
Octopus boom in British waters is a concern, say scientists
Over the last few months, fishers along the southwest coast of England have seen an increase in the number and size of common octopus.
Alan Steer, a crab fisher based in Devon, told Sky News: 'As of February this year, there was just a massive explosion in the population of octopus.'
He added: 'We went from catching nothing to catching 1,000 kilograms a day.'
Fishers have noticed an increase in octopus (Image: Getty)
Steer explained that each octopus weighed between 2.5kg and 3.5kg.
Sky News explained: 'The octopus is a valuable catch, fetching more at the fish market than the crab that many local fleets are designed to fish for.
'And it's just as well, because the eight-limbed creatures are also devouring local crab and lobster species, leaving some fishers empty-handed.'
Steer said: 'Since the octopus have turned up now, we are seeing massive devastation to the crab and lobster and scallop stocks in the pots' as he showed empty crab and lobster shells inside them.
The crab fisher thinks his crab and lobster catches have dropped by around 70%.
While the common octopus is no stranger to British waters, more research is needed to understand why there has been a recent boom, say scientists.
It's possible that warmer temperatures and fewer predators (such as tuna, cod and sharks) could have an impact.
The pots have holes for small crabs and lobsters to exit out of but octopus can also get through these holes meaning they're being caught.
Sky News explained: 'Previous "blooms" of octopus, recorded in 1899, 1950 and 2022, saw the animals stick around for a season or two, before disappearing in cold winters.'
It added: 'The Devon and Severn Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority (IFCA) said the escape holes can be closed off if fishers were trying to catch octopus only, in which case they'd have to throw any other catch back into the sea.'
The IFCA's deputy chief officer, Sarah Clark, said the increase in octopus is a 'concern', saying: 'We're going to be trying to gather as much information about octopus and what we do in the next coming months, years, if the octopus fishery remains within the South West.
Recommended reading:
What to do if your dog is bitten by a snake - symptoms, treatment and more
Great white sharks could be found in UK waters soon according to marine experts
Zoo animals to get more space amid 'long overdue' welfare changes
'And that's obviously a big 'if', because we don't know if the octopus will be here again next year.'
Today, the support fishers need will be determined as a result of the meeting with the future involving more meetings that will focus 'on collecting data, the impact on other species and how to determine whether the octopus are here to stay.'
'Dr Zoe Jacobs, from the National Oceanography Centre (NOC), said the recent 'marine heatwave', which has seen water temperatures 2.3C higher than average, might be behind the reported early sightings of barrel jellyfish, increased numbers of seabass and pods of dolphins spotted in shallow inshore regions,' Sky News explained.
She explained: 'It may also be behind the recent spike in octopus. We need to improve our monitoring of such species to collect as much evidence as we can to understand if the marine heatwave is indeed driving this sudden influx of warm-water species into coastal waters.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
44 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Lawyer explains if you can ask messy neighbours to tidy up as it could knock £89k off YOUR home's value
We explain the rules on whether you can ask neighbour's to tidy up HOUSE THAT Lawyer explains if you can ask messy neighbours to tidy up as it could knock £89k off YOUR home's value Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) YOU might scrub your home till it sparkles, but if your neighbour's garden looks like a scrapyard, it could end up costing you tens of thousands. New research shows that messy or neglected homes next door can wipe as much as £89,000 off your house price, according to Churchill Home Insurance. 1 The state of your neighbour's house could affect your home's value From overgrown lawns and broken fences to rubbish-filled drives and shoddy DIY jobs, a scruffy property next door can seriously sabotage your sale. According to a survey of estate agents by Censuswide, homeowners across the UK could lose £43,000 on average, or 16 per cent of their property's value, thanks to untidy neighbours. Matt Lanniage, from The Property Expert, also pointed out that having a messy neighbour could put a buyer off completely. He said: "A neighbour's garden is not only a matter of first impressions; it's also an indicator of the type of person you are about to move next to. "I've sold homes on the same street as much as 10% more if it can be highlighted that the neighbours are nice and considerate. With permission we often use the neighbours first names as part of our marketing strategy." But can you order a neighbour to tidy up? we spoke to experts to find out. What actually counts as 'messy' The top turn-offs include: Abandoned or broken-down cars Peeling paintwork or graffiti Untended front gardens Overflowing bins Dodgy DIY or poor-quality extensions Broken fences, walls or gutters Can I make my neighbour tidy up? Almost all estate agents, 97 per cent, in fact, say you should try talking to your neighbour first. Coronation Street star turned millionaire bikini boss shows off HUGE mansion she built herself A polite conversation can go a long way. Some people might not even realise their home is putting off potential buyers. Sarah Khan, Head of Churchill Home Insurance, said: "Sometimes, a simple, friendly conversation with your neighbour could be the most valuable step you take before putting your home on the market." You could even offer to help, especially if your neighbour is poorly or elderly. Patrick Ansell, head of litigation at Taylor Rose, said: "In most cases, the cause is unintentional. The owner could be elderly or unwell, or the property might be vacant due to probate etc." "A respectful conversation is usually the best first step. Most people are reasonable and may already be aware of the issue, but unable to resolve it without help." If you've tried and nothing's changed, you might need to contact Citizens Advice or your local council. The Top Five Reasons Neighbours Squabble One study by Compare the Market revealed the top reason British neighbour's argue Broken fences - top of the board was broken fences and whose responsibility it was to fix it Parking: one of the leading drivers of neighbour disputes, with 54.1 per cent of people having issues with people parking in front of their house, parking bay or driveway