Biden's ex-chief reveals Hillary Clinton worried about his decline
Klain, 63, sat for a transcribed interview on Thursday with the House Oversight Committee, as part of Chairman James Comer's probe into whether former Biden officials intentionally hid signs of the president's decline. A source familiar with the interview told the Daily Mail that Klain, in his testimony, said both Clinton and Sullivan raised concerns to him in 2023 and 2024 about Biden's political chances for a second term.
'Mr. Klain stated President Biden's memory got worse,' over the course of his presidency, the source said, adding the former chief of staff admitted that 'Biden was less energetic and more forgetful but he still had the acuity to govern.' Additionally, 'Sullivan told Klain that Joe Biden was less effective in 2024 compared to 2022.' Clinton did not serve in Biden's administration. But Sullivan was in near daily contact with the then-president in his role as Biden's principal foreign policy aide.
A spokesperson for Clinton did not respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment but did not dispute Klain's account to CNN, telling the network Clinton was concerned with how the question of Biden's age was being handled politically in light of the attacks and questions he was facing. Biden dropped out of the race in July of last year after his disastrous debate with Donald Trump in June 2024, where he froze on stage and struggled to answer questions.
A spokesperson for Sullivan pushed back on Klain's account of the timing of their conversation. 'Jake did not have a conversation with Ron about Joe Biden running for president before the debate,' Adrienne Watson, a representative for Sullivan, told Daily Mail. Klain, unlike other Biden staffers, did not plead the Fifth amendment and answered the lawmakers' questions in his appearance before the House Oversight committee. The interview took placed behind-closed doors.
Despite leaving government service after two years in the White House, Klain had an up close view of Biden in the final years of his presidency and was considered a key outside adviser. He was among the aides who helped prepare Biden for that infamous debate, running 'debate camp' at Camp David. Biden's struggles during that debate supercharged questions about his health and mental well-being that had been circulating for months.
Several Democratic leaders - including Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi - questioned his ability to remain as the party's nominee and moved to push him out of the race. Hunter Biden, the former president's son, told a podcast earlier this week that his father had been given the sleep aid Ambien ahead of the debate because of a harrowing travel schedule that preceded that contest. 'I know exactly what happened in that debate,' Hunter Biden told YouTube creator Andrew Callaghan on Monday.
'He (Joe Biden) flew around the world, basically the mileage he could have flown around the world three times. He's 81 years old.' 'They give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage and he looks like he's a deer in the headlights,' the younger Biden added. But Klain said he was unaware whether Biden took Ambien the evening before the June 2024 presidential debate and relayed that 'the president appeared tired and ill before the debate.'
There are more interviews with Biden's former staff on the docket as Republicans probe a possible coverup of the president's health and Comer has threatened to use a subpoena to entice testimony. Comer's witness list includes the most powerful figures in the Biden White House, such as aides with unfettered access to the residence where the president lived with Jill Biden and those who handled Biden's daily schedule.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Missing minute' of Epstein jail tape held by FBI, source alleges
The minute of surveillance video allegedly 'missing' from the footage of the night Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his prison cell has apparently been found. A source familiar with the investigation told the Daily Mail that the FBI and DOJ are both in possession of the minute of video that the agencies previously said was not there because of a tape transition that occurred automatically every night. The Justice Department released earlier this month nearly 11 hours of surveillance footage of the area of the prison leading to Epstein's cell the night he died. It was meant to prove that no one went towards the convicted child offender that night as conspiracies raged that Epstein was murdered to prevent him from spilling secrets about high-profile co-conspirators. Sleuths quickly found there was a one–minute gap in the footage overnight from August 9 to August 10, 2019, which only led to more speculation that a cover-up was underway. The time code on the screen jumped forward one-minute just before midnight. When the video was released earlier this month, it was described as 'raw' footage. Attorney General Pam Bondi (pictured) was questioned about the video in a July 8 Cabinet meeting, and she claimed the Bureau of Prisons told her it was an antiquated process that happened every night when the tapes automatically reset. Now it's revealed the FBI is in possession of a version of the video that includes the missing minute. It's unclear why the section was missing when the video was released earlier in July or what is in the video that wasn't previously shown. And there are still questions swirling over whether the Justice Department will decide to release the found minute. Bondi has taken much of the brunt of the criticism over the administration's handling of the Epstein files over the last month. In an unsigned joint memo made public on July 6, the DOJ and FBI claimed a months-long review of the files found that the disgraced financier and offender was not murdered in his cell. It also concluded that there was no so-called 'client list' of co-conspirators and said that no one else would be charged in relation to his crimes.
