Information Is Extraordinarily Valuable. How Dangerous To Make It Free
Google purchased Waze for $1.15 billion in 2013. Why would it pay so much for an app that people can access for free, and that charges them nothing for usage?
The answer is that information is incredibly valuable. While Waze once again doesn't charge anyone for usage and directions, how people use it along with when and where people go with it is surely valuable to businesses eager to meet and lead the needs of an acquisitive public.
The price paid for Waze back when $1 billion was $1 billion is useful to think about as conservatives get all worked up about the removal of Rule 1033 from the GENIUS Act. The Rule, one whose implementation was initially cheer-led by former CFPB head Rohit Chopra, mandates that banks and other large financial institutions provide outside businesses free access to information gathered about existing bank customers. Something's wrong with this Rule, which is more than an understatement.
To understand why, please yet again contemplate the 2013 acquisition of Waze. If the information produced by the latter rated such a high acquisition price, stop and think what large financial institutions could command for databases pregnant with knowledge about the saving, investing, and buying habits of hundreds of millions of clients and depositors.
In contemplating the above, stop and think about the shareholders of the largest financial institutions, and their understandable expectation that the institutions they own maximize their profit-making potential. Considered in that way, Rule 1033 quickly becomes much more than a costly regulatory burden foisted on large financial institutions. Worse than that, it becomes a subsidy for the myriad other businesses inside and outside of finance eager to poach some of the most remunerative customers in the world while armed with some of the best information. No business can give away something so valuable for free.
From there, just ask why FinTechs and other non-bank entities would be so interested in accessing information about big bank customers in the first place. Rest assured that the interest isn't rooted in staring lovingly at the data. See above.
What banks go to great expense to compile and store in highly protective fashion is extraordinarily valuable to businesses outside the banking system for the same reason that it's valuable to the entities compiling it. Translated, they're eager to use the information gathered by the big banks with an eye on courting those same customers with products and services not just tailored to meet their individual needs, but to lead them.
Which easily explains why banks and financial institutions have begun charging a fee for access to the information. It's not just that there are substantial costs associated with compilation, it's that there must be compensation for creating crucial knowledge that is so valuable to so many.
What's puzzling is that these truths are even being debated. More puzzling is that some of those debating them are conservatives who, at least in the past, would have been the first to defend businesses against price controls foisted on them from the proverbial Commanding Heights.
Rule 1033 isn't just wrongheaded and a price control, it's also anti-customer exactly because it mandates giving away what's crucial and valuable for free. If there's no value in producing essential knowledge about customers, what's the point of continuing to create what businesses of all stripes very much require to meet and lead the needs of their customers?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Major Bank Thinks Bitcoin Is Going To Get Less Volatile — Is It Time To Invest?
If you've been on the sidelines watching bitcoin's wild price swings with caution, you're not alone. For years, bitcoin has had dramatic ups and downs, making everyday investors nervous about jumping in. However, this might be changing. As reported by CoinDesk, a report from Deutsche Bank suggests that bitcoin's volatility is likely to continue falling. It pointed to growing mainstream acceptance and an increase in the digital currency's adoption by companies, retail investors and governments. Read Next: Learn More: And if the trend continues, bitcoin could become more like traditional assets and even more attractive to long-term investors. What does this mean for conservative investors? Is it time to invest? Why Bitcoin's Volatility Is Easing Up Since its creation, bitcoin's price has been nothing but a wild ride. However, according to Deutsche Bank, several key factors are helping reduce volatility. For one, there's growing institutional adoption. More companies, retail investors and governments are embracing bitcoin, not just as a speculative asset but as a long-term investment. Second, there's more regulatory clarity. During the recent U.S. Crypto Week in Washington, D.C., the GENIUS Act, which aims to set a regulatory framework for stablecoins, was signed into law. The CLARITY Act, which would establish regulatory guidelines for cryptocurrencies, has also passed in the House. Check Out: A More Mature Market Could Attract Long-Term Investors Deutsche Bank sees the decline in volatility as a sign of a maturing market. If bitcoin continues on this path, it may start to look more like a digital version of gold — a stable store of value rather than a risky bet. That shift could attract more conservative investors, including pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, who previously stayed away due to high risk and regulatory uncertainty. Is It Time To Invest? Bitcoin becoming less volatile doesn't guarantee that prices will only go up. It means the market could behave more predictably over time. If you've been hesitant about buying bitcoin because of the wild price swings, this trend toward stability might offer a more comfortable entry point. Still, it's important to remember that bitcoin is not without risk. It remains a high-risk, high-reward asset, and it's still influenced by news, regulatory decisions and shifting investor sentiment. But if Deutsche Bank is right and bitcoin's volatility is declining, then we may be looking at a new chapter for crypto — one where long-term investors can invest in the crypto with a bit more peace of mind. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on Major Bank Thinks Bitcoin Is Going To Get Less Volatile — Is It Time To Invest?
