Jon Voight Gives First Interview on Trump's Bombshell Film Industry Tariff Proposal: We Can't Let Hollywood ‘Go Down the Drain Like Detroit' (EXCLUSIVE)
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Several decades ago, Jon Voight first met Donald Trump at an Oscars afterparty. The Academy Award-winning best actor can't remember the exact year, but he thinks it was not long after the debut of Franco Zeffirelli 1979 sports classic 'The Champ.' The two men bonded over the film and Voight's iconic performance as a former boxer looking for personal redemption by returning to the ring.
'He loves that movie,' Voight says of the president. 'He also loves 'Rocky,' and there's a little bit of a playfulness about which one is the better film.'
More from Variety
Now, Voight is working with President Trump — a politician he has fervently backed since 2016 — on a plan to stem runaway production and 'give people back their dignity and their jobs,' He adds, 'Something has to be done, and it's way past time.'
For a town accustomed to bombshells, President Trump's post on Sunday that called for 100% tariffs 'on any and all Movies coming into our Country that are produced in Foreign Lands' sent shockwaves through Hollywood and beyond. Though an overwhelming majority of the industry would concur that some type of federal help is needed, the confusing post was met with skepticism and negative headlines.
Variety caught up with Voight by phone while he was driving through what sounded like a car wash. He declined to talk about specifics or logistics, preferring to allow the draft presentation he spearheaded with producer Steven Paul to speak for itself. But the 'Coming Home' legend did weigh in on the impetus behind taking the plan to the president, who Voight describes as a movie buff and pop culture enthusiast, and his surprise at the media's negative reaction — 'How about enthusiasm and gratitude?' He insists that the headlines about the tariff plan do not reflect what he is hearing from a broad spectrum of interests.
'We've gotten a lot of good response from people,' he says. 'We're really rolling up our sleeves and working. I think we have a good plan, and we're just beginning. This little team of mine has worked very hard to try to figure out things. The union people and producers give their expertise and understanding to this problem, and we're working together. A lot of people had a lot of input and we're listening to everybody.'
How Hollywood got to this point, where the U.S. film and TV economy began to freefall as studios opted to shoot in Canada, the U.K., Hungary and Australia over Los Angeles and domestic hubs like Atlanta and New York, was inevitable, Voight says. As a result, the rank and file like makeup artists, costume designers and camera people have been hit the hardest with too few jobs available at any given time. Instead, the studios mostly hire local crews when shooting abroad.
'Every studio has a lot of smart people, and they have maneuvered the write-offs and the gifts that are being given out throughout the world to lure people to different countries. They take advantage of them,' Voight says of the incentives that can shave tens of millions of dollars off of a film's budget. 'Now we're saying, 'Hey, we have to have that here.' Let's have the level playing field. But really, we need more than that. We need to be competitive.'
What may come as a surprise is President Trump's interest in intervening on behalf of an industry that almost universally loathes him.
'I think he's been treated unfairly. I think I have too. But what's the difference? Who cares?' Voight asks. 'I mean, there's been a battle, but now it's time to put that aside. And I must say, in all of the interactions we've had [on addressing runaway production], politics has never come up. Never.'
Voight believes that Hollywood Democrats are eager to put aside the charged 2024 election that saw Trump prevail over Democrat Kamala Harris. As he sees it, Hollywood is facing the most pronounced existential crisis in its history.
'It's come to a point where we really do need help, and thank God the president cares about Hollywood and movies,' he says. 'He has a great love for Hollywood in that way. We've got to roll up our sleeves here. We can't let it go down the drain like Detroit.'
Scott Karol, the lawyer who worked closest with Voight and Paul on the plan, is a Democrat. It's likely most of the people he has sought input from are left-leaning as well.
'This shouldn't be political. I don't know the political identities of the people we've talked to. We've talked to a lot of people here. I don't distinguish them on their party affiliation. And If we can come up with [a plan that can be executed], he'll back us. He wants us to be the Hollywood of old,' Voight adds. 'If we all come together, I believe we have a bright future.'