Trees - complaints about a neighbour's tree cracking your garden path was also common with nearly half of participants finding it frustrating Bin wars - outdoor bin etiquette continues to ignite the most furious debates between neighbours Nosy Neighbours - some people have their eyes and ears at the ready to have a peek causing problems for others Your council can act if the property is causing a nuisance or breaking environmental rules. But this should be a last resort. If you do need to go down this route, then it's worth being prepared, Mr Ansell added. He said: "Before escalating, it's wise to document everything first. Keeping a diary of conversations and key events (e.g. incidents) and taking photos can be vital evidence if legal action becomes necessary. You should also consult an estate agent to understand how much the problem is affecting your property's value, although there is no guarantee that a successful claim will result in this amount being awarded to you. "Disputes must be disclosed when selling a property, which can deter buyers, so resolving the issue early is normally in everyone's best interests." How to boost your home's value While you can't control your neighbour's mess, you can make your own home irresistible to buyers. Property expert Liv Conlon, who stages hundreds of homes each year through her business says first impressions count - and fast. 'You've got 10 seconds to impress a buyer. Make it count,' she says. Start by giving your entrance a glow-up: a fresh coat of paint on the front door in a smart shade like black or navy, two matching potted plants, and a spotless doormat can totally transform your kerb appeal. Inside, focus on the living room — clear clutter, pull sofas away from the walls to create cosy conversation zones, and use a large rug to define the space. Statement accessories like oversized lamps or chunky vases also give the impression of a polished, show-home finish. And don't forget the bathroom. Fresh towels, a matching soap dispenser and a clean bath mat can make even a basic space feel more luxurious. Simple styling updates can cost just a few quid, but add serious value when it's time to sell. You can read more about Liv's top styling tips here.


Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Royal chef shares late Queen's strict meal rules and why she often ate alone
Former royal chef Darren McGrady spent 15 years cooking for the British royal family - serving the likes of Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Diana, Prince William, and Prince Harry some of his finest dishes A former royal chef who cooked for the likes of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip has revealed the strict meal times the household followed for different family members. According to former royal chef Darren McGrady, the daily dining schedule in the late monarch's household was strictly regimented, with each member of the family often eating separately according to their own habits and tastes. "Meal times were fixed," the chef revealed. "The Queen was very strict and disciplined. Contrary to popular belief, she never called for food at odd hours. They had set meals, and if they wanted something in between, there was always fruit or chocolates in their rooms." Breakfast for the late Queen was served at 9am sharp - and surprisingly, it was a modest affair. "The Queen's breakfast was at 9am, served in her room. She'd help herself to cereal from a Tupperware container, especially Special K, even though there were 20 chefs available to cook anything.' Her husband, Prince Philip, had different preferences and often dined separately. 'Prince Philip, on the other hand, enjoyed more adventurous breakfasts like deviled kidneys,' the chef said. Lunch was always at 1pm, while dinner was served promptly at 8:15pm, moved to 8:30pm only if the Queen Mother was present. Though the timing was fixed, the food was often traditional and comforting rather than lavish. 'We didn't do anything over-the-top extravagant. The Queen was very frugal, likely due to her wartime upbringing," the chef explained. "Ingredients like lobster, caviar, and foie gras were reserved for state banquets. On normal days, she was perfectly happy with comfort food, so we cooked meals like cottage pie." Each member of the family, the chef noted, had their own culinary preferences. "Each royal had their favourites. For the Queen, it always came back to indigenous produce - partridge or venison from Sandringham, grouse from Balmoral. "The had a sweet tooth and loved dark chocolate, especially anything over 60 percent cocoa. Any dessert with chocolate on the menu was sure to be chosen.' The then-Prince Charles, now King, stood out for his passion for organic and Mediterranean foods. "Charles was the most adventurous. He brought organic food into the royal kitchens long before it became mainstream," the chef said. "He'd bring his own hampers with home-grown fruits and vegetables, especially at Sandringham... He also enjoyed foraging for wild mushrooms which he would bring to the kitchens for us to use in meals." Despite the modern fascination with dietary requirements, the royal table rarely accommodated special requests. 'During my 11 years with the Queen, we didn't have a single vegetarian, gluten-free, or lactose-intolerant guest,' the chef revealed. 'If you dined with the Queen, you ate what the Queen ate. If you didn't like it, you'd stop for a McDonald's on the way home.' And while garlic wasn't outright banned, it was subtly left out of the late monarch's meals. 'There weren't banned foods, but the Queen didn't like garlic or strong onions, viewing them as antisocial,' the chef said. 'Prince Philip, however, loved garlic and would have it at his dinner parties.' The younger royals had a more relaxed approach. Prince William and Prince Harry were fond of comfort food, and occasionally indulged in fast food. 'Wills and Harry loved cottage pie, pizza, chicken nuggets, french fries, potato wedges, macaroni cheese,' the chef recalled. 'One lunchtime, the Princess came in and said, 'Cancel lunch today. I'm taking them out.' I asked, 'Where are you going?' and she said, 'McDonald's.' I said, 'I can do burgers better than McDonald's,' and she said, 'I know that Darren, but they want the toys in the Happy Meal.'' For royal events such as state banquets, the chefs prepared more extravagant dishes. 'A state visit takes a lot of planning,' the chef explained. 'We'd get likes, dislikes, and dietary restrictions from the Foreign Office, then plan four menus and send them to the Queen - she'd choose one.' The Queen's taste remained consistent even for formal occasions. 'Dessert was often a bombe glacée - an ice cream dish. The Queen loved ice cream or chocolate desserts,' he added.


