
The Perth suburbs where units could be your way onto property ladder
But the catch is, you need a 20 per cent deposit to buy the apartments.
The research highlights how high lease costs are keeping a third of the population stuck in the rent trap, paying off a landlord's mortgage — instead of their own — while they struggle to save the required deposit.
President of the Real Estate Institute of WA Suzanne Brown acknowledged the odds are stacked against renters.
'It should always be your goal to exit the rental market — whatever that looks like,' she said.
'Perhaps that is buying something you can afford and renting somewhere you want to live. But buying should always be the long run focus.'
Ms Brown said renters should not give up, as she regularly saw examples of people who saved a 20 per cent deposit, sometimes in challenging circumstances.
Furthermore, major help was coming for first-home buyers through the First Home Guarantee, which will help eligible buyers to purchase with as little as a five per cent deposit without paying costly lender's mortgage insurance.
Research by the Real Estate Institute of WA shows 28 suburbs have median unit rents that are higher than weekly mortgage repayments at 6.05 per cent interest over 30 years.
Bayswater, Burswood, Beckenham, Perth and Cannington have the highest rental income versus mortgage cost differential.
In Burswood, there is almost a $1000 monthly difference between median mortgage repayments ($2737 per month) and median rental income ($3683 per month).
While the REIWA research does not include water, council rates and strata fees, separate research by The West Australian shows it is often still cheaper to buy than rent once these costs are included.
A two-bedroom city apartment on Murray St, for example, sold for $518,000 in mid May.
With a 20 per cent deposit, the owner pays $575 a week to repay the $414,000 loan over 30 years. Water and council rates, and the strata levy, comes to an additional $103 a weekly, leaving the home owner $678 a week out of pocket. An apartment in this city complex sold for $518,000 in mid May and advertised as a rental two weeks later for $725 a week, making it cheaper to buy than rent. The catch is, you have a deposit. Credit: supplied
But the very same apartment has this week been advertised as an unfurnished rental property, on a six-month lease, for $725 a week, leaving the home-owner positively geared from day one, nearly $50 a week in the red.
In another example, a two-bedroom, two-bathroom apartment in Bayswater sold for $540,000 in October.
Buyers would need a hefty $108,000 deposit to buy it, and repay $600 a week for 30 years under 6.05 per cent interest.
A further $35 a week is required for the strata fees, and $59 is required each week for council and water rates.
With total weekly costs at $694, the owner is still ahead, given an almost identical apartment around the corner is renting for $740 a week. This two by two Bayswater apartment sold for $540,000 in October 2024. Credit: supplied
Another examples includes a modern complex in Burswood, which is currently advertising a one-bedroom apartment, with parking space, for $650 a week rent.
However, the neighbouring one-bedroom apartment sold in mid May for $465,000. With a 20 per cent deposit ($93,000) a mortgage- holder would repay about $520 a week for 30 years. An extra $94 is required each week to pay water rates, council rates, strata levies and a special deck levy. With total costs at $614 a week, the owner is still ahead.
'Units are a more affordable entry point to the market than houses, particularly in areas closer to the city and lifestyle attractions, and can be good options for people looking to exit the rental market,' said Ms Brown. This one bedroom unit in this Burswood complex sold recently for $465k. Credit: supplied
'Currently capital growth for the broader unit market is on par with the housing market, driven by the strong demand for property.
'In general though, the rate of growth for apartments — in particular — does tend to be lower than for houses. But that is not often a significant factor for people looking to buy their first home.
