logo
‘Rubber Burns, the Map Fades Away.' Sure, Fine.

‘Rubber Burns, the Map Fades Away.' Sure, Fine.

The Atlantic10 hours ago
The traffic receded as Chicago withdrew into the distance behind me on Interstate 90. Barns and trees dotted the horizon. The speakers in my rental car, playing Spotify from my smartphone, put out the opening riff of a laid-back psychedelic-rock song. When the lyrics came, delivered in a folksy vibrato, they matched my mood: 'Smoke in the sky / No peace found,' the band's vocalist sang.
Except perhaps he didn't really sing, because he doesn't exist. By all appearances, neither does the band, called the Velvet Sundown. Its music, lyrics, and album art may be AI inventions. Same goes for the photos of the band. Social-media accounts associated with the band have been coy on the subject: 'They said we're not real. Maybe you aren't either,' one Velvet Sundown post declares. (That account did not respond to a request for comment via direct message.) Whatever its provenance, the Velvet Sundown seems to be successful: It released two albums last month alone, with a third on its way. And with more than 850,000 monthly listeners on Spotify, its reach exceeds that of the late-'80s MTV staple Martika or the hard-bop jazz saxophonist Cannonball Adderley. As for the music: You know, it's not bad.
It's not good either. It's more like nothing—not good or bad, aesthetically or morally. Having listened to both of the Velvet Sundown's albums as I drove from Chicago to Madison, Wisconsin, earlier this week, I discovered that what may now be the most successful AI group on Spotify is merely, profoundly, and disturbingly innocuous. In that sense, it signifies the fate of music that is streamed online and then imbibed while one drives, cooks, cleans, works, exercises, or does any other prosaic act. Long before generative AI began its takeover of the internet, streaming music had turned anodyne —a vehicle for vibes, not for active listening. A single road trip with the Velvet Sundown was enough to prove this point: A major subset of the music that we listen to today might as well have been made by a machine.
The technical quilt that was necessary to produce an AI album has been assembling for some time. Large language models such as ChatGPT can produce plausible song lyrics, liner notes, and other textual material. Software such as Suno can, based on text prompts, create songs with both instrumentation and vocals. Image generators can be directed to create illustrated compositions for album art and realistic images of a band and its members, and then maintain the appearance of those people across multiple images. When I got to Madison, I signed up for Suno's service. Mere moments later, I had created my own psychedelic-rock, road-trip-themed jam, a bit more amplified and less sitar-adjacent than the Velvet Sundown's. I didn't even have to name the track; Suno dubbed it 'Endless Highway' on my behalf. '​​Rubber burns, the map fades away / Chasing the ghosts of yesterday,' its fake male vocalist intoned. Sure, fine.
But cultural circumstances have also made AI music tolerable, and even welcome to some listeners. At the turn of the century, Napster made digital music free, and the iPod made it legitimate. You could carry a whole record store in your pocket. Soon after, Spotify, which became the biggest music-streaming service, started curating and then algorithmically generating playlists, which gave listeners recommendations for new music and offered easy clicks into hours of sound in any subgenre, real or invented—acid jazz, holiday bossa nova, whatever. Even just the phrase lazy Sunday could be turned into a playlist. So could lawn mowing or baking. Whatever Spotify put into your queue was good enough, because you could always skip ahead or plug in a new prompt.
Real or not, the Velvet Sundown feels more like a playlist than a band. Its 'Verified Artist' description on Spotify used to read, 'Their sound mixes textures of '70s psychedelic alt-rock and folk rock, yet it blends effortlessly with modern alt-pop and indie structures.' That assembly of influences, stretching across half a century, appears with greater and lesser prevalence in each of the band's numbers. 'As the Silence Falls' feels indie folk, with washed-out guitars and soft vocals; 'Smoke and Silence' is more bluesy, with stronger vocals and a classic-rock feel. From track to track, the singer's voice seems to change in tone too—perhaps a quirk of generativity—making the collection feel less like a purposeful LP and more like a blind-bag gamble.
Music used to define someone's identity: punk, rock, country, alternative, and so forth. Asking 'What music do you like?' could elicit a person's taste, values, and fashion sense. The rockers might hang out behind the gym and smoke cigarettes; they were a clique just like the jocks and the nerds. Finding, joining, and deepening a connection to a music subculture required effort; you had to find the right venues, records, zines, or crowd. In that era, music was tribal. A relationship with the Sisters of Mercy, Guns N' Roses, or Bauhaus represented a commitment.
