
Fianna Fáil MEPs still to pick a side ahead of no-confidence motion in European Commission president
European Commission
president
Ursula von der Leyen
.
The no-confidence vote was tabled by a far-right Romanian MEP and 74 others, predominantly from right-wing populist and nationalist parties.
On Thursday, Members of the European Parliament will vote on the proposed motion of no-confidence in Ms von der Leyen, the head of the
EU
's executive arm that proposes laws.
The effort is widely expected to fall far short of the required two-thirds majority needed to censure the commission. If the motion was successful, it would likely force Ms von der Leyen and her team of EU commissioners, including former Fianna Fáil minister
Michael McGrath
, to resign.
READ MORE
Fianna Fáil's four MEPs, Barry Andrews, Billy Kelleher, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú and Barry Cowen, have yet to declare what way they will vote. Fianna Fáil have been weighing up the possibility of supporting the motion or abstaining in the vote.
The no-confidence vote centres on the 'Pfizergate' controversy, where the commission faced criticism for refusing to release text messages exchanged between Ms von der Leyen and the chief executive of Pfizer, during negotiations to secure supplies of Covid-19 vaccines at the height of the pandemic.
Copies of the texts had been sought in access-to-information requests made by the New York Times, which later
took the commission to court
for blocking the release of the texts.
Speaking in the European Parliament on Monday, Ms von der Leyen said the motion was supported by extreme political movements, 'from anti-vaxxers to Putin apologists'.
Defending her role at the top of the EU executive during the pandemic, Ms von der Leyen said it was 'no secret' that she was in contact with senior figures in companies producing Covid-19 vaccines.
'Every single contract negotiated was examined in detail in the capitals before being signed by each of the 27 member states. There were no secrets, no hidden clauses,' she told a sitting of MEPs in Strasbourg.
'The implication that these contacts were somehow inappropriate or against the European interest is, by any measure, simply wrong.'
The motion was an attempt to spin 'debunked conspiracies' and try to rewrite the history of how Europe 'successfully overcame a global pandemic together', she said.
The EU executive needed to be in a strong position during ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States, the German politician said.
Sinn Féin's two MEPs, Lynn Boylan and Kathleen Funchion, said they would vote against Ms von der Leyen, due to the failure of the EU to hold Israel to account for its conduct during its invasion of Gaza, among other things.
Fine Gael's four MEPs will oppose the motion, which they said had been 'tabled by far-right members of the European Parliament in a bid to destabilise the EU for political gain'.
Iratxe García, a senior Spanish MEP who leads the centre-left Socialist and Democrats (S&D), the second largest grouping in the parliament, said its members would not support the motion, as it refused to work with the far right.
The motion has divided some right-wing populists, with hard right Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni's party opposing the effort to bring down the commission leadership.
Nicola Procaccini, an MEP from Ms Meloni's Brothers of Italy party, said the move was a mistake. 'This motion is doomed to fail and we know it, without even getting close to the level of votes needed,' he said.
