Romanian run-off the most crucial vote on Europe's ‘Super Sunday' of elections
Romanians
are voting in a pivotal presidential run-off that could radically alter their country's strategic alignment and economic prospects, as voters in
Poland
and
Portugal
also cast their ballots in a European electoral 'super Sunday'.
The Romanian contest, the most consequential of the three, pits a brash,
EU
-critical, Trump-admiring populist against a centrist independent in a knife-edge vote that analysts have called most important in the country's post-communist history.
George Simion, a former soccer ultra and ultranationalist agitator who sees his far-right Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR) party as a 'natural ally' of the US Maga movement, comfortably won the May 4th first round with a score of 41 per cent, double that of the Bucharest mayor, Nicuşor Dan.
Recent polls have shown the gap between the two candidates closing, with one putting them neck and neck and another placing Mr Dan – who has described the vote as a battle between 'a pro-western and an anti-western Romania' – ahead.
READ MORE
'This election isn't just about the president of Romania but about its entire direction,' said Siegfried Mureşan, a liberal Romanian MEP. Mr Simion would 'weaken Europe's unity, undermine support for Ukraine, and benefit only Vladimir Putin,' he added.
In Poland, 13 contenders are vying to be the country's next head of state in the first round of presidential elections, with the centrist mayor of Warsaw, Rafał Trzaskowski, a senior member of prime minister Donald Tusk's Civic Coalition, the front-runner.
Polls predict that Mr Trzaskowski and Karol Nawrocki, a historian who is formally independent but has been endorsed by the former national-conservative Law and Justice (PiS) government, will advance to the second round, which is due on June 1st.
A win for the centrist would boost Mr Tusk's ability to push through his reformist agenda, which has been hampered by Polish presidents' power to veto legislation passed by parliament. The outgoing president, Andrzej Duda, is a PiS ally.
Portugal, meanwhile, heads to the polls for its third snap general election in three years after the centre-right prime minister, Luís Montenegro, triggered and lost a confidence vote in parliament over questions about his family's business activities.
Mr Montenegro's Democratic Alliance platform is forecast to finish first but fall short of a majority, and could struggle to form a government, especially if the Socialist party, likely to finish second, keeps its pledge to oppose his legislative agenda.
Mr Montenegro has vowed not to work with the far-right Chega, whose leader, former TV football pundit André Ventura, was hospitalised on Friday after twice collapsing at rallies, but could be replaced as party leader with someone more Chega-compatible.
In Romania, Mr Simion's first-round win triggered the collapse of Romania's government of centre-left Social Democrats (PSD) and centre-right Liberals (PNL), and whoever wins will nominate the next prime minister and influence the formation of a new ruling coalition.
The vote is a rerun of last November's ballot, won by a far-right, Moscow-friendly firebrand, Călin Georgescu, who was barred from standing again after the vote was cancelled amid allegations of campaign finance violations and Russian meddling.
Mr Simion has promised to nominate Mr Georgescu, who is under formal investigation on counts including misreporting campaign spending, illegal use of digital technology and promoting fascist groups, as prime minister if he becomes president.
Romanian presidents have a semi-executive role with considerable powers over foreign policy, national security, defence spending and judicial appointments. They can also dissolve parliament if MPs reject two prime ministerial nominations.
Analysts have said that since neither PSD or PNL would want a snap election with Mr Simion's AUR – the second biggest party in parliament – in the ascendant, a minority AUR-led government, backed perhaps by PSD, is a clear possibility if Mr Simion wins.
Mr Simion opposes further aid to Ukraine and has sharply criticised the EU's leadership. While he insists he wants Romania to stay in the EU and Nato, he could ally with Hungary's Viktor Orban and Slovakia's Robert Fico as another disruptive force. – Guardian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 days ago
- Irish Times
Developers are bluffing when they say lower prices would undermine viability of house building
With full employment and buoyant public finances, Ireland has never been wealthier. Affluence, rather than insufficient home building, is the true source of our housing challenges . Recognising this, and adopting more appropriate policies, is crucial to avoiding a deeper housing crisis. In the popular debate, housing demand simply equals population growth. However, the economic definition of demand is the quantity of housing that society is willing and able to consume at each price. Population growth is relevant to this. It creates competition that influences consumers' willingness to pay. But willingness does not translate into demand unless there is also an ability to pay. This explains why the world's most densely populated cities , which are in countries such as Bangladesh and Somalia, do not have the highest house prices. READ MORE Further emphasising the imperfect relationship between demography and housing demand, Bulgaria and Poland had the EU's hottest housing markets last year, despite contracting headcounts. [ Residential construction fell 10% in first quarter of 2025 compared with last year, says CSO Opens in new window ] In Ireland, rising prices and rents signify that housing demand currently exceeds supply. Contrary to the mainstream view, this does not stem from demographic growth outstripping housing supply. Between 2011 and 2022 the number of households in Ireland rose by 187,000. The housing stock only rose by 117,000, but the perception that this left a backlog of unmet housing need is mistaken, because 67,000 vacant homes were also reoccupied over the same period. Together, these sources provided 184,000 units of accommodation – closely matching the growth in household numbers. Our economic definition helps explain how demand can exceed supply even when we are building enough homes for everyone. This is possible because multiple factors, besides the number of bodies seeking beds, influence a society's willingness and ability to pay for housing. These include consumer preferences and wealth, with rich societies typically preferring, and having the resources, to live in smaller households. All of this suggests that excess capital, rather than insufficient building, is the source of Ireland's housing challenges. This raises fundamental questions about the Government's fixation with increasing housing output. Rather than striving to boost supply, Government should desist from fanning the flames of demand with subsidies such as Help to Buy and the First Home Scheme. The unspoken purpose of these is to incentivise building by driving up property values. This is unnecessary and self-defeating. The State should subtract capital from the market by tightening credit conditions. The Local Authority Home Loan is a flawed concept, while the Central Bank of Ireland 's 2023 decision to relax mortgage rules unnecessarily fuelled demand. As a dominant buyer and renter of property, the State should also exercise its market power to pay less. Government is frightened of flexing this muscle by the tacit threat of a developers' strike. Industry's trump card - which it recently played to have rent controls relaxed – is to scare up a panic that suppressing property values would undermine construction viability, causing the Government to miss its housing targets. This is bluff. Developers only earn when they build, and development costs would adjust to reduced sales price expectations if the Government called it out. Moreover, as outlined above, we are already constructing enough homes – regardless of what the industry-led targets say. Six months ago, nobody was contemplating a global recession or plunging corporation tax receipts. But both are now clearly possible Unfortunately, given the powerful interests that profit from housing development, none of this is likely. For now, the subsidies will remain and the State will continue competing against private households in the property market. Consequently, house prices and rents will rise further. This is clearly negative for consumers. But higher rents and prices will draw out more supply and, somehow, this has become a greater political priority than providing affordable homes. With population growth now slowing, increased housing output will unfold in one of two ways. If the economy remains strong, the additional homes will be occupied. By making sacrifices and taking on bigger mortgages, wealthier tenants and buyers will manage to fund themselves. For the growing remainder, the State will simply increase the subsidies. The cost of this, and the environmental costs associated with excessive building, mean everyone will face higher taxes. In this best-case scenario, the average household size will fall. Ireland currently has the EU's third-biggest households, and some consider this incongruous with our prosperity. [ Median value of homes bought by first-time buyers has risen to nearly €372,000 Opens in new window ] However, while Ireland's citizens aspire to small households like those in other wealthy countries, we also have the EU's highest proportion of children and teens. This makes larger households natural for us. A salutary lesson can be learned from the last time affluence and ambition seduced us into overruling this reality. Between 1996 and 2011, the average household size plunged from 3.14 to 2.73 persons. This was funded by prolific mortgage lending that facilitated a sharply reduced proportion of 18- to 34-year-olds living with their parents. However, the debt proved unsustainable when the economy turned, the banks failed, vacancy surged, the housing market crashed, the boomerang kids returned home and the average household size abruptly stopped falling. We are in danger of repeating this mistake. This time, however, the State, rather than the commercial banks, is bankrolling the appetite for smaller households with its subsidies and schemes. Six months ago, nobody was contemplating a global recession or plunging corporation tax receipts. But both are now clearly possible. In this scenario, the State would be unable to underwrite the occupancy of homes produced by excessive building targets – and we should know what follows. Dr John McCartney is a lecturer in property economics at TU Dublin and adjunct associate professor at UCD
Irish Times
17-06-2025
- Irish Times
Liberal-minded Tories call for ‘defence of civility' in face of populist politics
The Conservative Party as the standard bearer of centre-right British politics faces 'long term extinction' unless it appeals to younger voters, a study has found. Bright Blue, a London think tank linked to the party's liberal wing, also warned that 'sudden philosophical shifts' under different Tory leaders in recent years had severely damaged its reputation with voters, who now doubted its competence. Bright Blue, run by former political adviser Ryan Shorthouse, has released a report, The Right Road, on the future of the centre right in Europe, where mainstream politics has been roiled by populist right-wing parties. It called for a 'reboot and reunification' of the centre right to defeat populists and, as described by the authors, the 'statist' left. READ MORE It laid out principles that the authors argued centre-right parties should rally around. These included 'prioritising the defence of civility' in the face of abrasive populist politics, and fostering a greater shared national identity 'for people to unite around' in countries grappling with immigration and assimilation. Tuesday's launch in London of the report, however, laid bare some of the divisions that persist in the Conservative party over its best way forward amid the threat to its future from populist political forces such as Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Researchers, academics and Tory-linked politicians gathered for a panel debate on Tuesday in the grand Council Room of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers building at Birdcage Walk, within sight of the Houses of Parliament at Westminster. One of the panellists, Nick Timothy, a former co-chief of staff to former Tory prime minister Theresa May, and now a Tory MP himself and party whip, gave an excoriating analysis of the party's travails. Mr Timothy said Conservatives had been 'seduced' by political liberals who had managed to convince everybody that their ideology was the 'natural order of things' when, he said, it wasn't. He encouraged his fellow Tories to 'embrace the change' wrought on the mainstream system by populists. For example, Mr Timothy said Britain had been 'incredibly naive' in the way it dealt with China. He suggested China's influence had been 'a cancer in the economy'. Chinese exporters, he alleged, were selling equipment to Britain with secret 'kill switches' while the British government had treated China 'like Sweden' in trade rules. 'They're not Sweden,' he said. He also called for a push towards 'net negative' immigration. Meanwhile, his fellow Tory MP, shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie, said he felt Mr Timothy was 'too negative'. But he conceded centre-right parties such as the Tories had been 'quite lazy' in addressing issues important to voters, such as immigration. He warned, however, that they needed to make their case 'with more hope', which he said voters craved.
Irish Times
11-06-2025
- Irish Times
Poland's Donald Tusk faces no confidence vote after election failure
Poland's prime minister Donald Tusk is expected to survive a vote of no confidence he called in a bid to shore up support after his candidate lost the presidential election . But while the premier's position is not immediately on the line, Wednesday's parliamentary debate and vote are expected to expose further strains and ideological divides within his coalition. Mr Tusk called the vote shortly after right-wing opposition candidate Karol Nawrocki was elected president, defeating the ruling coalition's front-runner and mayor of Warsaw, Rafał Trzaskowski. The presidential battle turned into an unofficial referendum on Mr Tusk and the failures of his government almost two years after he won the parliamentary elections, relegating the nationalist Law and Justice (PiS) party into the opposition. READ MORE Leaders of Mr Tusk's main coalition partners have pledged support ahead of Wednesday's vote. But that is 'only the first of several hurdles Tusk will have to overcome if he does not want to spend two more years running a lame duck government', said Adam Gendźwiłł, political science professor at Warsaw university. Mr Tusk's coalition controls 242 of the 460 seats in Poland's Sejm, or lower house, with the next parliamentary elections not due until 2027. If he loses his 12-seat majority, he could continue as head of a minority government, but that would limit his ability to pass any significant legislation even further. Snap elections could only be triggered if a supermajority of 307 MPs decide to dissolve parliament. By winning the presidency, Mr Nawrocki has scuppered Mr Tusk's plan to reset his reform agenda with an ally in the presidential palace. [ Polish government faces vote of confidence after Karol Nawrocki's wins presidential election Opens in new window ] In Poland, presidents can veto bills – a power already used by outgoing president Andrzej Duda, a PiS nominee considered to be more moderate than Mr Nawrocki but who has blocked Mr Tusk's judicial reforms. The promise of those reforms also underpinned the European Commission's decision to unlock billions in EU funds frozen during a stand-off with the previous PiS-led government over rule of law concerns. Mr Nawrocki has not yet clarified what he plans to do about the judicial overhaul, which Mr Tusk has pledged to pursue. Following Mr Nawrocki's win, the prime minister decided to fast-track a confidence vote to rapidly quell internal dissent. In a national television address last week, Mr Tusk described the parliamentary vote as a chance to 'move forward' for his coalition. 'We want everyone to see – also our opponents at home and abroad – that we are ready for this situation, that we understand the seriousness of the moment,' he said. – The Financial Times Limited 2025
