Barry Keoghan refused to play drums for Ringo Starr ahead of Beatles biopic
The actor, 32, who is set to portray Ringo Starr in an upcoming Beatles biopic, got candid on a once in a lifetime hangout with the famed drummer, 84.
'I met him at his house, and he played the drums for me,' Keoghan revealed on Wednesday's episode of 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!'
Advertisement
'He asked me to play, but I wasn't playing the drums for Ringo.'
10 The Beatles, from left Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and John Lennon.
Redferns
10 Ringo Starr in 1964.
Getty Images
Advertisement
Host Jimmy Kimmel asked the 'Saltburn' star if he was there to absorb all he could from Starr, to which Keoghan concurred.
'And when I was talking to him, I couldn't look at him,' he added. 'I was nervous, like right now. But he's like, 'You can look at me.''
Despite being starstruck by the Beatles drummer, Keoghan never lost sight of the fact he was there for work purposes.
10 Barry Keoghan attends Valentino 'Le meta-theatre des intimites' show.
Getty Images for Valentino
Advertisement
'My job is to observe and kinda taken in mannerisms and study him,' he said. 'I want to humanize him and bring feelings to it and not just sort of imitate.'
In order to embody Starr, Keoghan has been practicing playing the drums on his own time.
He noted Starr was 'absolutely lovely.'
Director Sam Mendes announced the news that he was making a biopic for every member of the Beatles, including John Lennon, Paul McCartney, and George Harrison.
Advertisement
10 Musician Ringo Starr of Ringo Starr And His All Starr Band performs on stage at Harrah's Resort Southern California on March 21, 2019 in Valley Center, California.
Getty Images
10 Joseph Quinn, Barry Keoghan, Harris Dickinson and Paul Mescal attend CinemaCon 2025- Opening Night.
Getty Images for CinemaCon
Paul Mescal will play McCartney, 82, Harris Dickinson will star as Lennon, who was assassinated in 1980 at age 40, and Joseph Quinn will take on the role of Harrison, who died in 2001 at 58.
The films, collectively called 'The Beatles – A Four-Film Cinematic Event,' are set to premiere in April 2028.
'We're not just making one film about the Beatles — we're making four,' Mendes said. 'Perhaps this is a chance to understand them a little more deeply.' He also called the film series 'the first binge-able theatrical experience.'
10 Harris Dickinson, Paul Mescal, Barry Keoghan and Joseph Quinn.
Ilaria Urbinati / Instagram
'There had to be a way to tell the epic story for a new generation,' the Oscar winner continued. 'I can assure you there is still plenty left to explore and I think we found a way to do that.'
The official logline for the movie is: 'Each man has his own story, but together they are legendary.'
Advertisement
In November, Starr gave his stamp of approval for Keoghan to play him.
'Well, Barry's great,' he told Entertainment Tonight at the time. 'I believe he's somewhere taking drum lessons. And I hope not too many.'
10 Ringo Starr performs on stage at The Holland International Blues Festival in Grolloo, Netherlands, 9th June 2018.
Redferns
The Beatles formed in 1960, with their original drummer being Pete Best, who played with the band from 1960 to 1962. Best, 83, was then replaced by Starr.
Advertisement
After gaining notoriety in the mid-1960s as the drummer of the Beatles, Starr shows no signs of slowing down in his later years.
'Sometimes when I finish a tour, I'm like, 'That's the end for me.' And all my children say, 'Oh, Dad, you've told us that for the last 10 years.' And they get fed up with me,' he told People in March.
10 Barry Keoghan at CinemaCon.
Sony Pictures via Getty Images
'I do feel, 'Oh, that's got to be enough,' and then I get a phone call: 'We've got a few gigs if you're interested.' Okay, we're off again!'
Advertisement
The musician has sons Zak, 59, and Jason, 57, and daughter Lee, 54, with his late ex-wife, Maureen Cox.
Come June, Starr is off again on a 10-date tour with his All Starr Band. In September, his namesake band will play six shows during a Las Vegas residency at the Venetian Theatre.
