US Senate votes to strike controversial AI regulation moratorium from Trump agenda bill
The provision in the Senate bill would have effectively prevented states from enforcing many proposed and existing AI-related laws — including regulations around sexually explicit and political deepfakes — for the next decade. Earlier this month, Senate Commerce Committee Republicans had moved to tie compliance with the moratorium to crucial federal funds for deploying internet infrastructure.
While some tech leaders have advocated for a single federal law rather than a patchwork of state regulations, the moratorium had raised alarms among other tech workers and leaders, academics, advocacy groups, state regulators and lawmakers. Opponents of the provision worried that it could hamstring efforts to hold tech companies accountable for potential harms to society, especially in light of the fact that there is currently no comprehensive federal legislation regulating AI.
On Monday night, the Senate voted 99-1 in favor of an amendment to strike the provision from the bill. The amendment was co-sponsored by Sens. Ed Markey, Maria Cantwell and Marsha Blackburn.
'This 99-1 vote sent a clear message that Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires,' Markey said in a statement, adding, 'I look forward to working with my colleagues to develop responsible guardrails for AI.'
The vote came during the Senate's marathon 'vote-a-rama' on various amendments to the agenda bill. Republicans have been aiming to have the bill on President Donald Trump's desk by July 4, but the legislation must still go back to the House if it passes the Senate.
At least one House lawmaker, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, had warned that she would vote 'no' on the agenda bill if the Senate did not remove the AI moratorium provision.
Opponents of the AI regulation moratorium cheered the Senate vote on Tuesday.
'State legislatures all across the country have done critical bipartisan work to protect the American people from some of the most dangerous harms of AI technology,' Ilana Beller, democracy organizing manager at the progressive consumer advocacy group Public Citizen said in a statement. 'The defeat of this moratorium will mean vital protections remain in place for millions of Americans.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Citi Reiterated a Buy Rating Ardagh Metal Packaging (AMBP), Kept the PT Unchanged
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (NYSE:AMBP) is one of the 11 Hot Penny Stocks to Buy Right Now. On July 2, Anthony Pettinari from Citi reiterated a Buy rating on Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (NYSE:AMBP) and raised the price target on the stock from $4 to $5. The price target upgrade comes after the company announced the schedule for its Q2 2025 earnings call, which is planned to take place on July 24. Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (NYSE:AMBP) reported strong results in its Q1 2025. The company reported total revenue of $1.268 billion, up 11% year-over-year and driven by 6% global shipments growth and double-digit growth in Adjusted EBITDA. Its strong demand for non-alcoholic beverages led to an increased global shipments with 7% growth in the Americas, 5% in Europe, and an 8% increase in North America. A shipping container filled with freshly-produced aluminum cans ready for distribution. Moreover, the company reported an adjusted EBITDA of $155 million, representing a 16% increase. Management is anticipating adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter to be between the range of $195 million and $205 million. Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (NYSE:AMBP) is a Luxembourg-based company specializing in the production and supply of metal beverage cans. While we acknowledge the potential of AMBP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The AI therapist will see you now: Can chatbots really improve mental health?
Recently, I found myself pouring my heart out, not to a human, but to a chatbot named Wysa on my phone. It nodded – virtually – asked me how I was feeling and gently suggested trying breathing exercises. As a neuroscientist, I couldn't help but wonder: Was I actually feeling better, or was I just being expertly redirected by a well-trained algorithm? Could a string of code really help calm a storm of emotions? Artificial intelligence-powered mental health tools are becoming increasingly popular – and increasingly persuasive. But beneath their soothing prompts lie important questions: How effective are these tools? What do we really know about how they work? And what are we giving up in exchange for convenience? Of course it's an exciting moment for digital mental health. But understanding the trade-offs and limitations of AI-based care is crucial. AI-based therapy is a relatively new player in the digital therapy field. But the U.S. mental health app market has been booming for the past few years, from apps with free tools that text you back to premium versions with an added feature that gives prompts for breathing exercises. Headspace and Calm are two of the most well-known meditation and mindfulness apps, offering guided meditations, bedtime stories and calming soundscapes to help users relax and sleep better. Talkspace and BetterHelp go a step further, offering actual licensed therapists via chat, video or voice. The apps Happify and Moodfit aim to boost mood and challenge negative thinking with game-based exercises. Somewhere in the middle are chatbot therapists like Wysa and Woebot, using AI to mimic real therapeutic conversations, often rooted in cognitive behavioral therapy. These apps typically offer free basic versions, with paid plans ranging from US$10 to $100 per month for more comprehensive features or access to licensed professionals. While not designed specifically for therapy, conversational tools like ChatGPT have sparked curiosity about AI's emotional intelligence. Some users have turned to ChatGPT for mental health advice, with mixed outcomes, including a widely reported case in Belgium where a man died by suicide after months of conversations with a chatbot. Elsewhere, a father is seeking answers after his son was fatally shot by police, alleging that distressing conversations with an AI chatbot may have influenced his son's mental state. These cases raise ethical questions about the role of AI in sensitive situations. Whether your brain is spiraling, sulking or just needs a nap, there's a chatbot for that. But can AI really help your brain process complex emotions? Or are people just outsourcing stress to silicon-based support systems that sound empathetic? And how exactly does AI therapy work inside our brains? Most AI mental health apps promise some flavor of cognitive behavioral therapy, which is basically structured self-talk for your inner chaos. Think of it as Marie Kondo-ing, the Japanese tidying expert known for helping people keep only what 'sparks joy.' You identify unhelpful thought patterns like 'I'm a failure,' examine them, and decide whether they serve you or just create anxiety. But can a chatbot help you rewire your thoughts? Surprisingly, there's science suggesting it's possible. Studies have shown that digital forms of talk therapy can reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression, especially for mild to moderate cases. In fact, Woebot has published peer-reviewed research showing reduced depressive symptoms in young adults after just two weeks of chatting. These apps are designed to simulate therapeutic interaction, offering empathy, asking guided questions and walking you through evidence-based tools. The goal is to help with decision-making and self-control, and to help calm the nervous system. The neuroscience behind cognitive behavioral therapy is solid: It's about activating the brain's executive control centers, helping us shift our attention, challenge automatic thoughts and regulate our emotions. The question is whether a chatbot can reliably replicate that, and whether our brains actually believe it. 