Austin schools can't fix Dobie Middle by adding to overcrowded Lamar Middle
Between the Easter weekend and the quickly scheduled meeting this past Monday, parents had little time to think, let alone organize. It's no surprise that accusations flew and tempers flared at that meeting. Personally, I disliked much of the tone and tenor on display. No one likes a NIMBY. The district is navigating a difficult situation. State standards are being enforced in ways that feel more predatory than liberating.
But at the heart this is the unavoidable reality that Lamar already has too many students. The district's solution? Portable buildings built between now and August.
A few days earlier at a community meeting at Dobie, parents, teachers and students expressed dismay at the district's plans to close their school — plans that would mean their students would spend up to two hours a day on school buses. (Square that with improving student outcomes.)
The state has since given the Austin Independent School District until June 30 to decide Dobie's fate. We should use this time to rethink the current plan.
According to state law, an entire school district can be taken over by the Texas Education Agency if a school within that district receives five consecutive 'F' ratings. Dobie just got its fourth F. Therefore, Austin ISD reasons, a merger is necessary to stave off a state takeover. But this is a misguided way to frame the debate.
The district's reasoning presents the plan not as a public policy but as a political strategy — designed to prevent a state takeover. Whatever one thinks of TEA, state laws exist to keep districts accountable for failing schools. A policy explicitly designed to dodge that accountability doesn't seem to operate within the spirit of the law.
Austin ISD has also been noncommittal on the details. At Monday's meeting, for example, families' concerns about teacher-student ratios, access to 504 services for students with disabilities, and the continuation of the fine arts academy were met only with vague answers.
The reality is, there is no way to do what is being proposed without taking something from Lamar students. This pits two groups of parents against each other while ignoring the wishes of both.
Austin ISD has other options. State law allows the district to hand over Dobie to a charter school operator. Charter schools are not for everyone, but this option could be accompanied by a transfer policy that allows Dobie families to relocate to other schools that have capacity.
Ultimately, the better option would be to double down on Dobie — keep it open, invest new resources and work to improve outcomes. This might risk a TEA takeover in the future, but Dobie isn't the only Austin school to have received multiple F-ratings. TEA might come knocking anyway. We need to create a blueprint for turning F-rated schools around in 1-2 years.
By pursuing the current plan, Austin ISD risks a scenario that breaks Lamar without fixing Dobie. They are also putting undue pressure on students, parents and teachers at so-called 'failing' schools, who are working tremendously hard in almost impossible circumstances. They are not to blame for the prospect of a state takeover. They are the ones being failed.
Austin school leaders are in a bind and do not receive the support they deserve from the state. But the district has better options. Instead of spending millions of dollars on hastily erected portables at Lamar, Austin ISD should invest the money in the Dobie community.
Ben Wright is a freelance communication strategist and the parent of a Lamar Middle School student.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Austin ISD can't fix Dobie Middle School by breaking Lamar | Opinion

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Melania Trump tours Texas flooding devastation in subdued ensemble
First lady Melania Trump joined President Donald Trump to visit victims of the Texas floods Friday, July 11. The first lady was pictured embracing her husband while departing the White House in a khaki-colored jacket and monochromatic army green look paired with animal print sunglasses and Converse Chuck Taylor kicks, also a fashion favorite of former Vice President Kamala Harris. Later, the duo arrived at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, before traveling to Kerrville, Texas, to survey the damage of catastrophic flooding that tore across the Texas Hill Country, as authorities and volunteers searched for the missing, and local residents mourned the dead. For the arrival, Trump tucked her free-flowing waves from earlier under a black baseball cap. Melania Trump wears bold floral pants, bright pink heels The death toll has rose to over 120 people killed since heavy rainfall overwhelmed the Guadalupe River and flowed through homes and summer camps in the early morning hours of July 4. With just word-of-mouth warning, a man raced 25 miles to save guests at his Texas RV park Trump's outfit for the occasion was toned down compared to some recent looks, including a black mantilla veil she wore to the funeral of Pope Francis in April that went viral among followers of the first lady's fashion, which is often thought to reflect her mood. In recent months, Trump has made selective public appearances that reflect her private, lowkey nature. However, in major moments, she has appeared alongside the president at a slew of engagements including his second Inauguration festivities, Fourth of July events, the White House Easter egg roll and the administration's multimillion-dollar festival and parade celebrating the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. Last week, the first lady wore a white Thom Browne shirt dress to attend Independence Day celebrations at the White House, also joining the president for his "One Big, Beautiful Bill" signing. The dress featured a collar, left unbuttoned, and was coordinated with a pair of the first lady's fashion must-haves: chic Manolo Blahnik pumps. Contributing: Christopher Cann, Joey Garrison, Karissa Waddick, Bart Jansen


Miami Herald
30-06-2025
- Miami Herald
Multiple Cell Towers Sabotaged Across NATO Nation: What To Know
Sweden is investigating a series of suspected sabotage incidents involving more than 30 telecom towers, raising alarms over infrastructure vulnerability amid ongoing geopolitical tensions in Europe. The affected infrastructure spans locations along Sweden's E22 highway, where cables were severed and technical equipment damaged at multiple sites, according to local media and Data Center Dynamics. Sweden, which joined NATO in March 2024, is among several member states seeing increased focus on critical infrastructure protection, particularly in the context of the Baltic region's elevated security posture following Russia's war in Ukraine. Though the motive and perpetrator remain unknown, the nature of the damage has heightened concerns within Sweden's security community. "This stands out and is more than usual," Roger Gustafsson, head of security at Sweden's Post and Telecom Authority (PTS), told the national broadcaster SVT Nyheter. The incidents started during Easter weekend at more than 30 locations and led to outages on mobile networks in some cases but nothing major. The E22, also known as the European Road, is part of a road network that stretches for more than 3,300 miles, connecting the U.K. in the west to Russia in the east. Detective Superintendent Håkan Wessung, head of serious crime in Kalmar, said investigators "don't rule anything out," including the possibility of deliberate attacks, according to The Economic Times. Previous incidents in Sweden include a 2016 case in which a 300-meter mast was deliberately taken down, affecting tens of thousands of households. Meanwhile, concerns about infrastructure security have extended to undersea cables. In February, a fiber-optic cable between Finland and Germany was damaged in Swedish waters near Gotland. Swedish authorities opened a sabotage investigation, although the Finnish operator reported no service disruption. "These incidents must be viewed in the context of the existing serious security situation," Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson wrote on X, formerly Twitter, at the time. Similar sabotage acts previously affected NATO member states, including Sweden, such as the cutting of key underwater communications cables in the Baltic, arson attacks on logistics facilities in Germany, and cyberattacks targeting defense firms. Swedish prosecutor Michelle Stein, who is leading the police investigation, told SVT: "There are circumstances that make everything seem to be connected, but it is something that the investigation will have to show." Multiple European telecommunications firms, in an open letter to the European Union, U.K. and NATO In April: "At this crucial time for Europe's security and resilience, we commend your efforts to strengthen collective defence and protect critical infrastructure. Subsea cables play a vital role in Europe's connectivity, competitiveness, defence readiness, and economic stability. We recommend the EU/EEA and UK authorities as well as NATO renew their collaboration to address this situation effectively, together with the industry stakeholders from the EU and from the UK. "With the rise in hybrid threats, including incidents affecting subsea cables in the Baltic and North Sea, we emphasize the importance of enhanced, coordinated action to safeguard Europe's cross-border networks. The EU Action Plan on Cable Security provides a clear approach to further increase the resilience and security of subsea cables." Swedish authorities continue to investigate the tower incidents, with assistance from security services and technical experts. They have not announced arrests or released findings confirming sabotage. In the meantime, national and regional coordination on critical infrastructure protection is expected to intensify. The developments have pushed telecommunications and energy security higher on Sweden's national agenda as European nations adapt to a security environment reshaped by war and technological vulnerability. Related Articles Russia Predicts Why NATO Will CollapseUkraine Rebukes NATO Member For Plea To Forgive PutinChina Research Ship Spotted on NATO's DoorstepBetting Market in Disarray Over Zelensky Suit That's Also Maybe Not a Suit 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Yahoo
30-06-2025
- Yahoo
Supreme Court declines appeal from White Texan claiming racial harassment at school
WASHINGTON – A White Texan says he was targeted by classmates and teachers at his predominantly Hispanic school district because of his race, including being called 'Whitey' by a math aide and being asked by a principal if he was listening to Dixie music. In middle school band class in 2018, two students brought up 'the evils of the white race in American history,' Brooks Warden said in his years-long lawsuit. The Supreme Court on June 30 declined to decide if Warden can sue for racial harassment under the Civil Rights Act. More: Supreme Court sides with straight woman in 'reverse discrimination' case The Austin Independent School District said Warden failed to show the alleged hostility was based on race, rather than his political views. 'This case has devolved into a publicity stunt fueled by partisan rhetoric and political opportunism,' lawyers for the school district told the Supreme Court. 'Austin ISD does not condone harassment or bullying of any kind, and it regrets that Brooks had negative experiences with its students and staff members, but this is not a Title VI case.' A federal judge dismissed the complaint. But the Louisiana-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals evenly divided over the issue. One of the appeals judges who sided with Warden said the culture increasingly accepts – it not celebrates – racism against White people. 'Racism is now edgy and exciting—so long as it's against whites,' Circuit Judge James Ho wrote. Warden said the bullying began after he wore a MAGA hat on a middle school field trip in 2017. His lawyers said he should not have to prove that race was the main reason he was targeted instead of just one of the reasons. The school district said Warden never complained that he was mistreated because of his race while he was a student there. That allegation came nearly a year after he sued and after a local judge had dismissed his multiple amended complaints against the school, lawyers for the district said. The court, the lawyers said, should not 'open the proverbial floodgates to civil liability by allowing students to sue their schools for race-based harassment every time they hear a political viewpoint about race that they do not share.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court declines case of White Texan claiming racial harassment