The proposal was one 'big political show' from the far-right to undermine democracy, according to Bas Eickhout, the co-leader of the European Greens.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
36 minutes ago
- The Journal
Irish sovereign wealth fund pumped millions into companies contracted by Israel Defence Forces
IRELAND'S SOVEREIGN WEALTH fund, the Irish Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF), still has holdings in companies with links to Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory. In 2024, then-Minister for Finance Michael McGrath announced that the fund had divested from five companies that are linked to settlement activity that is considered illegal under international law. But the ISIF continues to invest in eight other companies named on a United Nations database - a key document that highlights businesses and parent companies whose subsidiaries enable the continued existence of Israeli settlements. By the end of 2023, the total value of these investments was more than €10 million. As part of a new investigation, The Journal Investigates looked at how much Ireland is investing in these companies and how they are linked to illegal settler activity in Palestine. Many of these investments are in multinationals, but two in particular are in companies that hold contracts with the Israel Defence Forces (IDF): Delek Group and Motorola Solutions Inc. The value of the ISIF's investments in these two companies alone was almost €5 million -roughly the same amount as the State's sovereign wealth fund invested in the other six companies combined. — Investigations like this don't happen without your support… Impactful investigative reporting is powered by people like you. Support The Journal Investigates Advertisement IDF vehicles Out of the eight companies that the ISIF invests in, just one is based solely in Israel: Delek Group, the owner of a chain of petrol stations that was founded in the country in the early 1950s. The ISIF's investment in the company is indirect, which means that it did not directly buy shares or provide capital to Delek, but instead invested in it through an intermediary such as a fund or financial institution that handles investment decisions on Ireland's behalf. As of 2023, the State indirectly invested around €214,000 in Delek, which is best-known in Israel as the operator of a chain of filling stations and convenience stores. A search of Google Maps shows that it operates a handful of these petrol stations in the occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. Google Maps Google Maps However, the company is also linked to the activities of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF): under a contract agreed in 2020, the IDF listed Delek as one of two companies whose petrol stations are allowed to be used by military vehicles to refuel. Delek also reportedly holds other contracts with the Israeli defence industry, according to WhoProfits , an independent group dedicated to 'exposing the role of the private sector in the Israeli occupation economy' through a database. The database has been consulted by the international BDS movement, and WhoProfits has been repeatedly highlighted by the United Nations, including in a report last week by the current Special Rapporteur for Palestine Francesca Albanese. The Journal Investigates contacted Delek Group for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication, and no other recent statements on the company's position about its activities in occupied Palestinian territories could be found. Surveillance systems and checkpoints US-based technology firm Motorola Solutions and its subsidiary, Motorola Solutions Israel, are among just six companies that appear on the UN database for supplying security. The Irish government holds millions in both direct and indirect investments in the parent company. It should not be confused with the telecoms company of the same name, from whom it split in 2011, Motorola Solutions specialises in security products and systems such as video equipment and command centre technology. Sign up The Journal Investigates is dedicated to lifting the lid on how Ireland works. Our newsletter gives you an inside look at how we do this. Sign up here... Sign up .spinner{transform-origin:center;animation:spinner .75s infinite linear}@keyframes spinner{100%{transform:rotate(360deg)}} You are now signed up It holds contracts worth hundreds of millions of Euro with Israel's government and military, and its systems are used extensively throughout the occupied territories, along the separation wall in the West Bank, and at Israeli military bases. The company provides everything from surveillance systems, radar detectors, and mobile communications systems to Israelis living in illegal settlements and the Israel Defence Forces. In a 2012 UN Special Rapporteur for Palestine Richard Falk, named Motorola Solutions Israel as 'sustaining the settlements' and limiting 'the Palestinians' freedom of movement within their territory'. Like Delek Group, the company's activities have also been extensively detailed by WhoProfits. Motorola Solutions has been named as 'the sole supplier of the 4G cellular network for the Israeli military' as well as the sole supplier of Israeli military smartphones after it was given a contract worth $100 million to do so. Human rights groups have also highlighted how the company's MotoEagle Wide Area Surveillance System – which uses radars and cameras to detect movements - has been used as a 'virtual fence system' in dozens of illegal settlements. In addition, Motorola has longstanding contracts with the Israel Prison Service and the country's Population and Immigration Authority – including communications equipment at prisons like Ofer in the West Bank, where Palestinians are held in military detention. As of 2023, the Irish government directly invested around €700,000 and held €3.9 million worth of indirect investments in the company. The Journal Investigates contacted Motorola Solutions for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication. The company has previously told a number of outlets that it supports 'efforts in the region to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict'. The Journal Investigates Reporter: Stephen McDermott • Investigation Editor: Sinead O'Carroll • The Journal Investigates Editor: Maria Delaney • Social Media: Cliodhna Travers • Main Image Design: Lorcan O'Reilly Investigations like this don't happen without your support... Impactful investigative reporting is powered by people like you. Over 5,000 readers have already supported our mission with a monthly or one-off payment. Join them here: Support The Journal


