Florida State Under Fire for NIL Era's Dirty Secret
The most dangerous contract isn't the one you read. It's the one you're told to trust.
Over the past week, leaked details from Florida State's proposed revenue-sharing agreements have raised eyebrows and alarms. Legal clauses that allow the university to unilaterally extend a player's contract, renegotiate deals after injury, and impose multi-thousand-dollar fines have been quietly circulating among athletes. The response from agents, lawyers, and insiders has been swift, according to CBS Sports.
Advertisement
'That's not normal.'
'That would never fly in pro sports.'
'They have all the leverage, and the terms go too far.'
But here's the real issue: FSU didn't invent this model. They just got caught.
And if we're being honest, the number of programs drafting similarly aggressive terms, silently, systematically, and without public scrutiny, is likely higher than most fans (and players) would ever imagine.
Athletes fought for years to reach this moment. The NCAA settlement promised direct pay, institutional clarity, and a new chapter in player empowerment. For once, the system appeared to be moving in the right direction. But the moment schools gained permission to cut checks, they also began quietly writing their own rules and burying them in legalese.
Advertisement
Florida State Seminoles helmet during the Spring Showcase at Doak S. Campbell Stadium.© Melina Myers-USA TODAY Sports
Florida State's contract reportedly includes a clause that allows them to void or revise a deal if an athlete's injury materially impacts their NIL value. Another gives the school the ability to extend a player's contract without renegotiating, regardless of performance. Penalties for lost equipment or behavioral violations run as high as $2,500.
In theory, these protections serve the university. In practice, they put every athlete at risk of being turned into a line item on a risk management spreadsheet.
Imagine a wide receiver who earns his way into a starting role, only to get sidelined with a broken foot. Under these terms, his deal, once celebrated, can be restructured, devalued, or canceled outright. No agent. No union. No oversight. Just a document, signed in good faith, now turned against him.
Advertisement
It's hard to blame athletes. Most of them don't have contract managers. Many don't even have proper NIL reps. They're often handed a document by someone they're taught to trust and told, 'This is standard.' That phrase, 'this is standard,' might be the most quietly corrosive phrase in the entire NIL era.
Nathan Ray Seebeck-Imagn Images
Here's the truth: there is no standard. Not yet.
What FSU's contract exposes isn't just one school's overreach. It is the systemic lack of accountability in college sports' new financial ecosystem. Athletes are being told they're professionals now. But professionals have agents, lawyers, and clauses designed to protect their interests. Most college athletes have a parent, a coach, and a pen.
Advertisement
And this is where it gets messy: how many of these 'partnerships' are actually one-sided power grabs dressed up as opportunity? If FSU's contract terms hadn't leaked, would anyone be asking questions? Would any athletes even know what they signed?
Because if this is what we know from one school's draft, imagine what's hidden in the fine print at the end.
This isn't about whether Florida State is out of bounds.
It's about the quiet erosion of trust happening behind closed doors, where contracts are crafted with the kind of language that assumes athletes won't ask questions. Where leverage is baked into clauses, and the benefit of the doubt always tilts toward the institution.
Advertisement
If this is the version that got leaked, what didn't?
Schools aren't just offering deals. They're building systems to control outcomes. The very power athletes were promised is being repackaged and handed back in a form that looks official, but reads like a trap.
It's not enough to say athletes are finally getting paid. Not if the price is autonomy. Not if the paperwork gives the school a way out and leaves the player holding nothing.
This is what the new era looks like when no one's watching.
And now that we've seen a piece of it, we should start asking who else is hoping we don't.
