
In 50-over game, India should win everything but in Tests theyll have to rely a lot on Bumrah: Lamb
The ex-cricketer, who now runs 'Lamb Associates', a successful hospitality venture, is happy with the rise of Indian cricket and how the IPL has been life-changing for cricketers around the world, but he is not too happy with the way ICC is running Test cricket.
The 71-year-old, who represented England in three Wold Cups and 79 Tests, and witnessed the historic occasion of South Africa winning the World Test Championship final, is far from convinced with how the WTC can survive in its existing format.
Forced to move to England from SA in the Apartheid era, he gave his thoughts on the controversial racial quota system in South African cricket.
Speaking to PTI, Lamb also spoke passionately about his playing days with Kapil Dev in County cricket and why he rates Sachin Tendulkar over Sunil Gavaskar and Virat Kohli.
Q. You toured India for the first time in the 1984-85 series, having made your debut at Lord's in 1982 against India. How would you sum up the rise of Indian cricket?
A. I always thought that Indian cricket was going to go up, it was on the gradual climb. And because of the population and being your number one sport, cricket was always going to be the top of the tree.
The IPL has changed cricket in India and the world. It's incredible to see these youngsters coming through, the 15-year-olds and the 16-year-olds (like Vaibhav Suryavanshi), and making a name for themselves.
In one day cricket, India should win every competition. In Test matches, you're going to rely a lot on Bumrah and you're going to miss Virat Kohli big time.
Q. Would you have fancied playing in the IPL and how has it changed the life of an international cricketer?
A. It's changed the life of all cricketers that are playing now. They don't have to play Test cricket. They can just have 20-20 contracts all around the world and earn a fortune. I mean, the money we earned was tippings when we played. But good for them. They deserve all the millions; as entertainers they deserve to be paid.
And would have I enjoyed the IPL? Yeah, because when I played, I always waited till the last 20 overs or the last 10 overs if we're playing a 50-over game.
Q. You played with the great Kapil Dev at Northamptonshire and played against the likes of Sunil Gavaskar and Sachin Tendulkar. Who is your favourite Indian cricketer of all time?
A. I love the way Kapil Dev played. We played together at Northampton. I remember him coming over and I saying, 'Kapi, I'm so pleased that you've come over. We need to strengthen our bowling'. He said, 'no I haven't come to strengthen my bowling. I've come to better my batting. I've come here as a batsman, which I always enjoyed that'.
Q. Gavaskar, Sachin or Kohli?
A. Sachin easily. I played against him when he was 18. I dropped him at slip and he went to get 100 (in a Test match). So I always say to him, it was me that made your name (laughs).
Kohli is a brilliant player, he's got all the shots, he can score quickly. But if you want the best player I played against, that Indian player is Sachin, even ahead of Sunny. The only thing I would have liked to see Sachin play the West Indies, where Sunny scored runs against the West Indies. He was probably the only Indian to score runs against those quicks.
Q. You are not a fan of the current WTC format. Why is that?
A. The ICC is going to have to do something about it because the format they have for international Test matches, people are not too sure what is going on there as it's done over two years.
There are some teams, like everyone said, that South Africa qualified due to the fact that they played all the weaker teams. But that wasn't South Africa's problem. That was the ICC's problem. They came up with that.
And, I believe, you need a two-tier structure. And that's got to come in very rapidly. The ICC chairman, he's got to sit down, otherwise, cricket's going to be at a loss. You need strong teams playing each other but they've also got to play the weaker teams.
Q. South Africa, the country of your birth, has finally won a world title. You must be a happy man?
A. Yes, I was there (at Lord's). We had customers, clients there, and it was fantastic. I mean, South Africa are known as the chokers. If you have a look how many times they've blown it. Very proud of the way Aiden Markram batter under pressure.
Q. You had to move to England during Apartheid and till date South Africa remains a divided nation in the words of Proteas captain Temba Bavuma. While rugby has no strict quota system at the national level, the cricket team does. Your thoughts?
A. Rugby seems to have got it right, but cricket hasn't got it right. The system has been overdone. It's now basically, you are only allowed a certain amount of white players playing (an average of six coloured players including two Africans over the course of a season).
South Africa could be a stronger team if they pick players on merit (and not on quota). Those days of Apartheid are long gone. The coloureds, the Indians and the blacks and the whites, they've got to work properly together and say, 'hey, if that guy's good enough, he must play'. We must pick the best team we can have.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru stampede: D'Cunha report blames RCB, KSCA, DNA for tragedy; firm moves HC, calls it ‘biased, hasty'
The Karnataka cabinet has accepted the Justice John Michael D'Cunha report on the Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede, which resulted in 11 fatalities. Consequently, the cabinet has announced legal action against the RCB franchise, KSCA, and DNA Entertainment Networks. BENGALURU: The Siddaramaiah cabinet on Thursday decided to initiate legal action based on retired high court judge John Michael D'Cunha's report indicting IPL franchise Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) and event management firm DNA Entertainment Networks for the June 4 stampede outside Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium in which 11 cricket fans died and over 50 others were injured. 'Action against (suspended) govt officials depends on the outcome of the departmental inquiry,' law and parliamentary affairs minister H K Patil said after the cabinet meeting, in which the inquiry report into the stampede was formally accepted. DNA Entertainment immediately filed a petition in Karnataka high court, asking for the inquiry commission's report to be quashed on grounds of alleged procedural lapses and bias. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru CM Siddaramaiah suspended former Bengaluru police chief B Dayananda and four other senior cops on charges of crowd-management lapses, while fending off allegations that his govt was just as responsible for clearing a victory parade for IPL champions RCB even before the final in Ahmedabad got over on June 3. The Central Administrative Tribunal has since stayed the suspensions. DNA Entertainment's petition alleges that the report was submitted in 'undue haste', ignoring 'critical documentation' demonstrating the firm's efforts to manage the event inside the stadium. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 15 Prettiest Icons In The History The Noodle Box Undo It argues that an event management company can not be held liable for crowd mismanagement outside the venue, which is under govt's jurisdiction. The firm has also flagged simultaneous inquiries in alleged violation of Article 20(2) of the Constitution, which prohibits multiple proceedings for the same offence. The high court had taken suo motu cognisance of the stampede deaths and sought a report from the state govt, following which the commission of inquiry was announced. A parallel CID investigation and a magisterial inquiry led by the deputy commissioner (Bengaluru urban) are underway. The D'Cunha Commission named KSCA chief Raghuram Bhat, former secretary A Shankar, ex-treasurer E S Jayaram, RCB vice-president Rajesh Menon, DNA Entertainment managing director T Venkatavardhan and vice-president Sunil Mathur, among others, as being responsible for the stampede.