'I had a rough week,' a friend told me recently. I asked her to try out a mental health chatbot for a few days. She told me the bot replied with an encouraging emoji and a prompt generated by its algorithm to try a calming strategy tailored to her mood. Then, to her surprise, it helped her sleep better by week's end. As a neuroscientist, I couldn't help but ask: Which neurons in her brain were kicking in to help her feel calm? This isn't a one-off story. A growing number of user surveys and clinical trials suggest that cognitive behavioral therapy-based chatbot interactions can lead to short-term improvements in mood, focus and even sleep. In randomized studies, users of mental health apps have reported reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety – outcomes that closely align with how in-person cognitive behavioral therapy influences the brain. Several studies show that therapy chatbots can actually help people feel better. In one clinical trial, a chatbot called 'Therabot' helped reduce depression and anxiety symptoms by nearly half – similar to what people experience with human therapists. Other research, including a review of over 80 studies, found that AI chatbots are especially helpful for improving mood, reducing stress and even helping people sleep better. In one study, a chatbot outperformed a self-help book in boosting mental health after just two weeks. While people often report feeling better after using these chatbots, scientists haven't yet confirmed exactly what's happening in the brain during those interactions. In other words, we know they work for many people, but we're still learning how and why. Apps like Wysa have earned FDA Breakthrough Device designation, a status that fast-tracks promising technologies for serious conditions, suggesting they may offer real clinical benefit. Woebot, similarly, runs randomized clinical trials showing improved depression and anxiety symptoms in new moms and college students. While many mental health apps boast labels like 'clinically validated' or 'FDA approved,' those claims are often unverified. A review of top apps found that most made bold claims, but fewer than 22% cited actual scientific studies to back them up. In addition, chatbots collect sensitive information about your mood metrics, triggers and personal stories. What if that data winds up in third-party hands such as advertisers, employers or hackers, a scenario that has occurred with genetic data? In a 2023 breach, nearly 7 million users of the DNA testing company 23andMe had their DNA and personal details exposed after hackers used previously leaked passwords to break into their accounts. Regulators later fined the company more than $2 million for failing to protect user data. Unlike clinicians, bots aren't bound by counseling ethics or privacy laws regarding medical information. You might be getting a form of cognitive behavioral therapy, but you're also feeding a database. And sure, bots can guide you through breathing exercises or prompt cognitive reappraisal, but when faced with emotional complexity or crisis, they're often out of their depth. Human therapists tap into nuance, past trauma, empathy and live feedback loops. Can an algorithm say 'I hear you' with genuine understanding? Neuroscience suggests that supportive human connection activates social brain networks that AI can't reach. So while in mild to moderate cases bot-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy may offer short-term symptom relief, it's important to be aware of their limitations. For the time being, pairing bots with human care – rather than replacing it – is the safest move. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Pooja Shree Chettiar, Texas A&M University Read more: AI is advancing even faster than sci-fi visionaries like Neal Stephenson imagined AI maps psychedelic 'trip' experiences to regions of the brain – opening new route to psychiatric treatments AI has been a boon for marketing, but the dark side of using algorithms to sell products and brands is little studied Pooja Shree Chettiar does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Back-to-school spending set to dip as economic woes shrink budgets, Deloitte forecasts
(Reuters) -Back-to-school spending is expected to dip this year, as tariff-driven price hikes and economic uncertainty force Americans to tighten household budgets, according to a Deloitte forecast released Thursday. Overall spending is projected to remain flat at $30.9 billion or $570 per student on average, despite higher prices across all product categories, which is 7% below 2021, according to the report. Last year, parents spent an average of $586 per child. The Deloitte survey was conducted online using an independent research panel between May 21 and May 30, involving 1,203 parents with at least one child in grades K-12. Major retailers including Walmart, Target, and are competing for customer spending amid a deal-heavy shopping season, including Amazon's Prime Day sales, which will run for four days this year. According to an Adobe Analytics forecast released this week, online spending is expected to reach $23.8 billion. Consumer spending has remained soft in recent months amid President Trump's shifting tariff policies. Families are expected to focus their spending on necessary items like clothing, while reducing expenditures on categories such as technology and school supplies, Deloitte found. More shoppers will trade down to cheaper private-label brands and spread purchases into August, the report added. "Value for the money is the top driver of retailer choice, and parents are increasingly willing to switch brands or retailers to find the best deals," Brian McCarthy, principal of retail strategy at Deloitte Consulting said. More than half of surveyed parents were anxious about the potential for higher prices on back-to-school items and planned to cut back on restaurant meals and recreational activities to manage their budgets. Demand for standard shipping rose 76%, compared with 63% in 2024, the survey found, signaling shoppers will choose longer delivery times to lower or avoid shipping costs. Sign in to access your portfolio
