
Tamil Nadu govt ready to assist 'Madrasi Camp' residents in Delhi if they choose to return
CHENNAI: If residents of Delhi's 'Madrasi Camp', who are natives of Tamil Nadu (TN), choose to return to their home districts, necessary assistance shall be extended to them, the TN govt said on Sunday.
A demolition was carried out at Madrasi Camp in south Delhi's Jangpura on Sunday to remove illegal settlements. The action follows
Delhi high court
's directive to remove slums along the Barapullah drain. TN govt said all legal avenues available to them have now been exhausted.
"Comprehensive support, including assistance for livelihood and other essential needs, will be extended to them. This assistance will be facilitated through the offices of the concerned district collectors to ensure timely and effective implementation," the state govt said, in an official release.
Numerous occupants of the unauthorised settlement, predominantly inhabited by people from Tamil Nadu, expressed their opposition to the clearance.
According to the govt, the Madrasi Camp comprises 370 slum dwellings and is predominantly inhabited by people of Tamil Nadu origin. Delhi high court had said the camp was an unauthorised encroachment on the bank of the Barapullah drain.
"This has led to obstruction and blockage of the drain, causing significant waterlogging in the surrounding areas, especially during the monsoon season."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Descubra ofertas de voos imperdíveis
Voos | Anúncios de Pesquisa
Saiba Mais
Undo
Accordingly, the court directed that eligible residents be rehabilitated and relocated under the provisions of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) Act and the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015.
In compliance with the directions of the court, a survey was undertaken by the Eligibility Determination Committee to assess the eligibility of all residents for rehabilitation and relocation.
Govt authorities posted a list of qualified families on the settlement walls on April 12. Of the 370 families, around 190 met the eligibility criteria. These beneficiaries were allotted residential units under the Economically Weaker Section category of the DDA in Narela. The court set a timeline for residents to vacate the camp between May 20 and 31, with demolition scheduled to commence from June 1.
"As per the instructions of the chief minister of Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu House in New Delhi has been tasked with actively facilitating and overseeing coordination efforts.
Reaffirming its unwavering commitment to the welfare of people of Tamil Nadu origin residing outside the state, the govt of Tamil Nadu is in active coordination with the residents of Madrasi Camp to ensure that every possible support is extended to them without delay," the govt said.
Meanwhile,
Aam Aadmi Party
(AAP) Delhi state president Saurabh Bharadwaj pointed out that the demolition came immediately after the Delhi CM claimed during an event to celebrate 100 days of BJP in govt that not a single jhuggi would be touched. "Within 24 hours of CM Rekha Gupta's promise, bulldozers arrived at Barapullah's Madrasi Camp and flattened hundreds of homes," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Those who act like urban Naxals will be arrested: Fadnavis on Special Public Security Bill
Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has made it clear that the Special Public Security Bill is not for taking action against those who criticise the government, but warned that those who act like urban Naxals will be arrested under it. The Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill , 2024, which seeks to prevent unlawful activities of Left Wing Extremist organisations with focus on urban Naxalism and "passive militancy", was passed by the state legislature during the recent monsoon session of the state legislature. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category CXO Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity Management Healthcare Data Science PGDM Product Management Design Thinking Data Science others Project Management Leadership Technology MBA Operations Management Data Analytics Digital Marketing MCA Finance healthcare Degree Others Public Policy Skills you'll gain: Operations Strategy for Business Excellence Organizational Transformation Corporate Communication & Crisis Management Capstone Project Presentation Duration: 11 Months IIM Lucknow Chief Operations Officer Programme Starts on Jun 30, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Customer-Centricity & Brand Strategy Product Marketing, Distribution, & Analytics Digital Strategies & Innovation Skills Leadership Insights & AI Integration Expertise Duration: 10 Months IIM Kozhikode IIMK Chief Marketing and Growth Officer Starts on Apr 7, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Digital Strategy Development Expertise Emerging Technologies & Digital Trends Data-driven Decision Making Leadership in the Digital Age Duration: 40 Weeks Indian School of Business ISB Chief Digital Officer Starts on Jun 30, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Technology Strategy & Innovation Emerging Technologies & Digital Transformation Leadership in Technology Management Cybersecurity & Risk Management Duration: 24 Weeks Indian School of Business ISB Chief Technology Officer Starts on Jun 28, 2024 Get Details The bill, which has stringent provisions, including hefty fines and jail term up to seven years for those found guilty, has sparked criticism from civil society groups and opposition parties, who view it as a tool to suppress dissent under the pretext of national security. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo Talking to reporters here on Saturday, Fadnavis said the law was not against demonstrators or those who criticise the government. "If you act like an urban naxal, you will be arrested," he said when asked about Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) president Raj Thackeray's challenge to the CM to arrest his party workers under the newly-passed legislation. Live Events On Raj Thackeray's charge that the CM wanted to forcibly teach young children Hindi but not Marathi to those coming from outside, Fadnavis said Marathi is mandatory in Maharashtra, but an additional Indian language should be learnt along with it. "I am opposed to laying a red carpet to English instead of an Indian language," he said.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Cincinnati street brawl: Vivek Ramaswamy donates to attack victim 'Holly'; fundraiser tops $100K
Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has made a significant donation to a GiveSendGo fundraiser supporting a woman named Holly, who was assaulted during a violent mob attack in downtown Cincinnati. The incident, which went viral, showed Holly being punched while trying to help another victim during the chaotic street brawl. American commentator and YouTuber Benny Johnson shared a screenshot of Ramaswamy's donation, writing on X, "Wow. @VivekGRamaswamy just made an incredibly generous donation to Holly's GiveSendGo. Thank you to all who've shown up for her. 100% goes to Holly." The fundraiser has now surpassed $100,000 in donations. "We have now officially raised $100,000 for Holly in just one night. This is one of the most successful GiveSendGo campaigns in history," Johnson posted earlier. Ramaswamy had earlier condemned the attack and criticised the absence of police and emergency services. Earlier, in a post on X, he wrote, "It's unconscionable that there were no police present in that area of Cincinnati on a Friday night, or even an ambulance to take her to the hospital. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search Ads Get Info Undo Hard-working Americans shouldn't have to worry for their safety when they have a good time in our cities.' He added that Holly, a single working mother, told him no public official aside from one detective had contacted her. "Leftists like to lecture about 'systemic injustice' while thugs turn our cities into war zones. I'm done with their excuses," Ramaswamy said. If elected in the coming year, Ramaswamy declared, "We're going to set an example for what that looks like in Ohio." The viral video of the incident shows a man being chased into the street, shoved to the ground, and beaten by a crowd. One individual body-slams him while others kick and stomp him. As the man tries to get up, a woman, later identified as Holly, rushes to help, only to be punched twice in the face. She collapses to the pavement, hitting her head and bleeding from the mouth as the crowd continues to cheer. The clip has sparked outrage and renewed calls for better safety and policing in urban areas.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Elite colleges under pressure: Trump wields federal funding to redefine academic autonomy
US President Donald Trump In an unprecedented reconfiguration of the relationship between higher education and the federal government, several of the United States' most prestigious universities have capitulated, some quietly, others under public scrutiny—to the hardball tactics of President Donald Trump's administration. Under threat of losing billions in federal research funding, elite institutions have agreed to sweeping concessions, financial penalties, and ideological alignment with a White House intent on recasting academia in its own image. At the heart of the confrontation is the administration's aggressive use of funding as leverage. Research dollars—historically doled out based on academic merit—are now weaponized to coerce ideological compliance. In a departure from past presidential norms, Trump has fused his political agenda with federal purse strings, tying grants to reforms in campus speech, gender definitions, diversity policy, and even interpretations of antisemitism. The Columbia precedent Columbia University was the first to yield. On July 23, the Ivy League institution agreed to pay a staggering $200 million fine to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for reinstatement of suspended research grants. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Susan Boyle Is Now so Thin and Looks Beautiful! Undo Over $400 million in federal funding had been pulled earlier in the year, largely due to the administration's claim that Columbia failed to adequately address antisemitic incidents during the Israel-Hamas war. In its agreement, Columbia consented to overhauls of its student disciplinary protocols and formally adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, a controversial benchmark critics say conflates political criticism of Israel with hate speech. Additionally, the university committed $21 million to a compensation fund for faculty and staff who alleged discrimination. Yet, even in compromise, Columbia drew a line in the sand: the deal includes language asserting that the federal government cannot dictate its hiring, admissions, or academic speech. For Trump officials, however, the Columbia deal serves as a 'road map' for future enforcement, a blueprint of how universities might 'come to heel.' Brown and Penn : Ideological bargains Brown University followed with a $50 million payment directed not to federal coffers but to Rhode Island's workforce development programs—an unusual stipulation reflecting the administration's local economic messaging. In exchange, the government lifted funding freezes and ended probes into alleged antisemitism and racial bias in admissions. As part of the settlement, Brown agreed to remove race as a consideration in admissions and adopt the administration's binary definitions of gender. The University of Pennsylvania reached its own compromise, agreeing to retroactively disqualify swimming records set by transgender athlete Lia Thomas and issue a formal apology to female swimmers the administration argued had been disadvantaged. The Education Department had linked this civil rights case to a broader effort to ban transgender athletes from women's sports, resulting in a $175 million freeze in Penn's research funding prior to the agreement. Like Columbia's and Brown's, Penn's agreement included a clause preserving curricular independence, but the impact of the federal intrusion had already left its mark. The Holdouts: Harvard , Cornell , and beyond Not all institutions have acquiesced. Harvard University, long a symbolic adversary of Trump's populist conservatism, faces the largest penalty yet: a freeze on more than $2.6 billion in federal research support. The administration has accused Harvard of fostering antisemitism and enabling ideological extremism—charges the university disputes through multiple lawsuits. Negotiations continue, but administration officials have reportedly demanded a penalty surpassing Columbia's. For Harvard, the stakes are not only financial but existential: ceding to such terms may compromise the academic autonomy it has zealously guarded for nearly four centuries. Cornell University, Northwestern, and Duke have likewise seen vast sums—ranging from $108 million at Duke to over $1 billion at Cornell—frozen amid allegations of civil rights violations, racial preferences in hiring, and insufficient protection for Jewish students. In Princeton's case, dozens of federal research grants were suspended without any explicit reasoning—underscoring the unpredictability and opacity of the administration's tactics. A presidency reshaping academia Trump's strategic targeting of elite universities reflects a broader ideological crusade. He has painted Ivy League institutions as bastions of liberal dogma, harboring what his administration sees as anti-American, antisemitic, and discriminatory practices. Unlike any of his predecessors, Trump is using federal funding as both cudgel and carrot—punishing noncompliance while rewarding universities that align with his ideological framework. Critics argue this is a dangerous politicization of education, undermining the intellectual independence and open inquiry that universities are meant to protect. Supporters counter that it's long overdue corrective action against institutions they view as detached from public values. What is undeniable is the chilling effect: colleges across the country now operate under the specter of federal scrutiny, where the cost of defiance is measured not only in dollars but in compromised autonomy. Autonomy at a price These developments mark a watershed moment in American higher education. The Trump administration's wielding of federal research dollars as a means of ideological enforcement has redrawn the contours of university-government relations. Institutions once thought untouchable now find themselves making fraught calculations, balancing their principles against existential financial risk. For elite colleges, the question is no longer just about academic excellence—it is about whether independence can survive in an era where funding is contingent upon political fealty. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!