AI Is Already Showing Signs of Slashing Job Openings in the UK
Why Did Cars Get So Hard to See Out Of?
How German Cities Are Rethinking Women's Safety — With Taxis
Philadelphia Reaches Pact With Workers to End Garbage Strike
Job vacancies have declined across the board in the UK as employers cut costs in the face of sluggish growth and high borrowing rates, with the overall number of online job postings down 31% in the three months to May compared with the same period in 2022, a McKinsey & Co. analysis found.
But it has been the most acute for occupations expected to be significantly altered by AI: Postings for such jobs — like white-collar ones in tech or finance — dropped 38%, almost twice the decline seen elsewhere, according to the consulting firm.
'The anticipation of significant – albeit uncertain – future productivity gains, especially as the technology and its applications mature, is prompting companies to review their workforce strategies and pause aspects of their recruitment,' said Tera Allas, a senior adviser at McKinsey.
The trend appears to be exerting another drag on the UK job market just as tax increases prompt cuts in lower-skilled sectors like retail and hospitality and the pace of economic growth stalls.
Occupations considered to be highly exposed to AI — meaning the technology can replace at least some of the tasks involved — have recorded the sharpest contractions in vacancies, McKinsey's analysis showed. Demand for jobs such as programmers, management consultants or graphic designers fell more than 50% over the last three years.
Some of that may also be due to industry-specific issues and a challenging macroeconomic backdrop. But McKinsey said in some sectors, like professional services and information technology, the number of job openings dropped even as businesses reported healthy growth rates.
Data shared by job-search website Indeed also indicated early signs that AI is affecting hiring decisions. It showed that employers tend to cut hiring in fields that involve building or using AI tools, according to Pawel Adrjan, director of EMEA economic research at the Indeed Hiring Lab.
For example, vacancies in mathematics, which mainly consist of data science and analytics roles, had the highest share of AI mentions in job descriptions but are down almost 50% from pre-pandemic levels, Indeed figures showed. At the other end of the spectrum, real estate or education jobs that barely mention the technology grew over the period.
Some entry-level jobs involving tasks like summarizing meetings or sifting through documents are particularly exposed to AI, accelerating a decline in such roles as companies streamline headcount costs. Entry-level postings, which include apprenticeships, internships or junior jobs with no degree requirements, have fallen by almost a third since ChatGPT came to market at the end of 2022, according to data from job-search website Adzuna.
'The rapid rise of artificial intelligence is adding pressure on young jobseekers, who are still in the grip of the Covid aftermath, marked by inflation, economic headwinds, and low business confidence,' said James Neave, head of data science at Adzuna.
'Our Goal Is to Get Their Money': Inside a Firm Charged With Scamming Writers for Millions
Trump's Cuts Are Making Federal Data Disappear
Trade War? No Problem—If You Run a Trade School
Soccer Players Are Being Seriously Overworked
Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub?
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Perceptions around banks have improved since launch of Consumer Duty
Public perceptions about banks have improved since the launch of the Consumer Duty two years ago, which set higher standards of consumer protection, a survey indicates. The Consumer Duty was launched in July 2023, requiring financial firms to put customers at the heart of what they do, including when designing products and communicating with customers. Back in March 2023, YouGov asked people how they felt banks and financial services companies were performing. Just over two years later, it has carried out another survey, indicating improvements in public opinion. In the most recent survey, YouGov recorded 11 percentage-point increases in the proportion of people who believe banks provide information that is easy to understand (rising from 44% in 2023 to 55% in 2025); that banks protect customers from potential harm (from 40% in 2023 to 51%); and that they provide value for money (up from 36% to 47%). There was also a three-point rise in the proportion of people who believe that banks provide good customer service (from 60% to 63%). The proportion of people who believe banks are doing a poor job of communicating risk to consumers has dropped seven percentage points from 47% to 40%. Under the duty, financial firms should provide helpful and accessible customer support, so it is as easy to sort out a problem, switch or cancel a product, as it was to buy it in the first place. They should also provide timely and clear information, helping people to make good financial decisions. Important information should not be buried in lengthy small print. Providers should also offer products and services that are right for the customer and products and services should also provide fair value. Firms also need to consider whether someone is in a vulnerable situation, for example due to poor health or financial troubles. The latest research was carried out in June 2025, among more than 2,100 people across Britain. The 2023 survey involved 2,000 people across Britain.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 Scenarios That Could Send Bitcoin to $150,000, or Crash It Back to $45,000
