Paul Murray: State Budget surpluses haven't been planned, they're the result of a run of historic luck
She's had to deal with the disclosure of massive cost increases in the Government's IT projects — the biggest one in her transport portfolio, which she oversees despite the obvious conflicts as Treasurer, and the news that her locally-assembled Metronet railcars are not fit for use, according to the unionists who drive them.
So she'd also be hoping people think all the cash she doles out in this 'Made in WA' Budget will be better handled. And that no one mentions blowouts.
When Saffioti got the job two years ago, the State's net debt was $28.3 billion. This Budget takes it to $42.5b by 2028-29 — a 50 per cent increase — while still predicting annual cash surpluses.
Treasurers who can't control debt in times of unprecedentedly high revenues don't deserve applause. That's the bad news, Rita.
Digging deep into the Budget papers it is apparent that much of this mounting debt is to fund the net zero emissions transition, although a single figure for the massive cost is elusive due to the scattered details of 'public non-financial corporations sector net debt' and multiple subsidies.
Saffioti's speech drew parallels with other States' finances that are as nauseous as they are provocative for those planning to torch WA's special GST deal.
'WA's net debt as a percentage of Gross State Product is expected to be 9.1 per cent at the end of the budget year — compared to an average of over 20 per cent across the other states and the Commonwealth,' Saffioti said.
She forgot to say it was 6.2 per cent when she became Treasurer and will be 9.5 next year. That's the measure of her profligacy.
Other State governments would love her good fortune — other than basket-case Victoria — most would probably handle the revenue windfalls far more responsibly.
'This Budget reinforces the walls of fortress WA,' Saffioti said, channelling Mark McGowan. She will need a fortress to fight off the other State treasurers infuriated by her boasting.
'Our domestic economy has grown by almost 26 per cent over the past five years, well above the 16 per cent growth nationally.'
But that's nothing more than a demonstration of her historic luck. Her surpluses are built on booming iron ore prices that will not be there when her over-spending makes our debt peak.
Most people don't realise how much luck contributes to Saffioti's books. She now receives more than double the revenues enjoyed by the Barnett government in its last years thanks to inflated royalties and the generous GST deal.
After last year's Metronet-affected blowout in spending by 10.6 per cent, this year's increase is lower at 4.3 per cent, before falling by 5.9 per cent in 26-27.
Those businesses feeling the squeeze that government over-spending puts on the labour market are having quite a rollercoaster ride.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Environmental reform could slash government spending, lift productivity: expert
Urgent reform of Australia's 'broken' environmental laws would dramatically cut government costs and lift productivity growth, a leading environment expert claims. The Albanese government has faced continued pressure over Australia's sluggish productivity growth, which is among the worst in the developed world. Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation chair Ken Henry said sweeping environmental reform could be the solution. The former Treasury secretary will tell the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday there is 'no chance' the Labor government will meet its net-zero target while also delivering upon housing and infrastructure commitments without reform to state and federal environmental protection laws. 'The Australian government has an ambition to massively increase critical minerals exports and downstream processing here in Australia,' Dr Henry is expected to state. 'This means more mines, new industrial facilities, and more pressure being loaded onto broken EPBC project assessment and approval processes.' The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, or EPBC, is Australia's main national environmental legislation. Dr Henry said the government's pledge to erect 1.2 million homes by 2030 would require more land and transport, meaning more interaction with EPBC assessments. 'These projects, be they wind farms, solar farms, transmission lines, new housing developments, land-based carbon sequestration projects, new and enhanced transport corridors or critical minerals extraction and processing plants, must be delivered quickly and efficiently,' Dr Henry will tell the NPC. 'All these projects will be critical to enhancing economic resilience and lifting flagging productivity growth. 'Boosting productivity and resilience relies upon environmental law reform. 