Europe Is Terrifyingly Hot, and Its Leaders Are Doing Worse Than Nothing
From late June to early this month, temperatures across the continent soared past 100 degrees Fahrenheit, particularly afflicting Spain and France. As wildfires flared and drought loomed, emergency measures kicked in. Nuclear reactors shut down, construction workers were told to stay home, schools canceled whole days of classes, and the Eiffel Tower was closed to visitors. Such stopgaps, though, could only limit the damage. By initial estimates, the 10-day heat wave left some 2,300 dead.
These emergencies are going to keep happening. Not only are we rushing toward devastating global warming but Europe is also heating faster than other regions. This was a time to recognize the need for more resolute action to tackle the root causes of extreme heat and work harder to cut emissions. Europe's politicians had the chance to prove what they often claim: that the European Union is a world leader on the green transition.
They didn't take it, mustering only platitudes about staying safe. Instead, Europe's leaders are pulling back from climate measures they agreed to in years past. Faced with economic challenges and geopolitical mayhem, an emboldened right-wing chorus is claiming that the European Union is doing too much already. Disastrously, European leaders are caving in to these voices. They are reining in their ambitions to green the economy — and delivering their citizens to a terrifyingly hot future.
It's a real change of mood from just a few years ago. Picked in 2019 as president of the European Commission, the bloc's executive arm, Ursula von der Leyen promised to make the European Green Deal the centerpiece of her agenda. The plan centered on some 1 trillion euros in public and private investment, tied to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. After the pandemic, this became the leading focus for investment funded by the bloc's collective borrowing. The green transition was not an economic sacrifice, officials claimed, but a key means of safeguarding the continent's future.
Yet the political coalition on which that deal rested, made up of the E.U.'s traditional center-left and center-right parties, no longer looks so stable. After parliamentary elections last year, it is increasingly threatened by a potential alternative right-wing alliance, made up of a motley array of fiscal hawks, conservatives and hard-right nationalists. These forces are divided on some issues and have no formal agreement. But voting together on some measures, they have shown that they constitute a majority able to block legislation. One nationalist lawmaker is even set to be Parliament's lead negotiator on an important climate bill.
Hard-right forces have long railed against the Green Deal. Prime Minister Viktor Orban of Hungary was quick to dismiss it as a 'utopian fantasy'; the far-right Vox, a contender to be part of Spain's next government, demands its wholesale abandonment. In Rome, Giorgia Meloni's Brothers of Italy takes a more nuanced line, speaking a folksy language of protecting nature while resisting plans for industrial adaptation. In her view, such a program would create a 'desert' in which 'there is nothing green.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MoD official responsible for catastrophic Afghan data breach that cost billions still works for government
The Ministry of Defence official responsible for a catastrophic data leak which put the lives of up to 100,000 Afghans at risk still works for the government, it has emerged. The major breach happened in February 2022 after a member of the armed forces inadvertently shared a spreadsheet containing the names of thousands of people who said they were in danger from the Taliban and had applied for sanctuary in Britain. The leak, which came to light when someone threatened to publish the whole list on Facebook, prompted thousands of Afghans to be evacuated to Britain under a top secret resettlement scheme which the government projected to cost billions. The details of the leak, and the subsequent evacuation, have been kept under wraps for almost two years as the result of an unprecedented superinjunction. Asked whether the serviceman behind the leak was still employed by the government, defence secretary John Healey told the News Agents Podcast: 'They are no longer doing the same job on the Afghan brief and in the end.' Asked for a second time whether the official was still employed by the government, Mr Healey refused to be drawn on the matter. Instead, he added: 'This is bigger than the actions of a single individual. 'For me as defence secretary now in this government, my biggest concern and my first focus coming into government was to try and get a grip of something that was entirely unprecedented'. Journalist Lewis Goodall asked for a third time whether the person is still a government employee and the defence secretary again avoided answering. Pushed for a fourth time, he responded: 'I'm actually not going to get into the personnel matters'. Asked yet again, he went on: 'My first priority was not trying to conduct some sort of witch hunt on the defence official that released the spreadsheet that caused this profound data loss. 'My argument to you is that accountability can start today, accountability in due course, as the facts of this are properly scrutinised and examined that will come.' Mr Goodall told Mr Healey that 'we can assume on the basis of your answers that noone has been fired'. When The Independent asked the MoD to clarify whether the serviceman was still employed by the government, a spokesperson said there was nothing to add. The database contained 33,000 records and the confidential information of over 18,700 applicants to the Ministry of Defence's Afghan resettlement scheme (Arap). It contained email addresses and phone numbers of applicants, as well as their father's names and their case status. Defence secretary John Healey gave a statement in the Commons on Tuesday about the data incident (Parliament) It also included the names of some British government officials. It is understood that the unnamed official emailed the dataset while trying to verify information about the applications, believing the dataset to only have around 150 rows. The MoD only became aware of the breach more than a year after the release, when excerpts of the dataset were anonymously posted onto a Facebook group in August 2023, with officials fearing those affected by the breach could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data. An unprecedented superinjunction was made at the High Court in September 2023 to reduce the risk of alerting the Taliban to the existence of the data, which banned any news about the leak being published or the order itself being discussed. Ministers went on to create a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in a bid to help covertly relocate more than 16,000 Afghans to the UK. Around 8,000 more Afghans are still due to arrive in Britain. Asked about the next steps, Mr Healey said that influential committees of MPs, such as the defence select committee, should 'absolutely' launch an 'in depth inquiry' in to what had happened. He said he thought he would have been 'very, very unlikely' to have taken out a superinjunction if he had been in position at the time the data breach was discovered. Senior MPs have warned about the precedent set by the super injunction to cover up the data breach. Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said: 'I am concerned the super injunction was applied as that is peculiar, it stopped any free speech or examination in Parliament and we are still none the wiser as to who was responsible or why it happened.' The superinjunction, lifted on Tuesday, is thought to be the longest lasting order of its kind and the first time the government has sought such a restrictive measure against the media.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bank of England's Bailey backs IMF to help fix problems in global economy
By William Schomberg LONDON (Reuters) -Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey said on Tuesday the International Monetary Fund had a key role to play in tackling the buildup of risky imbalances in the world economy, many of them coming from the United States and China. In a speech he was due to give to Britain's finance elite, Bailey acknowledged the concerns of U.S. President Donald Trump's administration about the danger of IMF overreach. But the BoE boss said attempts to fix the problems in the world economy - chief among them the big U.S. trade and current account deficits alongside China's big surpluses and its weak domestic demand - had to be resolved at the multilateral level. "If it is only done at the national level, we will get less good policymaking," he was due to tell the annual Mansion House dinner. Bailey has previously stressed the importance of the IMF and other multilateral bodies at a time of heightened trade tensions following Trump's imposition of high import tariffs and his threats to go further. The IMF recently criticised another part of Trump's economic programme - its plans for massive tax cuts. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has accused the Fund of straying too far from its core economic stability and surveillance missions. Bailey said countries running big deficits were typically the ones that come under the most pressure in financial markets. "We have seen market disturbance this year. We have to be highly alert to financial stability risks – something that I can assure you we are following closely," he said. Bailey also said China should free up its domestic demand as part of a global plan to tackle "excess imbalances before dangerous levels of trade restrictions come into play, and before we face the prospect of difficult adjustment with macroeconomic volatility and financial instability." Bailey said the IMF should consider using its powers to convene talks with member