
US tariff tussles stuff of nightmares for Bordeaux winemakers
The United States is by far the top export market for Bordeaux's wine, accounting for €400 million worth of annual sales - or about 20 percent of the total.
China lags behind with €300 million ahead of the United Kingdom with €200 million.
Sunday's announcement of a trade deal between the United States and the European Union did not clear up what tariffs European wine and spirits producers will face in the United States.
Advertisement
While Trump said European exports face 15 percent tariffs across the board, both sides said there would be carve-outs for certain sectors.
EU head Ursula Von der Leyen said the bloc still hoped to secure further so-called "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for alcohol, which she hoped to be "sorted out" in the coming days.
Philippe Tapie, chairman of regional traders' union Bordeaux Negoce, which represents more than 90 percent of the wine trade in the Bordeaux area, is worried by the uncertainty.
"One day, it is white, the next it is black - the US administration can change its mind from one day to the next and we have no visibility," he told AFP.
In mid-March, Trump had threatened Brussels with 200 percent tariffs on alcohol in response to a proposed EU tax on US bourbon.
Then in April he brandished a new threat of 20 percent across the board on EU products, a threat ultimately suspended.
Since then, the level first held at ten percent but, in late May, the US leader threatened to revert to 50 percent before pivoting to 30 percent starting August 1st, the deadline for the negotiations with the EU that led to a preliminary accord after Trump and Von der Leyen met in Scotland on Sunday.
"At 10 percent or 15 percent, we'll find solutions. At 30 percent, no. End of story," Tapie warned just ahead of the announcement as he criticised a "totally unpredictable American administration".
To export wine, "there's a minimum of 30 days by boat. If you go to California, it's 60 days. We can't think in terms of weeks," says Tapie, who says he has "never been confronted with such a situation" in 30 years of business.
Advertisement
Twins Bordeaux, one of Bordeaux's leading wine merchants, also laments the tariffs' impact.
"The American market represents about a third of our turnover, or around €30 million," explains Sebastien Moses, co-director and co-owner of Twins, which usually ships upwards of a million bottles a year to the United States.
Since January, "our turnover must have fallen by 50 percent compared to last year," he says.
"So far, we've managed to save the situation, because as soon as Donald Trump was elected we anticipated this and sent as much stock as possible to the US," explains Moses, though longer term he says this is not a "stable" strategy.
As an attempted work around Twins Bordeaux even shipped cases of around 10,000 bottles by air in March.
"But only very expensive wines, at no less than €150-€200 per bottle, because by air it's at least two and a half times the price of shipping by sea," he said.
For Bordeaux wine merchant Bouey, the US market represents less than 10 percent of its exports.
"We have long since undertaken a geographical expansion. Faced with the global chaos, commercial strategies can no longer be based on a single- or dual-country strategy," Jacques Bouey, its CEO, told AFP in April.
The tariffs come with the industry already struggling with declining consumption that has led to overproduction and a collapse in bulk prices.
By early 2023, a third of Bordeaux's approximately 5,000 wine growers admitted to being in difficulty.
"We're starting to become world champions in terms of accumulating problems," complained Tapie.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
28 minutes ago
- LeMonde
EU accuses online shopping platform Temu of 'illegal' product sales
The European Union accused Chinese-founded online shopping giant Temu on Monday, July 28, of breaking the bloc's digital rules by not "properly" assessing the risks of illegal products. EU regulators believe Temu is not doing enough to protect European consumers from dangerous products and that it may not be acting sufficiently to mitigate risks to users. "Evidence showed that there is a high risk for consumers in the EU to encounter illegal products on the platform," the European Commission said in its preliminary finding. It pointed to a mystery shopping exercise that found consumers were "very likely to find non-compliant products among the offer, such as baby toys and small electronics." Temu has become wildly popular in the EU despite only having entered the continent's market in 2023, and now has 93.7 million average monthly active users in the 27-country bloc. Temu under DSA investigation Temu is under investigation as part of a law known as the Digital Services Act (DSA) that forces the world's largest tech firms to do more to protect European consumers online and better police content online. The EU said Temu's October 2024 risk assessment was "inaccurate and relying on general industry information rather than on specific details about its own marketplace." If confirmed to be in breach, the EU can slap a fine on Temu. Fines under the DSA can go as high as 6% of a company's total worldwide annual turnover and force it to make changes to address violations. Launched in October, the EU probe continues to investigate other suspected breaches including the use of addictive design features that could hurt users' physical and mental well-being and how Temu's systems recommend content and products. Temu will now be able to respond to the EU regulators' findings and defend itself, but there is no time limit on how long an investigation may last. EU law under attack The DSA is part of the EU's reinforced legal weaponry to curb the excesses of Big Tech, with stricter rules for the world's biggest platforms. It has faced criticism from the US administration under President Donald Trump. The Republican-dominated judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives described the DSA in a scathing report as a "foreign censorship threat" on Friday. Staunch Trump ally Jim Jordan, committee chair, will meet with EU Tech Sovereignty Commissioner Henna Virkkunen in Brussels, on Monday. There are currently other DSA probes into Chinese online retailer AliExpress, social media platforms Facebook and Instagram and X as well as TikTok. The EU also wants to crack down on cheap packages that flood into the bloc each year, with a proposal under discussion for a €2 flat fee per parcel. Last year, 4.6 billion such packages entered the EU – more than 145 per second – with 91% originating in China. The EU expects the numbers to increase.