NDTV
39 minutes ago
- NDTV
Ravindra Jadeja's Dismissal During 4th Test Sparks Controversy On Social Media: "Why No Replay?"
The fourth Test match between India and England witnessed a new controversy as Ravindra Jadeja 's dismissal did not go down well with several social media users on Thursday. Jadeja was dismissed by Jofra Archer thanks to a brilliant catch by Harry Brook. However, not everyone was happy with the catch and some questioned whether the umpires should have gone for a review. Pant was beaten by an away-swinger from Jofra as the delivery flew off his outside edge and was caught by Brook at second slip. However, many viewers questioned whether the ball touched the ground as Brook tried to complete the sharp catch and wondered why the umpires did not opt for a review in such a tight situation. Harry Brook grounded that Jadeja catch. Why is there no replay yet? #ENGvIND — Cricket in 60fps (@cricketscape) July 24, 2025 India didn't have the brightest of mornings on Day 2 of the Manchester Test, going to Lunch at 321/6, with rain forcing an early break but despite the gloomy weather and early wickets, the talking point of the session was Rishabh Pant 's brave return to the crease after suffering a painful foot injury on Day 1. The @imjadeja catch by Harry Brook had clearly touched the ground Jadeja stood his ground as he too saw it. Why would he give way? #INDvsENG #ECB — Vivek J (@Vivekrvcse) July 24, 2025 The visitors managed to add just 57 runs in 22 overs in the first session, losing two important wickets along the way. Jofra Archer, who looked sharp from the start, gave England the perfect start by dismissing Ravindra Jadeja for 20. Shardul Thakur, known for his fighting spirit, showed great patience at the other end. He absorbed the pressure, punished the loose balls, and built a useful stand before England skipper Ben Stokes got the breakthrough by dismissing him for a well-made 41. The biggest moment of the session came when Rishabh Pant walked out to bat, limping and clearly in discomfort, yet determined. As he made his way to the middle, the crowd erupted with a huge roar. It was a sight that lifted Indian fans' spirits instantly.


NDTV
39 minutes ago
- NDTV
"I Had To Touch His Feet...": Shardul Thakur Reveals Stunning Rishabh Pant Comeback Story
India all-rounder Shardul Thakur on Thursday lauded Rishabh Pan't "unmatched" courage and pain threshold after the latter came out to bat on day two of the fourth Test against England with a broken foot. Speaking to reporters, Shardul confirmed that Pant indeed suffered a fracture while batting on day one. "I think it was always our plan (to try and bring Pant to the middle). There were quite a few efforts from the medical team. So, yes, kudos to them," said Shardul, referring to Pant's fifty that helped India post 358 in their first innings. "They could get Rishabh back onto the field. He could bat there for a while. And whatever he did, it's of course vital runs for the team he scored. "And yes, he was in a lot of pain. And we have seen him doing a lot of amazing things. And this was just another amazing thing that he did for the team today," added Shardul. Shardul and the rest of his teammates were excited to see how Pant approached his innings after resuming at an overnight 37 when he retired hurt after copping a blow on his right foot while attempting a reverse sweep off England pacer Chris Woakes on Wednesday. "Everyone was very excited to see how he would approach for his innings. And I think what he showed today, the passion he showed for the team is unmatched. We have seen a lot of instances in the past when they have batted with fractures. "I think there was a time when Graeme Smith was batting in the South African team. His hand was fractured. So, in these moments, the grit of the player comes into play. "And I think Rishabh's positivity and his grit keeps him away from all the pains and whatever pain he has. His pain bearing capacity is very high. If he is in pain, it is a big injury," said Thakur. On Pant batting in the second innings, Thakur said: "That is his call and medical team's call. In the morning we thought maybe he would be able to bat. Earlier, I had to touch his feet and see if he was able to walk properly. If he is able to walk properly, then we can talk about batting. "When we reached the ground and were warming up up, he was not there. And then I went for batting. I don't know what happened after that. And I think there is a fracture," confirmed Thakur. England opener Zak Crawley too was surprised to see Pant in the middle. "Not many people can do what Pant did today," said Crawley, who put England in a good position by sharing a 166-run opening stand with Ben Duckett. England ended the day at 225 for two with Ollie Pope and Joe Root in the middle.