Dozens of politicians' print requests refused, including 2,000-page document for Simon Harris
Politicians at Leinster House are entitled to have tens of thousands of items printed for free every year to help promote their work.
However, a strict policy is in place that covers only 'parliamentary duties' and not material related to elections, political parties, or fellow candidates.
Between 2022 and 2024, a total of 125 print jobs were rejected by the Oireachtas for a variety of different reasons.
Records released under FOI show that Fianna Fáil were behind more than half the refused batches – 67 in total.
Fine Gael had 22 print jobs refused, Labour 11 and Sinn Féin 8; there were also lower numbers recorded for other smaller groupings or Independents.
High-profile political figures were among those who had printing rejected with three jobs refused for Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers.
Little detail was provided on the reasons why, with Oireachtas records simply saying they were not in line with the 'service level agreement.'
Both Tánaiste Simon Harris and Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan had a single print job refused.
Harris' 2,000-page-print job was rejected as outside the bounds of the 'service level agreement' while Mr O'Callaghan's newsletter was declined due to 'overtelectioneering.'
Advertisement
Former Taoiseach Leo Varadkar also had a 5,000-batch constituency update refused during 2023 – it was simply marked 'rejected' in the Oireachtas files with no further information provided.
There were other reasons for refusal too with one newsletter denied because it breached rules about the promotion of a business.
A note said this was based on: 'Material which is or could be construed as being related to or promoting a private commercial endeavour, for example a newsletter which promotes, whether directly or indirectly, a company, business or product.'
Another was refused because it was considered to be promotion of a political party.
It said that was covered by rules covering a ban on 'political party/independent members' corporate material e.g. headquarter type printing, such as application forms for party membership; material which is either directly or indirectly aimed at party fundraising; information notes to party members.'
Other jobs were rejected for more banal reasons including faulty file types, defective documents, and one case where a senator exceeded their monthly printing allowance.
One job for a batch of 1,500 printed leaflets was refused because it contained information on an upcoming referendum.
A note on the file said: 'It is the responsibility of the members and qualifying political parties to ensure that items printed in the printing facility that could be said to be designed to influence voters on how to vote in a Referendum are not distributed after the passage of a [bill].'
Fianna Fáil's John Lahart, who had four separate jobs refused, said: 'I don't remember the specific ones offhand, but it often relates to materials about councillors.
'We have had generic material sent back and generally where that might be about the Fianna Fáil team in our area and they would have come back and said that wasn't allowed.'
Under Leinster House's printing policy, jobs can also be declined where they have information that could be considered a crime or encouraging others to commit a crime.
However, there were no refusals under that section according to the documents that were released.
Asked about the records, the Oireachtas said it had no further comment to make.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
Dublin city councillors set to increase property tax for first time
DUBLIN CITY COUNCILLORS are set to vote next week to stop applying a 15% discount on property tax for the first time in more than 10 years. The change, for 2026, comes at the same time that the government is also applying increases to property tax to reflect the significant rise in house prices, although tax bands have been tweaked to moderate the impact. It's understood councillors' decision will cost less than €65 per year for homeowners whose houses are worth up to €525,000, with exact costs on a sliding scale based on the value of the property. For a €450,000 house, for example, the annual charge will be €428 in total. For the owners of the capital's most expensive houses, councillors' decision will cost more, with homes worth between €1m and €2m likely to pay €150-460 more than they would have with the discount. A house worth €1.2m must pay €1,094 in property tax in total each year from 2026 onwards. Property tax was introduced in 2013 at the behest of the Troika , with a view to broadening the tax base and funding local authorities without taxing employment. Dublin City Council management has long argued that the vast majority of Dublin homeowners would not be hit with substantial additional charges if councillors agreed to reduce the discount applied, while the city would benefit. The council's ruling group, comprising Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil, Labour and the Green Party, agreed after last year's local elections to apply the baseline rate with no discount this year for the first time. The decision, which will be taken at a meeting on 18 July, is expected to bring in more than €15m in extra funding for the city. It's understood councillors are considering targeting the additional revenue at improving the council's housing stock, as well as improvements to footpaths, although no final decisions have been taken yet. Advertisement Labour and the Green Party, which pushed for the discount to be scrapped, argue that property tax is progressive and will provide crucial funding for improving the city. Councillors Feljin Jose of the Green Party and Darragh Moriarty of Labour characterised property tax as the closest thing Ireland has to a wealth tax, given most of the country's wealth is held in property. 'A lot of our [council] housing stock is very bad, and we need to maintain and repair and urgently increase the energy efficiency of those buildings,' said Jose of the Green Party. Darragh Moriarty of Labour said: 'In the vast majority of instances, these are very modest property taxes, by European comparisons. The 15% will be modest as well.' He noted that the decision would mean an extra €60m could be invested in improving the city over the lifetime of the council. Councillor Deirdre Heney of Fianna Fáil said she hoped additional funding would be allocated to footpath repairs and tree maintenance, issues that are raised with her frequently by residents, as well as to building more playgrounds. Property tax for 2026 is owed on 1 November. The government changed property tax bands earlier this year to moderate the increase in the amount of tax payable as a result of increasing house prices. A possible left-leaning ruling coalition on Dublin City council last year including Sinn Féin fell apart over the question of property tax . Sinn Féin wanted to continue to apply the 15% property tax discount. Separately, the government said last week that this year it will allow Dublin city, which takes in by far the most property tax of any council, to keep an additional €19m of the revenue it raises this year. The government wants this extra funding spent on implementing the recommendations of its Dublin city taskforce. Each year, a proportion of council tax from larger local authorities is redistributed to those with a lower property tax base. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Fianna Fáil MEPs still to pick a side ahead of no-confidence motion in European Commission president
Fianna Fáil MEPs have come under pressure for suggesting they might support a motion of no-confidence in European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen . The no-confidence vote was tabled by a far-right Romanian MEP and 74 others, predominantly from right-wing populist and nationalist parties. On Thursday, Members of the European Parliament will vote on the proposed motion of no-confidence in Ms von der Leyen, the head of the EU 's executive arm that proposes laws. The effort is widely expected to fall far short of the required two-thirds majority needed to censure the commission. If the motion was successful, it would likely force Ms von der Leyen and her team of EU commissioners, including former Fianna Fáil minister Michael McGrath , to resign. READ MORE Fianna Fáil's four MEPs, Barry Andrews, Billy Kelleher, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú and Barry Cowen, have yet to declare what way they will vote. Fianna Fáil have been weighing up the possibility of supporting the motion or abstaining in the vote. The no-confidence vote centres on the 'Pfizergate' controversy, where the commission faced criticism for refusing to release text messages exchanged between Ms von der Leyen and the chief executive of Pfizer, during negotiations to secure supplies of Covid-19 vaccines at the height of the pandemic. Copies of the texts had been sought in access-to-information requests made by the New York Times, which later took the commission to court for blocking the release of the texts. Speaking in the European Parliament on Monday, Ms von der Leyen said the motion was supported by extreme political movements, 'from anti-vaxxers to Putin apologists'. Defending her role at the top of the EU executive during the pandemic, Ms von der Leyen said it was 'no secret' that she was in contact with senior figures in companies producing Covid-19 vaccines. 'Every single contract negotiated was examined in detail in the capitals before being signed by each of the 27 member states. There were no secrets, no hidden clauses,' she told a sitting of MEPs in Strasbourg. 'The implication that these contacts were somehow inappropriate or against the European interest is, by any measure, simply wrong.' The motion was an attempt to spin 'debunked conspiracies' and try to rewrite the history of how Europe 'successfully overcame a global pandemic together', she said. The EU executive needed to be in a strong position during ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States, the German politician said. Sinn Féin's two MEPs, Lynn Boylan and Kathleen Funchion, said they would vote against Ms von der Leyen, due to the failure of the EU to hold Israel to account for its conduct during its invasion of Gaza, among other things. Fine Gael's four MEPs will oppose the motion, which they said had been 'tabled by far-right members of the European Parliament in a bid to destabilise the EU for political gain'. Iratxe García, a senior Spanish MEP who leads the centre-left Socialist and Democrats (S&D), the second largest grouping in the parliament, said its members would not support the motion, as it refused to work with the far right. The motion has divided some right-wing populists, with hard right Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni's party opposing the effort to bring down the commission leadership. Nicola Procaccini, an MEP from Ms Meloni's Brothers of Italy party, said the move was a mistake. 'This motion is doomed to fail and we know it, without even getting close to the level of votes needed,' he said. The proposal was one 'big political show' from the far-right to undermine democracy, according to Bas Eickhout, the co-leader of the European Greens.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ireland should hold another referendum on women in the home, UN committee says
The Government should assess the reasons the referendum on deleting Article 41.2 on the importance of women's role in the home failed and find alternative wording in order to run another vote on it, according to a United Nations' panel that deals with the issue of discrimination. In a report published on Monday, the UN's Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) expressed disappointment with the failure of the referendum to pass and suggested the Government should not give up on the issue. 'The committee recommends that the State party conduct an independent evaluation of the referendum, carry out information campaigns on the negative reinforcement by article 41.2 of gender stereotypes about women's roles in the home and undertake inclusive public consultations to find alternative wording with a view to holding another constitutional referendum on amending article 41.2 of the Constitution to remove the stereotypical language on the role of women in the home,' it said. The article says 'the State recognises that by her life within the home, woman gives to the State a support without which the common good cannot be achieved. READ MORE 'The State shall, therefore, endeavour to ensure that mothers shall not be obliged by economic necessity to engage in labour to the neglect of their duties in the home.' The amendment proposed to replace the clause with a more gender neutral one on care but it was heavily defeated, with more than 70 per cent of those voting opposing the move. The recommendation is one of a long list from the committee in its latest assessment of Ireland's progress on the issue of discrimination against women. It bases these on submissions and hearings with Minister of State Colm Brophy, having led a delegation that included officials from several Government departments which appeared before the committee last month. The committee welcomes the progress made in a range of areas and a number of the pieces of legislation passed by the Oireachtas in recent years. These include legalisation intended to address issues around human trafficking, domestic violence, online harassment and gender pay gaps. However, the committee suggests there are more areas in which significant work needs to be done. It says what it describes as 'arbitrary barriers' to redress for survivors of historic abuse in Mother and Baby Institutions should be removed. It also says access to legal services for women facing domestic violence or employment cases should be improved and backs reform of the primary education curriculum 'to systematically incorporate gender equality and eliminate gender stereotypes' [ Greater Traveller representation needed in Irish politics, says UN committee Opens in new window ] It said particular supports needed to be provided to marginalised women including those with disabilities and from Roma, Traveller, migrant or rural communities. It says more needs to be done to address the gender pay gap in employment and to take more single adult families headed by women, out of poverty. Reacting to the paper on Monday, the Department of Children, Disability and Equality welcomed the recognition expressed of progress on a range of issues since the last such report in 2017. It also recognised the suggestion more needed to be done. Director of the National Women's Council Orla O'Connor said: 'These recommendations are a clear call to action for the Irish Government. They highlight the urgent need for systemic change to tackle the deep rooted and intersecting inequalities faced by women and girls- particularly in relation to childcare, women's health, political representation, and responses to gender-based violence.'