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump criticized the idea of presidential vacations. His Scotland trip is built around golf.
The White House isn't calling Trump's five-day, midsummer jaunt a vacation, but rather a working trip where the Republican president might hold a news conference and sit for interviews with U.S. and British media outlets. Trump was also talking trade in separate meetings with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Trump is staying at his properties near Turnberry and Aberdeen, where his family owns two golf courses and is opening a third on Aug. 13. Trump played golf over the weekend at Turnberry and is helping cut the ribbon on the new course on Tuesday. Advertisement He's not the first president to play in Scotland: Dwight D. Eisenhower played at Turnberry in 1959, more than a half century before Trump bought it, after meeting with French President Charles de Gaulle in Paris. But none of Trump's predecessors has constructed a foreign itinerary around promoting vacation sites his family owns and is actively expanding. Advertisement It lays bare how Trump has leveraged his second term to pad his family's profits in a variety of ways, including overseas development deals and promoting cryptocurrencies, despite growing questions about ethics concerns. 'You have to look at this as yet another attempt by Donald Trump to monetize his presidency,' said Leonard Steinhorn, who teaches political communication and courses on American culture and the modern presidency at American University. 'In this case, using the trip as a PR opportunity to promote his golf courses.' A parade of golf carts and security accompanied President Trump at Turnberry, on the Scottish coast southwest of Glasgow, on Sunday. Christopher Furlong/Getty President Trump on the links. Christopher Furlong/Getty Presidents typically vacation in the US Franklin D. Roosevelt went to the Bahamas, often for the excellent fishing, five times between 1933 and 1940. He visited Canada's Campobello Island in New Brunswick, where he had vacationed as a child, in 1933, 1936 and 1939. Reagan spent Easter 1982 on vacation in Barbados after meeting with Caribbean leaders and warning of a Marxist threat that could spread throughout the region from nearby Grenada. Presidents also never fully go on vacation. They travel with a large entourage of aides, receive intelligence briefings, take calls and otherwise work away from Washington. Kicking back in the United States, though, has long been the norm. Harry S. Truman helped make Key West, Florida, a tourist hot spot with his 'Little White House' cottage there. Several presidents, including James Buchanan and Benjamin Harrison, visited the Victorian architecture in Cape May, New Jersey. More recently, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama boosted tourism on Massachusetts' Martha's Vineyard, while Trump has buoyed Palm Beach, Florida, with frequent trips to his Mar-a-Lago estate. But any tourist lift Trump gets from his Scottish visit is likely to most benefit his family. 'Every president is forced to weigh politics versus fun on vacation,' said Jeffrey Engel, David Gergen Director of the Center for Presidential History at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, who added that Trump is 'demonstrating his priorities.' Advertisement 'When he thinks about how he wants to spend his free time, A., playing golf, B., visiting places where he has investments and C., enhancing those investments, that was not the priority for previous presidents, but it is his vacation time,' Engel said. It's even a departure from Trump's first term, when he found ways to squeeze in visits to his properties while on trips more focused on work. Trump stopped at his resort in Hawaii to thank staff members after visiting the memorial site at Pearl Harbor and before embarking on an Asia trip in November 2017. He played golf at Turnberry in 2018 before meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Finland. Trump once decried the idea of taking vacations as president. 'Don't take vacations. What's the point? If you're not enjoying your work, you're in the wrong job,' Trump wrote in his 2004 book, 'Think Like a Billionaire.' During his presidential campaign in 2015, he pledged to 'rarely leave the White House.' Even as recently as a speech at a summit on artificial intelligence in Washington on Wednesday, Trump derided his predecessor for flying long distances for golf — something he's now doing. 'They talked about the carbon footprint and then Obama hops onto a 747, Air Force One, and flies to Hawaii to play a round of golf and comes back,' he said. On the green... Christopher Furlong/Getty ... and in the sand. Christopher Furlong/Getty Presidential vacations and any overseas trips were once taboo Trump isn't the first president not wanting to publicize taking time off. George Washington was criticized for embarking on a New England tour to promote the presidency. Some took issue with his successor, John Adams, for leaving the then-capital of Philadelphia in 1797 for a long visit to his family's farm in Quincy, Massachusetts. James Madison left Washington for months after the War of 1812. Advertisement Teddy Roosevelt helped pioneer the modern presidential vacation in 1902 by chartering a special train