logo
Made in Italy under scrutiny: A call for transparency and credibility

Made in Italy under scrutiny: A call for transparency and credibility

Fashion United4 days ago
"Made in Italy" has recently come under intense scrutiny, not only due to tariffs that continue to penalise many sectors despite recent trade agreements, but primarily because of persistent issues surrounding illegal labor exploitation. Companies are also grappling with significant difficulties in effectively monitoring their entire supply chains, encompassing both direct suppliers and sub-suppliers.
These incidents of exploitation, the latest of which involves the prestigious Loro Piana brand, consistently highlight a critical theme for FashionUnited: the paramount importance of transparency and clear communication. Businesses must sincerely, simply, and carefully explain what "Made in Italy" truly signifies and how its standards are upheld throughout the production process. Saying "Made in Italy" without concrete explanation is no longer enough
Simply stating that a product is "Made in Italy" without a concrete explanation is no longer sufficient to entice customers. This is particularly true in light of revelations concerning exploitation and unsafe working conditions, even involving highly prestigious brands. The knowledge that a designer handbag or luxury garment, retailing for thousands of euros, is sometimes paid to the supplier for a mere few tens of euros, as uncovered by various investigations, exacerbates the problem and alienates consumers from designer labels.
Less than a week ago, Giusy Bettoni, founder and CEO of CLASS, an international eco-hub based in Milan, spoke with FashionUnited. She warned that claiming to be "Made in Italy" without a precise, clear, simple, concrete, and concise explanation of the concept is unhelpful, benefiting neither fashion nor the supply chain.
A few months prior, Renzo Rosso, owner of OTB, the holding company behind brands such as Diesel, Jil Sander, Maison Margiela, Marni, and Viktor&Rolf, also urged brands to speak up. He encouraged them to explain and demonstrate what "Made in Italy" genuinely represents. "We have unique qualities, good taste, we must assert ourselves for who we are and for what we have to offer," explained the founder of OTB.
"Italy produces around 80 percent of the world's luxury goods and is considered the number one country for the production chain. This is why our artisans are sought after all over the world, we must not let them escape," Rosso emphasized to RaiNews24 during the programme Pomeriggio 24, on Made in Italy Day.
Among the prominent supporters of a concrete approach to "Made in Italy" is the Minister of Enterprise and Made in Italy, Adolfo Urso. Last week, he announced that the introduction of a certification system was under consideration. This announcement followed the placement of the Loro Piana brand under judicial administration for alleged violation of workers' rights.
Urso told trade associations during a fashion roundtable that some illegal businesses in the fashion supply chain have tarnished the image of "Made in Italy."
A statement from the Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy clarified, "To counter the illegal behaviour of a few regarding labour, which can damage the reputation of the entire sector, Urso highlighted that the government is working on legislation to certify the sustainability and legality of companies in the sector, with the aim of offering a structural solution to the problem." This proposed legislation seeks to certify the supply chain belonging to the brand owner, based on specific preliminary checks. The goal is to prevent the brand owner from being held responsible for illegal or opaque behavior attributable to suppliers or sub-suppliers along the chain. What truly defines "Made in Italy"
However, the fundamental questions remain: what truly defines "Made in Italy," and can certification genuinely provide a comprehensive solution? Experience with certifications for gender equality indicates that such measures, while useful, have not fundamentally altered corporate approaches or fully equalized treatment in the workplace. Similarly, the introduction of increasingly stringent regulations, while necessary, is often insufficient on its own.
Therefore, this issue is complex and deeply cultural, encompassing numerous facets. In some instances, it may be necessary to move beyond the "Made in Italy" label and instead focus directly on the credibility of the brand, its people, and the company itself. Patrizio Bertelli, owner of Prada, was an early proponent of this view, decades ago advocating for "Made in Prada" to de-stigmatize offshoring to China. His philosophy was that if a product bore the brand's logo, it inherently guaranteed quality production, sustainable practices, and social responsibility.
Adriano Goldschmied, widely known as "the godfather of denim," echoes this sentiment. He has consistently maintained that a product must be "made anywhere" but ultimately a winner. As far back as 2017, he told FashionUnited that "Made in Italy" could be seen as a "sin of presumption." He argued that consumers trust the brand, not merely the "made in" label. "I'll give you an example: this phone I have in my hand is an Apple; the consumer doesn't care whether it's made in Taiwan or the US, but they care that it works well, which is guaranteed by the brand. This philosophy of 'Made in Italy', in many cases, has taken the Italian market out of reality. It is also true that in Italy there are excellent companies that know how to do their job, examples of great skill and quality," Goldschmied explained.
"The consumer is informed, they know how to recognise quality and that's what counts, not the 'made in' label. You have to be 'made anywhere but a winner'," Goldschmied concluded.
This reflection holds more relevance now than ever. To successfully navigate this complex situation, the industry must regain credibility through storytelling that communicates impeccable, real, and concrete story-making. The consumer is informed, they know how to recognise quality Credits: FashionUnited, image generated with the help of Artificial Intelligence This article was translated to English using an AI tool.
FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@fashionunited.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

American ambassador to Italy so 'displeased' with official Roman villa he lived aboard yacht and 'commuted via helicopter'
American ambassador to Italy so 'displeased' with official Roman villa he lived aboard yacht and 'commuted via helicopter'

Daily Mail​

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

American ambassador to Italy so 'displeased' with official Roman villa he lived aboard yacht and 'commuted via helicopter'

A Texas billionaire turned US ambassador to Italy was so unhappy with his new official villa in Rome he lived aboard his superyacht for weeks. Tilman Fertitta, 68, was nominated to the ambassadorship by Donald Trump in December and confirmed by the Senate in April. However, the hospitality tycoon and owner of the Houston Rockets did not move into his official Roman residence, Villa Taverna, until July 10 following a 'series' of renovations to the property. Prior to that, Fertitta had reportedly been helicoptering in to his engagements on land, much to the annoyance of locals, Airmail reports. A spokesperson for his company, Fertitta Entertainment, confirmed to the Daily Mail that the ambassador opted to live on his $150million yacht during construction to the historic residence. 'Ambassador Fertitta has been living in Villa Taverna since July 10 and couldn't wait to move in with his family,' the spokesperson said. 'Several weeks prior, however, during the construction improvements to the family quarters (which he paid for), required that he live elsewhere. 'Rather than a hotel, he chose to commute from his yacht to the embassy, which amounted to only 3.5 weeks.' His 77-meter Feadship-brand vessel, called Boardwalk, has 12 bedrooms, 15 bathrooms, a chef's kitchen, six bars, a large mosaic pool and a helipad, according to Robb Report. Information on the number of rooms and amenities inside the Villa Taverna is not publicly available, and it is unclear what renovations Fertitta had done to the place. 'No changes have been made to the Villa and he honors its architecture, its history, and is quite excited to reside there during his ambassadorship,' Fertitta's company spokesperson insisted. However, a separate news release from the embassy notes, 'a series of careful renovations' at the historic home. The fifteenth-century Villa Taverna, commissioned by Cardinal Consalvi, was first rented by the US Embassy in 1933, according to the State Department. Villa Taverna is known for its rich history, lavish outdoor gardens and expansive art collections. 'The Villa and its historical gardens are filled with valuable art from antiquity through the Renaissance, to the nineteenth century,' the State Department said. On Wednesday, the State Department announced that Fertitta unveiled a new American art collection at the villa. 'The Villa's new collection, curated in partnership with the State Department's Art in Embassies program, reflects his belief in art as a bridge between cultures—sparking dialogue, telling stories, and enriching shared space,' the department said. The collection features pieces by American artists such as Roy Lichtenstein, Frederic Remington, John Singer Sargent and Hans Hofmann. Before he moved into the residence, Fertitta hosted an Independence Day celebration at the villa with Italian leaders. Fertitta was born in Galveston but is of Sicilian descent.

Armani fined €3.5m by regulator over workers' rights
Armani fined €3.5m by regulator over workers' rights

