logo
NGO, ADR move Supreme Court challenging revision of electoral rolls in Bihar

NGO, ADR move Supreme Court challenging revision of electoral rolls in Bihar

"The SIR order if not set aside, can arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise lakhs of voters from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the country, which are part of basic structure of the Constitution," said the NGO ADR, in its plea filed in the top court.
It added that the documentation process requirements of the directive, lack of due process, as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said SIR of Electoral Roll in Bihar, further make this exercise bound to result in the removal of names of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls, leading to their disenfranchisement.
Seeking to quash the direction of ECI's SIR order of 24, June 2025, the ADR said, the ECI, by doing so, has shifted the onus of being on the voters' list from the State to citizens.
It has excluded identification documents such as Aadhar or ration cards which further make marginalised communities and the poor more vulnerable to exclusion from voting.
"The Declaration as required under the SIR process is violative of Article 326 in so far as it requires a voter to provide documents to prove his/her citizenship and also citizenships of his/her mother or father, failing which his/her name would not be added to the draft electoral roll and can be deleted from the same," the ADR said.
Terming the ECI's order as unreasonable and impractical timeline to conduct SIR in Bihar, the petitioner, ADR said that with close proximity to state elections which are due in November 2025, there are lakhs of citizens (whose names did not appear in 2003 ER) who do not possess the documents as required under the SIR order.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-chief justices back simultaneous polls, flag poll body's broad powers in bill
Ex-chief justices back simultaneous polls, flag poll body's broad powers in bill

India Today

time3 hours ago

  • India Today

Ex-chief justices back simultaneous polls, flag poll body's broad powers in bill

Former Chief Justices of India have supported the constitutionality of the 'one nation, one election' concept but raised concerns about the provisions of the proposed bill, particularly the wide powers granted to the Election Commission of India (ECI). Their views were conveyed to a parliamentary committee examining the bill on simultaneous a written opinion submitted to the Joint Committee of Parliament, former Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud dismissed the opposition's contention that synchronising Lok Sabha and state assembly elections violates the Constitution's basic argument that staggered elections are a part of the Constitution's basic structure (or form part of the principles of federalism or democracy) does not hold. Staggered timing of elections cannot be considered as a feature of the original Constitution, let alone an immutable feature,' he said. Chandrachud, however, expressed reservations over the 'sweeping powers' the bill seeks to grant the Election Commission. He warned that such 'unbounded authority' could allow the poll body to extend or curtail the tenure of a state assembly beyond the constitutionally mandated five years under the pretext of aligning elections with the Lok Sabha. 'The Constitution must define, delineate and structure the circumstances under which the ECI may invoke this power,' he Chief Justices Ranjan Gogoi and J S Kehar are scheduled to appear before the committee on July 11 for discussions with members over the bill's provisions. Gogoi had earlier appeared before the committee in March and shared concerns about excessive powers being given to the Chief Justice U U Lalit had appeared in February and advised that simultaneous polls be introduced in a phased manner. He warned that cutting short the terms of state assemblies with significant tenure left for synchronisation could invite legal their concerns, all three former Chief Justices agreed that the idea of simultaneous elections does not breach the Constitution. Chandrachud said, 'Simultaneous elections will not infringe upon the voters' right to elect their representatives and that the bill ensures that electors remain continuously represented by their duly elected MPs or MLAs.' He further criticised arguments against the bill as being based on the belief that 'the Indian electorate is naive and can be easily manipulated.'Chandrachud also cautioned that simultaneous elections could marginalise regional and smaller parties due to the influence of better-funded national parties. 'To ensure a level playing field among political parties, the rules governing electoral campaigning, particularly those relating to campaign finance, must be strengthened,' he pointed out that while individual candidates face spending limits under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, there are no caps on party the bill's proposal that houses elected through midterm polls will only serve the remainder of the original five-year term, Chandrachud flagged concerns about the effectiveness of such short-term governments. He said their ability to implement meaningful projects would be constrained, as the Model Code of Conduct would apply six months before the next members of the parliamentary panel have echoed this concern, questioning the capacity of short-tenure governments to deliver on policy and governance.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#One Nation One Election

What Is The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision In Bihar & Why Has It Created A Stir?
What Is The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision In Bihar & Why Has It Created A Stir?

News18

time3 hours ago

  • News18

What Is The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision In Bihar & Why Has It Created A Stir?

