India Trade Deal Almost Ready, Trump Modi Ties Key To Breakthrough
'You'll Hear From Trump Soon' US India Trade Deal Almost Ready, Trump Modi Ties Key To Breakthrough

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'You'll Hear From Trump Soon' US India Trade Deal Almost Ready, Trump Modi Ties Key To Breakthrough

Big news from Washington! The United States and India are on the verge of finalising a major trade agreement, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Speaking just hours after President Trump reiterated optimism about a deal, Leavitt confirmed that talks are in the final stages and an official announcement is expected soon. Trump is pushing for a 'full trade barrier dropping' and improved market access, something he calls 'unthinkable'. Leavitt also praised India as a strategic ally and highlighted Trump's strong personal rapport with Prime Minister Modi. Meanwhile, India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar is in the US, attending the QUAD Foreign Ministers' Meeting and launching a UN exhibition on terrorism. With both diplomacy and trade firing on all cylinders, India-US relations are heating up fast.#trump #usindiatradedeal #modi #karolineleavitt #quad #jaishankar #indo-pacific #unitednations #moditrump #usindiarelations #toi #toibharat #bharat #breakingnews #indianews

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store