
Call for £18m rail line upgrade between Nottingham and Lincoln
'Economic growth'
The proposed upgrades aim to increase train speeds along the route from a typical 50mph (80km/h) to about 75mph (120km/h).The long-term aim is to double the frequency of services to two trains an hour, though no aim has been announced for how long journeys would take between the two cities following the upgrades.Midlands Connect said this could drive economic development, promote more sustainable travel and foster social mobility along the route, helping to address areas of deprivation. Its report estimates the project could deliver a £3.60 return in regional benefits for every £1 invested.The proposed work would see the relocation of one signal unit, short sections of minor track re-alignment and carrying out structural repairs to existing culverts.James Naish, MP for Rushcliffe and chair of the East Midlands all-party political group, said: "The Castle Line is a critical local line, connecting many suburban and rural communities to jobs, services, and opportunities in both major cities."Nottingham and Lincoln are fantastic cities, homes to a diverse range of businesses and excellent universities. "By better connecting them to the local communities in between, we can help to improve social mobility and drive forwards economic growth while promoting more sustainable transport choices."I fully back this proposal."Midlands Connect is asking the DfT to grant approval for the scheme to proceed to Decision to Develop, which is the second of five stages in the Rail Network Enhancements Pipeline (RNEP) framework.If it progresses on schedule, work could start in April 2026 with completion in summer 2028.A DfT spokesperson said: "We are absolutely committed to improving connectivity across the East Midlands, which is why we are investing over £2bn to improve transport infrastructure in the region, as part of our Plan for Change."We will look carefully at the proposals for the Castle Line and we fully anticipate it will be part of a pipeline of projects to be considered in future funding decisions."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Warhammer chief queries his own £2m bonus
The publicity-shy boss of the company behind Warhammer miniatures and many video games has cast doubt on a new bonus scheme that has nearly trebled his pay. Kevin Rountree, chief executive of Games Workshop, earned £4.4 million last year at the fantasy figurine maker, up from £1.5 million the previous year. The pay bump, one of the biggest for a FTSE 100 boss, came as the Nottingham-based business entered the blue-chip index. Its shares have continued their stellar rise and are up more than a fifth this year to value Games Workshop at £5.3 billion. Last week it posted a 30 per cent rise in full-year profits to £263 million and promised to open more stores around the world after cashing in on the launch of Space Marine 2, a video game that is based on its hugely successful Warhammer 40,000 franchise, set in the year 40,000AD. Games Workshop staff shared a £20 million cash bonus pot worth £6,000 each, but it was the media-shy Rountree, whose picture has never been published, who was the biggest winner. He landed a 'one-off' bonus worth £2.2 million as a reward for his ten years running the company. Crucially, the award is payable in shares in three years if Rountree is still in the job and hits certain targets. This type of share-based deal is common among other big companies, but it is the first time Games Workshop has made such a payment since it was set up in a London flat in 1975 – and Rountree seemed unconvinced. 'The new policy is a big change,' Rountree wrote in the company's annual report. 'Time will tell whether it improves Games Workshop's performance and whether it is the right change,' he added. Rountree said he would continue to focus on 'what is right for Games Workshop and our long-term success, not on short-term gains'. Kate Marsh, who chairs the company's pay committee, admitted that such one-off payments 'can attract shareholder scrutiny', but felt it was now 'appropriate' when compared to other firms of a similar size.


Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
The case for a third runway at Heathrow remains as shaky as ever
SIR – Longstanding campaigners against a third Heathrow runway will have to dust off their posters and letters of protest (' Starmer takes on Khan over new runway at Heathrow ', report, August 1). Clearly we are going to have to go through the old arguments all over again. Nothing appears to have happened to change the analysis produced by the Department for Transport in 2017. This suggested that, if more airport capacity is really needed, it should be at Gatwick, on economic as well as environmental grounds. Andrew McLuskey Ashford, Middlesex SIR – The proposal for a third runway at Heathrow is misguided. With the additional possibility of a second runway at Gatwick, the skies over London and the south-east of England risk becoming even more crowded, increasing the likelihood of a catastrophic crash. The answer is to build a new four-runway, state-of-the-art airport in the Thames Estuary, with fast rail links to London and nationwide. This could serve Britain for at least the next century. Heathrow and Gatwick would gradually be closed down, freeing up valuable land for much-needed housing. The claimed disruption to bird life is overstated: they will simply move north to the wetlands of Suffolk and Norfolk. We need politicians with the vision to implement such a scheme, rather than the short-sighted ones we currently have. Sandy Pratt Storrington, West Sussex SIR – As a Tory, I am not particularly enamoured with Sir Sadiq Khan or Sir Keir Starmer. However, on the question of Heathrow, I side with Sir Keir. Sir Sadiq should be reminded that he is merely a mayor, while Sir Keir is the Prime Minister.


BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Failed RAF Scampton asylum seeker housing plan loses £48m
The failed attempt to house asylum seekers on the RAF Scampton site has cost the Home Office at least £48m, figures 2024 the Labour government scrapped the previous Conservative government's plans to accommodate migrants at the former Dambusters Local Democracy Service has approached the Conservative party for a comment. A Home Office spokesperson said the costs had "surged well beyond initial estimates and no longer delivered value for money for taxpayers". The government has previously admitted that a total of around £60m was spent on the site, of which £48.5m has been recorded as a losses, recently published in the Home Office's accounts for the last year, could have increased to £180m if the project had been pursued for another three years, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service."The cost of exiting this site was minimal compared to the projected minimum," the Home Office spokesperson Labour MP Hamish Falconer said Robert Jenrick – the Conservative minister for immigration at the time – needed to account for the decision."There are real questions for Robert Jenrick about why he kept pushing his disastrous plan for Scampton," he said on social media."Local people were opposed, costs were rocketing, and the taxpayer was losing tens of millions. It took a Labour MP and government to stop the madness."The Local Democracy Service has approached Jenrick for a while minister in 2023, Jenrick said: "The Home Secretary and I have been clear that using expensive hotels for asylum seekers is wholly unacceptable."Delivering accommodation on surplus military sites will provide cheaper and more orderly, suitable accommodation for those arriving in small boats."The former airbase has been placed on the open market to help recoup the costs of the failed buyers could include West Lindsey District Council who have £300m regeneration plans for the site. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices