‘Make America Healthy Again' is winning young voters — Democrats should worry
Recent polling shows Americans trust Republicans over Democrats on nearly every major issue confronting our country: the economy, immigration, foreign policy and inflation. The two areas where Democrats hold the upper hand is health care and vaccines.
RFK Jr. has a shot of undermining that advantage, especially with young voters.
Although the Health and Human Services secretary has been relentlessly blasted by the liberal media for being 'anti-vaccine' (which Kennedy denies), a great many Americans like Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again agenda and agree that corporate interests are helping to make Americans sick and overly reliant on pharmaceuticals.
A poll conducted by NBC News last month (in which Trump earned only a 45 percent job approval) showed that a majority of the country (51 percent) liked what RFK is doing, whereas only 48 percent disapproved. Interestingly, when asked who was to blame for America's chronic health problems, including obesity and heart disease, a plurality of respondents blamed the food industry.
Much of RFK's agenda makes sense. A New York Times author last fall set out to debunk five of Kennedy's main claims about the nation's health, but ended up supporting three of them. For example, she concluded that 'many public health and nutrition experts agree' with his assertion that 'Ultraprocessed foods are driving the obesity epidemic, and they should be removed from school lunches.'
On the subject of food dyes, which the HHS secretary says 'cause cancer, and ADHD in children,' she wrote, 'some small clinical trials have suggested that certain synthetic food dyes may increase hyperactivity in children.' 'Many experts agree,' she continued, 'it wouldn't hurt to avoid them.'
How about his suggestion 'that consuming too many added sugars, especially from high fructose corn syrup, contributes to childhood obesity and cardiovascular disease?' Answer: 'Correct.'
RFK Jr. is shaking up the food industry. In April, the Food and Drug Administration announced it would move to eliminate several petroleum-based dyes, which Kennedy claims can cause cancer and ADHD in kids, by the end of next year. Already, a large number of top brands, including General Mills, Kraft Heinz, Nestlé, Hershey, J.M. Smucker, McCormick, Pepsico and Sam's Club, have taken steps to replace the artificial dyes used in candy, ice cream and other products with natural ingredients, despite the costs of doing so.
The changes are likely to be popular, despite the less alluring colors of mint chip ice cream or Froot Loops. In Canada and Europe, foods colored with artificial dyes are required to carry a warning label. Consequently, manufacturers generally use natural products instead.
Call me crazy, but the fact that so many food companies are making the switch, despite the expense and possibility of lost sales, suggests they know something they're not publicizing about these dyes and that Kennedy is on the right track.
In May, Kennedy and his 'Make America Healthy Again' commission targeted ultra-processed foods in a 69-page report. Ultraprocessed foods, which make up 70-plus percent of Americans' diet, are made with manufactured rather than natural ingredients and formulated to encourage people to eat more, which adds to our obesity problems.
A study last year of the dietary habits of nearly 10 million people published in the British Medical Journal revealed that exposure to ultra-processed food 'was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.' In particular, the study linked ultraprocessed foods to increased incidents of some 30 health conditions, including obesity, diabetes, heart disease, certain cancers and mental health disorders.
Is Kennedy right to take them on? Absolutely. The wonder is that no one has investigated the industry before this.
It is actually not a puzzle. According to Open Secrets, agribusiness PACs donated nearly $31 million to politicians last year, while food sales and processing firms threw in another $3 million. Moreover, the food industry spilled $16 million on lobbying. That buys a lot of protection.
Meanwhile, RFK Jr.'s concerns over widely prescribed vaccines has been harshly criticized by the medical establishment. The left has accused him of downplaying a measles outbreak in Texas, and talking up cures rather than advocating for increased vaccinations.
But Kennedy has acknowledged that public trust in U.S. vaccine mandates and indeed in our health industries need to be rebuilt. He is right.
That has led to a complete overhaul of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, citing 'persistent conflicts of interest' among members of the former board which, he wrote in a recent op-ed, 'has never recommended against a vaccine — even those later withdrawn for safety reasons.' Having new, independent researchers take a fresh look at Americans' vaccine regimen should be welcomed.
Kennedy's willingness to gore sacred cows and ask tough questions make him popular with young people, and is likely contributing to Republican gains with young male and female Gen-Zers.
A recent Fox News interviewer asked a young influencer why young voters are 'flocking to MAHA.' Lexi Vrachalus answered that she and others were alarmed by the rise chronic diseases in their peers — diseases that are preventable with diet and lifestyle choices. Asked about her focus on the gut, she explained, 'if we eat bad, we are going to feel bad mentally and physically, so I think it's crucial that we fuel our bodies with real, whole, single ingredient, unprocessed foods.'
In May, The New York Times published a piece about 'The Rise of the 'Crunchy Teen' Wellness Influencer' writing, 'High schoolers are appealing to other health-conscious kids online, sometimes by expressing views in line with the 'Make America Healthy Again' movement.' The skeptical Times writer found plenty of reason to find the trend concerning, as teens may, for instance, over-emphasize one diet component or another.