Not so much today. The internet has fragmented and flattened subcultures. The Velvet Sundown's puppeteers present the band's soft pastiche of genres—psychedelic, folk, indie—as sophisticated fusion, but of course it's nothing more than a careless smear of stylistic averages. Psychedelic, folk, and indie rock each in their own way have something to say, musically and lyrically—about musical convention, spirituality, introspection, or social and political circumstances. The Velvet Sundown doesn't seem to care about any of those things.
This approach appears to be serving the band or its creators very well. The Velvet Sundown may actually appeal to people. None of its tracks go hard; instead, each one offers something slightly different—a sitar lick, a blues-guitar solo, a folk-adjacent country twang—that might prove palatable to any given listener. Perhaps no human artist could tolerate producing such soulless lackluster, but an AI is unburdened by shame.
The lyrics' milquetoast moodiness may also contribute to the band's listener numbers. Each line is short, and the phrases barely connect to one another, making it easy for listeners to hear whatever they might want to hear: 'Dust on the wind / Boots on the ground / Smoke in the sky / No peace found.' Really makes you think, until you realize that, no, it doesn't at all. Where the music engages with the political commitments that often characterize its influences, it does so in a way that could mean anything. Take the chorus of 'End the Pain,' one of the band's top songs on Spotify. Singing with folk-rock urgency, the alleged 'frontman and mellowtron sorcerer' Gabe Farrow pleads, 'No more guns, no more graves / Send no heroes, just the brave.' These words convey the sensibility of an anti-war anthem, but they offer so little detail that the song could adequately service supporters or detractors of any conflict, past or present.
Anonymous and mild sensibilities have currency because today's music—whether created and curated by humans or machines—is so often used to make people feel nothing instead of something. In open-plan offices, people started donning headphones to gain some semblance of privacy. At home, they do the same to mask the sound of traffic or their roommates' Zoom calls. Internet-connected, whole-house audio systems can turn any room into a souped-up, algorithmic white-noise machine that sounds like Italo disco or chillhop in the way that LaCroix tastes like lime. The music that is best adapted for these settings is that which descends from what Brian Eno dubbed, on his 1979 album, Music for Airports, 'ambient.' This music is not meant to be listened to directly; it's used to drown out everything else.
As I drove amid the cornfields on I-90, the Velvet Sundown did just that. The band's tracks were not satisfying in any way, but they were apt. I was on the road, but I could be anywhere—awaiting a Pilates class, paying for deli meat, scrolling through internet memes—and the sound would hit the mark.
And the worst part was that it was fine. It was fine! To my great embarrassment, the Velvet Sundown's songs even managed to worm their way into my brain. Did I like their music? No, but my aesthetic judgment had given over to its vibes, that contemporary euphemism for ultra-processed atmosphere.
How far could I push this feeling? Returning to the car after a refreshment stop, I tried to make Spotify go meta on the band: I asked the app to generate a playlist made from songs that are similar to the Velvet Sundown's. A list appeared of bands I didn't recognize. Many seemed a little off: Appalachian White Lightning and Flaherty Brotherhood sounded like they might be AI acts as well. (A little Googling revealed that others suspect the same.) I suppose this makes sense; I was asking the algorithm to give me a channel of sanitized, inauthentic-seeming psychedelic-folk-indie rock, and it delivered. I pondered for a moment whether any of the other artists on my custom playlist (the South Carolina folk-rock singer-songwriter Johnny Delaware? The Belgian folk-pop quartet Lemon Straw?) might be fake—and how one might try to suss that out.
The question felt exhausting, so I switched back to the Velvet Sundown. As I drove and the music played, I felt nothing—but I felt that nothing with increasing acuteness. I was neither moved nor sad nor pensive, just aware of the fact that my body and mind exist in a tenuous zizz somewhere between life, death, and computers. This is second-order music listening, in which you experience the idea of listening to music. What better band to provide that service than one that doesn't even exist?
But looking toward the blushing sky ahead of me, I realized that I didn't even want this music to be art, or to feel that I was communing with its makers. I simply hoped to think and feel as little as possible while piloting my big car through the empty evening of America. This music—perhaps most music now—is not for dancing or even for airports; it's for the void. I pressed play and gripped the wheel and accelerated back onto the tollway, as the machines lulled me into oblivion.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Left-leaning actress Natasha Lyonne leading efforts to lobby Trump admin on AI regulation
Left-leaning actress Natasha Lyonne leading efforts to lobby Trump admin on AI regulation

