Is Canada headed for a recession? Here're the details
Canada is facing a possible recession because of global trade issues. Traditional signs like GDP growth and job losses are worrying. Unemployment has increased, and forecasts predict slow growth. Consumer confidence is mixed, with some fearing a downturn. Unusual economic indicators are also being watched. The future is uncertain due to tariffs and other economic problems.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Traditional Indicators Point to Trouble
Deloitte warns of a looming downturn, citing weak GDP growth and falling investment.
Oxford Economics projects just 0.7% growth in 2025, followed by a 0.2% contraction in 2026, driven by global trade shocks and reduced immigration.
RBC anticipates continued slowing of growth into 2026.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Consumer Confidence: A Mixed Signal
Reading the Quirky Economic Tea Leaves
The 'lipstick effect': People splurge on small luxuries during tough times.
Greenspan's 'men's underwear index': Underwear sales dip during recessions, as it's one of the easiest purchases to delay.
The 'cardboard box recession': A drop in demand for cardboard boxes, according to Charles Schwab's Jeffrey Kleintop, may indicate a slowdown in manufacturing.
The 'Skyscraper Index': Economist Andrew Lawrence notes that the construction of record-breaking skyscrapers often precedes economic downturns.
Uncertainty Reigns
As global trade tensions escalate, Canada finds itself on the brink of a potential recession, with both traditional and unconventional indicators flashing warning signs.The C.D. Howe Institute defines a recession as a "pronounced, persistent, and pervasive decline in aggregate economic activity," typically marked by two consecutive quarters of declining GDP. Current forecasts suggest storm clouds may be gathering:Meanwhile, Canada's job market is under strain. As of April 2025, the unemployment rate rose to 6.9% — the highest since November 2023 — leaving more than 1.6 million Canadians out of work. That month, the economy lost 30,000 jobs, while adding just 7,400 new ones.The Bank of Canada, in its recent Financial Stability Report, outlined scenarios in which prolonged U.S. tariffs could trigger a year-long recession, with GDP declining for four consecutive quarters.Consumer sentiment is sending more ambiguous signals. The Bloomberg-Nanos Canadian Confidence Index rebounded to 48.6 as of May 9, approaching the neutral 50-point threshold. Data scientist Nik Nanos attributes the boost to the election of Prime Minister Mark Carney.But some economists warn the rebound may not last. Walid Hejazi, professor at the University of Toronto, notes that fear alone can drive downturns. 'If consumers fear a recession is coming,' he says, 'they may reduce their spending, and reduced consumer spending makes the economy slow down even more.'Beyond the traditional data, economists are watching more unusual trends:The road ahead is anything but clear. Isabelle Salle, a behavioral macroeconomics professor at the University of Ottawa , says we're navigating uncharted waters.'Tariffs and this uncertainty shock just added to existing problems, at the worst time possible,' she explains. 'With uncertainty, you cannot easily assign probabilities to the different scenarios. You really have to operate with just options.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Why Canada made a u-turn on its contentious Digital Services Tax
In a bid to restart stalled trade negotiations with the United States, Canada scrapped its Digital Services Tax (DST) hours before it was due to take effect on Monday. Calling the DST 'a direct and blatant attack' on the US, President Donald Trump had on Friday announced the termination of all trade discussions with Canada. With the contentious tax out of the way, talks between Washington and Ottawa will likely resume. What was the DST? The DST was a 3% levy on the digital services revenue a firm made from Canadian users above $20 million in a calendar year. Controversially, the tax was set to be retroactively implemented beginning 2022. This would have had a significant impact on American technology giants such as Google, Meta, Apple, and Amazon — American tech companies would have had to pay roughly $2.7 billion to the Canadian government, if the tax were to be implemented, The New York Times had reported. 'The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians…,' Canada's finance ministry said in its statement on Sunday. While the law had been passed earlier, payments were due from Monday. What does Canada's U-turn mean? Canada is the United States' second-largest trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of US exports. It bought $349.4 billion of US goods and exported $412.7 billion to the US last year, according to US Census Bureau data. At the same time, it currently faces the steepest of Trump's tariffs: apart from the 10% base tariff imposed on most countries, Canada (and Mexico) face an additional 25% on all exports to the US, apparently meant to curb illegal immigration and stop fentanyl smuggling. Trump has also slapped 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Canada and 25% on auto imports. This makes getting a trade deal with the US a top priority for Canada. Scrapping the DST would help in this regard — Trump had been among its most vehement critics. Early indications are that Washington and Ottawa could meet the previously-set July 21 deadline for a trade agreement. Domestically, the U-turn is unlikely to hurt Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, despite his election platform revolving around standing up to the US President. This is because the DST was not particularly popular in Canada either since it could have raised the cost of all kinds of digital services — from hailing cab rides to streaming movies. In fact, in recent months, many speculated that the tax's best purpose could be to serve as a bargaining chip in ongoing trade talks with the US.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Financial stability must deliver service efficiency