But Democrats should find the trend concerning as well, especially as Kennedy's MAHA program continues to win over young voters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Why many women over age 52 have a higher risk of getting STIs
STIs are on the rise — but it's not just frat bros and free-lovers feeling the burn. While younger people still account for the majority of cases, studies show that some of the steepest spikes are happening in people 55 and up. Experts have offered several explanations for the surge, but research suggests there's a risk factor affecting many midlife and older women that has largely flown under the radar and could be playing a key role. Advertisement 4 More Americans are having sex in their senior years thanks to advancements in medicine. Monkey Business – More than a million American women hit menopause each year — and it's not just hot flashes and mood swings they're facing. The transition, which wraps up around age 52 on average, marks the end of reproductive years and is driven by a drop in estrogen as the ovaries slow hormone production. While vaginal dryness and loss of elasticity are well-known symptoms, research from Ohio State University (OSU) shows that menopause can also weaken the vaginal tissue itself, making it more prone to tearing. Advertisement That vulnerability comes down to changes at the cellular level. The vagina's surface is made up of multiple layers held together by key proteins like desmoglein-1 (DSG1) and desmocollin-1 (DSC1). 'These proteins strengthen the vaginal lining and restrict pathogen access to deeper tissue, reducing the risk of infection,' Dr. Thomas L. Cherpes, associate professor of otolaryngology at OSU, wrote in The Conversation. Advertisement 4 Menopause can bring a host of uncomfortable symptoms, including vaginal changes. – In their research, Cherpes and his colleagues found that postmenopausal women have significantly lower levels of DSG1 and DSC1 than women who haven't gone through the transition. To see how this might impact infection risk, the researchers removed the ovaries of mice in a lab to mimic estrogen loss in postmenopausal women. Compared to mice with intact ovaries, those without had far lower levels of DSG1 and DSC1 in their vaginal tissue. Advertisement The team also found that these mice were more vulnerable to infection with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), which causes genital herpes. They were less able to clear chlamydia infections from the lower genital tract as well. The findings help explain why postmenopausal women are more susceptible to STIs than their younger counterparts. Notably, when Cherpes and his colleagues applied estrogen cream to the mice without ovaries, it restored the vaginal lining's integrity and fully protected them from HSV-2 infection. 4 The vaginal tissue is more vulnerable to tearing after menopause, opening the door to infection. megaflopp – 'While additional research is needed, findings from our lab suggest that estrogen-containing compounds used to relieve vaginal irritation and other symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause can also reduce susceptibility to STIs among older adults,' Cherpes wrote. Sex doesn't stop — and neither do the risks Americans might not like to talk about it, but older adults are still very much having sex. A 2018 survey found nearly 40% of people aged 65 to 80 are sexually active, and almost two-thirds remain interested in sex. Advertisement More recent AARP data shows that 26% of 60- to 69-year-olds and 17% of those 70 and older have sex weekly. 'Hormone-replacement therapy, vaginal lubricants and the approval of sildenafil (Viagra) and its relatives have extended people's sex lives,' Dr. Sandra Adamson Fryhofer told the American Medical Association. But while more people are living longer and staying sexually active, more are also paying the price. 4 Sex-crazed seniors are fueling a major spike in STIs nationwide. David – Advertisement 'Rates are highest in the under 25 age group, which accounts for about 50% of STIs, but we're definitely seeing a rise in infections in the older population, particularly in people over 65,' Dr. Angelina Gangestad said in an interview with University Hospitals. Between 2010 and 2023, the number of Americans over 65 diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea or syphilis rose by roughly three-, five- and sevenfold, respectively, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Research also suggests women over 50 are at greater risk for HIV than their younger peers. Advertisement In addition to the effects of menopause, experts say several other factors are likely fueling the rise. Condom use is significantly lower among older adults compared to younger people. One study found that just 3% of Americans aged 60 and older have used a condom in the past year. Older adults also tend to have less knowledge about STIs, including how they spread, what symptoms look like and how to prevent them. Advertisement To make matters worse, research suggests that many doctors don't ask older patients about their sex lives — and seniors aren't exactly jumping to bring it up with their family or friends, either. 'No one wants to think about grandma doing this,' Matthew Lee Smith, an associate professor at the Texas A&M School of Public Health, told NBC News. 'You certainly aren't going to ask grandma if she was wearing condoms — and that's part of the problem, because every individual regardless of age has the right to intimacy.'