10 The Beatles try their luck on a pair of fruit machines in Las Vegas in 1964.
Getty Images
Starr founded his group in 1989, and the current musical lineup stars Steve Lukather, Warren Ham, Colin Hay, Gregg Bissonette, Hamish Stuart and Buck Johnson.
Advertisement
'In those days, I had a phone book, so I found guys who were musicians and I'd call them,' he recalled of the group's early days. 'We opened in Texas in a field and it was great. And we've been doing it ever since because I love to play live. I love the audience, I know they love me and we have a great time.'
Starr, however, 'doesn't even look' at his drums when he's by himself at home.
10 The Beatles.
Bettmann Archive
'I've never liked just drumming by myself,' he told USA Today in 2024. 'I always want to be in a band with players. If you play whatever, I'll play with you all night. [As a kid] I went upstairs the traditional way from all of those black and white movies where the drummer goes upstairs to his kit and hits them.'
'Well in my neighborhood, I was this close to being stabbed!' he recalled. 'Everyone in the neighborhood was going, 'SHUT UP!' But I'll play anywhere. My first band was the guy from next door, Eddie Miles, and my best friend Roy taught us bass and that's what we've done: just keep playing with other guys.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Ichiro hilariously needles lone writer who left him off Hall of Fame ballot
Ichiro has a Hall of Fame mind and on off the field. The long-time Seattle Mariner didn't hold back during his Hall of Fame acceptance speech on Sunday, calling out the lone Baseball Writers' Association voter who failed to include him on his or her ballot, despite his historic career achievements. 'Three‑thousand hits or 262 hits in one season are achievements recognized by the writers. Well, all but one of you. And by the way, the offer for that writer to have dinner at my home has now expired,' Ichiro said to a roaring Cooperstown crowd. Ichiro Suzuki speaks during the Baseball Hall of Fame induction ceremony at Clark Sports Center on July 27, 2025 in Cooperstown, New York. Getty Images Ichiro headlined the 2025 class, sharing the Cooperstown stage with CC Sabathia and elite reliever Billy Wagner, while legendary players Dick Allen and Dave Parker were inducted posthumously. Ichiro was selected on his first ballot with a sweeping 99.7 percent of the vote share, collecting 393 of 394 votes. The achievement also makes Ichiro the first Asian-born Hall of Fame inductee. Over 19 MLB seasons, Ichiro racked up 3,089 major league hits with a career batting average of a blistering .311, as well as 509 stolen bases, 10 Gold Gloves, three Silver Slugger awards, and two batting titles. Ichiro's single-season record of 262 hits in 2004 still stands to this day. Inductees, from left, Billy Wagner, Ichiro Suzuki, CC Sabathia, Willa Allen, representing her late husband late Dick Allen and David Parker II, representing his late father Dave Parker pose for a photograph after the Baseball Hall of Fame induction ceremony at Clark Sports Center on July 27, 2025 in Cooperstown, New York. Getty Images Ichiro's 242 hits as a rookie in 2001 are also 10th all-time and second after 1930 — that season he won both MVP and Rookie of the Year in the American League. He also reached 10 consecutive All-Star games to begin his career, an MLB record. As of Ichiro's speech, the writer who left him off the ballot, keeping him from becoming the second unanimous first ballot Hall of Famer, has remained anonymous. Mariano Rivera received a perfect 425 of 425 votes for his initial Hall of Fame bid in 2019. Ichiro's 99.7 percent ties Derek Jeter for second place.
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Artificial Authenticity And The Humblebrag Industrial Complex
Andy Warhol poses with his beloved dachshund Archie in November 1973. (Photo by Jack Mitchell/Getty ... More Images) Getty Images A now-viral screenshot (below) of a satirical LinkedIn post from four years ago has been shared thousands of times—mocking the platform's ecosystem of manufactured inspiration, where every mundane encounter becomes a profound lesson in leadership. Yet scroll through your feed today, and you'll find posts nearly indistinguishable from the parody. We've reached peak professional performance theater, where the line between genuine insight and algorithmic optimization has dissolved entirely. And what's notable is that more and more people are now using AI to draft their LinkedIn posts, outsourcing their inner monologue to machines that have never had an inner anything. Posts today are more than twice as long as they used to be, and a 2024 study by Originality found that over half of these long-form English language posts on the platform were AI generated. LinkedIn hasn't just digitized networking—it has industrialized authenticity, outsourcing even emotional labor to algorithms and turning professional identity into a content genre. This goes beyond LinkedIn's occasional awkwardness or self-indulgence. It's about how professional identity itself is evolving in an AI-saturated world, and the economic stakes are higher than we realize. Screenshot of LinkedIn post by Lumko Solwandle Nathan Pettijohn Before LinkedIn digitized professional networking in 2003, career advancement relied on physical proximity and institutional gatekeepers. Professional relationships were built through alumni networks, industry conferences, golf courses, and corner office introductions—spaces that inherently favored those with existing social and economic capital. LinkedIn democratized access to professional networks while simultaneously industrializing the performance itself, making visible what was once private and measurable what was once intuitive. Today, LinkedIn has over 1 billion global members, with only 1% posting content weekly, yet generating 9 billion impressions weekly. This platform has industrialized what sociologist Arlie Hochschild calls "emotional labor"—the management of feelings to create a publicly observable facial and bodily display. Except now, we're outsourcing even that labor to artificial intelligence. The platform's ecosystem of " broetry "—those distinctive LinkedIn posts formatted with short, dramatic line breaks for maximum impact—represents something deeper than mere narcissism. The typography itself performs sincerity, mimicking the cadence of spoken vulnerability. When someone writes: "I made a mistake. And it changed everything. Here's what I learned..." They're not just sharing a professional insight. They're using visual formatting to simulate the pauses and emphasis of authentic emotional revelation, turning genuine human moments into content optimized for algorithmic consumption. LinkedIn's algorithm can identify robotic responses but remains surprisingly vulnerable to AI-generated thought leadership. When machines can successfully impersonate human professional insight, what does that say about the original insight? We've reached a point where artificial authenticity reflects back on itself so thoroughly that it's difficult to recall what unmediated professional wisdom even sounded like. The Humblebrag Industrial Complex LinkedIn has transformed what was once a social faux pas into a legitimate digital marketing strategy. The platform rewards what sociologists might recognize as ritualized vulnerability—a scripted performance of authenticity that has crystallized into genre: "I'm humbled to announce..." (success disguised as modesty, the linguistic equivalent of covering a Ferrari with a tarp) "A stranger did something kind and restored my faith in humanity..." (virtue signaling through anecdote, usually involving coffee shops or airport encounters) "I was rejected from my dream job, and it was the best thing that ever happened to me..." (destiny disguised as disappointment, the professional equivalent of "everything happens for a reason") These posts function as modern parables, teaching us how to navigate professional success while maintaining the illusion of humility. But the economic implications are worth noting. Research by Edelman found that thought leadership influences decision-makers' purchasing behaviors, with their B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study showing that strong thought leadership content not only strengthens a company's reputation but also positively impacts RFP invitations and pricing. LinkedIn's audience has twice the buying power of the average online user, and four out of five people on the platform drive business decisions. This creates what amounts to the Instagramification of the cubicle, where every career move becomes content, every professional insight becomes engagement bait, every human moment becomes a potential case study in leadership. The performance actually matters—posts with 50 comments from engaged users prove far more impactful than those with 1,000 likes and no conversations, suggesting that authentic dialogue (however performed) still carries economic weight. Unlike other social media platforms where influence might translate to brand deals or Patreon subscriptions, LinkedIn performance has direct B2B economic consequences. Consider the case of Justin Welsh, who reports building "$10.3M+ in business revenue at ~86% profit