Supreme Court declines appeal from White Texan claiming racial harassment at school
In middle school band class in 2018, two students brought up 'the evils of the white race in American history,' Brooks Warden said in his years-long lawsuit.
The Supreme Court on June 30 declined to decide if Warden can sue for racial harassment under the Civil Rights Act.
More: Supreme Court sides with straight woman in 'reverse discrimination' case
The Austin Independent School District said Warden failed to show the alleged hostility was based on race, rather than his political views.
'This case has devolved into a publicity stunt fueled by partisan rhetoric and political opportunism,' lawyers for the school district told the Supreme Court. 'Austin ISD does not condone harassment or bullying of any kind, and it regrets that Brooks had negative experiences with its students and staff members, but this is not a Title VI case.'
A federal judge dismissed the complaint. But the Louisiana-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals evenly divided over the issue.
One of the appeals judges who sided with Warden said the culture increasingly accepts – it not celebrates – racism against White people.
'Racism is now edgy and exciting—so long as it's against whites,' Circuit Judge James Ho wrote.
Warden said the bullying began after he wore a MAGA hat on a middle school field trip in 2017. His lawyers said he should not have to prove that race was the main reason he was targeted instead of just one of the reasons.
The school district said Warden never complained that he was mistreated because of his race while he was a student there. That allegation came nearly a year after he sued and after a local judge had dismissed his multiple amended complaints against the school, lawyers for the district said.
The court, the lawyers said, should not 'open the proverbial floodgates to civil liability by allowing students to sue their schools for race-based harassment every time they hear a political viewpoint about race that they do not share.'
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court declines case of White Texan claiming racial harassment
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Senators Came to Their Senses on AI Regulation Ban
Some sense has prevailed in the Senate — a 99-1 vote against a provision in its huge tax and spending bill that would have banned state-level artificial-intelligence laws for the next 10 years. It's been just 944 dizzying days since ChatGPT was launched into the world — imagine what might have happened over the next 3,653. A last-gasp effort to amend the bill, which included reducing 10 years to five, also failed. The new wording would have been more onerous than the original, decimating existing state laws on facial recognition and data privacy. New laws will need to tackle AI-triggered issues on discrimination, recruitment and mental health. The matter is simply too urgent to be left only in Washington's hands. Senators rightly saw through the moratorium as doing the bidding of big tech companies that want free rein to do as they please in the insatiable race to build and sell AI.
CBS News
24 minutes ago
- CBS News
35 people charged in "dismantling" of Norristown drug rings that flooded Montco with crack cocaine, DA says
July 4 events proceeding as scheduled in Philadelphia despite DC33 strike | Digital Brief July 4 events proceeding as scheduled in Philadelphia despite DC33 strike | Digital Brief July 4 events proceeding as scheduled in Philadelphia despite DC33 strike | Digital Brief Thirty-five people were criminally charged Tuesday after a monthslong investigative operation targeting the drug market in Norristown, Pennsylvania, Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele said in a news release. Hundreds of pages of court documents show how "Operation Cocaine Goldmine" used wiretaps, confidential informants, controlled buys and other surveillance to track three drug trafficking organizations in Norristown — the county seat — from late 2024 to June 2025. Steele said the investigation took place as opioid and fentanyl use declined, but "cocaine and crack cocaine...[experienced] a resurgence, in part due to the dramatic decline in wholesale cocaine prices." As bulk traffickers, mid-level suppliers, and street-level dealers were able to get easier access to large quantities of the drug due to the price shifts, county detectives worked with the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, FBI, DEA and Norristown police on targeting networks operating in Norristown. Steele said the investigation has helped identify "intertwined networks of individuals who are most responsible for the trafficking of bulk quantities of cocaine into Montgomery County." The documents show some dealers were also involved in the illicit dealing of prescription drugs, like Klonopin and Percocet. Seven pounds of powder and crack cocaine, over $138,000 cash and 17 guns were seized during the operation. Steele said the operation and other recent arrests in shootings are "a concerted effort to rid Norristown of this criminal element that will not be tolerated in our county seat. I want to thank our state and federal partners for their ongoing assistance, especially the Attorney General's Office." Alleged ringleaders identified and charged Steele's office identified these five people as the alleged ringleaders of the three drug networks: · Terrell Bailey, 50, of Norristown · Jerome Berry, 32, of Norristown · Malik Noel, 49, of Philadelphia · Oscar Gordon, 37, of Norristown · Donta Wells, 40, of Norristown All of those five have been arrested and charged. Warrants have been issued for seven other people: Denise Baird, Darnell Cotton, Tyya Griffin, Tyleek Lee, Michael Taylor, Curtis Thomas and Cori Wagner.
CBS News
24 minutes ago
- CBS News
Michigan lawmakers, officials react to passage of federal spending bill
The U.S. Senate narrowly passed President Trump's massive tax and spending bill Tuesday, with a tie ultimately broken by Vice President JD Vance. The bill that was referred to by Republicans as the "Big, Beautiful Bill" now goes back to the House for a final vote and then to the president's desk, possibly by the end of this week. All Senate Democrats voted against the bill, including Michigan Senators Gary Peters and Elissa Slotkin. Here are some of the reactions and statements issued by Michigan officials and organizations as the vote was announced. U.S. Senator Gary Peters, D-Michigan "Democrats did everything in our power to stop this legislation, but President Trump and Republicans in Congress are dead set on selling out hardworking Michiganders so they can pay for a massive tax cut for billionaires. This bill is reckless, irresponsible, and an unconscionable betrayal of American families. I voted no," Sen. Gary Peters said. U.S. Senator Elissa Slotkin, D-Michigan "After more than 25 hours on the Senate floor, I voted no on the so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' No matter which way you slice it – health care, energy, housing – the President just rammed through a bill that will make Michiganders pay in every part of their lives. All so the wealthiest among us can get a tax break," Sen. Elissa Slotkin said. Curtis Hertel, chair of the Michigan Democratic Party "Millions of Michiganders will see their costs go up thanks to Republicans in DC choosing to help billionaires over working families. Republicans are trying to gut Medicaid and SNAP programs and put thousands of jobs, and even more lives, at risk as hospitals are forced to close and families lose coverage," Michigan Democratic Party chair Curtis Hertel said. "This budget is not just cruel, it's stupid and a financial disaster for our state and the whole country." Charlesetta Wilson, director of nursing homes at SEIU Healthcare Michigan "This legislation is a direct attack on the health and dignity of Michigan's working families. It would rip more than a trillion dollars from Medicaid and other essential programs our communities rely on just to fund more tax breaks for billionaires. ... We're calling on Michigan's U.S. House delegation to vote no," Charlesetta Wilson, director of nursing homes at SEIU Healthcare Michigan, said. Michigan League for Public Policy "The shock of this bill is hard to overstate. Republican leaders just voted to spend trillions of dollars to increase poverty and hunger, to strip away health coverage, and to create the biggest redistribution of wealth from poor to rich in U.S. history. Much of the bill — including billions of dollars to be spent on a 'mass deportation plan' that could upend our nation's immigration system — lacks specificity and gives full discretion to the Trump administration, not Congress. And this shortsighted, harmful bill also adds $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficit. It's just staggering," read a statement from the Michigan League for Public Policy.