Irish Times
44 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Government nominates senior counsel as new High Court judge
The Government has nominated Sean Gillane SC to be appointed as a High Court judge. Mr Gillane will fill the vacancy created by the elevation of Mr Justice Denis McDonald to the Court of Appeal on December 10th, 2024. Mr Gillane became a junior counsel in 1997 and a senior counsel in 2009. He has been involved in a number of high-profile court cases including the recent trial of Jozef Puska's brothers and sisters-in-law , where he acted on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions. His appointment was made at the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. READ MORE The Government also made the following nominations to the District Court: solicitor Ms Valerie Corcoran; Ms Emile Daly BL; Ms Karen Dowling BL; solicitor Ms Liz Healy; solicitor Ms Catherine Ryan; and Ms Áine Shannon BL. The Government nominated Mr Derek Cooney BL in principle to the District Court. There is one pending vacancy in the District Court due to an upcoming retirement of a judge on July 24th. Welcoming the nominations, Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan said: 'Today marks an important milestone for the justice system and democracy in the State. 'The system for judicial appointment in Ireland is a crucial mechanism to uphold the independence of the judiciary, which is a central element of Ireland's constitutional framework.' These are the first judicial nominations following the establishment of the Judicial Appointments Commission on January 1st, 2025. Under the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2023, only candidates recommended by the Judicial Appointments Commission can be nominated by the Government for appointment by the President. 'The new Act and the work of the Judicial Appointments Commission ensures a rigorous, transparent and merit-based application process for nomination as a judge,' Mr O'Callaghan said. 'The candidates nominated today have successfully undergone this process and I wish them every success in their important new roles.'


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Legal proceedings initiated against Department of Housing after pulling out of PPP deal in ‘11th hour'
Legal proceedings have been initiated against the Department of Housing after it pulled out of a public-private partnership (PPP) agreement at the 'eleventh hour' over value for money concerns, an Oireachtas committee has heard. Last month, the department pulled out of the PPP projects in which a private investment consortium was to deliver almost 500 social homes in Dublin, Kildare, Sligo and Wicklow. The decision was made on a 'value for money basis,' according to the department. Minister for Housing James Browne initially told committee members on Tuesday he was not aware of any legal proceedings. However, he was later informed by department officials that a judicial review had been lodged. Social Democrats housing spokesman Rory Hearne, who initially asked the Minister whether the preferred bidder for the PPP projects had initiated legal proceedings, said it was 'jaw-dropping' that Mr Browne was unaware. READ MORE While believing PPP 'has a role to play', Mr Browne, who would not speak further on the legal proceedings, said it must be 'completely overhauled and re-examined'. 'It is an important route to be able to get homes that we need in the country but it has to be done in a manner that is fair to the taxpayer as well as giving value for money for the taxpayer,' he said. Labour TD Conor Sheehan said the cancellation of the PPP projects at the 'eleventh hour' has made the delivery route 'essentially unviable.' Separately, Mr Browne told committee members that it will be 'exceptionally difficult' to meet housing targets in 2025. Mr Browne said that while there was a significant increase in commencement notices last year, there was a sense that developers 'turned their attention to further commencements as opposed to finalising the projects they were working on at that time.' Some 60,000 commencement notices were lodged last year, an increase of 84 per cent from the year prior. This was driven largely by temporary development levies introduced to stimulate housing construction. Mr Browne said there has been a consistent level of housing delivery predictions this year from different bodies 'in and around the low 30,000s mark'. 'When you see that level of consistency, it's difficult to disagree with. Certainly, it will be exceptionally difficult to meet our own target that was set out for this year coming from such a low base,' he said. Several committee members also raised concerns over new design standards for apartments , with Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin saying they will allow for 'smaller, darker apartments with less amenities in sub-optimally planned residential developments'. Several questioned how the changes would result in cost reductions of between €50,000 and €100,000 per unit, a claim made by Mr Browne earlier on Tuesday, with Mr Ó'Broin saying he did not believe such a reduction was possible. Mr Browne said the cost reductions will be made possible by the 'significant increase' in the number of units that can be 'put on to the one box unit.' The Minister said he would publish data concerning the projected cost reductions 'in the near future.'