Xiaomi Launches New Advanced In-house Mobile Chip
Tech giant Xiaomi unveiled a new advanced in-house mobile chip on Thursday, a significant milestone for the company as Chinese firms shift resources towards home-grown technology against a bleak international trade backdrop.
Xiaomi, which sells goods from smartphones to vacuum cleaners and electric vehicles (EVs), is one of China's most prominent consumer electronics firms.
With the XRING O1, it becomes only the second smartphone brand globally after Apple to mass produce its own 3-nanometre chips, among the most advanced on the market.
This despite being a latecomer to the chip industry, Xiaomi founder Lei Jun said at a launch event on Thursday, joking that the feat had been "harder than ascending to heaven".
Xiaomi took early steps into semiconductors for smartphones with the launch of the firm's first in-house chip, the Surge S1, in 2017.
But the group was forced to halt production of the chip due to technical and financial obstacles.
Lei said the journey to developing the XRING O1 had taken over a decade.
"How much hardship, how much sweat, how much untold pain have been involved in these 11 years? How much courage and determination did it take to make this decision?" he said.
The XRING O1 will first be deployed in Xiaomi's new 15S Pro flagship smartphone and the Pad 7 Ultra tablet, which were also launched Thursday along with a preview of the firm's first electric SUV.
A number of Chinese firms are racing to develop their own chips with the aim of freeing themselves from reliance on foreign suppliers.
Xiaomi is only the fourth smartphone brand globally to have developed its own system-on-chip, with Huawei the only domestic competitor.
"This represents yet one more step toward China reaching self-sufficiency in this crucial industry -- as well as in broader ICT and electronics supply chains," Stephen Ezell from US-based think tank Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) told AFP.
Over the past few years, Washington has sharply tightened export controls on advanced chip technology to China, citing national security concerns.
Chinese chip foundries are restricted from accessing foreign equipment needed for cutting-edge chip production -- meaning that firms have to rely on overseas foundries for 5nm-process and below.
Xiaomi has not confirmed which company is manufacturing the XRING O1, though Lei said it uses the same second generation 3nm-process technology as Apple's latest chips.
Apple contracts Taiwanese chipmaking titan TSMC for its fabrication.
The chip is a "significant" achievement for Xiaomi, and allows it to reduce "its reliance on external designers" such MediaTek and Qualcomm, Washington-based semiconductor and technology analyst Ray Wang told AFP.
"Longer term, owning its SoC (system-on-chip) roadmap will insulate Xiaomi's devices from the US-China geopolitical tensions and help mitigate global supply-chain disruptions," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Germany Warns Apple, Google on DeepSeek App Over Privacy Breaches Tied to China
Germany's top data protection office is raising the alarm over DeepSeek, a Chinese AI chatbot app, for allegedly breaking European privacy laws. On Friday, Berlin's data commissioner Meike Kamp urged Apple and Google to consider removing the app from their stores, accusing DeepSeek of unlawfully transferring German user data to China. "DeepSeek's transfer of user data to China is unlawful," Kamp said in a public statement, warning that Chinese authorities may have full access to user information once it reaches servers in China, EuroNews said. Kamp also noted that DeepSeek failed to prove that it provides the same level of data protection required under the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). GDPR rules strictly limit how companies move personal data outside the EU. Any transfer must have proper safeguards in place, such as legal agreements and data handling standards equal to Europe's. Kamp claims DeepSeek hasn't shown that it meets those requirements. DeepSeek Faces EU Scrutiny for Sending User Data to China The app, created by Chinese companies Hangzhou DeepSeek and Beijing DeepSeek, gained popularity for offering a cheaper AI chatbot alternative using fewer high-end chips. However, its growing presence in Europe has sparked privacy concerns. According to CNBC , Kamp's office notified Apple and Google and expects both tech giants to perform a "timely review" of whether the app should remain available. If both platforms remove it, the result could be a de facto ban across the entire European Union and potentially the UK as well. "It is certainly possible that this incident could lead to an EU-wide ban," said Matt Holman, an AI and data lawyer at Cripps, in an email. "But regulators across the EU would need to agree before making that move official." For now, Apple and Google have not publicly responded to the request. CNBC has reached out to both companies and DeepSeek's privacy team but has not received a reply. This is not DeepSeek's first clash with European regulators. Earlier this year, Italy ordered DeepSeek to block its app after the company refused to comply with an official data request. Ireland also launched a separate investigation into how the app processes user information. Originally published on
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tariff Rollbacks Won't Bring Instant Price Relief