countries - chief among them the U.S. - as well as working with the World Trade Organisation to produce a nuanced assessment of the global trading system. "I think it helps to remember that the key challenge we all face is to increase growth in the world economy: to grow the pie to support living standards for the people we serve, all of the time," Bailey said. "It is as simple as that." He said he would use his new role as head of the Financial Stability Board - grouping global financial regulators - to develop with the IMF resilience tests for the global financial system, including firms such as hedge funds and banks. Bailey also said in his speech that he favoured using digital payment technology for retail payments and bank accounts as a next step for the industry. He said he was unconvinced about the need for a retail central bank digital currency, and that stablecoins were not a substitute for commercial bank money. (Writing by William Schomberg; Editing by Rod Nickel)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The markets are betting against Trump on the assumption the Fed will rescue them if their call is wrong
President Trump is layering tariff upon tariff—he added 30% to Mexico and Europe over the weekend—and the markets are still trading near their all-time highs on the assumption that Trump will back down. They're also betting that the Fed will ease interest rates if the tariffs hurt the U.S. economy. But that might not happen if the Fed prioritizes controlling inflation over rescuing the stock market. Markets are sitting near their all-time highs this morning in Europe, Asia, and the U.S. Bitcoin hit $122K earlier today. There has been a moderate amount of selling this morning but nothing to worry about. And yet, according to Wall Street, none of this should be happening. Investors seem to be ignoring President Trump's tariff threats—he imposed 30% on Mexico and the EU over the weekend—on the assumption that they will eventually be negotiated away or pushed even further into the future. And, according to JPMorgan, the markets may be making a mistake if they think the Fed will come to their rescue in the event that Trump unexpectedly sticks to his guns. Thus the TACO trade (Trump Always Chickens Out) is creating a ton of risk ahead, according to Deutsche Bank. 'Markets are clearly not pricing in these higher tariffs, and we may only know the outcome in the final hours, offering the potential for a sharp market reaction and heightened volatility,' DB's Henry Allen told clients. His colleague Jim Reid had much the same take: 'To be fair, a month ago Trump threatened the EU with a 50% tariff so you might argue this is an improvement! The market will generally think this is mostly a negotiating tactic and that we're unlikely to see such rates,' he told clients. 'However at some stage, someone's bluff could be called. Trump is under less pressure to back down with US risk markets around their highs and bond markets relatively stable at the moment. If huge tariffs do get imposed on August 1st, in thin holiday markets, we could get a sizeable market reaction.' Goldman Sachs is singing from the same hymnbook. 'Participants—and our economists—mostly do not expect these tariffs to go into effect. After seeing the pattern several times already this year, markets have likely determined that the rates being floated are too high to sustain,' Kamakshya Trivedi and his team told clients. Likewise, Paul Donovan at UBS: 'Financial markets seem content to assume US President Trump will default to retreating from their latest trade tax threats.' The markets also seem to be assuming that the U.S. Federal Reserve will bail them out if anything goes wrong with their TACO trade. If the tariffs are inflationary, the Fed will not be able to deliver the cuts to interest rates that the markets are currently assuming are priced-in. JPMorgan's Bruce Kasman et al are predicting a 'stagflationary tilt' for the second half of the year as the tariffs supply shocks hit the economy. 'The disconnect between this forecast and market pricing of substantial gains in corporate earnings and little upward pressure on US inflation is striking,' they told clients over the weekend. 'Our forecast should also be seen as a challenge to the market's embrace of a Goldilocks scenario of solid growth and declining US inflation alongside easing Fed over the coming year,' they said. Here's a snapshot of the action prior to the opening bell in New York: S&P 500 futures were off 0.3% this morning, premarket. The index itself closed down 0.33% on Friday but remains near its all-time highs. Bitcoin is now above $122K, another all-time high. South Korea's Kospi was up 0.83% this morning. The Stoxx Europe 600 was down 0.41% in early trading. The UK's FTSE 100 was up 0.37% in early trading. Hong Kong's Hang Seng was up 0.26%. Japan's Nikkei 225 was down 0.28%. China's CSI 300 Index was flat, remaining above 4,000—near its all-time high. This story was originally featured on