Related: How NIL Spending Is Reshaping College Football's Competitive Landscape
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 3, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FBI Probes Detroit Pistons' Malik Beasley Over Wire Fraud and Illegal Gambling
Federal authorities are investigating former Detroit Pistons guard Malik Beasley's alleged involvement in wire fraud, gambling, and illegal prop betting, according to ESPN. The allegations stem from Beasley's time playing for the Milwaukee Bucks during the 2023-2024 season, sources told the outlet, with the focus on 'unusually heavy betting interest on Beasley's statistics' starting in January 2024. A gambling industry source shared that one or more prominent U.S. sportsbooks noticed the activity. Advertisement The 18-month investigation is being led by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, Beasley's lawyer Steve Haney told The Detroit News. 'It's a gambling investigation involving Malik. No criminal charges have been issued. It's nothing but an investigation and Malik is entitled to the presumption of innocence,' Haney said, per the outlet. The investigation has reportedly resulted in the Pistons withdrawing a three-year, $42 million contract offer to Beasley. While on the court, it appeared Beasley was fairing well. The free agent has played for six teams throughout his nine-career in the NBA and has earned nearly $60 million, including his recent one-year, $6 million deal with the Pistons, according to Spotrac. However, behind the scenes, a different story unfolded. Advertisement In April 2025, Hazan Sports Management Group Inc. sued Beasley, alleging he failed to repay a $650,000 cash advance for marketing revenue from using his name, image, and likeness. Hazan made 'a substantial investment of time, effort, and resources in a player with known issues (including and especially financial issues)…when they took him on as a client and provided him with a substantial marketing advance in anticipation of helping Beasley become one of the premier players at his position,' the lawsuit reads, per The Detroit News. The company added that when Beasley allegedly fired the firm, '…(Hazan) made several attempts to collect the full amount of the marketing advance but received little more than drips and drabs of sporadic payments and vague promises to repay the balance over time.' The firm is now seeking a minimum of $2.5 million, alleging that he failed to uphold their contract agreement. Advertisement Additional claims against Beasley include a lawsuit from The Stott apartments, stating he owes $7,355 in unpaid rent, as well as a $26,827 judgment won by a celebrity barbershop, Cairo Cuts, that provided him with a loan. Dentist Hassan Alshehabi of Delicate Smiles also won a $34,390 default judgment against Beasley related to a loan. The Detroit News reports Beasley's financial troubles total more than $8 million. 'I have been with Malik for a long time, I have seen a lot of people around him come and go, but I have stayed away from any of his financial management or mismanagement or decisions he would make with money,' Haney told the outlet. Haney clarified that he doesn't handle his client's finances and noted that while his goal is to connect his clients with top business experts, it's ultimately the client's decision to seek guidance. Advertisement The post FBI Probes Detroit Pistons' Malik Beasley Over Wire Fraud and Illegal Gambling appeared first on AfroTech. The post FBI Probes Detroit Pistons' Malik Beasley Over Wire Fraud and Illegal Gambling appeared first on AfroTech.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lakers eye veteran guard as trade chatter heats up across NBA
The NBA offseason is heating up again, and things are moving fast. Chris Paul's name is once again making waves after reports suggested he's considering a return to Phoenix. But the domino effect from that situation could shape the rest of the league's guard market, and the Lakers might be right in the middle of it. MORE: Damian Lillard, Josh Gidddey headline best NBA free agents still available Advertisement Paul, now 40, is reportedly eyeing a reunion with the Suns or a possible return to the Clippers, two teams close to his family in Los Angeles. That alone could reshape the market, especially with Bradley Beal also nearing a buyout from Phoenix. Where Beal lands could determine Paul's next move, which in turn could affect where other available guards go. One of those guards? Malcolm Brogdon. Lakers linked to Brogdon amid Wizards trade talks According to a report from Jake Fischer, the Washington Wizards are open to working out a sign-and-trade involving Brogdon, and the Lakers are among the teams showing interest. Brogdon may not be a flashy name, but he brings a reliable offensive game and veteran experience to the table. Advertisement The Wizards are in full rebuild mode and see Brogdon as a trade chip. Several teams have reportedly reached out, including the Clippers, Suns, Warriors, Timberwolves, Pelicans, Kings, and Bucks — but the Lakers are one of the more intriguing fits. If they miss out on Paul, Brogdon could be a solid backup plan, especially with his ability to run the offense and contribute on both ends of the floor. Still, there's risk involved. Brogdon has struggled to stay on the court in recent years. He's played just 63 games over the last two seasons, a big drop after winning Sixth Man of the Year in Boston two years ago. Outside of that one healthy year with the Celtics, he hasn't played more than 60 games since his 2018–19 season with the Bucks. If healthy, Brogdon could give the Lakers much-needed depth in the backcourt alongside D'Angelo Russell and Austin Reaves. The question is whether the Lakers want to take that gamble or look elsewhere. Meanwhile, the Wizards would likely want picks or young players in return, something the Lakers have to weigh carefully. Advertisement As for Paul, a return to Phoenix would likely end any potential reunion with the Lakers. But if he goes elsewhere — or delays his decision — the Lakers could get more aggressive in talks with Washington. The whole situation is fluid, and it could come down to who makes a move first. One thing is clear: the Lakers are actively exploring their options. Whether it's Paul, Brogdon, or someone else, expect them to stay involved in the conversation until their backcourt is settled. The NBA offseason may just be getting started, but the Lakers are already in the thick of it. More NBA News:
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Justice Department, driven by Trump policy, plans to go after naturalized U.S. citizens
In his all-out war on illegal immigration, President Donald Trump has branded immigrants as 'criminals,' 'invaders' and 'predators,' as his administration targets millions of Haitians, Latin Americans, gang members and foreign college students for deportation. Now, the president has directed the Justice Department to bolster its resources in a major crackdown on naturalized citizens suspected of unlawfully obtaining their U.S. citizenship. According to a recent memo, the department plans to focus not only on individuals who may have lied about a crime or having done something illegal during the naturalization process. But authorities also plan to focus on others who may have committed a crime after becoming citizens — a generally untested legal frontier. Citing Trump's policy objectives in the June 11 memo, the head of DOJ's Civil Division instructed government lawyers to go after naturalized citizens who pose a potential danger to national security, such as acts of terrorism or espionage, violated human rights, engaged in international drug trafficking or committed felonies that were not disclosed during the naturalization application. The DOJ list of priority targets, backed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, even includes naturalized citizens who have been convicted of defrauding the U.S. government, such as Medicare, Medicaid and COVID-19 loan programs. 'These categories are intended to guide the Civil Division in prioritizing which cases to pursue; however, these categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case,' Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate wrote in the memo, pointing to an expansive interpretation of laws on the revocation of naturalization. A range of critics, including immigration and defense attorneys, say the Justice Department's new 'priorities for denaturalization cases' are extremely broad and vague — allowing the Trump administration to target any number of naturalized citizens for various offenses that may fall outside the scope of the law, before trying to deport them to their native country. Ultimately, a federal judge must decide on any government bid to revoke the status of a naturalized citizen, a long process involving likely appeals. 'Traditionally, the law was intended to apply to individuals who committed an unlawful act before becoming naturalized citizens—particularly if that act was not disclosed during the naturalization process or if there was a material misrepresentation on the application,' Miami immigration attorney Steven Goldstein told the Miami Herald. 'What appears to be happening now is an effort to broaden the law's scope, targeting conduct that occurs at any point after naturalization, based on interpretations laid out in the memo,' said Goldstein, a former federal prosecutor with the now-defunct Immigration and Naturalization Service. 'This administration has aggressively expanded the reach of immigration enforcement — and they've shown they're unafraid to defend these expansions in court.' The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers condemned the Justice Department's new directive. 'The Trump Administration's push to revoke citizenship is alarming, and raises serious Fourteenth Amendment concerns,' group president Christopher Wellborn said in a statement. 'Although the memo purports to target concealment of earlier offenses, the language suggests that any offense, at any time, may be used to justify denaturalization,' he said. 'This is particularly concerning given the administration's reliance on vague claims of gang affiliation in deportations.' The impact of the new DOJ policy aimed at U.S. citizens who were born in a foreign country is unclear. According to the Migration Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank, the United States has about 24.5 million naturalized citizens, a little more than half of the country's immigrant population. Historically, the Justice Department has zeroed in on Nazi collaborators, Communist party members and spies for denaturalization if they 'illegally procured' their U.S. citizenship, including 'by concealment of a material act or by willful misrepresentation,' according to federal law. Denaturalization was commonly used during the McCarthy era of the late 1940s and early 1950s, and expanded during the Obama administration and Trump's first term in office. The country's latest denaturalization case occurred in mid-June when a federal judge revoked the citizenship of Elliott Duke, an American military veteran from the U.K. who was convicted a decade ago of receiving and possessing child-porn images while stationed in Germany — a crime he did not disclose on his naturalization application before becoming a U.S. citizen in 2013. The issue became even more heated after the Trump administration raised the possibility of stripping Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral candidate for New York City, of his U.S. citizenship as part of the crackdown against foreign-born citizens convicted of certain offenses. The spurious allegation, known to be false, is that Mamdani may have concealed his support for 'terrorism' during the naturalization process. Mamdani, 33, who calls himself a Democratic socialist, was born in Uganda to ethnic Indian parents, became a U.S. citizen in 2018 and has attracted widespread media attention over his vocal support for Palestinian rights. Trump, during a visit last week to the new Everglades detention facility called Alligator Alcatraz, was asked about Mamdani's pledge to 'stop masked' Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents 'from