'For investors, the unit market usually outperforms the housing market for yield. '
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘Really sad': Local Perth shopping centre to be demolished
Duncraig resident Neal Meakins channelled Muriel's Wedding's character Bill Heslop when describing how he was disappointed his local shopping centre would be demolished. 'It's obviously a shame, but you can't stop progress,' he said of the proposed redevelopment of the Glengarry Shopping Centre, which is set to be demolished to make way for a Woolworths supermarket — forcing out the local IGA — as well as new shops, eateries and commercial space. Earlier this year, Woolworths — the country's biggest supermarket chain — lodged a development application with the City of Joondalup to redevelop the 20-store centre, which is currently home to an IGA, several family-owned businesses and a post office. 'I've been shopping here for a long time and it's a shame for me to go somewhere else because I know the shop so well,' Mr Meakins said. Duncraig resident Neal Meakins. Credit: Andrew Ritchie / The West Australian The controversial Glengarry redevelopment comes as Woolworths postpones new builds on Charles Street in North Perth and Murray Street in West Perth, sparking questions about the supermarket's commercial strategies. It's understood some WA sites had higher construction costs based on their designs, which had affected development timelines. A Woolworths spokesman said it was excited about the opportunity to upgrade and modernise the Glengarry shopping centre. He added the community was currently under-serviced in terms of grocery retail with no full line supermarket. Glengarry Shopping Centre. Credit: Andrew Ritchie / The West Australian Inside of Glengarry Shopping Centre. Credit: Andrew Ritchie / The West Australian 'The redevelopment would include new services and convenient shopping options, and aims to create a vibrant place for small business and the community,' the company spokesman said. 'From time to time we acquire existing neighbourhood shopping centres that are in need of investment to improve the amenity and the offer for the community, leading to a local economy and jobs boost.' IGA supplier Metcash told The Sunday Times the independent grocer planned to exit Glengarry because though Woolworths had allowed for a 'very small second supermarket', it was not tenable for an IGA for several reasons, including size and location, with no direct access to a loading dock. Render of Woolworths' proposal. Credit: Supplied Metcash supplies to over 1600 independently-owned stores in Australia across the IGA and Foodland brands. Grant Ramage, the boss of Metcash's food arm, flagged concerns about the independents' ability to remain a viable competitor when one of the bigger supermarkets could just muscle in. Coles last year acquired the Milton Village shopping centre in Brisbane's inner west and as part of the redevelopment, did not renew the lease of the IGA that had been there for decades. In NSW, the Elermore Vale shopping centre was purchased by a developer as a proxy for Woolworths, paying $27 million in 2023. Woolworths is expected to replace the IGA once the lease expires in 2028. 'The trend known as creeping acquisitions is ongoing and contributes to the erosion of independent supermarket presence in local markets over time, and the overall scale of the independent network, needed to maintain a competitive offer,' Mr Ramage said. The Outer Metropolitan Development Assessment Panel will make a decision on Woolworths' application at a later date, with the City of Joondalup yet to provide a recommendation. I'm not sure why we need another Woolworths or Coles when there are so many nearby. For marketing and retail analyst Barry Urquhart, this was just part of the near-50-year-old Glengarry centre's life cycle. 'What you've got to say is that all things come to an end,' Mr Urquhart, managing director of Perth-based research company Marketing Focus, said. 'Any business that has been around operating, in any premises, beyond 15 years, a lot of consumers will say, 'Has it had its life cycle fulfilled' and therefore, it needs to be renewed, upgraded or replaced.' Asked if he agreed with Woolworths' claims the Glengarry redevelopment would improve shopping convenience and create a vibrant place for small business tenants and the community in Duncraig, Mr Ramage said there was no new residential redevelopment to justify another large supermarket. He added there were six existing Woolworths supermarkets within a 10-minute drive of Duncraig. But for some shoppers and local businesses that occupy the centre, the proposed redevelopment is long overdue, with the roof caving in. Rosemarie Persson, owner of Duncraig-Glengarry Flowers & Gifts, said the redevelopment was 'going to be fantastic for the area'. 'It will bring in more people, which it needs. It's a tired old little shopping centre and it just needs it,' she said. 'There's going to be more coffee shops and more places to eat, a Woolworths, more variety. But hopefully all the small businesses around here can come back and benefit from that.' Shopper Moira McFarlane welcomed the news of a bigger and modern centre with basement parking, but she was concerned about the traffic it would bring. '(The redevelopment is) well overdue, well overdue,' she said. 'My concern is the traffic, because it's bad enough now. The deliveries and trucks coming in near the hospitals next door is a bit concerning.' While Woolworths had offered Holmesys Bakehouse owner Steven Holmes a spot in the new centre, he said he wouldn't be able to afford the costs of temporary relocation. 'As a small business owner, I cannot afford it. I've only been here for three years, and I haven't even got the revenue yet,' he said. 'Which I have told them . . . so yeah, I'm just taking the money and I'm gone. 'There's positives and negatives for everything, but I don't understand why (Woolworths) is building here when they've got one literally five minutes up the road in Warwick.' Duncraig local Karen Kroeger said local shopping centres like Glengarry suited independent grocers. 'I'm not sure why we need another Woolworths or Coles when there are so many nearby,' she said. 'I feel for a lot of small businesses who may not be able to operate in a new centre place because of rent increases, or there's not enough space, and it's also hard and costly for them to start somewhere again in a different location,' she said. Duncraig local Karen Kroeger and son Patrick. Credit: Andrew Ritchie / The West Australian 'It's really sad for them; they've built up their reputations here, and they know all the locals.' The owner of Glengarry IGA declined to comment. Mr Ramage said consumers could face less variety and reduced product range and availability, as well as poorer service — or none at all when they are forced to use self-checkouts — with the arrival of Woolworths. He added that despite the millions of dollars of taxpayer money spent, the string of public inquiries into Australia's supermarket sector inquiries had not adequately addressed the issue of anti-competitive acquisitions. 'We are hopeful that the new merger laws will assist when they come into effect but will only go so far and won't reverse the damage done to date,' Mr Ramage said. Treasurer Jim Chalmers last October introduced new rules requiring any mergers that exceed a broad set of financial thresholds to get approval from the competition regulator. Under the current regime, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission only has the power to stop or legally challenge mergers it deems as having a substantial impact in the market. From the start of next year, a merger will need the green light from the watchdog if the combined turnover of the merging businesses is more than $200m, and either the business or assets being bought has turnover higher than $50m, or the global transaction value is above $250m. Deals where an Australian business turning over $500m tries to buy out another smaller business, with turnover above $10m, will also be captured under the new rules. From this month, businesses may voluntarily notify acquisitions to the ACCC. The ACCC in March delivered its final report into the $120 billion supermarket sector, which confirmed Coles and Woolworths' dominance. Former ACCC chair Graeme Samuel, who led the watchdog between 2003 and 2011, criticised the report's recommendations as not having enough teeth. Among the ACCC's list of recommendations, supermarkets should be required to inform customers when product sizes have changed and this information should be in close proximity to shelf tickets and on relevant websites. In response to the ACCC report, Metcash said it was pleased the regulator recognised the competitive role independents played in local communities. But Metcash said it was concerned with the growing dominance of the major supermarkets and their ability to grow through creeping acquisitions of independents and land banking.


