HC to hear afresh pleas against Maratha reservation from July 18
The bench noted that the state government's submission that an interim order passed last year that any applications for admissions to educational institutions or jobs at government authorities taking benefit of the impugned Act will be subject to further orders in the present proceedings still continues, therefore, it was inclined to conduct the final hearing on the pleas.
The Supreme Court on May 13 had asked HC to expeditiously hear the pleas including application by students appearing for National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) undergraduate and postgraduate exams of 2025. The students filed pleas seeking interim relief, claiming that a delay in the disposal of pleas was impacting their right to equal consideration in the admission process.
The pleas were not heard after the then Bombay HC Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya's transfer as the CJ of Delhi HC in January this year.
Justice Upadhyaya was part of a full or three-judge bench, which since April, last year, had been hearing the pleas against the Socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC) Act, 2024 that provided 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs to the Maratha community. The petitioners' arguments concluded on October 14, 2024.
Two days after the SC order, the Bombay HC, on May 15, constituted a new three-judge bench/full bench of Justices Ravindra V Ghuge, N J Jamadar, and Sandeep V Marne, which heard the pleas on Wednesday.
The 2024 law, which provided 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs to the Maratha community that constitutes nearly one-third of Maharashtra's population, had been at the forefront of political discourse last year during the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections.
Senior advocate Pradeep Sancheti, for the petitioner students, argued that education and career of thousands of students appearing for NEET exams will be affected if the interim relief of stay on the effect of the 2024 law was not granted to them.
However, Advocate General Birendra Saraf, representing the Maharashtra government, submitted that an interim order was issued by the HC on April 16, last year, and the same continued even till date, and the same was not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court.
Saraf argued that the same interim order will apply to the petitioner students, and their admissions will be subject to further orders passed by the HC.
He also submitted that interim relief cannot be sought by filing fresh petitions while the interim arrangement was made last year and the same continued from time to time.
The full bench led by Justice Ghuge then expressed 'inclination to commence the final hearing of the matter' and said it will begin the same on July 18.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
17 minutes ago
- Hans India
Marathi medium helped my conceptual understanding in school: CJI Gavai
Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai turned emotional on recalling the moment he fulfilled his father's dream by becoming a judge and also highlighted on Sunday the benefits of studying in his Marathi mother tongue, claiming that it helped him in better conceptual understanding. The CJI virtually held back his tears as he opened his heart at a lawyers' event in Maharashtra, saying, 'I am happy my father's dream to see me become a judge has come true.' The CJI, the first Buddhist to occupy the top post, fondly remembered his father and his early days in the legal profession at the 161st-anniversary celebrations of the Advocates Association of Western India (AAWI), an organisation he joined in 1983. On Sunday, the CJI visited Chikitsak Samuh Shirodkar School in Girgaon, reminiscing about his childhood memories. Having studied from primary to secondary levels at this very institution, he expressed deep gratitude to the teachers who shaped his early life. Speaking at the school, Chief Justice Gavai said, 'Whatever height I have reached today, my teachers and this school have played a significant role in it. The education and values I received here gave direction to my life.' 'My journey in public speaking began on this very stage. Through speech competitions and cultural programmes, I gained confidence. It is because of those opportunities that I am what I am today,' he recalled. The CJI added, 'I studied in a Marathi-medium school. Studying in one's mother tongue helps in better conceptual understanding, and also instils strong values that stay with you for life.' Justice Gavai toured the classrooms, library, and art section of the school, interacting warmly with his old classmates and reliving fond memories. The heartfelt tribute given by the students was a deeply emotional and proud moment for him. His visit was a matter of great honour and inspiration for the school. Present on the occasion were Maharashtra's Skill Development Minister and Mumbai City Guardian Minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha, Bombay High Court Justice Madhav Jamadar, Chikitsak Samuh President Kishore Rangnekar, Secretary Dr Gurunath Pandit, Principal Sanchita Gawde, and other dignitaries. Justice Gavai comes from a distinguished background. His father, Ramakrishna Suryabhan Gavai, was a prominent Ambedkarite leader and founder of the Republican Party of India (RPI). Fondly known as Dadasaheb, the senior Gavai was also a member of the Lok Sabha from Amravati and served as the Governor of Bihar, Sikkim, and Kerala between 2006 and 2011 during the tenure of the Congress-led UPA government. He passed away in 2015, four years before his son's elevation to the Supreme Court. Justice Gavai was elevated as a Judge of the Supreme Court on May 24, 2019. In the six years before his elevation, he was a part of around 700 Benches dealing with matters pertaining to a variety of subjects, including constitutional and administrative law, civil law, criminal law, commercial disputes, arbitration law, electricity law, education matters and environmental law. He has authored around 300 judgments, including that of the Constitution Bench on various issues, upholding the rule of law and safeguarding the fundamental rights, human rights and legal rights of citizens. Appointed as an Additional Judge of the Bombay High Court in November 2003, Justice Gavai became a permanent Judge in November 2005.
Scroll.in
19 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
SC administration asks Centre to take back official CJI residence occupied by DY Chandrachud
The Supreme Court administration has written to the Centre seeking the vacation of the official residence of the chief justice of India, stating that former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud has stayed beyond the permissible period, PTI reported on Sunday. In a July 1 communication to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, the Supreme Court administration urged the Centre to take back possession of the residence on 5, Krishna Menon Marg in New Delhi, allotted to Chandrachud during his tenure as the chief justice, and return it to the court's housing pool. The administration said that the permission granted to the former chief justice of India to retain the accommodation expired on May 31 and that the six-month period allowed under the Supreme Court Judges Amendment Rules, 2022, had ended on May 10. As per Rule 3B of the amended 2022 rules, a retired chief justice can retain a Type VII bungalow – a lower grade than the Krishna Menon Marg bungalow – for up to six months after retirement. Chandrachud, who served as the 50th chief justice of India from November 2022 to November 2024, has remained in the official residence nearly eight months after leaving office. He said that the delay in vacating the house was due to his daughters' ' severe comorbidities and genetic conditions ', for which they are currently receiving treatment at AIIMS, the Hindustan Times reported. Chandrachud added that he had already been allotted a new house on rent by the government, but it was under renovation as it had remained shut for nearly two years. 'It is a matter of just few days and I will shift,' the Hindustan Times quoted him as saying. 'I have occupied the highest judicial office and am completely cognisant of my responsibilities.' In December, Chandrachud had written to his immediate successor, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, seeking permission to stay at the official residence until April 30. Khanna had approved the request and the housing ministry had allowed the extension with a nominal licence fee of Rs 5,000 per month. Later, Chandrachud verbally requested Khanna to extend his stay until May 31, PTI reported. The request was approved, but with the condition that no further extensions would be granted. In April, Chandrachud informed Khanna in writing that he was in the process of shortlisting an alternative accommodation suited to his daughters' needs and requested to stay on until June 30, the Hindustan Times reported. His two successors, Khanna and current Chief Justice BR Gavai chose not to move into the Krishna Menon Marg residence, opting instead to remain in their previously allotted homes.
The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Delhi Government to urge Supreme Court to allow uniform rules on overage vehicles: CM Gupta
Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Sunday (July 6, 2025) said that her government will echo the sentiments of the people of Delhi before the Supreme Court and urge it to allow uniform rules on overage vehicles in the national capital in line with those followed across the country. Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena has also written to Ms. Gupta urging her government to file a review petition in the Supreme Court, saying that it is 'irrational to imagine that a 10-year-old Diesel vehicle has reached its end of life in Delhi while remaining roadworthy in other parts of the country.' A 2018 Supreme Court judgement banned diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years in Delhi in an attempt to reduce vehicular pollution in the Capital. The L-G in his letter wrote that he acknowledges that the Air pollution is a shared responsibility and must be addressed with urgency and foresight. He called for a more balanced and technologically advanced framework to deal with vehicle emissions. 'The policy execution must also reflect principles of legality, fairness, and socioeconomic sensitivity,' Mr. Saxena said. Also read: Delhi Government says it won't scrap old vehicles; cites public backlash, systemic challenges Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of an event, Ms. Gupta said 'We will tell the Supreme Court about the pollution control measures taken by the government. The parameters that are applicable in the entire country should also apply to Delhi. We want Delhiites not to face any inconvenience.' Last week, Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa wrote to the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) to put on hold its direction to deny fuel to end-of-life vehicles at fuel stations and also impound such vehicles identified through Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras installed at the fuel stations. But the CAQM is yet to officially respond or issue any statement in this regard. Also read: Respond to petrol pump owners' plea: Delhi HC to CAQM On April 23, the CAQM had directed that all ELVs identified through the ANPR cameras or other such systems installed at the fuel stations shall be denied fueling from July 1 in Delhi and from November 1 in five districts of Gurugram, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Gautam Budh Nagar and Sonipat and from April 1, 2026 in the rest of NCR. The Delhi Government supported the CAQM's directions and from July 1, the Transport Department of the Delhi government and traffic police started to impound ELVs reaching the fuel stations. However, days later, Mr. Sirsa wrote to the CAQM asking them to put on hold the ban.