margins" largely through LinkedIn content. His posts about entrepreneurship routinely generate hundreds of thousands of impressions and directly drive sales for his courses and consulting services. Welsh's success illustrates how LinkedIn has flattened traditional professional hierarchies—you don't need a corner office or MBA to influence industry conversations. The Shadow Audience Effect Erving Goffman once described everyday life as a kind of stage, where individuals perform identity for an audience. LinkedIn crystallizes this theory in digital form. What makes LinkedIn's artificial authenticity particularly powerful is what we might call the "shadow audience effect." For every person who reads and engages with your post, there are dozens more who scroll past, absorbing your message without leaving any digital trace. You're influencing people you'll never know you influenced, creating ripple effects of professional persona that extend far beyond the platform's ability to track. This invisible influence explains why LinkedIn content often feels like performance art masquerading as professional insight. The poster knows they're being watched by potential clients, employers, and industry peers, even if those watchers never engage. The result is calculated transparency—being selectively vulnerable through frosted glass. For younger professionals or those without traditional credentials, this can create a pressure to perform vulnerability as a career strategy, not as a path to connection. What LinkedIn has accomplished is the digitization of what Pierre Bourdieu called ' cultural capital '—the knowledge, skills, and tastes that signal social status. Professional networking was always about displaying and accumulating this capital, but LinkedIn made the process explicit, quantified, and globally accessible. Your post engagement isn't just social validation; it's the real-time measurement of your professional cultural capital in the marketplace. This is why so many users report career opportunities or new clients from posts that received little visible engagement—because the real influence lies in who's watching, not who's commenting. When Machines Learn Professional Authenticity The integration of AI into LinkedIn content creation represents an evolution in professional identity performance. AI writing tools now offer LinkedIn-specific templates—some trained on large datasets of high-performing posts—designed to replicate the cadence of professional inspiration. The AI learns the cadence of professional inspiration, the rhythm of humble bragging, the precise vulnerability-to-insight ratio that drives engagement. MIT sociologist Sherry Turkle observes : "Technology doesn't just do things for us. It does things to us, changing not just what we do but who we are." This shift is particularly evident in professional contexts, where AI-assisted content creation is reshaping how we construct and perform our professional identities. This shift in how we perform professional identity online doesn't exist in a vacuum. It's emerging in parallel with broader workplace transformations—remote work, pandemic-era burnout, the so-called ' Great Resignation ,' and the rise of solo entrepreneurship. As traditional career ladders collapse or morph into lattices, platforms like LinkedIn have become a kind of stage where we rehearse relevance. In a world where your job title might be in flux and your office is your kitchen table, broadcasting a coherent professional persona isn't just branding—it's survival. The implications extend beyond LinkedIn. As AI becomes more sophisticated at mimicking human professional communication, the premium on genuinely human insights—the kind that can't be replicated by algorithms—may actually increase. We might be witnessing the last gasps of performed authenticity before authenticity becomes the only viable differentiator. The Algorithm Made Me Do It Andy Warhol famously predicted everyone would be famous for fifteen minutes. LinkedIn offers something more unsettling: the chance to remain professionally relevant indefinitely—as long as we never stop performing. The platform has created a new form of professional purgatory where authenticity becomes a competitive advantage precisely because it's so rare. In a feed flooded with AI-generated inspiration and algorithmic optimization, the genuinely human voice doesn't just stand out—it becomes economically valuable. We've reached the point where being authentically yourself is the ultimate professional hack. But here's the deeper paradox: LinkedIn didn't create performed professionalism—it simply made it visible, measurable, and unavoidable. The platform exposed what was always true about professional identity: it has always been performative, from the firm handshake to the power lunch to the carefully curated resume. LinkedIn merely provided the stage and sold tickets to the show. The real question isn't whether artificial authenticity is corrupting professional discourse—it's whether we'll develop the literacy to distinguish between human insight and algorithmic mimicry. As AI becomes more sophisticated at replicating professional wisdom, the ability to offer genuinely original thinking may become the ultimate career differentiator. The humblebrag industrial complex will endure, but so will our fundamentally human need for genuine connection and meaningful work. The challenge is learning to sound like ourselves—even while writing on a platform (and perhaps with tools) designed to make us all sound the same. Just perhaps, the most human thing we can do is think thoughts worth writing ourselves.