West Australian
2 days ago
- West Australian
Perth business owners fed up with original designs being duplicated by ‘sketchy' online competitors
Perth business owners have shared what it is like to have larger online retailers duplicate their designs and sell them at a lesser price with no consequences. Local designers told The West Australian it 'feels like a punch in the gut' when their pieces— which they spend anywhere up to a year creating — get 'stolen' by online fast fashion retailers. The local slow fashion labels have had their designs 'duped' by well-known websites including Peppermayo, Glassons, Lioness, Ali Express and Shein. Fremantle seamstress Michelle Teles Vecchio, who is behind the popular Deconduarte dresses, said she didn't know whether to be flattered or angry when she saw her designs were being copied. 'I had many customers send me images of the dress that had been duped,' Ms Teles Vecchio said. 'I was pretty flattered to be honest but then I also felt a sense of anger. 'It was a huge fast fashion company and people were commenting on it saying the style and design was genius however it was stolen from us.' Ms Tele's no longer one-of-a-kind Ortiga dress, retails for $500, yet online competitors are charging just a fraction of that price for what looks almost like an exact replica. 'It definitely has negative effects . . . people in this cost-of-living crisis can't afford to pay $500 for a dress, so they will always choose the cheaper option,' she said. Signed + Sealed founders Georgia Shehade and Hannah Jones also felt 'flattered' by having their products duplicated but said it is 'damaging' to their newly-launched clothing and swimwear brand. 'When you see a unique, well-made piece from a local Australian business, there's often a knock-off not far behind,' the pair said. 'Dupe culture being so accepted is really damaging for small brands. 'At first we were really disappointed. It was one of our most popular and distinctive designs . . . so it was frustrating to see a cheaper, lower-quality version being made, widely available. 'However, we are always able to laugh about it and know that imitation is the highest form of flattery.' The mum and daughter duo behind Perth's viral Knitwit The Label have even had their marketing materials used by competitors. 'It's such a weird feeling seeing videos that I've taken, often actually of me wearing our pieces on social media without my consent at all,' Nina Wallace, 20, said. 'At first, seeing the pieces my mum and I work so hard on being duped felt like a punch in the gut. Now, I see an ad using one of my photos multiple times a day, it still stings, 'I have found it really difficult to get support from Instagram and TikTok in regards to getting these ads and pages taken down. These companies will also delete any comments trying to call them out or alert others that these aren't the original piece. 'Having our clothing duped directly impacts our sales as uninformed consumers will often get drawn into buying the cheapest version that they can find. 'Although I understand we're in a cost-of-living crisis, I find it really hard to justify stealing designs and selling dupes at the cost of small businesses.' Mon Ete Swim founder Paris Lindsay has noticed it is no longer exclusively fast fashion companies who are stealing her designs. 'We've seen fast fashion labels . . . attempt to replicate our bikinis, but what's been even more disheartening is seeing other small businesses — especially local ones in Perth and across Australia — try to do the same,' Ms Lindsay said. The Western Australian Small Business Commissioner Saj Abdoolakhan said reports of Australian small businesses having their unique designs copied and mass-produced by online retailers is 'concerning'. 'Small-business owners invest significant time and resources into developing original products,' he said. 'When these are replicated and sold by online retailers, often at a significantly lower price, it undermines not only the individual business but also broader innovation and entrepreneurship in Australia. 'Designers can protect their fashion design intellectual property by applying for a design right . . . a registered and certified design right protects the overall visual appearance of a new and distinctive product including fashion designs. 'A design right gives the designer the exclusive right to use their design within Australia only, however it is possible to apply for the same design right overseas.' However, the small business owners said applying for a design right is 'pointless'. 'Not even large corporations waste their time with this,' Ms Teles Vecchio said. 'This is costly and pointless in my opinion.' Ms Lindsay agreed: 'Trademarking is incredibly expensive for a small business, and even then, it doesn't offer much protection unless you're willing to fight it legally. 'Most brands that copy will change a small detail . . . which is enough to get around any legal issues.' Some of the business owners have attempted to use social media to call out the brands duplicating their designs but have been hit with cease and desist notices. The West Australian reached out to Peppermayo and Lioness for comment but did not hear back from either of them.


Perth Now
2 days ago
- Perth Now
Online rivals knocking off Perth labels' original designs
Perth business owners have shared what it is like to have larger online retailers duplicate their designs and sell them at a lesser price with no consequences. Local designers told The West Australian it 'feels like a punch in the gut' when their pieces— which they spend anywhere up to a year creating — get 'stolen' by online fast fashion retailers. The local slow fashion labels have had their designs 'duped' by well-known websites including Peppermayo, Glassons, Lioness, Ali Express and Shein. Fremantle seamstress Michelle Teles Vecchio, who is behind the popular Deconduarte dresses, said she didn't know whether to be flattered or angry when she saw her designs were being copied. 'I had many customers send me images of the dress that had been duped,' Ms Teles Vecchio said. 'I was pretty flattered to be honest but then I also felt a sense of anger. 'It was a huge fast fashion company and people were commenting on it saying the style and design was genius however it was stolen from us.' Deconduarte ORTIGA dress in blue which retails for $500. Credit: Deconduarte website Ms Tele's no longer one-of-a-kind Ortiga dress, retails for $500, yet online competitors are charging just a fraction of that price for what looks almost like an exact replica. 'It definitely has negative effects . . . people in this cost-of-living crisis can't afford to pay $500 for a dress, so they will always choose the cheaper option,' she said. Signed + Sealed founders Georgia Shehade and Hannah Jones also felt 'flattered' by having their products duplicated but said it is 'damaging' to their newly-launched clothing and swimwear brand. 'When you see a unique, well-made piece from a local Australian business, there's often a knock-off not far behind,' the pair said. 'Dupe culture being so accepted is really damaging for small brands. 'At first we were really disappointed. It was one of our most popular and distinctive designs . . . so it was frustrating to see a cheaper, lower-quality version being made, widely available. 'However, we are always able to laugh about it and know that imitation is the highest form of flattery.' The mum and daughter duo behind Perth's viral Knitwit The Label have even had their marketing materials used by competitors. 'It's such a weird feeling seeing videos that I've taken, often actually of me wearing our pieces on social media without my consent at all,' Nina Wallace, 20, said. Peppermayo Consie Long Sleeve Mini Dress, retails for $129.95 Credit: Peppermayo website 'At first, seeing the pieces my mum and I work so hard on being duped felt like a punch in the gut. Now, I see an ad using one of my photos multiple times a day, it still stings, 'I have found it really difficult to get support from Instagram and TikTok in regards to getting these ads and pages taken down. These companies will also delete any comments trying to call them out or alert others that these aren't the original piece. 'Having our clothing duped directly impacts our sales as uninformed consumers will often get drawn into buying the cheapest version that they can find. 'Although I understand we're in a cost-of-living crisis, I find it really hard to justify stealing designs and selling dupes at the cost of small businesses.' (L-R) Paris Lindsay from Mon Ete Swim, Hannah Jones from Signed + Sealed, Nina Wallace from Knitwit the Label, Michelle teles from deconduarte. Credit: Caitlin Vinci Mon Ete Swim founder Paris Lindsay has noticed it is no longer exclusively fast fashion companies who are stealing her designs. 'We've seen fast fashion labels . . . attempt to replicate our bikinis, but what's been even more disheartening is seeing other small businesses — especially local ones in Perth and across Australia — try to do the same,' Ms Lindsay said. The Western Australian Small Business Commissioner Saj Abdoolakhan said reports of Australian small businesses having their unique designs copied and mass-produced by online retailers is 'concerning'. 'Small-business owners invest significant time and resources into developing original products,' he said. 'When these are replicated and sold by online retailers, often at a significantly lower price, it undermines not only the individual business but also broader innovation and entrepreneurship in Australia. 'Designers can protect their fashion design intellectual property by applying for a design right . . . a registered and certified design right protects the overall visual appearance of a new and distinctive product including fashion designs. 'A design right gives the designer the exclusive right to use their design within Australia only, however it is possible to apply for the same design right overseas.' However, the small business owners said applying for a design right is 'pointless'. 'Not even large corporations waste their time with this,' Ms Teles Vecchio said. 'This is costly and pointless in my opinion.' Ms Lindsay agreed: 'Trademarking is incredibly expensive for a small business, and even then, it doesn't offer much protection unless you're willing to fight it legally. 'Most brands that copy will change a small detail . . . which is enough to get around any legal issues.' Some of the business owners have attempted to use social media to call out the brands duplicating their designs but have been hit with cease and desist notices. The West Australian reached out to Peppermayo and Lioness for comment but did not hear back from either of them.