'But the biggest threat to future productivity growth comes from nature itself; more particularly, from its destruction.' Dr Henry will urge for a breaking of the 'deadlock' to deliver sweeping reforms in a single package. They would include protecting Matters of National Environmental Significance guidelines by shifting the focus to regional planning, urgent finalisation of the effective national environmental standards, and formation of a national environmental protection agency. He will also urge for 'genuine co-operation and a shared purpose' between business and environmental groups as well as between the states and federal government. 'Environmental law reform provides an opportunity to reconstruct the co-operative federal reform capability we developed in the 1990s but have since lost,' Dr Henry will state. 'A strong federal reform capability will be required to deliver other, even more challenging economic reforms. Environmental law reform can provide the template.' Dr Henry said there was 'no point in building a faster highway to hell', and while approvals needed to be granted faster, the environment needed to be protected. 'In reforming the EPBC Act, we can get this right. We have had all the reviews we need,' he will say. 'All of us have had our say. It is now up to parliament. Let's just get this done.' The Labor government is contending with a raft of proposals to fix productivity, from superannuation reform to artificial intelligence and disability inclusion. At the same time, Environment Minister Murray Watt said in May that legislating a federal environment protection agency was a 'very high and immediate' priority.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Melbourne freight rail infrastructure: How Victoria's failed $6b pitch to Canberra put a new rail line in limbo
'When constructed, the OMR will act as the backbone to developing areas in the north and west, ensuring that freight movements around the area are accommodated on high-quality built-for-purpose roads,' the 2021 analysis found. That year, the Victorian government lodged a $123.4 million funding submission to Canberra to begin to develop the Outer Metropolitan Ring, beginning with a standard-gauge rail connection from Beveridge to Werribee, connecting to a giant new freight terminal in Truganina. The Victorian government argued that Canberra should bear the full cost of the project because the line would form part of the national rail network – traditionally a federal responsibility. It sought to tie the enormous project to Inland Rail, a $31 billion, federally funded freight link between Melbourne and Brisbane, which is under construction. Had the Commonwealth accepted Victoria's submission, the Inland Rail line would have been extended deep into Melbourne's industrial west, the correspondence reveals. A new orbital rail line could then have been under construction today, snaking through some of the city's fastest growing suburbs, including Mickleham, Diggers Rest, Aintree, Rockbank and Manor Lakes. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese views construction plans at the Beveridge intermodal precinct. Credit: AAP But the Albanese government ultimately baulked, anxious to rein in rising costs on Inland Rail. It chose in 2023 to build Melbourne's Inland Rail terminal in Beveridge, 44 kilometres north of central Melbourne. The decision forced the Allan government to put its preferred terminal location, in Truganina, on ice indefinitely earlier this year. Building the Truganina terminal would have cost up to $1.9 billion, but could have involved substantial private sector contributions, correspondence states. Australian Rail Freight Alliance chief executive Reid Mather said the outcome was disappointing. 'The cheapest time to build is today. It won't get any cheaper,' he said. Mather said the Truganina terminal was more expensive to build than the Beveridge terminal, but better located. The federal government would not get full value out of the enormous investment in Inland Rail until freight trains could reach Truganina, and that required building the Outer Metropolitan Ring, he said. The terminal in Beveridge was remote from most industrial precincts so would do little to reduce truck traffic on city freeways, he said. 'To be able to pack down a 1.8-kilometre train that would be double-stacked and get it back to do its 24-hour cycle to Brisbane, the most efficient way for that to occur is to unload it as close to the port as possible,' Mather said. 'If we're going to unload trains at Beveridge, the dilemma is … are you going to truck those containers in and cause more congestion? Rail Freight Alliance chief executive Reid Mather says Inland Rail needs a direct link to the Port of Melbourne via the western suburbs to fulfil its purpose. Credit: Alex Coppel 'None of these things are easy, but the only way you get double-stacked container trains in [to the Port of Melbourne] is to use the outer metro road corridor that has been gazetted for years.' Melbourne's west is the biggest freight and logistics precinct in Australia, moving about 12 per cent of the nation's total freight, and 37 per cent of Victoria's, according to Port of Melbourne figures. Confidential correspondence argued Beveridge was an inferior option to Truganina because it was remote from Melbourne's western suburban industrial heartland and its south-eastern population centres, it was a smaller site with less capacity to