Times

time8 hours ago

  • Times

Armani fined €3.5m by regulator over workers' rights

Italy's consumer regulator has issued a €3.5 million fine to the luxury fashion house Armani over misleading ethical claims. The label, which has been worn by Angelina Jolie, Sharon Stone and Kevin Spacey at recent high-profile events, has long claimed to protect workers' rights. However, the antitrust regulator published findings on Friday claiming Armani had outsourced most of its handbag and leather accessory production to third-party manufacturers, many of which subcontracted to companies that failed to meet health and safety standards. There was evidence at some of the subcontractors' plants that safety devices had been removed to increase production. Sanitary and hygiene conditions were deemed 'inadequate' and workers were 'frequently employed either wholly or partially off the books'. 'In this context, it is evident that the protection of workers' rights and health did not align with the content of the ethical and social responsibility statements disseminated,' the watchdog said. It did not say where the workers were based. Armani said it was 'embittered and shocked' and would appeal against the ruling. It insisted it had 'always operated with the utmost fairness and transparency towards consumers, the market and stakeholders'. Giorgio Armani appeared at Milan Fashion Week in 2024 but did not attend this year GABRIEL BOUYS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES In a 2022 report, the company listed 'respect for human and workers' rights' as one of its greatest concerns and said in statement last year it had 'always had control and prevention measures in place to minimise abuses in the supply chain'. An investigation into Dior, which is owned by LVMH, the French multinational, was closed after the brand made a series of commitments relating to its supply chain monitoring. The Milan-registered Loro Piana and Valentino were put under judicial administration over alleged worker abuses in supply chains earlier this year. Codacons, a consumer rights group, said: 'Consumers who buy products from the fashion giant spend considerable sums [that] should represent excellent quality and workmanship.' Giorgio Armani, 91, remains the sole shareholder and chief executive of the label he founded 50 years ago. In a sign of his advancing years, he opted out of his usual appearance at Armani's runway shows at Milan Fashion Week in June, when the company said he was 'recovering at home'. The brand has a significant presence in the UK, with flagship stores on London's Bond Street and Regent Street, and made €2.3 billion global revenue last year.

Fancy coffee shop swamped with protests after fed-up customer reveals she was charged for having croissant cut in half
Fancy coffee shop swamped with protests after fed-up customer reveals she was charged for having croissant cut in half

The Sun

time10 hours ago

  • The Sun

Fancy coffee shop swamped with protests after fed-up customer reveals she was charged for having croissant cut in half

A FANCY coffee shop in northern Italy has been swamped with protests after a fed-up customer revealed she was charged extra for having her croissant cut in half. The woman, who has not been named in local media, visited Audrey Patisserie in Oderzo on Sunday for breakfast, ordering two coffees and a pastry. 4 4 4 But when she asked staff to slice the croissant so she could share it with her mother, she later discovered an extra €0.10 (around 9p) charge on the bill. Fuming, she shared the receipt online, writing: 'It's not about the cost, it's the principle.' Her post spread like wildfire, sparking an avalanche of fury from social media users. One user blasted: 'You have to hate your customers to charge them €0.10 to cut a croissant in half. 'A total lack of elegance, refinement, and empathy. 'They should bring hotel management students to your restaurant to show them how not to treat your customers. Pathetic.' Another piled on: 'Disgusting cappuccino and they ask 10 cents to cut a croissant in half, never again, how squalid.' A third raged: '€0.10 what a disgrace… just to cut a croissant!!!' The backlash left café owner Massimiliano Viotto under siege, as his shop was bombarded with negative reviews. He said: 'We were flooded with one-star reviews from people who have never even visited our shop. Customer Charged Surprise $5 'Bitching Fee' at Pizzeria After Speaking Up 'Our Google rating dropped from 4.5 to 3.5, but we're confident it will recover with time and dedication.' Viotto denied the charge was a rip-off, even though it doesn't appear on the menu, claiming it covers the use of an extra plate and napkin and the 'skill' needed to cut a pastry. Bafflingly, a photo from the café shows a staff member simply snipping through a croissant with a pair of scissors while steadying it with a fork. He insisted: 'It's not a scam. It is a conscious choice that we defend with pride.' The row adds to Italy's growing reputation for bizarre summer surcharges. Last year, a woman in Arezzo revealed she was slapped with a £50 fee to cut her own birthday cake in a restaurant. And it's not the only baffling bill making headlines. A man has told how he was left scratching his head after a local restaurant added a mysterious 'S Charge' to his tab. The 2.75% extra fee — around 70 cents — appeared despite him paying in cash, meaning it couldn't be a card surcharge. Posting the receipt online, he wrote: 'After eating at a local restaurant I noticed a charge on the receipt I did not recognize and have never seen before. 'I emailed the contact listed on their website a week ago but never received a response. 'Can someone tell me what is the S Charge (2.75%)? Can't be a credit card up charge since I paid cash.' The post sparked heated debate, with most guessing it was some form of service charge. 4

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store