logo
Trump's 30pc tariffs could have ‘significant effect' on job creation in Ireland, says Paschal Donohoe

Trump's 30pc tariffs could have ‘significant effect' on job creation in Ireland, says Paschal Donohoe

Irish Independent18 hours ago
It comes as US president Donald Trump on Saturday threatened to impose a 30pc tariff on imports from the European Union, starting on August 1.
However, Mr Donohoe added he is confident that Ireland 'will get its way through it' as the country's economic finances are in 'good condition'.
Speaking on RTÉ Radio One's Morning Ireland, he said the economic forecast from a few weeks back, considering there were 10pc tariffs in place between the US and the EU, would mean a 'lower level of growth within our economy and up to 75,000 fewer jobs being kept or created within our country.'
'Regrettably, the scenario that we now face could involve an even more significant effect on growth, a further effect on the job creation, a number of jobs within Ireland, but that is why we continue to negotiate so hard through the EU to try to avoid that happening,' he said.
'And thankfully, we are approaching these moments of great challenge with our economic and public finances in good condition, and a record number of people that work in Ireland.
'We are facing challenges, but I'm confident that with the decisions we've made, the hard work of the people of Ireland, and further choices we can make, we will rise to this moment and get our way through it,' he added.
The Government is currently working on the economic projections for Ireland if the 30pc tariffs on EU exports to the US were to be imposed, he said.
"It's also important to be honest that the impact on job creation and levels of employment within our economy would be worse and would affect where we believe we are likely to be.
"This is a big challenge. We need to have a moment of recognition of that, but we've faced challenges before, and we will get through this one too,' he said.
Meanwhile, the minister said he is seeing large employers in Ireland and investors in the Irish economy 'pausing decisions they're making".
ADVERTISEMENT
'That's not the same thing as saying the decisions won't be made or they can't go in our favour in the time ahead.
"But understandably, with the level of economic uncertainty that is there, employers are taking care regarding decisions they make."
It was announced last month that the Budget 2026 will not repeat the cost of living package with the one-off payments that were included in the previous budgets.
Minister Donohoe said he accepts that the removal of one-off measures will 'have an effect on [the most vulnerable] within our society', adding the country has permanent measures in place to help them.
'[There are] really big challenges that we could face in terms of jobs, growth, our public finances, and we need to make decisions now that can help, but that won't create further challenges or risks for us in the future.
"We have rolled out measures to help carers, to help with the cost of going to school, the cost of going to college, the cost of childcare. They were permanent measures that were brought in in recent budgets.'
When asked whether he accepts that there will be people who are going to be worse off after the upcoming Budget than they were last year, he said he doesn't accept that at the moment.
"What we will seek to do is look at what permanent measures we can bring in that would help those who were the worst off on a more permanent basis.
'The Government is really aware that there will be many who will be affected by the removal of measures that were large in nature when inflation was high.
'But the reason why those measures are going to be changed, and we're not going to be in a position to repeat them, is that inflation will not be growing at the pace that it was in the past.
'What we will seek to do is bring in measures that will be more permanent in nature, that will mitigate the effects, insofar as possible, of the removal of those measures.
"The key theme of this budget is going to be how we can create an economy that will keep those people in work and keep a record levels of employment within our economy.
'And in order to do that, regretably, because of the environment that we're in and the pressures that we're facing, we have to make choices,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than 30 years on, genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda reminds us we said 'never again' many times before
More than 30 years on, genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda reminds us we said 'never again' many times before

Irish Examiner

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

More than 30 years on, genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda reminds us we said 'never again' many times before