Best of Variety
Sign up for Variety's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's new model to support Ukraine is a win-win
From the start, Ukraine's defense against Russia's full-scale invasion has been underpinned by a robust commitment from its Western partners. The Biden administration's pledge to support Ukraine 'as long as it takes' promised a sustained flow of military and financial aid directly from Washington. This 'direct donor' model was key to Ukraine's initial resilience, providing essential weaponry from U.S. stockpiles. Biden's approach primarily involved direct transfers from U.S. weapons inventories, prioritizing speed and ensuring that Ukraine received vital equipment quickly to counter Russian aggression. The American government provided extensive amounts of equipment, from air-defense missiles to artillery rounds and armored vehicles, directly to Kyiv. Now, under President Trump, the paradigm is shifting. The U.S. is transitioning from a direct donor to a 'strategic supplier,' where European allies purchase American weapons for Ukraine at their own expense. While this reorientation marks a significant change, it is far from the worst-case scenario for Ukraine. Instead, it represents a pragmatic and potentially more sustainable evolution of transatlantic burden-sharing, securing critical capabilities for Ukraine while invigorating the U.S. defense industrial base and recalibrating the nature of allied support. Support is still 'as long as it takes' but also 'at the others' expense.' This marks a departure from the traditional post-World War II donor-recipient model, particularly within the NATO alliance, towards a more transactional 'America First' approach. Future U.S. engagement in global security will likely be contingent upon tangible economic benefits and direct cost-sharing from allies. Such a shift could lead to a more predictable, albeit less altruistic, framework for security cooperation, where allies are compelled to demonstrate their commitment through direct financial contributions. This policy reorientation accelerates European strategic autonomy. While the immediate effect is Europe paying for U.S. weapons, the long-term implication is a forced impetus for greater European defense integration and self-sufficiency. European nations have already been increasing their defense spending and proactively planning for a future with less guaranteed U.S. aid. This new model, by making U.S. weapons available for purchase, encourages Europe to develop its own robust procurement mechanisms and potentially expand its own defense industrial base. Ukraine's most pressing and enduring need remains robust air defense against Russia's escalating missile and drone attacks. The U.S.-made Patriot air-defense system is critical, as it is one of the few systems capable of intercepting high-speed ballistic missiles. These systems are vital for protecting civilian infrastructure and population centers, which have been subjected to relentless Russian bombardment. A critical strategic reality for Ukraine is that not all American weapons are equally replaceable by European alternatives. While Europe is ramping up its own artillery production, the Patriot system's unique counter-ballistic missile capability makes it a requirement that only the U.S. can provide at scale. Europe, at the same time, has demonstrated a clear willingness and increasing capacity to shoulder a greater share of the burden. The European Union has already provided €165 billion in financial assistance and has launched an €800 billion Defense Readiness Plan. Frozen Russian sovereign assets may be used to finance what Ukraine needs. The shift to a foreign military sales model is explicitly intended to invigorate the U.S. defense industrial base. By integrating 'exportability features' into defense systems during the design phase, the U.S. seeks to advance its competitiveness abroad and potentially lower unit costs for both America and its allies. While the foreign military sales process has historically been slow and plagued by delivery backlogs, the new model offers a potential solution. Consistent, large-scale orders from European allies could provide the long-term contract certainty that the U.S. defense industry requires to invest significantly in surge capacity and overcome challenges. This transforms what was previously a 'drain' on American stockpiles, requiring replenishment at taxpayer expense, into a sustained stimulus for U.S. manufacturing, aligning with 'America First' economic principles. This shift is not merely about burden-sharing; it is about recapitalizing and modernizing the U.S. defense industrial base. While immediate fixes for current shortages remain challenging, this strategic reorientation creates a more sustainable industrial ecosystem. Trump's recent rhetoric marks a notable change from his earlier stance, which often appeared conciliatory toward Vladimir Putin. He has recognized that Russia, not Ukraine, is the core problem in negotiations, even threatening tariffs and sanctions on Russia and its trading partners if a peace deal is not reached within 50 days. The reality that Putin is not amenable to a quick 'deal' is now clear. There is now a crucial political opening for continued support to Ukraine, even if the funding mechanism changes. The narrative that Trump desires Ukraine's fall has been refuted. Instead, Trump is committed to ending the war on terms that align with his administration's interests. This represents a significant psychological advantage for Ukraine, as it lessens the fear of a complete U.S. abandonment.


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Columbia to pay $221M to restore funding cut by Trump administration
Columbia University said Wednesday it has agreed to pay the Trump administration $221 million to restore federal funding that was stripped following a probe into antisemitism on the campus. The school, according to the settlement, will pay a $200 million settlement to the federal government over a three-year period and $21 million to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). 'This agreement marks an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty,' Acting University President Claire Shipman said in a statement. 'The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track,' she added. The interim president said the Trump administration deal will allow the school to maintain its academic independence after losing $400 million in grant funding earlier this year. In June, a judge dismissed a lawsuit led by Columbia's faculty, ruling that only the school had grounds to sue the government for revoking its funds. 'Columbia's longstanding research partnership with the federal government is vital to advancing our nation's progress in key areas of science, technology, and medicine,' Board of Trustees Co-Chairs David Greenwald and Jeh Johnson said in a statement on the matter. 'We are proud of the role we play in advancing this public service and preparing the next generations of students to meet complex challenges around the world,' they added. President Trump announced the agreement on Tuesday night in a Truth Social post celebrating the win for his administration. 'It's a great honor to have been involved, and I want to thank and congratulate Secretary Linda McMahon, and all those who worked with us on this important deal,' he wrote. 'I also want to thank and commend Columbia University for agreeing to do what is right. I look forward to watching them have a great future in our Country, maybe greater than ever before!' He warned earlier in the post that other schools could face similar measures to motivate the erasure of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which the administration has deemed discriminatory. 'Columbia has also committed to ending their ridiculous DEI policies, admitting students based ONLY on MERIT, and protecting the Civil Liberties of their students on campus,' he wrote in the post. 'Numerous other Higher Education Institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust, and have wrongly spent federal money, much of it from our government, are upcoming,' the president added.


Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
South Park skewers Trump over Epstein files, depicts him in bed with Satan
The hit Paramount show aired the incendiary new episode as the first of its new season. President Donald Trump calls on a reporter during a meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in the Oval Office at the White House on July 22, 2025, in Washington. |By Paul Dallison 07/24/2025 08:04 AM EDT After a two-year break, 'South Park' returned to TV on Wednesday night with an explosive episode aimed squarely at Donald Trump that depicted the president in bed with Satan and referenced Jeffrey Epstein. The start of the new season of 'South Park' was delayed by several weeks while the Paramount network secured a deal worth $1.5 billion with the show's creators for the streaming rights. Paramount is the owner of CBS, which has been firmly in Trump's crosshairs. The episode features Trump arguing with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who complains about tariffs on Canada and says: 'What are you, some kind of dictator from the Middle East?' After confusing Iran and Iraq, the 'South Park' version of Trump tells Carney to 'relax.'