The recent U.S.–China trade agreement brought down tariffs from their peak highs—U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports now sit at about 55%, with China's tariffs at roughly 10%. While these numbers are lower than the previous peaks of 145% and 125%, respectively, the economic reality on the ground is far from a simple rollback. According to experts cited by Al Jazeera, businesses and consumers should not expect immediate or dramatic price drops. The tariff cuts are just one factor in a complex web of costs that continue to drive prices up. Supply Chain Rebuilding: A Slow, Costly Process Over the last few years, many companies have restructured their supply chains to avoid the worst of the trade war's impacts, shifting manufacturing to countries like Vietnam, Mexico, and India. These changes involve new contracts, investments in different infrastructure, and learning curves that cannot be reversed overnight. As noted by a logistics specialist interviewed by The Scottish Sun, "Even with tariffs reduced, many companies can't simply return to their old suppliers because the costs of switching again are prohibitive." Consumers Will Feel the Pinch for a While What does all this mean for everyday shoppers? Price reductions on imported goods—electronics, appliances, and even clothing—are likely to be gradual. High tariffs acted like hidden taxes that increased costs at every step of the supply chain, and those increased costs have been passed down to consumers. As explained by analysts in the Times of India, the legacy of these tariffs is still embedded in the price tags, and inflationary pressures worldwide only amplify the effect. The Bigger Picture: A Temporary Pause, Not a Full Reset While the tariff reductions are being presented as a win, the current arrangement includes a 90-day review window, meaning tariffs could rise again if further negotiations stall. This temporary nature leaves businesses in a cautious stance, hesitant to fully commit to long-term supply chain strategies involving China. Experts quoted by Al Jazeera point out that this deal represents more of a tactical pause than a true resolution—highlighting the lingering uncertainty and costs in global trade. Lower tariffs provide some breathing room but don't erase years of economic shifts and financial burdens. For consumers, price relief will be slow to come. For businesses, the supply chain landscape remains complex and costly to navigate. The U.S.–China trade deal's tariff rollback is a step forward—but a cautious one that still carries a heavy price.
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
Not Quite A Victory Lap: Rethinking The US–China Trade Agreement
The newly announced trade deal between the United States and China is being described as a breakthrough moment in what has been a rocky and prolonged economic standoff. Both sides are scaling back tariffs and promising a more stable trading relationship. But look a little deeper, and the picture becomes less about resolution—and more about damage control. This agreement isn't the end of a conflict. It's more like a timeout. Tariffs Rolled Back, But Still High One of the headline changes is that U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods are being lowered to 55%, while China has agreed to reduce its own import duties to around 10%. While these are improvements compared to the highs seen during the peak of the trade war, they're still steep by historical standards. As reported by CNBC, the long-term consequences of earlier tariff hikes—including supply chain disruption and sourcing shifts—have already reshaped how U.S. companies operate. Many manufacturers have moved operations to countries like Vietnam, Mexico or India. The latest deal doesn't undo that shift, and many industry analysts argue it likely won't. The Rare-Earth Factor: Strategic Access or Strategic Risk? A central pillar of the agreement is China's pledge to expand exports of rare-earth elements—critical materials used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, and most modern electronics. On the surface, this appears to be a major win for the U.S., which has been grappling with access to these minerals due to export restrictions and a lack of domestic processing capability. But the deal also underscores just how dependent the U.S. remains on China for these resources. According to a report by The Australian, China's decision to allow rare-earth exports comes with no long-term guarantees and no change in control over the global supply chain. In effect, the U.S. is securing short-term access without reducing its strategic vulnerability. No Real Fix for the Structural Divide What this agreement does not include is just as important as what it does: No binding framework on intellectual property protection No enforcement mechanism for subsidy transparency No tariff freeze beyond the next 90 days This lack of structural depth raises questions about the durability of the deal. As reported by Finance Magnates, many economists see the announcement as a political maneuver designed to calm markets ahead of further negotiations, rather than a resolution to long-standing economic tensions. What It Means for Businesses and Consumers For American consumers, this deal might bring a modest reprieve from price hikes on certain imported goods—especially electronics, tools, and industrial inputs. For businesses, the effects are more nuanced. Companies that rely on Chinese components could benefit from reduced tariffs, but the continued volatility and short time horizon (tariffs are up for reassessment in 90 days) mean long-term planning is still risky. Supply chain diversification efforts that began during the height of the trade conflict are unlikely to reverse. Instead, many firms may continue sourcing from alternative markets to hedge against future uncertainty. Final Word: A Deal, Yes—But Not a Resolution This deal represents a cooling-off period, not a cure. It de-escalates tensions and offers temporary relief, but leaves the deeper economic rifts between the U.S. and China unresolved. With additional trade discussions scheduled with India and the EU in July, and tariff reviews just weeks away, this agreement is best seen as a fragile pause—not a permanent peace.