Systemic risk is not a concern, going by the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) latest Financial Stability Report. As its systemic risk survey conducted in May reveals, 'medium risk" is seen in all major risk groups, with 92% of respondents expressing a level of confidence in India's financial system that's either higher than or similar to the last round's. Also Read: Andy Mukherjee: India's economy needs a revival of 'animal spirits', not cheaper credit As the report notes, corporate balance sheets are healthy, as are those of banks, which have taken their non-performing loan ratios to a multi-decadal low and reported strong earnings, even as stress tests have affirmed the adequacy of their capital buffers. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | India's economy: The case for cautious optimism Mutual funds and clearing corporations are resilient too. While high equity valuations and global trade uncertainty pose some risks, India's financial system seems in good shape overall. As a macroprudential exercise, such sector-wide scans are important. Also Read: Dynamism at work: India's economy has led Nestle out of the Sensex Yet, as RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra says in the report's foreword, 'Financial stability, like price stability, is a necessary condition, and not a sufficient one to boost India's potential growth." His note ends with a mention of the need for service efficiency. A stable base, after all, is just a foundation for economic success.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Automakers push back against India's 'aggressive' emission limits
The proposed steep cut risks billions of rupees in penalties and threatens future investments in one of India's most critical manufacturing sectors Bloomberg Automakers are pushing back against India's proposed carbon emission limits and plans for new standards for lighter cars, terming the South Asian nation's use of regulation to stem planet-warming greenhouse gases as 'too aggressive.' New Delhi's plan to cut car emissions by a third from 2027, more than twice the pace of its previous target, risks the sustainability of the industry, according to a note from the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers seen by Bloomberg News. The document is part of discussions on the third phase of India's Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency norms, a set of rules first introduced in 2017 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependency on oil imports. India is one of the world's largest releasers of greenhouse gases, and its $137-billion auto industry is a major contributor. The proposed steep cut risks billions of rupees in penalties and threatens future investments in one of India's most critical manufacturing sectors, the document, a formal submission by Siam to the power ministry, said. A meeting with the government is planned for July 2 in New Delhi, where automakers will present their case directly to Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named. The government is also proposing to apply different standards for small and lightweight cars versus heavier models and carmakers are resisting it, the people said. The approach could benefit companies like Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., which dominates the country's small car market and is investing heavily in compressed gas and hybrid technology. Still, the industry body will stick to a united position, the people said, adding that splitting standards by size would undermine policy cohesion and might unfavorably benefit a few players. A lobby led by Maruti and Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. is also arguing for hybrids, ethanol-blend models and gas-powered cars to get emission credit incentives comparable to those given to electric vehicles, the people said. Maruti and Toyota Kirloskar did not immediately respond to emails seeking comments. India is also floating the idea of ending sales of petrol and diesel vehicles by 2040, the document showed. This proposal has consistently faced resistance, with Siam warning that such 'drastic steps' would undermine both ongoing and prospective investments. The industry body points to recent developments in Europe — where regulators are revisiting their own 2035 fuel car ban — as proof that India needs a more flexible road map. 'Despite better charging infrastructure and higher EV penetration, even Europe is struggling to meet these targets,' the document said. As automakers and government officials discuss the proposals, the outcome could shape India's clean vehicle policy for years to come as the country tries to balance climate goals with economic growth and affordability for its 1.4 billion citizens. Here are other key submissions from the Siam note:
