Tommy Sheridan says he is 'victimised' by Glasgow council
He has challenged this decision at Scotland's highest civil court, the Court of Session.
Tommy told BBC Scotland News that his gender critical views on trans rights were a factor in the decision by the SNP-run council.
READ MORE: Tommy Sheridan refused social work job due to 'unacceptable risk', court hears
Sheridan, who completed a master's degree in social work at Glasgow Caledonian University, told BBC Scotland that he had "no doubt whatsoever" that he was being blacklisted by the council.
He said that this is because of his socialist background and his views on transgender issues, which he says conflict with those of the SNP-led council.
He said: "I don't think it chimes with the spirit of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act to hold against someone a 15-year-old conviction.
"Particularly when I've already had to go through a vetting process, a very stiff vetting process from the body that was set up to regulate social care."
Sheridan maintains that his "lived experience", including time in prison, makes him particularly suited to working in criminal justice youth social work.
He said: "I come from a very working-class background, brought up in a housing scheme, having been in and around jails for the best part of 20-odd years.
"I have intimate knowledge of the processes, challenges, and what prison is really like."
(Image: Newsquest) He also claimed his gender-critical beliefs—such as rejecting self-identification in favour of biological definitions—played a role in the decision: "I think being a socialist is always difficult for some of the SNP councillors, but I think the biggest area would be my gender critical views.
"I don't share the SNP's position that someone can declare that they're a man or a woman. I believe in biology, I believe in science, and so does the law now.
"It's very unusual that the Supreme Court agrees with me, but there you go. I agree with the Supreme Court.
"Now, those are gender critical views that Glasgow City Council SNP group don't agree with. So I've got no doubt in my mind that that's part of the package."
Sheridan's case is currently under consideration at the Court of Session, after he received a rejection letter in August 2024.
The court heard that Glasgow City Council deemed his past conviction an 'unacceptable level of risk' for a social work role.
His lawyer argued the Scottish Social Services Council (SSSC)—the body responsible for regulating the profession—had already approved him as a suitable candidate, making the council's position unlawful.
In response, the council's legal representative, Paul Reid KC, maintained the decision was within the local authority's rights as an employment matter and therefore not subject to judicial review.
Lord Young is expected to deliver a ruling in due course.
READ MORE: Tommy Sheridan to pursue legal action against Scottish council
Sheridan has announced plans to return to frontline politics, seeking selection as a candidate for the Alba Party in the next Scottish Parliament elections.
He added: "Why don't I go back into politics and start using the skills I have to communicate, to advocate, to try and promote independence.
"But also to rage against some of the injustices in our world just now, of which there are far too many."
Sheridan rose to prominence as an anti-Poll Tax campaigner, later becoming an MSP in 1999 for the Scottish Socialist Party, which he led during its peak years.
He was imprisoned in 2011 after being convicted of perjury related to a defamation case against the News of the World.
A Glasgow City Council spokesperson said: 'It is untrue to say that Mr Sheridan's views on trans rights had any bearing on this matter whatsoever.
"The hiring process is purely operational, and elected members play no role in selecting candidates for this kind of role.
"Furthermore, these assertions did not form any part of Mr Sheridan's case in court.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
44 minutes ago
- The National
SNP have morphed into a shadow of the party they should be
I say 'repeat' as in the immediate post-World War Two period the then Labour secretary of state for Scotland, the commendable Tom Johnston, had a vision to build hydro dams in both the Highlands and south-west Scotland to provide cheap local energy which could be harnessed to create industrial activities and well-paid jobs in both regions, addressing the scourge of depopulation. The dams were built but the promise of cheap local electricity was never delivered. Once his plan was known to London, he was told 'oh no dear boy, it must all go into the National Grid'. No competitive advantage could be delivered to these areas of Scotland – what a naive plan. Scots – well nearly 50% of them, as yet – have still not woken up to the new post-Brexit regime in Westminster. It matters not whether that regime is Labour, Tory, Liberal or very soon likely Reform UK. There is no 'UK' in any of their thinking. This is the new 'Little England' post-Brexit nation. Starmer, when he agreed – well I should say 'accepted' – the recent trade terms with 'The Donald', announced on camera 'this is an important agreement for both our countries, England and America'. This was no slip of the tongue, that is their collective thinking, post-Brexit. They, meaning our southern neighbour, didn't just vote to leave Europe, their utopia is in the green and pleasant lands of England where, if Scotland exists at all, she is their colony to be exploited for all her resources and 'free gratis'. At the end of her informative article 'Why have the SNP consistently missed an opportunity with zonal energy pricing' (Jul 10), Lesley Riddoch asks: 'Who is making this political argument? Not the SNP, why the heck not?' The answer is surely 'ineptitude'. The SNP leadership appear to be ignorant of the benefits that zonal pricing would bring, not just to domestic users, but in helping Scotland rebuild an industrial capability. This, with zonal pricing, could be implemented now under devolution. Similarly, where was the outcry over Grangemouth? Why did the SNP not walk out of Westminster en masse after Brexit? Our friends in Europe expected us to, but no, and then the long list of unpopular English prime ministers, from the liar Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, 'now is not the time' Theresa May, Sunak, Sir Keir Starmer and waiting in the wings Nigel Farage. No opportunities were developed during these periods of great opportunity for the independence movement; the leadership of the SNP wasted every one of them. It is perhaps summed up best by Edwin Morgan, our great poet laureate who wrote, on the opening of the Scottish Parliament with such great promise, on October 9 2004: 'What do the people want of this place? They want it to be filled with thinking persons as open and adventurous as its architecture. 'A nest of fearties is what they do not want. 'A symposium of procrastinators is what they do not want. 'A phalanx of forelock-tuggers is what they do not want. And perhaps above all the droopy mantra of 'it wizny me' is what they do not want.' Well Lesley, there is your answer. It is exactly where we are with the current SNP leadership, exactly what Edwin cautioned us and our parliament to avoid, with John Swinney as the Chief Feartie in charge. Congratulations, John. A leadership with no vision for independence, no ambition to get us there, and not even a whimper at the ongoing, and deliberate, deindustrialisation of Scotland. 'Grangemouth no more, Falkirk no more!' The SNP have morphed into a shadow of the party they should be. People see through it. Shameful. We need radicalism, outrage, passion, and most of all new leadership. Ian Stewart Uig, Isle of Skye I AGREE with a lot of what Nick Cole said in his letter on Thursday, July 10, but he had at least two major omissions. Alex Salmond was in fact stitched up by SNP, so had a right to speak out against them. The SNP pushing gender recognition reform when they knew fine well it would split the indy vote was deliberate, as proven by them getting rid of those who would push for independence. Tim Rideout and Joanna Cherry spring to mind, but there were others. So the current version of SNP did nothing for a decade, and still does nothing except get rid of indy folk. The fact the party doesn't support the case at UN or adopting the UN charter on self-determination says it all. The real SNP that wanted independence has been hijacked by devolutionists. They likely supported indy at some point, but the salary and perks are too good to risk now. So although I'm desperate for independence, I'm not going to vote for the SNP to do nowt for another decade. If they don't get concrete plans on the board to go ahead without Westminster agreement if necessary, many Scots won't vote for them. Nick would do better for cause and party if he focused on why the SNP are not keen to proceed, and helped get them out of the party. A new NEC, and out with those who never mention independence. That's the cure for all SNP's woes, so what's stopping them? Grangemouth shows the long game is no longer a viable option so the best way to secure the party's future is to push ahead with indy. Voters who trusted them to act won't let them just be a devolution party. The biggest dividers of the indy vote in my opinion are gender recognition reform and SNP inaction on the supposed main goal. Heartbreaking, so it is. Bill Robertson via email
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
NHS in Scotland 'stuck in analogue age' as health boards shell out millions on pagers
Labour claimed the continued reliance on the devices proved the SNP Government was failing to equip the NHS for the 21st century. Scotland's NHS is " stuck in an analogue age" after it was revealed that health boards have shelled out millions of pounds on pagers in recent years. The devices were widely used in the 1980s and 1990s for instant communication before being replaced long ago by smartphones. Scottish Labour said the continued reliance on the devices proved the SNP Government was failing to equip the NHS for the 21st century. Data obtained by the party found health boards had spent at least £4,596,608 on pagers since 2018/19, with NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde spending almost £1.8 million and NHS Lothian spending close to £1 million. But the total figure is expected to be higher as some health boards failed to respond to a freedom of information request. Spending on pagers increased in at least seven health boards, while rising by 8 percent overall between 2018/19 and 2024/ Labour is now calling for improvements to hospital WiFi to reduce reliance on outdated technology like pagers and improve service delivery. At least 13 fax machines — used for sending messages instantly before emails — are still in use in Scottish hospitals. Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour health spokeswoman, said: "The UK Labour government is setting out a blueprint for NHS England's digital future, but the SNP, Scotland's NHS is still stuck in an analogue age. "The SNP has been in power for as long as the iPhone has existed, yet all analogue John has invented is excuses. Getting reliable WiFi in Scottish hospitals is the bare minimum the Scottish Government should do to bring our NHS into the 21 st century. "While English patients will soon be able to book appointments by app, the SNP can only promise a pilot for dermatology appointments in Lanarkshire. "Only Scottish Labour can take our NHS out of the SNP's analogue age — that's the new direction Scotland needs." It comes after Wes Streeting last week branded John Swinney an "analogue politician". The UK Health Secretary took a swipe at the First Minister as plans were announced to expand the NHS app available for patients in England. The Scottish version has yet to launch. Streeting said: "The UK Labour government is embracing technology to deliver a better NHS for patients and their families, giving them more control and transparency over their treatment. "In John Swinney the SNP have an analogue politician in a digital age and patients in Scotland are missing out. The SNP have record funding and complete control of the NHS in Scotland. "There are no excuses for [not having an app in place] and it just shows why Scotland can't afford a third decade of the SNP." A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'This spend of £4.6 million since 2018/19 must be seen in the context of an NHS budget that was more than £100 billion over the same period. 'While innovation and use of digital technology is essential to ensure the health and social care system's long-term sustainability, health boards should deploy the technology that enables NHS staff to best serve the needs of patients. "We expect health boards to embrace the latest tools, but also understand that pagers may be more practical and preferred in some cases. 'We have already taken significant steps through our Operational Improvement Plan and Health and Social Care Service Renewal Framework to set out clear actions to harness digital innovation, improve access to treatment, shift the balance of care into the community and strengthen prevention.'
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Trump's mass layoffs hit State Department as 1,300 workers are axed in deep state purge
The State Department has officially fired more than 1,300 workers after it warned them late on Thursday that mass layoffs were set to commence. The department sent layoff notices to 1,107 civil servants and 246 foreign service officers with assignments in the United States, the Associated Press reported. The notices said positions were being 'abolished.' The employees affected were also told they'd lose access to the State Department headquarters in Washington D.C., their emails and their shared drives by 5pm on Friday. The layoffs come only days after the Supreme Court cleared the way for Trump 's executive order allowing mass layoffs across the federal government to proceed, despite ongoing legal challenges. Employees, some of whom were crying, were seen exiting the State Department holding boxes of their belongings. Staffers who weren't laid off lined up in the lobby and applauded for their former colleagues. Outside the building were dozens of former colleagues, ambassadors, members of Congress and others who were protesting. Signs seen in the crowd said, 'Thank you to America's diplomats,' and 'We all deserve better.' 'We talk about people in uniform serving. But foreign service officers take an oath of office, just like military officers,' Anne Bodine, who retired from the State Department in 2011 after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, told the AP. 'This is not the way to treat people who served their country and who believe in "America First."' Friday's firings were part of President Donald Trump's mission to dramatically shrink the size of the federal government. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, though not yet commenting on the layoffs, was the one who proposed to Congress the reorganization of his department in late May. The State Department also lauded the Supreme Court ruling that allowed this reorganization to go through unchallenged. 'Today's near unanimous decision from the Supreme Court further confirms that the law was on our side throughout this entire process. We will continue to move forward with our historic reorganization plan at the State Department, as announced earlier this year,' the department posted on X, which was later reposted by Rubio himself. Rubio said officials took 'a very deliberate step to reorganize the State Department to be more efficient and more focused.' 'It's not a consequence of trying to get rid of people. But if you close the bureau, you don't need those positions,' Rubio told reporters Thursday. 'Understand that some of these are positions that are being eliminated, not people.' Foreign service officers affected will be placed immediately on administrative leave for 120 days, after which they will formally lose their jobs. For most civil servants the separation period lasts 60 days. Critics say the scale of cuts floated at the State Department will 'leave the US with limited tools to engage as a leader on the world stage during this critical juncture,' making it hard for many offices to carry out their missions. The cuts follow Trump's earlier elimination of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) - a major pillar of America's global aid apparatus that employed over 10,000 people worldwide. Diplomats warn the gutting of both agencies in a single year could cripple US influence abroad, especially as conflicts intensify in the Middle East and Ukraine, and China expands its global footprint. The American Foreign Service Association, the union that represents diplomats, urged the State Department last month to hold off on job cuts. Notices for a reduction in force, which would not only lay off employees but eliminate positions altogether, 'should be a last resort,' association President Tom Yazdgerdi said. 'Disrupting the Foreign Service like this puts national interests at risk - and Americans everywhere will bear the consequences.' While the administration is framing the cuts as streamlining, critics say the real effect is a hollowing out of US diplomacy with human rights, refugee resettlement, and war crimes offices facing extinction under the restructuring.