.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C5%2C0%2C5%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Pete Hegseth wants out of the Pentagon and is planning to run for office, report says
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is considering stepping down from his Pentagon duties to pursue political office in his adopted home state, according to a new report. Weeks before condemning the Pentagon's internal Signalgate review as a 'sham' on Tuesday, the defense secretary reportedly began discussing a potential 2026 gubernatorial run in Tennessee, sources told NBC News. According to Defense Department rules preventing civilian employees from seeking political office, Hegseth would need to resign his post to launch a campaign. If Hegseth were to follow through, it would mark the biggest shake-up in Pentagon leadership since the Trump administration ousted Joint Chiefs of Staff General Charles Brown in February. The Pentagon's chief spokesman Sean Parnell denied that Hegseth has ambitions of political office, and said the former Fox News host's focus 'remains solely on serving under President Trump.' Parnell said the sources are either 'imaginary' or the news station was 'getting punked.' The sources, who said they have spoken with Hegseth directly, claimed the defense secretary specifically mentioned a possible campaign for governor in Tennessee, where he has his primary residence. In a separate report, sources also told The Washington Post that Hegseth had discussed seeking political office. The state will have an open race with incumbent GOP Governor Bill Lee constitutionally prohibited from seeking a third consecutive term. A source told NBC News that they discussed eligibility requirements with Hegseth and his chances of winning if he were to enter the race. A second person said they talked with Hegseth about the realities of a campaign. Tennessee, however, requires that people live in the state for seven years before running for office, far longer than Hegseth's three years residing in the state. One source said that they had a discussion with Hegseth within the past three weeks. It was serious, they said, more than just brainstorming. Another source also characterized the conversation as serious. Both sources said that while Hegseth had been contemplating the Tennessee gubernatorial run, it was unclear after their conversations whether he would take the plunge. Others in Hegseth's inner circle reportedly said that he doesn't plan to launch a campaign. One person who discussed the potential Pentagon departure with Hegseth said the defense secretary was 'very, very clear' that he was not going to run for political office. The idea was 'totally off the table,' they said. It's not the first time Hegseth has reportedly eyed political office. The former Fox News host ran for a Senate seat in Minnesota in 2012, but he withdrew after failing to win the Republican nomination. Minnesota also has an open Senate seat next year. Since his confirmation in January, Hegseth has faced a string of controversies, including firing three senior Pentagon appointees – Dan Caldwell, Colin Carroll, and Darin Selnick – who he accused of leaking classified and sensitive information to the media. The defense secretary was engulfed in Signalgate in April after top officials mistakenly included The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg in a Signal group chat, giving him a front-row seat to discussions about impending U.S. strikes on Houthi militants in Yemen back in March.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump moves to scrap climate rule tying greenhouse gases to public health harm
Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday proposed revoking a scientific finding that has long been the central basis for US action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. The proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule rescinds a 2009 declaration that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. The 'endangerment finding' is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet. The EPA administrator, Lee Zeldin, announced the proposed rule change on a podcast ahead of an official announcement set for Tuesday in Indiana. Repealing the endangerment finding 'will be the largest deregulatory action in the history of America', Zeldin said on the Ruthless podcast. Zeldin called for a rewrite of the endangerment finding in March as part of a series of environmental rollbacks announced at the same time in what Zeldin said was 'the greatest day of deregulation in American history'. A total of 31 key environmental rules on topics from clean air to clean water and climate change would be rolled back or repealed under Zeldin's plan. He singled out the endangerment finding as 'the holy grail of the climate change religion' and said he was thrilled to end it 'as the EPA does its part to usher in the Golden Age of American success'. The EPA also called for rescinding limits on tailpipe emissions that were designed to encourage automakers to build and sell more electric vehicles. The transportation sector is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the US. Three former EPA leaders have criticized Zeldin, saying his March proposal would endanger the lives of millions of Americans and abandon the agency's dual mission to protect the environment and human health. 'If there's an endangerment finding to be found anywhere, it should be found on this administration because what they're doing is so contrary to what the Environmental Protection Agency is about,' Christine Todd Whitman, who led EPA under the Republican president George W Bush, said after Zeldin's plan was made public. The EPA proposal follows an executive order from Trump that directed the agency to submit a report 'on the legality and continuing applicability' of the endangerment finding. Conservatives and some congressional Republicans hailed the initial plan, calling it a way to undo economically damaging rules to regulate greenhouse gases. But environmental groups, legal experts and Democrats said any attempt to repeal or roll back the endangerment finding would be an uphill task with slim chance of success. The finding came two years after a 2007 supreme court ruling holding that the EPA has authority to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. David Doniger, a climate expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, said it was virtually 'impossible to think that the EPA could develop a contradictory finding [to the 2009 standard] that would stand up in court'. Doniger and other critics accused Trump's Republican administration of using potential repeal of the endangerment finding as a 'kill shot'' that would allow him to make all climate regulations invalid. If finalized, repeal of the endangerment finding would erase current limits on greenhouse gas pollution from cars, factories, power plants and other sources and could prevent future administrations from proposing rules to tackle climate change. 'The endangerment finding is the legal foundation that underpins vital protections for millions of people from the severe threats of climate change, and the Clean Car and Truck Standards are among the most important and effective protections to address the largest US source of climate-causing pollution,' said Peter Zalzal, associate vice-president of the Environmental Defense Fund. 'Attacking these safeguards is manifestly inconsistent with EPA's responsibility to protect Americans' health and wellbeing,' he said. 'It is callous, dangerous and a breach of our government's responsibility to protect the American people from this devastating pollution.'
