After dramatic vote, Senate pushes ahead on Trump's tax break, spending cut plan
Capping a tumultuous night, the Republican-controlled Senate advanced President
Donald Trump
's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and increased deportation money, with more weekend work ahead as Congress races to meet his Fourth of July deadline for passage.
By a 51-49 tally and with Vice President
JD Vance
at the Capitol to break a potential tie, the Senate cleared a key procedural step Saturday as midnight approached.
Voting had come to a standstill, dragging for more than three hours, with holdout senators huddling for negotiations and taking private meetings off the Senate floor. In the end, two Republicans opposed the motion to move ahead on Trump's signature domestic policy plan, joining all 47 Democrats.
"Tonight we saw a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate," Trump said in a social media post afterward.
Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some USD 3.8 trillion in
Trump tax breaks
.
Live Events
Trump had lashed out against holdouts, threatening to campaign against one Republican, Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who had announced he could not support the bill because of Medicaid cuts that he worried would leave many without health care in his state.
A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the Senate version of the bill would increase by 11.8 million the number of people without health insurance in 2034.
Tillis and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., voted "no".
Renewed pressure to oppose the 940-page bill came from Elon Musk, who criticised it as "utterly insane and destructive".
Ahead for senators now will be an all-night debate and amendments. If they are able to pass it, the bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. With the narrow Republican majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board.
Senate Democratic leader
Chuck Schumer
of New York said Republicans released the bill "in the dead of night" on Friday and were rushing through before the public fully knew what was in it. He forced a full reading of the text that began late Saturday and continued into Sunday morning.
Tax breaks and core GOP priorities
At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans.
The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit USD 350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda.
But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within GOP ranks. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a "death sentence" for America's wind and solar industries.
The Republicans are relying on the reductions to offset the lost tax revenues but some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts.
A dramatic roll call
As the roll call teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted "yes".
A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vance joined in. The talks dragged on.
Then Vance led them all back in to vote.
Later, Scott said he had met with the president, adding, "We all want to get to yes."
Lee said the group "had an internal discussion about the strategy to achieve more savings and more deficit reduction, and I feel good about the direction where this is going, and more to come."
Republicans revise after setbacks by Senate's arbiter
The release of the bill's draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the measure to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict "Byrd Rule", named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va. It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections.
Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals, including shifting food stamp costs from the federal government to the states or gutting the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, were deemed out of compliance with the rules.
But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them.
The final text includes a proposal for cuts to the Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary hurdles and objections from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a USD 25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers.
Top income-earners would see about a USD 12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the package would cost the poorest Americans USD 1,600, the CBO said.
Tussle over SALT
The Senate included a compromise over the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states, but the issue remains unsettled.
The current SALT cap is USD 10,000 a year, and a handful of Republicans wanted to boost it to USD 40,000 a year. The final draft includes a USD 40,000 cap, but limits it for five years. Many Republican senators say that is still too generous, but House Republicans are not fully satisfied either.
House Speaker Mike Johnson sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Democrats delay Trump's $3.3 trillion bill with 16-hour Senate reading
Hours before a tumultuous nearing-midnight vote on President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and increased deportation money, a Republican senator stood on the chamber floor and implored the plan's critics, "Read the bill.'After the dramatic 51-49 roll call late Saturday, Senate Democrats did exactly to stop the march toward passage of the 940-page bill by Trump's Fourth of July deadline, the minority party in Congress is using the tools at its disposal to delay and drag out the 'If Senate Republicans won't tell the American people what's in this bill, then Democrats are going to force this chamber to read it from start to finish," said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Sunday mid-afternoon, some 16 hours later, the clerk's reading of the nearly foot-high bill was within moments, the Senate launched debate. But it's still going to be a while, at least 10 hours of speeches stretching late into the night. The slow-walking tactic points to difficult days ahead.'It's taken a while to get here,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Budget Committee chairman, 'but we'll have a debate worthy of this great country.'Republicans, who have control of the House and Senate, are closer to passing Trump's signature domestic policy package, yet there is political unease. Democrats immediately launched fresh challenges against it, decrying the way they say Republicans are hiding the true costs by using unusual new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget office Sunday estimates the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, a nearly $1 trillion increase over the House-passed bill. It also found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, more than with the House's remain reluctant to give their votes, and their leaders have almost no room to spare, given their narrow majorities. Essentially, they can afford three dissenters in the Senate, with its 53-47 GOP edge, and about as many in the House, if all members are present and voting. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. had sent his colleagues home for the who has at times allowed wiggle room on his deadline, kept the pressure on lawmakers to finish. But the tense scene as voting came to a standstill for more than three hours let the internal discord play out in the end, Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky opposed the motion to move ahead, joining all 47 Democrats. Trump threatened to campaign against Tillis, worried that Medicaid cuts would leave many without health care in his state. Trump badgered Tillis again on Sunday morning, saying the senator 'has hurt the great people of North Carolina.'advertisementLater Sunday, Tillis issued a lengthy statement announcing he would not seek reelection in are using their majorities to push aside Democratic opposition, but have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax pressure to oppose the bill came from Elon Musk, who criticized it as 'utterly insane and destructive.'If the Senate is able to pass the package in the days ahead, the bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. GOP leaders will need almost every one of their members on BREAKS AND CORE GOP PRIORITIESAt its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including Trump's mass deportation the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within GOP ranks. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a "death sentence' for America's wind and solar Republicans are relying on the reductions to offset the lost tax revenues but some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper a congressional process called budget reconciliation, the Republicans can muscle the bill through on a simple majority vote in the Senate, rather than the typical 60-vote threshold needed to overcome the filibuster, Democrats in the minority have to latch on to other tools to mount their is the full reading of the bill text, which has been done in past situations. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., forced a 2021 reading of a COVID relief strategies the Democrats plan to use include using their full 10 hours of available debate time expected to launch later then the Democrats are prepared to propose dozens of amendments to the package that would be considered in an all-night voting session or all-day, depending on the Saturday's vote tally teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.'Several provisions in the package are designed for her state in Alaska.A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vice President JD Vance joined in. The talks dragged Vance led them all back in to Scott said he had met with the president, adding, 'We all want to get to yes.'Lee said the group "had an internal discussion about the strategy to achieve more savings and more deficit reduction, and I feel good about the direction where this is going, and more to come.'- EndsMust Watch
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Iran could enrich uranium again despite strikes, says International atomic body
The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has warned that Iran could begin enriching uranium again within just a few months, despite recent US-led airstrikes aimed at crippling Tehran's nuclear Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CBS News on Sunday that while the strikes had caused significant damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure, they had not eliminated the country's capabilities or knowledge speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," Grossi said in the interview on Face the Nation. 'The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that.' The comments raise questions over the effectiveness of the US and Israeli strikes on key nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. US President Donald Trump has claimed that the attacks "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's nuclear Grossi acknowledged that Iran's ability to convert and enrich uranium had been significantly set back, he emphasized that the core problem remains: Iran's technical expertise is intact."Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology," Grossi noted. "So you cannot disinvent this. You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have."advertisementThe strikes followed a 12-day air war ignited by Israeli attacks on Iranian sites earlier this month. The United States joined the campaign shortly afterward, citing the need to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear however, insists its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful purposes. But Western powers remain skeptical, mainly after reports emerged that Iran may have moved some of its highly enriched uranium stockpiles before the asked about those reports, Grossi said the whereabouts of the material remains unclear. "So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved," he said.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Why can't they use cutlery?': Zohran Mamdani's old video of eating rice with hand goes viral
After coming under Islamophobic attacks amid calls for his deportation, New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, whose surprise win in the primary shook the Republicans, the Socialist politician was slammed for eating rice with his hand. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A campaign video of his eating rice with his hand while discussing world politics went viral, with people debating how nauseous the video made them feel -- while others defended the South Asian practice. "Zohran says his worldview is inspired by the 3rd world while eating rice with his hands," the caption of the viral video said. In the particular clip that went viral, he said growing up in third-world, he has a very different understanding of Palestine. "It's not eating with your hands that's gross. It's the identity politics of it," one wrote. "Foreigner with a deep "understanding" of the third world's perspectives, wants to run our largest city. To whose benefit, I wonder?" another comment read. "He should be deported. He's against our Constitution on multiple levels," another wrote. "How can you live in the USA most of your life and not learn to eat rice etc with a fork? I'm sick. This aren't chicken wings," a third user added. "Nasty. Why can't they use cutlery. That's just lazy," one comment read. Some users pointed out that as the son of the celebrated Indian-American film director Mira Nair, he had a rich childhood and the third-world statement was just his grandstanding in front of the camera for the election. As the comment sections of the viral video turned into an Asian-hatred space, many people defended his way of eating with hand and said this is the standard way people in South Asia eat and there is nothing wrong it it. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Notably, he's not even doing it right. That isn't how you eat rice with your hands. This is entirely a constructed persona to make white liberals feel special and in the know," one wrote, implying that he was eating using his hands only for the camera. Notably, he's not even doing it right. That isn't how you eat rice with your hands. This is entirely a constructed persona to make white liberals feel special and in the know.