New York Post
11 hours ago
- New York Post
Jessie Murph sparks outrage over controversial music video depicting domestic violence, pornography
Jessie Murph has fans in an uproar. The 20-year-old singer, who has been compared to Amy Winehouse, sparked a social media firestorm over the music video to her risqué new song '1965.' The video, which came out July 18, has been accused of glorifying pornography and domestic violence due to its graphic nature. 11 Jessie Murph in her '1965' music video. Jessie Murph/YouTube 11 Jessie Murph puts a gun in a man's mouth in the '1965' music video. Jessie Murph/YouTube 11 Jessie Murph lounging on a bed in her '1965' music video. Jessie Murph/YouTube Fans are particularly upset over a shocking sex scene that takes place in the middle of the video. In addition, a woman who appears to be Murph is depicted tied up while face down on a couch in the video. 11 Jessie Murph's '1965' music video has sparked intense backlash with fans. Jessie Murph/YouTube 11 Jessie Murph has been accused of glorifying violence and porn. Jessie Murph/YouTube Fans flooded the comments section of the song's YouTube upload — which has over 7 million views — to express their displeasure. 'The way my jaw dropped the floor, there's still time to unrelease this,' one fan wrote. 'The fact it's been 5days or whatever since the video had been uploaded and youtube still hasn't blurred that out is crazy work,' a different comment read. 11 Jessie Murph released '1965' on July 18. Jessie Murph/YouTube A third person said, 'I didnt think it would be this bad. I am forever traumatized this is diabolical.' 'Since when is pornography allowed on youtube?' someone else asked. More fans slammed Murph for including a child in the video right before the sex scene. 'So so messed up,' a fan said. 11 Jessie Murph with a young child in her '1965' music video. Jessie Murph/YouTube 'Not only is this song ahh, putting a child before such a explicit scene is crazy,' a different fan noted. '1965,' which is from Murph's newly released second studio album 'Sex Hysteria,' is filled with raunchy lyrics. 'We'd go to church on a Sunday, wake up on Monday/You'd go to work and I'd stay home and sing and do fun things/I might get a little slap-slap, but you wouldn't hit me on Snapchat,' Murph sings. 11 Jessie Murph attends Spotify's 2025 Songs of Summer Celebration in Los Angeles on July 23. Getty Images for Spotify 'I think I'd give up a few rights/If you would just love me like it's 1965,' she also sings. An insider told the Daily Mail that Murph's song and music video sparked outrage in the country music scene, with some comparing her to Kanye West. 'If she continues this and goes completely off the rails like Kanye, then people should have more conversations about the person she is rather than the artist she is,' the insider told the outlet. 11 Jessie Murph performing during The ACM Country Kickoff at Tostitos Championship Plaza in Frisco, Texas. Getty Images The Post has reached out to Murph's reps for comment. In a recent interview with Teen Vogue, Murph spoke about the intense reactions her music evokes from fans. 'I'm glad that I make people have some sort of reaction. I'd rather them be like, 'I hate you,' or 'I love you,' rather than, 'I feel indifferently,' I guess,' the Alabama native stated. 11 Jessie Murph seen in New York City on July 21. GC Images 'But still, I just find it f—ing weird… I don't have any hate in my heart… That's been something that I've been trying to figure out how to navigate and not react and get mad because it totally makes me be like, 'F–k you, b-tch,'' she added. Days after releasing her new album, Murph's performance to '1965' on 'The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon' was similarly bashed by fans online. 'how dare anybody be comparing this to Amy… you should all be ashamed smh,' one fan wrote. 11 Jessie Murph performs during Spotify's 2025 Songs of Summer Celebration. Getty Images for Spotify 'everything about this feels like an SNL skit. how is this real,' another fan said. Murph was discovered by uploading vlogs and covers on TikTok and YouTube. She had her breakthrough with her 2021 single 'Always Been You,' three years before releasing her debut studio album, 'That Ain't No Man That's the Devil.'