Scotsman
13 hours ago
- Scotsman
Ministry of Defence accused of 'deceiving' Chinook crash victim families in legal fight update
The RAF Chinook ZD576 crashed in foggy weather on June 2, 1994 on the Mull of Kintyre. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The families of those killed in the 1994 Chinook helicopter crash have said they will press on with seeking a judicial review after the Ministry of Defence (MoD) dismissed their demands for a judge-led public inquiry. RAF Chinook ZD576 was carrying 25 British intelligence personnel from RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland to a conference at Fort George near Inverness when it crashed in foggy weather on June 2 1994 on the Mull of Kintyre. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad All 25 passengers – personnel from MI5, the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the British Army – were killed, along with the helicopter's four crew members. The wreckage of the RAF Chinook helicopter, which crashed on the Mull of Kintyre on June 2, 1994 killing all 29 on board. Picture: Chris Bacon/PA Wire The families launched legal action in a 'letter before action' to the UK government sent earlier this month on the 31st anniversary of the crash. They said they will now pursue a judicial review after the MoD responded and rejected their demands for a public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the crash, and for access to files which have been sealed for 100 years. Nicola Rawcliffe, whose brother Major Christopher Dockerty was killed in the crash aged 33, said: 'I am furious and disgusted with the MoD's decision to summarily dismiss our claim. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The MoD is continuing to deceive our families and disrespect our loved ones' memories by claiming that the many previous inquiries investigated all the facts, but we now know the aircraft was not airworthy. They didn't know half of what we know now. 'The government may have sealed the files for 100 years, but we, the families of those who died, are firmly united, strong and defiant, and we will get to the truth, no matter what it takes.' Following the crash, the Chinook's pilots, Flight Lieutenants Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper, were accused of gross negligence, but this verdict was overturned by the UK government 17 years later following a campaign by the families. A subsequent review by Lord Philip set out 'numerous concerns' raised by those who worked on the Chinooks, with the MoD's testing centre at Boscombe Down in Wiltshire declaring the Chinook Mk2 helicopters 'unairworthy' prior to the crash. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The MoD said the crash was a 'tragic accident' and while its sympathies remain with the families and friends of the victims, there have been several investigations and inquiries and it believes it is unlikely another would reach any new conclusions. Andy Tobias, who was eight when his father Lieutenant Colonel John Tobias, 41, was killed, said: 'My childhood was stolen from me because someone decided my dad and his colleagues should be put on a helicopter that was not fit for purpose.' The families, who have coalesced into the Chinook Justice Campaign, said failing to order a public inquiry is a breach of the UK Government's human rights obligations. Solicitor Mark Stephens, from law firm Howard Kennedy, said: 'This decision by the MoD to dismiss our claim is an unforgivable betrayal of service people who gave their lives for their country and an undisguised slap in the face for their long-suffering and bereaved families.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'So much for the Government's so-called commitment to duty of candour. 'We will now seek a judicial review into the Ministry of Defence's decision to deny the families truth, transparency and justice.' An MoD spokesperson said: 'The Mull of Kintyre crash was a tragic accident, and our thoughts and sympathies remain with the families, friends and colleagues of all those who died. 'We understand that the lack of certainty about the cause of the crash has added to the distress of the families. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We provided a detailed and considered response to the pre-action protocol letter stating the reasons why we cannot accept the demand for establishing a new public inquiry. 'It's unlikely that a public inquiry would identify any new evidence or reach new conclusions on the basis of existing evidence. 'The accident has already been the subject of six inquiries and investigations, including an independent judge-led review.'