deporting our neighbors.' Trump responded: 'Well, then, we'll have to arrest him.' Mamdani posted a statement on X: 'The President of the United States just threatened to have me arrested, stripped of my citizenship, put in a detention camp and deported. Not because I have broken any law but because I will refuse to let ICE terrorize our city.' Longtime North Miami immigration attorney Andre Pierre, who toiled for years on a landmark denaturalization case, said he has seen both Democratic and Republican administrations pursue aggressive immigration policies — but no president has made the issue as controversial and visible as Trump. Pierre said Trump ran for re-election on the campaign promise of ridding the country of illegal immigrants who have been convicted of committing crimes, along with gang members from El Salvador and Venezuela. But as soon as he was sworn in as president for a second term, he said, Trump started going after everyday, working-class Venezuelans, Haitians, Cubans and other immigrants with temporary protected status or humanitarian parole. 'A lot of people in these communities voted for for him and didn't think he was going to go that far,' Pierre told the Herald. Pierre said it was only a matter of time before the Trump administration would zero in on naturalized foreign-born citizens in the United States. But after reviewing the Justice Department's list of priorities for denaturalization cases, he came away dismayed. 'This memo is shocking,' Pierre said. 'But I don't see a lot of evidence supporting the kind of cases they want to go after.' Decades ago, Pierre represented a Haitian restaurant owner in Miami who applied for naturalization in November 1994, was approved in February 1996 and took the oath of allegiance and became a naturalized citizen in April 1996. But that fall, Lionel Jean-Baptiste was arrested on cocaine distribution charges, convicted at trial and sentenced to eight years in prison. Evidence showed that Jean-Baptiste committed the crime in March 1995 while his application for naturalization was still awaiting approval by the U.S. government — a fact that would ultimately undo his citizenship. After his conviction, government lawyers moved to revoke his naturalization status in what was considered to be a 'test' case, claiming he illegally procured his citizenship because he failed to show 'good moral character' during the application process. A federal trial judge agreed — a decision affirmed in 2005 by a federal appeals court in Atlanta. The key issue was whether the mere allegation of criminal activity against the Haitian immigrant demonstrated a lack of good moral character, a requirement for naturalization. 'The case dragged on for years,' Pierre said. 'It went all the way up to the Supreme Court.' After Jean-Baptiste, 77, lost his naturalization status, Immigration and Customs Enforcement was then able to take the next step of deporting him to Haiti. The Justice Department's new memo on denaturalization policies suggests that government lawyers might be able to pick ripe cases and expedite naturalized citizens as part of the Trump administration's aggressive goal of deporting millions of illegal immigrants. But a historic South Florida case that lasted for years suggests otherwise, because of the extraordinary due process afforded the defendant: Feodor Fedorenko, a former guard at the infamous Treblinka death camp in Poland, where the Nazis killed about 900,000 Jews during the Holocaust. When the Ukrainian-born Fedorenko applied for a visa to enter the United States in 1949, he lied about his activities during the war. He was granted a visa and lived in the U.S. under the radar for about 20 years. He then applied for U.S. citizenship and once again lied about his activities during the war and failed to disclose his collaboration with the Nazis in carrying out war crimes. He became a naturalized U.S. citizen and continued with his life working at a factory in Connecticut — until his retirement in Miami Beach. Authorities caught up with him. In 1978, federal prosecutors moved to strip Fedorenko of citizenship at trial before U.S. District Judge Norman Roettger in Fort Lauderdale. Fedorenko's case, which was cited several times in the Jean-Baptiste ruling by the appeals court, featured dramatic testimony by a half-dozen Jewish survivors of Treblinka who were living in Israel, by Fedorenko himself and by character witnesses. When asked about the gas chambers at the camp, Fedorenko testified that he never went near them, though he could see them from the guard tower where he was stationed occasionally, according to 2014 book, 'Forgotten Trials of the Holocaust.' Fedorenko, who considered himself a 'prisoner of war' even though he worked as a private in the German army, acknowledged that the Germans gave him a gun. But he denied that he ever whipped or shot an inmate. The lead Justice Department lawyer, Jon Sale, who had been an assistant special Watergate prosecutor, was tasked with proving by 'clear and convincing' evidence that Fedorenko illegally procured his citizenship by hiding his past as a Nazi guard from U.S. immigration authorities. But in the end, Roettger rejected the testimony of the Treblinka survivors and spared Fedorenko from being denaturalized. Although Roettger was not entirely convinced of Fedorenko's 'do no evil' depiction of himself as a Treblinka guard, the judge never took the next step of finding that his denial of what witnesses said about him was also untrue. Sale's team appealed, and the judge's ruling was overturned in 1979. Two years later, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld that ruling, leading to the former Nazi guard's denaturalization. 'Even then, his due process rights continued to be honored when the Immigration and Naturalization Service afforded him administrative hearings and appeals,' Sale, a prominent defense lawyer in Miami, told the Herald. 'After all this due process, he was finally deported to the Soviet Union.' There, because of his commission of war crimes in Crimea, Fedorenko, 79, was tried, found guilty and executed in 1987, a year after his deportation.