The Special Intensive Revision, launched on June 24, seeks to include the names of eligible citizens in the voter list while removing those who are ineligible The Election Commission's decision to initiate a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral roll in the run-up to the assembly elections later this year has triggered major political controversy. While the commission maintains that the revision is intended to enhance transparency and remove ineligible entries from the voter list, opposition parties have raised concerns, claiming that the move may lead to the exclusion of legitimate voters. This also prompted a response from the ruling BJP, which accused the Congress of attempting to protect fraudulent entries in the rolls. But what exactly is SIR, and why has it polarised parties? News18 takes a look UNDERSTANDING SIR There are four types of electoral roll revisions: intensive, summary, partly intensive and partly summary, and special. In an intensive revision, a thorough household verification is carried out. A summary revision involves updating the electoral roll based on claims and objections regarding additions or deletions, but without any door-to-door verification. In a partly intensive and partly summary revision, the existing rolls are published as a draft, while booth-level officers simultaneously conduct household verification. A special revision is implemented as an urgent corrective measure to rectify the electoral rolls. The Special Intensive Revision, launched on June 24, seeks to include the names of eligible citizens in the voter list while removing those who are ineligible. The last time such a revision was conducted in Bihar was in 2003. According to the Election Commission, several factors such as rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, the addition of young citizens reaching voting age, unreported deaths, and the presence of names of foreign illegal immigrants have made the revision essential. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar told News18 on Monday that not a single political party is satisfied with the current status of electoral rolls for different reasons. 'During the past four months, all 4,123 EROs (electoral registration officer), 775 DEOs (district election officer), and 36 CEOs (chief electoral officer) have held nearly 5,000 meetings with 28,000 political party representatives. The ECI (Election Commission of India) has also invited all recognised political parties for interaction. No one was satisfied with the current status of electoral rolls for one reason or the other," Kumar said. HOW WILL IT BE HELD? For the drive, the Booth Level Officers (BLOs) will conduct door-to-door surveys for verification during the process. 'The objective of an intensified revision is to ensure that the names of all eligible citizens are included in the Electoral Roll so as to enable them to exercise their franchise, and no ineligible voter is included in the electoral rolls and also to introduce complete transparency in the process of addition or deletion of electors in the electoral rolls," an official statement reads. In case of any claims and objections raised by any political party or an elector, the poll body official will inquire into the same before satisfaction is arrived at. If there are further issues, an appeal against the order can also be made to the District Magistrate and the Chief Electoral Officer. The poll body has directed that economically weaker and other vulnerable groups, including the elderly, sick, and Persons with Disabilities (PwD), should not be harassed and are facilitated to the extent possible, including through deployment of volunteers to take care of genuine electors. WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE? The Election Commission has stated that the Electoral Registration Officer will provide Enumeration Forms to the Booth Level Officers (BLOs), who will then distribute these forms to voters through home visits, offering guidance on how to complete them. Voters can also upload the forms and supporting documents online. After the forms are submitted and verified, a preliminary electoral roll will be made available on the ECI and CEO websites, and it will be shared with political parties. Both voters and political parties will have the opportunity to raise objections to the draft list. Once these objections are addressed, the final electoral roll will be published. The Election Commission is aiming to release the draft electoral roll for Bihar on August 1 and the final version by September 30, the poll body has announced. Nearly 87 per cent (6.86 crore) of Bihar's 7.90 crore voters have received enumeration forms during the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR), the ECI said, noting that 1.5 crore households have already been covered in the first round of visits by booth-level officers (BLOs). According to the ECI, 1.55 lakh booth-level agents (BLAs) are supporting the drive, with the BJP, RJD, and JD(U) contributing the highest numbers. News18 had reported earlier that of the total 7.89 crore voters in the state, around 4.96 crore—those who were already registered as of January 1, 2003—only need to fill out and submit the new enumeration form. However, the remaining 2.93 crore voters, which is about 37 per cent of the total, will also need to provide documents proving their Indian citizenship along with the form. The Election Commission had made submitting at least one of 11 documents a must for verification. These include birth certificates, passports, identity cards or pension payment orders issued to government employees or pensioners, permanent residence certificates, forest right certificates, caste certificates, family register prepared by state and local authorities, and land or house allotment certificates issued by the government. Aadhaar is not part of the list. However, in the face of criticism by opposition parties, the poll body has said voters can get verified in the electoral rolls despite not submitting the mandatory documents. 'If the documents are not given, the Electoral Registrar Officer will carry out verification based on investigation at the local level," EC said. A poster put up by EC says: 'If the necessary documents and photo are not available, then just fill the enumeration form and provide it to the Booth Level Officer. If you are unable to provide the necessary documents, the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) can take a decision on the basis of local investigation or evidence of other documents." WHY IS THE OPPOSITION PROTESTING? The Congress has criticised the revision process, arguing that it could lead to the deliberate exclusion of voters through the misuse of state machinery. In a statement, the Congress' empowered action group of leaders and experts (EAGLE) described the Election Commission's revision of electoral rolls as a solution more harmful than the problem itself. 'The INC opposes the devious Special Intensive Revision exercise ordered by the ECI for Bihar," the statement said, adding that the revision showed was EC's admission that all is not well with India's electoral rolls—a charge frequently levelled by Congress MP Rahul Gandhi. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee too has criticised the exercise, alleging that the Election Commission is targeting Bengal's youth under the guise of a new voter list verification process. 'This is very concerning. They have introduced a declaration form for getting your name on the voter list. For those born between July 1, 1987 and December 2, 2004, a new declaration form must be submitted along with the parents' birth certificates to enrol their names in the voters' list. The ECI says that parents' birth certificates must be submitted. What is going on in the name of full enumeration? This is a document and declaration form from the ECI. There are many irregularities," Banerjee said. Leader of Opposition and former Deputy CM of Bihar, Tejashwi Yadav, said: 'The EC's move is to disenfranchise the poor and marginalised sections of voters who have only Aadhaar as their valid document, which the EC says is not acceptable." The Opposition got a shot in the arm when Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), which has helped usher in several electoral reforms, moved the apex court against the EC's decision. A group of leaders from 11 parties of the INDIA bloc met with senior Election Commission officials to voice their opposition to SIR, condemning it as the 'greatest assault on the fundamental structure of the Constitution". top videos View all On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to hear on July 10 a batch of pleas challenging the Election Commission of India's move to conduct SIR in poll-bound Bihar. Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal, Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Gopal Sankaranarayanan, and Shadan Farasat jointly mentioned the matter before a partial working days bench comprising Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, seeking urgent listing. About the Author Apoorva Misra Apoorva Misra is News Editor at with over nine years of experience. She is a graduate from Delhi University's Lady Shri Ram College and holds a PG Diploma from Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : 2025 Bihar elections BJP congress election commission electoral roll news18 specials Location : Patna, India, India First Published: July 07, 2025, 12:01 IST News explainers What Is The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision In Bihar & Why Has It Created A Stir?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store