grow, and was more complex to build. Victoria's submission proved ill-timed, and too costly. Ballooning costs led the Albanese government to review Inland Rail the year after Victoria lobbied Canberra to inject billions more into the project. Loading The 2023 review acknowledged that the Port of Melbourne and the freight and logistics industry unanimously favoured Truganina over Beveridge, but concluded that building a rail line via the Outer Metropolitan Ring 'is likely to be cost prohibitive and not needed for Inland Rail in the near or medium term'. The Outer Metropolitan Ring is a planned 100-kilometre road and rail line running in an arc around Melbourne's northern and western periphery. The corridor was placed under a public acquisition overlay in 2010. The Victorian and Commonwealth governments jointly invested $20 million in a preliminary business case for the project in 2021-22. The business case is being kept secret. A freedom-of-information request was rejected due to cabinet confidentiality, but The Age understands the mega-project was costed at about $31 billion in 2021. A spokesperson for federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said the Albanese government remained supportive of building two terminals for Victoria, at Beveridge and Truganina. Loading 'Beveridge is being developed first because it can be delivered more quickly and is necessary in order to service Inland Rail's double-stacked freight trains by 2027, while [Truganina] is anticipated to become the larger intermodal terminal over time,' the spokesperson said. The Australian government has committed $1.72 billion towards the future development of the Outer Metropolitan Ring Rail and the Western Intermodal Freight Terminal in Truganina. Funding for the rail line is contingent on it being matched by Victoria. Asked on Monday about revelations in The Age that government planners predicted the first road component of the OMR was needed by 2031, acting Premier Jaclyn Symes said the road was 'not a proposal that we're actively considering'. 'But as is appropriate, preserving land for a future decision is an appropriate course of action,' she said. An Allan government spokesperson said the ring was a crucial future transport corridor, but did not answer questions on when it was scheduled to be built, given the state's failure to secure full federal funding for it. Start the day with a summary of the day's most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Federal court rules against Commonwealth duty of care claim over climate change impacts for Torres Strait Islanders
The Federal Court has issued a ruling against a landmark claim the Commonwealth has failed Torres Strait Islanders in its duty of care regarding 'human-induced climate change' affecting the islands. Justice Michael Wigney's decision on Tuesday found the applicants - Guda Maluyligal nation men Pabai Pabai and Guy Paul Kabai – had not been successful in producing a case of negligence against the Commonwealth. Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai asserted that the Commonwealth had responded inadequately and had fallen short in protecting Torres Strait Islanders from the impacts of climate change, claiming it had breached an owed duty of care. In the decision's summary, Judge Wigney said though he accepted many 'factual allegations' put forward by the men, current Australian law did not allow a 'real or effective avenue' for them to pursue their claims. His decision stated there is 'no doubt' the Torres Strait Islands have been and are being 'ravaged by the impacts of human-induced climate change'. 'The islands themselves have been, and continue to be, eroded and inundated by rising seas and increasingly severe extreme sea level and weather events,' the judgment said. Judge Wigney also found that previous governments' efforts to reduce climate change and its impacts had been lacking. 'When the Commonwealth identified and set Australia's greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets in 2015, 2020 and 2021, it failed to engage with or give any real or genuine consideration to what the best available science indicated was required for Australia to play its part in the global effort to moderate or reduce climate change and its impacts,' the decision said. Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai lack of success in their case was not due to their arguments having no merit, the judge added. 'Rather, it failed because the law in Australia as it currently stands provides no real or effective avenue through which the applicants were able to pursue their claims,' the decision said. 'In particular, the common law of negligence in Australia was an unsuitable legal vehicle through which the applicants could obtain relief in respect of the type of governmental action or inaction which was in issue in this case, or relief in respect of their loss of fulfilment of Ailan Kastom.' The judge ordered Mr Pabai and Mr Kabai and the Commonwealth provide the court with either an agreed draft orders or supply their own differing draft orders regarding the judgement to the court within the next six weeks.
