Trump hopes to align with Netanyahu on Gaza war endgame during visit
Why it matters: Trump is trying to seize the momentum from the Israel–Iran ceasefire to secure a breakthrough in Gaza this week. After four months of failed talks, there has been fresh momentum in recent days towards a ceasefire deal.
Breaking it down: The deal on the table is a 60-day truce involving the release of 10 live Israeli hostages and 18 deceased hostages. Trump hopes it will be a step toward a bigger peace agreement, though Netanyahu has thus far been unwilling to sign any deal to end the war.
Negotiators from Israel and Hamas, together with Qatari and Egyptian mediators, met Sunday in Doha to try and reach an agreement on the last sticking points in the ceasefire and hostage talks.
Netanyahu said before departing Israel that his meeting with Trump could help get a deal across the line.
Trump told reporters on Sunday that he thinks a deal could be reached this week.
Friction point: If a temporary ceasefire is reached, the post-war situation in Gaza will become the central topic in negotiations during the 60-day truce.
The U.S. side wants to reach understandings with the Israelis about who will govern Gaza without Hamas, and what security guarantees will prevent the group's return.
Driving the news: Trump and Netanyahu are expected to meet for dinner at the White House on Monday evening.
U.S. officials told Axios the "day after" issue will be a central topic in the meeting.
Initial discussions on this issue were held last week at the White House between Netanyahu's confidant Ron Dermer and White House envoy Steve Witkoff.
A U.S. official said Trump wants to hear Netanyahu's views on the post-war situation and reach a mutual understanding.
"We want to get an agreement on what comes next. At least a framework on the day after," the U.S. official said.
The other side: Israel has softened its position on the need to send senior Hamas officials into exile as part of a deal to end the war and is now willing to settle for the symbolic expulsion of a few top military commanders.
"There aren't many senior Hamas officials left in Gaza. We are not going to need a big ship to send them to exile — even a small dinghy will do," an Israeli official said.
The Israeli official added that Israel demands the dismantling of Hamas' military wing but is willing to consider granting amnesty for hundreds of militants if they lay down their arms.
The big picture: The big political "hot potato" is the question of who will govern a post-war Gaza.
Both Israel and the Trump administration want to avoid a Hezbollah-like model in Gaza, where Hamas stays as an armed militia even if only underground, while a civilian government runs the enclave.
"We are determined to ensure that Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel. It means one thing: the elimination of Hamas' military and governing capabilities. Hamas will not be there," Netanyahu said on Sunday before leaving Israel.
Zoom in: Netanyahu opposes Hamas having any part in governing a post-war Gaza, but also opposes any involvement of the Palestinian Authority in managing the enclave after the war ends.
Netanyahu wants Arab countries to control Gaza and provide security together with local Palestinian figures who are not affiliated with Hamas or the Palestinian Authority.
Egypt, Jordan, the UAE and Saudi Arabia oppose this and demand some role for the Palestinian Authority and a clear political horizon for the Palestinians in order to get involved in a post-war plan.
Countries in Europe and the Arab world are pushing for the day-after plan for Gaza to be part of a two-state solution between the Israelis and Palestinians, but Netanyahu and his government adamantly reject that.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rare trial to begin in challenge to Trump-backed deportations of pro-Palestinian campus activists
By Nate Raymond BOSTON (Reuters) -Groups representing U.S. university professors seeking to protect international students and faculty who engage in pro-Palestinian advocacy from being deported are set to do what no other litigants challenging the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda have done so far: Take it to trial. A two-week non-jury trial in the professors' case scheduled to kick off on Monday in Boston marks a rarity in the hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed nationally challenging Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to carry out mass deportations, slash spending and reshape the federal government. In many of those cases, judges have issued quick rulings early on in the proceedings without any witnesses being called to testify. But U.S. District Judge William Young in keeping with his long-standing practice instead ordered a trial in the professors' case, saying it was the "best way to get at truth." The lawsuit was filed in March after immigration authorities arrested recent Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, the first target of Trump's effort to deport non-citizen students with pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel views. Since then, the administration has canceled the visas of hundreds of other students and scholars and ordered the arrest of some, including Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University student who was taken into custody by masked and plainclothes agents after co-writing an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. In their cases and others, judges have ordered the release of students detained by immigration authorities after they argued the administration retaliated against them for their pro-Palestinian advocacy in violation of the free speech guarantees of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. Their arrests form the basis of the case before Young, which was filed by the American Association of University Professors and its chapters at Harvard, Rutgers and New York University, and the Middle East Studies Association. They allege the State Department and Department of Homeland Security adopted a policy of revoking visas for non-citizen students and faculty who engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy and arresting, detaining and deporting them as well. That policy, they say, was adopted after Trump signed executive orders in January directing the agencies to protect Americans from non-citizens who 'espouse hateful ideology' and to "vigorously" combat anti-Semitism. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in late March said he had revoked more than 300 visas and warned that the Trump administration was looking every day for "these lunatics." The goal, the plaintiffs say, has been to suppress the types of protests that have roiled college campuses after Israel launched its war in Gaza following the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023. Trump administration officials have frequently spoken about the efforts to target student protesters for visa revocations. Yet in court, the administration has defended itself by arguing the plaintiffs are challenging a deportation policy that does not exist and cannot point to any statute, rule, regulation or directive codifying it. "We don't deport people based on ideology," Homeland Security Department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem "has made it clear that anyone who thinks they can come to America and hide behind the First Amendment to advocate for anti-American and anti-Semitic violence and terrorism - think again. You are not welcome here," McLaughlin said. The trial will determine whether the administration has violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment free speech rights. If Young concludes it has, he will determine a remedy in a second phase of the case. Young has described the lawsuit as "an important free speech case" and said that as alleged in the plaintiffs' complaint, "it is hard to imagine a policy more focused on intimidating its targets from practicing protected political speech." The case is the second Trump-era legal challenge so far that has gone to trial before Young, an 84-year-old appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan. While other Trump-era cases have been resolved through motions and arguments in court, the veteran jurist has long espoused the value of trials and in a recent order lamented the "virtual abandonment by the federal judiciary of any sense that its fact-finding processes are exceptional. Young last month after another non-jury trial delivered civil rights advocates and Democratic-led states a win by ordering the reinstatement of hundreds of National Institutes of Health research grants that were unlawfully terminated because of their perceived promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to terminate deportation protection for thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans in U.S
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Department of Homeland Security will terminate deportation protections for thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans in the U.S., according to U.S. government notices posted on Monday, part of a broad effort by President Donald Trump to strip legal status from migrants. The terminations, effective September 6, would end Temporary Protected Status for an estimated 72,000 Hondurans and 4,000 Nicaraguans who have had access to the legal status since 1999, according to a pair of notices posted online on Monday. Trump, a Republican, has sought to end temporary legal status for hundreds of thousands of migrants in the U.S., including some who have lived and worked there legally for decades. The Trump administration argues that deportation protections were overused in the past and that many immigrants no longer merit protections. Democrats and advocates say that the migrants could be forced to return to dangerous conditions and that U.S. employers depend on their labor. During his 2017-2021 presidency, Trump sought to end most TPS enrollment, including the designations covering Honduras and Nicaragua, but was blocked by federal courts.
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Iran's President Alleges Assassination Attempt in Tucker Carlson Interview
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. In a new interview with American political commentator Tucker Carlson, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian made several notable claims, including an allegation that Israel, with support from the United States, attempted to assassinate him. This assertion adds another dimension to the ongoing tensions between Tehran and Washington. The interview also covered Iran's nuclear program, diplomatic efforts, and the broader U.S.-Iran relationship. Newsweek has reached out the State Department and Iran's foreign ministry for comment. Why It Matters Pezeshkian's statement about the failed assassination attempt drew particular attention, reflecting the continuing conflict and mistrust between Iran and U.S. ally Israel. The Middle East remains one of the world's most volatile regions, with Iran and Israel engaged in a prolonged proxy conflict that includes cyber warfare, covert operations, and targeted strikes. The United States plays a significant role in this dynamic, maintaining a hardline stance against Tehran. Allegations of an assassination attempt on a sitting Iranian president, if confirmed, would mark another escalation in the conflict. This photo released by the Iranian Presidency Office, President Masoud Pezeshkian speaks during a rally on Feb. 10, 2025, in Tehran, Iran. This photo released by the Iranian Presidency Office, President Masoud Pezeshkian speaks during a rally on Feb. 10, 2025, in Tehran, Iran. Iranian Presidency Office/AP Photo What To Know During the interview, Pezeshkian explicitly accused Israel of attempting to kill him during a strategic meeting of Iranian officials. He stated, "Yes, they did try and acted accordingly but they failed." According to Pezeshkian, the plan involved bombing the location where the meeting was held. He said Israeli efforts were supported by U.S. intelligence agencies but did not provide detailed information about the timing or exact location of the plot. Pezeshkian credited Iranian intelligence operatives with uncovering and thwarting the assassination attempt, though he declined to offer further specifics. Pezeshkian's Response to the Threat Pezeshkian expressed a defiant stance. He said that he was not afraid to die for his country, stating, "I am not afraid of sacrificing myself in defence of my country." He also framed his survival as a matter of divine will, adding, "It is in the hands of God almighty when a person will die or not die." Pezeshkian questioned the impact of violence on peace in the region, asking, "Will more bloodshed and killing bring peace to the region?" This reflects Iran's longstanding narrative positioning itself as a nation prepared to endure hardships while calling for regional stability. Split screen of Tucker Carlson (left) and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian (right). Split screen of Tucker Carlson (left) and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian (right). AP Photo/Gavriil Grigorov, Pamela Smith Further Topics Beyond the assassination claim, the interview explored several other critical issues facing Iran and its relations with the world. Pezeshkian spoke about the status of Iran's nuclear program, saying the country had a right to peaceful nuclear energy while criticizing ongoing U.S. sanctions and diplomatic pressures. He also addressed the prospects for renewed diplomacy between Iran and the U.S., expressing skepticism about the likelihood of meaningful progress given the strained political climate. Context of the Interview The interview was released by Tucker Carlson, who is known for his critical views on U.S. foreign policy and his willingness to engage with controversial figures. Carlson noted that the interview was conducted shortly after the U.S. and Iran narrowly avoided direct military confrontation. He defended airing the interview as a matter of public interest, saying, "Our view is that American citizens have the right to all the information they can gather about matters that affect them." The release adds to ongoing debates in the U.S. about how to approach relations with Iran. What People Are Saying Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian: "I am not afraid of sacrificing myself in defence of my country." Tucker Carlson: "Our view is that American citizens have the right to all the information they can gather about matters that affect them." What Happens Next Washington has not publicly responded to the assassination allegations. The claims have the potential to heighten tensions between Iran, Israel, and the U.S., possibly prompting retaliatory actions or new rounds of diplomatic friction. Analysts will be closely monitoring the situation for signs of escalation or attempts at de-escalation as regional actors weigh their next moves.