Fox News

time3 hours ago

  • Fox News

Left-leaning actress Natasha Lyonne leading efforts to lobby Trump admin on AI regulation

Left-leaning actress Natasha Lyonne is at the forefront of Hollywood efforts to get the government to address creators' concerns about AI infringing on their work. "My primary interest is that people get paid for their life's work," Lyonne said in a report in the Wall Street Journal. The story detailed Lyonne's efforts to lobby Hollywood heavyweights to sign onto her letter to the Trump administration in March, urging against the loosening of regulations around AI, which they deem a potential threat to their intellectual property without proper protections in place. The WSJ noted the White House's pending AI action plan "could influence how U.S. copyright rules are applied to training large language models," with tech companies like Google and OpenAI saying they need such models to keep theirs up to date and compete globally with rivals like China. The Hollywood letter said the companies "are arguing for a special government exemption so they can freely exploit America's creative and knowledge industries, despite their substantial revenues and available funds. There is no reason to weaken or eliminate the copyright protections that have helped America flourish." Lyonne and more than 400 others, including such figures as Paul McCartney, Ron Howard and Ben Stiller, signed the letter. Lyonne, known for her roles in the series "Poker Face" and "Russian Doll," is a partner in a new studio called Asteria, which describes itself as "an artist-led generative AI film and animation studio powered by the first clean and ethical AI model." Like many figures in Hollywood, Lyonne is not a fan of the president, endorsing Kamala Harris in 2024 and posting in a now-deleted X post in 2020 about turning Texas blue to defeat Trump. Earlier this year, she told The Hollywood Reporter she was concerned for marginalized communities, saying of Trump, "It's very weird to have like a showbiz guy in charge, is surreal. I'm actually pretty horrified by how strategic and effective this whole thing has been." She added she was concerned that 12-year-olds wouldn't be able to get abortions, later clarifying that she was referring to young victims of rape or incest who may be forced to give birth. The WSJ reported that Trump officials were unsure whether they'd take any action on the AI front, due to the complexities involved and having to take one side over another. There have been mixed rulings on the subject as well, with fair use arguments favoring companies like Meta and Anthropic in two cases last month because the copyrighted material used to train their AI models was sufficiently transformed, the Wall Street Journal reported. But others have favored copyright holders, depending on the context. OpenAI and Google put forth their own submissions earlier this year to the White House Office of Science and Technology asking their respective companies to be able to train their models on copyrighted material. "The federal government can both secure Americans' freedom to learn from AI and avoid forfeiting our AI lead to the PRC [People's Republic of China] by preserving American AI models' ability to learn from copyrighted material," OpenAI's letter states. Google's letter states, "Balanced copyright rules, such as fair use and text-and-data mining exceptions, have been critical to enabling AI systems to learn from prior knowledge and publicly available data, unlocking scientific and social advances. These exceptions allow for the use of copyrighted, publicly available material for AI training without significantly impacting rightsholders and avoid often highly unpredictable, imbalanced, and lengthy negotiations with data holders during model development or scientific experimentation." This week, a deal that had been reached between Sens. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, over how states can regulate artificial intelligence was pulled from President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" bill. The collapsed agreement would have required states seeking to access hundreds of millions of dollars in AI infrastructure funding in the "big, beautiful" bill to refrain from adopting new regulations on the technology for five years, a compromise down from the original 10 years. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. Fox News Digital also reached out to Lyonne's representatives, as well as Google and OpenAI, for comment.