Bitcoin smashing past its all-time highs is likely, but not guaranteed. If a set of interlocking bearish catalysts occur, the coin's price will fall sharply. Trade policy and inflation are the two big things that could rain on the parade. 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin › Trying to forecast Bitcoin's (CRYPTO: BTC) next big move is often easier than it seems, as long as you're willing to entertain multiple possibilities. Today, as always, the coin's balance depends on forces far bigger than crypto itself. At one end is a flood of global liquidity and ravenous demand from institutional investors. On the other is an inflationary flare-up that could wreck risk appetite and expose a fragile new crop of highly leveraged "Bitcoin treasury" companies. Investors need to understand both possibilities before deciding whether to buy more, trim, or simply hang on. Central banks have already started cutting the prime interest rate at which they lend to their national banks. In doing so, they reduce the cost of borrowing money, which has the effect of encouraging capital to chase riskier investments as safer yields from government bonds become lower. In this vein, the European Central Bank (ECB) delivered its second reduction of its interest rate in early June and signaled at least one more cut before year-end. The Federal Reserve in the U.S. has been flirting with rate cuts of its own and now faces pressure from the president to do so. Thus, further reductions to the interest rate are likely inevitable, though not necessarily happening this month or next. That incoming monetary swell is meeting a brand-new demand pipe in the form of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that hold Bitcoin. Those products soaked up another $1 billion of inflows in the week ending July 7, capping 12 straight weeks of inflows. Bitcoin used to rely on retail investor fervor to drive its price higher, but now it enjoys institutional autopilot bids every time brokers rebalance. Meanwhile, its supply growth is running on fumes, and it'll only get worse over time. Since the April 2024 halving, miners have been creating just 450 new coins per day, down from 900 before -- and more than they'll ever create in the future once the next halving kicks in sometime in early 2028. With 93% of all coins already mined, the float keeps shrinking even as ETF issuers, corporates, and long-term holders squirrel more away. Put liquidity, ETF flows, and hard-coded scarcity together, and the math gets euphoric for holders. From today's roughly $109,000 price, only a 37% climb is needed to clear $150,000. If interest rate cuts accelerate and fund inflows stay anywhere near current run rates, that threshold could arrive faster than most expect. There's a darker path here, and it behooves investors to understand how it could play out because it could be quite grim, at least temporarily. President Trump's July tariff schedule threatens levies as high as 25% to 70% on major trading partners, a move economists warn could reignite inflation just as headline prices were cooling. If inflation stays sticky as a result of these tariffs, the Federal Reserve may kill or put off its own rate-cut plans, bond yields could stretch back toward 5%, and the dollar would strengthen. Sharp moves in yields historically sap appetite for risk assets, including Bitcoin, and a stronger dollar has historically not been favorable for the asset either. There's another pair of risks here. In theory, the coin is an inflation hedge, yet it has stumbled during previous yield spikes when liquidity dried up and margin calls snowballed. A fresh stress point has emerged as dozens of newly listed Bitcoin treasury companies that borrow in dollars to buy coins. Their convertible bond capital structures work only if Bitcoin keeps climbing. A sharp drop could force emergency sales and hands upside to creditors. Many of the 50-plus Bitcoin treasury newcomers of 2025 could thus implode in the next downturn. If a leveraged unwind coincides with tighter monetary policy, Bitcoin's price could cascade to the mid-$40,000s, a roughly 59% drop from today. Thankfully for holders, the balance of evidence still tilts firmly toward a very bullish picture for Bitcoin here. Central banks outside the U.S. are already easing, global liquidity is edging higher, and ETF demand shows no sign of fatigue. Buy this coin, and hold it for the foreseeable future and beyond. When you do, just remember that volatility is the toll you pay for Bitcoin's long-run scarcity story. If you can stomach a potential detour to $45,000, the road to $150,000 or beyond will look surprisingly well-paved. Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,477!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,010,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Alex Carchidi has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Scenarios That Could Send Bitcoin to $150,000, or Crash It Back to $45,000 was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
29 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Italian Court Eases Some Government Demands on UniCredit's Banco BPM Bid
An Italian court lifted two conditions imposed by officials on UniCredit's UCG -0.14%decrease; red down pointing triangle bid for Banco BPM BAMI 3.14%increase; green up pointing triangle, while upholding others, marking the latest development in a takeover battle set to reshape the country's banking sector. The unsolicited offer launched by Italy's second largest lender for its smaller peer was met with government resistance in April when Rome invoked the so-called 'golden powers'–which allow the state to intervene in transactions at companies of strategic importance to the country–to impose certain conditions to clear the deal.