I recently travelled with Trócaire to Rwanda to meet communities working to adapt and mitigate against the increasing effects of climate change. While speaking to Béatha Usabyimana about the leading role she played in a terracing project, we surveyed the land and the remarkable progress the project has made. In the distance, I noticed a single patch of uncultivated land where a lone tree stood. Rwanda is a small country and quite densely populated — almost every metre of land is cultivated, so I thought this untouched patch of land looked unusual. Béatha said: 'That was my auntie's home once. I was 14 years old when all of my family was killed here. In Rwanda, sometimes you will see small patches of land with a single tree growing. It is to remember those we lost during the genocide." Many will have heard of the Rwandan genocide. Colleagues in Trócaire's Irish office still recall stories of working in Rwanda at the time and the sheer horror they witnessed. By 1994, Rwanda's population exceeded seven million, primarily divided into Hutu (85%), Tutsi (14%), and Twa (1%). Historically, the Tutsis held a higher social status, but social mobility allowed for movement between the groups. Over the course of 100 days in 1994, between 800,000 and one million people were massacred in Rwanda in the genocide against the Tutsi. Picture: AP /Ricardo Mazalan Colonial rule by Belgium and Germany intensified ethnic divisions through rigid classifications, causing tensions. On April 6, 1994, the assassination of the Rwandan and Burundian presidents when the plane they were travelling in was shot down, triggering a horrific genocide. Over the course of 100 days in 1994, between 800,000 and one million people were massacred in Rwanda in the genocide against the Tutsi. Two-thirds of the Tutsi population were murdered before the perpetrators were overpowered and forced into exile. This period is recognised by the UN as the Genocide against the Tutsi. Béatha explained that during that time, she and her three siblings were taken in by a neighbour and hidden in her home. Béatha's mother, and the remaining members of her family were all killed. A mother of two, Béatha is a passionate agronomist with a degree in rural development. In her village in the Karongi district of south-western Rwanda, Béatha has brought her experience to bear on the land as part of the 'Climate Justice Communities' programme. The programme is a combination of support from the Scottish Government, implemented by Trócaire and local partner organisation, Duterimbere, aimed at working alongside communities in Rwanda to respond and adapt to the increasing and devastating effects of climate change. Béatha is very satisfied with the progress the group has made, in particular the leading role women have taken to reshape the land, but she is also mindful to emphasise the impact of the genocide. She does not want that period of her life to be glossed over. Looking out over the verdant land where this happened, it was hard to believe such a ferocious act took place there such a short time ago. It was a reminder of the banality of these acts. How they can take place anywhere, and how most often they only stop when they are stopped. The now notoriously limited mandate of international forces in Rwanda led to declarations of "never again" in the wake of the genocide, and contributed to the generation of 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P), as a global norm at the turn of the millennium. Tim Sheehan, Trócaire: 'Perhaps one of the most chilling parallels with what happened in Rwanda is the clarity of intent. A key component of any genocide is the 'othering' of the target group and fostering public sympathy towards their eradication.' Picture: Fred Hirwa R2P, as it became known, seeks to ensure all states uphold their rights to prevent genocide and that the international community never fails to act in the face of genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity. As Béatha took the time to make sure we understood the significance of the tree, to ensure what happened was not forgotten, I couldn't help but think of Gaza and the genocide taking place at that moment, thousands of miles away. In Gaza, every red line of international law has been crossed. The world in which this genocide is taking place is very different to 1994, but the lessons from Rwanda are more relevant than ever. Perhaps one of the most chilling parallels with what happened in Rwanda is the clarity of intent. A key component of any genocide is the 'othering' of the target group and fostering public sympathy towards their eradication. During the Rwandan genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda, the notorious 'Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines', or 'RTLM', broadcast hate-filled propaganda against Tutsis and encouraged the Hutu population to take part in the genocide. At the time, it was a terrifying example of how basic technology could be utilised to mobilise the masses to foster acceptance of violence and mobilise people to perpetrate it. While the tenor of radio broadcasts in Rwanda in 1994 went largely hidden from the outside world, the rise of the internet since then has brought about a complete paradigm shift. Since October 7, 2023, the scale and severity of anti-Palestinian rhetoric on social media and across many media outlets in Israel have been clear for us to see. Over the last 21 months, numerous politicians have called for the complete annihilation of Gaza and have intentionally blurred the line between Hamas militants and the civilian population in order to justify a military campaign against them. Propaganda is just one way in which genocide is perpetuated, but the parallels with what happened in Rwanda are particularly clear in this respect. If we are to respect the principles of 'never again' and the memory of those who died in other genocides, we have to ensure we use these parallels as an initiation for action. While the world marks the anniversaries of Srebrenica and Rwanda this month, we continue to watch the genocide in Gaza unfolding in real time. If the Rwandan 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda has taught us anything, it is that the best moment to act is right now. Anything less will haunt us forever. Tim Sheehan is communications and content officer with Trócaire Read More Thirty years on, Srebrenica still lives under the shadow of genocide

Europeans call on Iran to resume immediate nuclear talks
Europeans call on Iran to resume immediate nuclear talks

RTÉ News​

time5 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Europeans call on Iran to resume immediate nuclear talks

France, Britain and Germany told Iran that they wanted Iran to resume diplomacy immediately over its nuclear programme and warned if there were no concrete steps by the end of the summer they would restore UN sanctions. The foreign ministers of the so-called E3, along with the European Union's foreign policy chief, held their first call with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi since Israel and the United States carried out air strikes in mid-June on Iran's nuclear programme. Speaking after the call, a French diplomatic source said the ministers had called on Iran to resume diplomatic efforts immediately to reach a "verifiable and lasting" nuclear deal. The three countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 deal with Iran that lifted sanctions on the country in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme. A UN Security Council resolution which enshrines the deal expires on 18 October and under its terms UN sanctions can be re-imposed beforehand. The process would take about 30 days. The Europeans have repeatedly warned that unless there is a new nuclear accord they will launch the "snapback mechanism", which would restore all previous UN sanctions on Iran if it is found to be in violation of the agreement's terms. "The ministers also reiterated their determination to use the so-called 'snapback' mechanism in the absence of concrete progress toward such an agreement by the end of the summer," the diplomatic source said. The source did not elaborate what concrete progress would entail. Since the air strikes, inspectors from the UN atomic watchdog have left Iran. While Iran has suggested it is open to diplomacy, there are no indications a sixth round of nuclear talks between the US and Iran will resume imminently. Diplomats say that even if they were to resume talks, reaching a comprehensive accord before the end of August - the final deadline the Europeans have given - seems unrealistic, especially without inspectors on the ground to assess Iran's remaining nuclear programme. Two European diplomats said they hoped to coordinate strategy with the United States in the coming days with a view to possibly holding talks with Iran soon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store