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Why is Donald Trump demanding that Beyoncé be prosecuted?
Amid mounting pressure for the Trump administration to release the Epstein files - as opposed to releasing files regarding the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server – the US President is looking back to last year. He is alleging that Kamala Harris spent campaign money on celebrity endorsements – even if a previous investigation has found this claim to be false. In a recent post on Truth Social, Trump has demanded that Beyoncé (and other celebrities) be prosecuted for campaigning for Harris during the 2024 presidential election. Apparently still bruised from his lack of A-list talent support during the election, Trump wrote: 'I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats, after the Presidential Election, and the fact that they admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!), Three Million Dollars for 'expenses,' to Oprah, Six Hundred Thousand Dollars to very low rated TV 'anchor,' Al Sharpton (a total lightweight!), and others to be named for doing, absolutely NOTHING!' He continued: 'These ridiculous fees were incorrectly stated in the books and records. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO. Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them. All hell would break out! Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Regarding Trump's claim, it is true that Harris' team spent funds on rallies and events, which featured celebrity endorsers like Beyoncé, Oprah and Lady Gaga. However, the publicly shared financial records from the 2024 presidential campaign show that those expenses went toward production costs and staff, not to the celebrities themselves. This was subsequently confirmed by a New York Times investigation published in November 2024. Beyoncé publicly supported Harris last year and made a speech a rally on reproductive rights. She previously threatened Trump's campaign team with legal action for its unauthorized use of 'Freedom' in a social media video, days after the singer approved the song as the official anthem for Kamala Harris' presidential campaign. At the time, Trump spoke dismissively about Beyoncé's appearance at a Harris rally in Houston, saying: "Beyoncé would come in. Everyone's expecting a couple of songs. There were no songs. There was no happiness.' This year, Trump also called for a 'major investigation' into Bruce Springsteen after the music legend made several remarks criticising Trump at his Manchester show earlier this year. Trump alleged that Springsteen was paid by Kamala Harris for his 'POOR PERFORMANCE DURING HER CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT' (posted online on Truth Social in all caps, naturally). He went on to ask: 'ISN'T THAT A MAJOR AND ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION?' In addition to Springsteen, Trump also took aim at other artists, including Bono and (once again) Beyoncé, during his rant: 'HOW MUCH DID KAMALA HARRIS PAY BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN FOR HIS POOR PERFORMANCE DURING HER CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT?. WHY DID HE ACCEPT THAT MONEY IF HE IS SUCH A FAN OF HERS? ISN'T THAT A MAJOR AND ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION? WHAT ABOUT BEYONCÉ? …AND HOW MUCH WENT TO OPRAH, AND BONO??? He carried on, escalating things: 'I am going to call for a major investigation into this matter. Candidates aren't allowed to pay for ENDORSEMENTS, which is what Kamala did, under the guise of paying for entertainment. In addition, this was a very expensive and desperate effort to artificially build up her sparse crowds. IT'S NOT LEGAL! For these unpatriotic 'entertainers,' this was just a CORRUPT & UNLAWFUL way to capitalize on a broken system. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!' This was followed up by a bizarre back and forth, in which Trump shared a fake clip on social media of him attacking The Boss with a golf ball. The post drew heavy criticism and mockery online, with many posting 'reality shots' of Trump on the golf course, and others commenting on how 'this is not what a president does.' Numerous musicians came to Springsteen's defence, including Pearl Jam frontman Eddie Vedder and veteran rocker Neil Young. Elsewhere, South Park creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker responded to the White House's reaction to their latest episode which mocked Trump, showing him in bed with Satan and depicting him as having a micro-penis. Trump, not Satan. White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said: 'Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows. This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention.' This led Parker to respond at Comic-Con International, with his trademark deadpan style: 'We're terribly sorry.' They weren't.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Brussels says EU-US deal 'better than trade war' with Trump
"I'm 100 percent sure that this deal is better than a trade war with the United States," EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic told journalists. EU chief Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday struck an accord with US President Donald Trump that will see exports from the bloc subjected to 15 percent tariffs -- but no tariffs for US exports to Europe. The agreement meant Brussels staved off a threat from Trump to hit Europe with levies twice as high if no deal was struck by August 1. But it still drew stinging criticism from some European capitals and industries who accused the EU of giving in too easily to the US leader. "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, united to affirm their values and defend their interests, resorts to submission," French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou wrote on X. Sefcovic urged those taking issue with the deal to "pause for the moment and consider the alternative". "A trade war may seem appealing to some, but it comes with serious consequences. With at least a 30 percent tariff, our transatlantic trade would effectively come to a halt," he said.