and directing key staffers to rent houses near Sagamore Hill, his home in Oyster Bay, New York, according to the White House Historical Association. Four years later, Roosevelt upended tradition again, this time by becoming the first president to leave the country while in office. The New York Times noted that Roosevelt's 30-day trip by yacht and battleship to tour construction of the Panama Canal 'will violate the traditions of the United States for 117 years by taking its President outside the jurisdiction of the Government at Washington.' In the decades since, where presidents opted to vacation, even outside the U.S., has become part of their political personas. In addition to New Jersey, Grant relaxed on Martha's Vineyard. Calvin Coolidge spent the 1928 Christmas holidays at Sapelo Island, Georgia. Lyndon B. Johnson had his 'Texas White House,' a Hill Country ranch. Eisenhower vacationed in Newport, Rhode Island. John F. Kennedy went to Palm Springs, California, and his family's compound in Hyannis Port, Massachusetts, among other places. Richard Nixon had the 'Southern White House' on Key Biscayne, Florida, while Joe Biden traveled frequently to Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, while also visiting Nantucket, Massachusetts, and St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands. George H.W. Bush was a frequent visitor to his family's property in Kennebunkport, Maine, and didn't let the start of the Gulf War in 1991 detour him from a monthlong vacation there. His son, George W. Bush, opted for his ranch in Crawford, Texas, rather than a more posh destination. Advertisement Presidential visits help tourism in some places more than others, but Engel said that for some Americans, 'if the president of the Untied States goes some place, you want to go to the same place.' He noted that visitors emulating presidential vacations are out 'to show that you're either as cool as he or she, that you understand the same values as he or she or, heck, maybe you'll bump into he or she.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact the Price of Crypto
On July 18, President Donald Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act into law. As noted by CoinDesk, the GENUIS Act is the first significant legislation for cryptocurrency in the United States. Read Next: Check Out: So what does this new legislation mean for cryptocurrency prices? What Does the GENIUS Act Do for Crypto? Rob Nolan, a Duane Morris partner, defined the GENIUS Act to The Hill as the 'first step of the U.S. government really regulating cryptocurrency.' The law pertains primarily to one kind of cryptocurrency, stablecoins, which are designed to keep a stable valuation by being pegged reliable assets, like the U.S. dollar or even gold. The GENIUS Act regulates who can issue the dollar-pegged stablecoins with federal oversight, ensuring that issuers have equal backing in liquid assets to their stablecoin values. Issuers must also perform regular public disclosures so that their holdings can be audited. Further, the act creates an interrelated framework of state-level and federal-level regulatory bodies to provide oversight for stablecoin transactions. While the law is only a few days old, it could impact the crypto market in multiple ways. Here are just a few means by which Trump signing the GENIUS Act could impact the price of crypto. Learn More: Stablecoins Are Up According to AInvest, the signing of the act 'catalyzed a dramatic surge in market activity.' It noted that the stablecoin market capitalization has grown by $4 billion. The GENIUS Act has not only provided what is seen as a governmental validation of stablecoins and crypto in general but also has allowed more crypto capital to flood the market in the form of newly regulated stablecoins. They Could Continue To Rise Now that stablecoins are validated with government regulation, more and more banks and various payment platforms can integrate stablecoins into the world of finance, which could further validate crypto and increase value. Fidelity noted that widespread adoption could lead to more usage of blockchain networks on which stablecoins would be built, which could 'be beneficial for the long-term value of these blockchains' cryptocurrencies.' Per AInvest, Bank of America, JPMorgan and Citigroup have already announced stablecoin plans. They're planning to either launch or invest in stablecoin ventures, it reported. Prices Could Still Fall While many view the GENIUS Act as a positive for the crypto market, there are critics who claim it compromises the decentralization of crypto, per CNBC. Now that stablecoins are far more regulated, they could be less appealing to certain investors. Additionally, as Fidelity noted, crypto prices could still fall. 'Regulations may reduce the probability of fraud and malpractice, but they can't protect a portfolio against negative market sentiment,' it said. Its broader impact on crypto remains murky and is likely dependent upon how the larger crypto world will take to this heightened form of regulation. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates The 10 Most Reliable SUVs of 2025 This article originally appeared on 3 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact the Price of Crypto Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données