UPI
21 minutes ago
- UPI
Deaths among young people who inhale 'laughing gas' are soaring
Children and teenagers in the U.S. are increasingly inhaling nitrous oxide, or laughing gas, to get high -- and deaths linked to use of the legal inhalant have increased 578% in the last 13 years. Photo courtesy FDA/HealthDay News It's no laughing matter: Kids and teens across America are increasingly inhaling nitrous oxide, better known as "laughing gas," to get high. Too often, this ends in tragedy. U.S. deaths linked to misuse of the common, legal inhalant climbed nearly sevenfold -- 578% -- between 2010 and 2023, a new report finds. In 2023, 156 Americans, many of them children, died from huffing nitrous oxide, according to a new study. "This is not local to one area; it's everywhere," said study co-author Andrew Yockey, assistant professor of public health at the University of Mississippi. "And it absolutely deserves national surveillance," he added in a news release. "The numbers are still small right now, but they're growing and they're growing fast." There are no age restrictions on buying nitrous oxide, and it "is available online and in gas stations across the country, so, these products become an easy way to get high, and the companies know that," Yockey said. "How long do we have to wait before we consider this a problem?" he asked. His team published its findings July 30 in JAMA Network Open. Nitrous oxide, often referred to as "whippets," is usually sold in canisters and access appears to be growing. "From about 2020 on, you really started to see two things: nitrous oxide products appearing in gas stations, online, etc., and then in 2023, the U.K. banned nitrous oxide," Yockey said. "I think that's when some of those products started creeping in globally." He noted that many nitrous oxide products come in flavors that are especially enticing to kids: Berries or cotton candy, for example. Products often come with flavored nozzles. "These flavored nozzles -- bubblegum, mango -- tell me these aren't being marketed to kids?" Yockey said. Unsurprisingly, kids and teens are most prone to experimenting with nitrous oxide. In fact, eighth-graders make up a big proportion of users, the research showed. However, use comes with risks: Blood clots, frostbite, asphyxiation, heart palpitations, hallucinations and even paralysis, brain damage or death, according to the study authors. The research focused on 14 years of U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data on nitrous oxide-related deaths. Fatalities were rare and relatively stable until about 2010, when there were 23 deaths nationwide. But after that point, death rates began to climb. "What's especially concerning is how accessible and deceptively safe nitrous oxide seems," said study co-author Rachel Hoopsick, assistant professor of health and kinesiology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. "It's legal, easy to buy and often viewed as harmless. But frequent or high-volume use can lead to serious neurological damage, psychiatric symptoms or even death." She said researchers are particularly worried about young people experimenting without understanding the risks. "The rise in harm calls for not only prevention," Hoopsick said in a news release, "But also stronger harm-reduction strategies." The U.S. Food and Drug Administration did issue a warning earlier this year, highlighting the dangers of inhaling nitrous oxide. That warning lists 15 nitrous oxide products, with names like Baking Bad, Cloud 9ine, Cosmic Gas and Whip-It!, but Yockey and Hoopsick are convinced there are dozens more. "We started researching nitrous oxide misuse after seeing headlines about young people dying from what many believed was a harmless substance," Hoopsick said. "Around the same time, we were both hearing anecdotal reports of nitrous oxide use among students on our respective campuses. These weren't just isolated incidents; they pointed to a larger, overlooked public health issue." Much more needs to be done to get the word out to parents and kids that "laughing gas" is far from harmless, the team said. "Public awareness is far behind where it needs to be," Hoopsick said. "Most people -- including parents, educators and even some health care providers -- don't realize how common nitrous oxide use has become or how dangerous it can be. "I want them to know that legal doesn't mean safe and that early, nonjudgmental conversations can make a real difference," she added. More information Find out more about the dangers of nitrous oxide at the Cleveland Clinic. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Politico
21 minutes ago
- Politico
‘I wouldn't want her in my district': Some Dems want Kamala Harris to sit the midterms out
After more than two decades serving in elected office — rising from San Francisco district attorney to California attorney general to senator and, ultimately, vice president and Democratic presidential nominee — Harris said she was eager to find a new way to be engaged, albeit one that would still maintain her profile with everyday people. 'I want to travel the country,' she told Colbert. 'I want to listen to people. I want to talk with people. And I don't want it to be transactional where I'm asking for their vote.' Her bearish assessment about the state of the country was, in Colbert's words, 'harrowing,' leading Harris, who is focusing on a book tour and potential non-profit initiative, to insist she was not disengaging from civic life entirely. 'In this moment where people have become so deflated and despondent and afraid, those of us who have the ability — which I do right now, not being in an office or in a campaign for that office, to be out there and to talk with folks and remind them of their power,' she added. A Harris spokesperson declined to comment for this story. While there is plenty of skepticism within the party's ranks about her viability in 2028, many prominent Democratic leaders still effuse praise for Harris and have touted her as a key asset for candidates in the midterms. Asked if he wants her to run in 2028, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, her former running mate, told POLITICO, 'I would welcome it. I think she was a great candidate. I think she would make a great president. I saw how she thinks. I saw how she cares about people. So if that's her decision, you know where my heart is.' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who's considered a potential presidential contender himself, boasted about Harris after a bill-signing ceremony this week, calling her a 'terrific spokesperson' with a storied career who can help Democrats speak to the economic challenges facing working people. 'Frankly, those of us who believe that we need change in this country right now, need all the help that we can get to try to overcome what's ahead and to win in the 2026 elections,' Pritzker told reporters. 'And so I welcome her to that fight.'