Rachel Scott on the Sensuality of Craft
Rachel Scott on the Sensuality of Craft

Business of Fashion

time3 hours ago

  • Business of Fashion

Rachel Scott on the Sensuality of Craft

Listen to and follow the 'BoF Podcast': Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Overcast Background: Rachel Scott, founder of Diotima, has built a reputation for bringing a nuanced portrayal of Caribbean culture to the global fashion stage. Drawing on her Jamaican heritage and global experience, Scott seeks to foreground overlooked craft traditions and champion a narrative that moves beyond exoticised tropes. 'Craft doesn't have an aesthetic. Craft is technique and execution,' Scott says. 'There are endless possibilities, and on a conceptual level, I think that craft is the most intimate form of fashion. Because it is made by hand, there is this energy exchange. So I kept thinking about intimacy, sensuality and desire. This week on The BoF Podcast, Rachel Scott sits down with BoF founder and CEO Imran Amed to discuss how she is redefining craft and advocating for a more inclusive design industry. Key Insights: Scott credits her global outlook to extensive travels during her childhood. 'When I was younger, [my mother] was adamant not to take us to Europe because that was easy. So she would take us to Asia… and South America. I already had this grounding of a global perspective,' she explained. Her extensive travels through Asia and South America particularly influenced her to view fashion as a form of communication: 'I started thinking about clothes as language, especially because I was seeing these different perspectives and these different approaches to dressing.' Scott seeks to foreground informal, yet globally shared, knowledge of embroidery and craft techniques. 'I remember seeing techniques in India that I had seen in Jamaica… there is this global knowledge, but only one place gets valued,' she says. This recognition inspired her mission to challenge the traditional valuation of craftsmanship. 'It's almost like an oral tradition that exists that I wanted to find a way to elevate and present to the world,' she adds. For Scott, craft is inherently sensual and intimate. 'Because it is made by hand, there is this energy exchange,' she says. This philosophy underpins her creative approach, focusing on tactile and emotional connections: 'I would receive the production of the crochet… I would open the box and feel this energy. There is spirit and there is something imparted from the person making it to the person wearing it.' Scott's advice to aspiring fashion designers is to challenge traditional expectations and timelines. 'Fashion is really crazy… someone really small is judged on the same level as someone from a conglomerate,' she explained, encouraging designers to embrace their unique journeys. 'You don't have to abide by these notions of when you should do something, how you should do it… wait until you're ready and find your way.' Additional Resources: The Business of Beauty Global Forum: Hailey Bieber Is Just Getting Started

I asked ChatGPT and Claude 4 to plan my vacation to Tahiti. Here's how they compared.
I asked ChatGPT and Claude 4 to plan my vacation to Tahiti. Here's how they compared.

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

I asked ChatGPT and Claude 4 to plan my vacation to Tahiti. Here's how they compared.

This post originally appeared in the BI Tech Memo newsletter. Sign up for the weekly BI Tech Memo newsletter here. For this special holiday edition of AI Playground, I asked ChatGPT and Anthropic's powerful new Claude 4 chatbot for recommendations for my Tahitian trip. I'm on vacation with my wife and a group of friends to celebrate the birthday of one of our oldest friends, Theresa. We're staying in Moorea for about seven days. There are four couples ranging in age between roughly 50 and 60 years old. I requested suggestions such as activities during the day and evenings, along with restaurant and bar recommendations. Finally, I asked what would be the best event and location to celebrate Theresa's birthday. Then, I asked Theresa and another friend, Lisa, to review the AI responses. My buddies had already spent a ton of time planning this vacation, so they immediately knew whether the chatbots had done a good job, or not. Here's what they thought: Theresa, the birthday girl: Both chatbots gave similar recommendations, such as a cultural tour, 4x4 rentals, a lagoon cruise plus snorkeling, and what I hadn't even thought about: a sunset cruise on my birthday. ChatGPT recommended three restaurants that we booked: Rudy's, Moorea Beach Cafe, and the Manava Polynesian show. Claude recommended one place we booked, Cocobeach. Both recommended Holy Steak House, but it's a 40-minute taxi ride from our hotel, which seems not worth it when there are so many other restaurants nearer. I preferred the ChatGPT format of a day-by-day itinerary. Claude's seemed like it was too heavily focused on marketing from the Cook's Bay hotel. Lisa: ChatGPT's answer was more comprehensive, listing a sample daily itinerary with pricing estimates and source/reference links. There was overlap, but ChatGPT offered more options and parsed its suggestions in an easy-to-read bullet format. The icons were a bit gimmicky, or maybe just overused. The response from Claude was easier to read, and I preferred its visual layout, but it proposed a smaller selection of activities, restaurants, and other things to do. Neither site mentioned scuba diving as a possibility, despite the fact that there's excellent diving around Moorea and many of us are doing this on the trip. (She gave ChatGPT 4.5 stars out of 5. Claude got 3.5 stars from her.) Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store