Memphis schools takeover imminent as bill is approved by TN legislature. What to know
The state takeover of Memphis-Shelby County Schools is now imminent.
Both the Tennessee Senate and House of Representatives passed legislation on April 22 that would force a state intervention into MSCS, in response to the controversial firing of ex-Superintendent Marie Feagins and poor academic performance for years.
Up until April 22, the legislature had two competing bills on how much power a board of advisors would have over the locally elected school board. The legislation that ultimately passed was more similar to the Senate version of the bill, sponsored by Sen. Brent Taylor, a Republican from Eads representing parts of Shelby County and Memphis.
"This is a decades-old problem, and the state and the county, they have tried for decades to try to figure out what to do about this school system in Shelby County that is routinely failing our students, despite spending $1.8 billion a year," Taylor said. "So we just need to quit passing this problem around more than a joint at a Willie Nelson concert, and finally decide that we're going to do something about our education system in Shelby County."
MSCS had no comment on the legislation passing.
State Rep. Mark White, a Republican from Memphis, called for state intervention into the largest school district in Tennessee in the immediate aftermath of the firing of Feagins.
The legislation calls for the expansion of charter schools and the private school voucher program.
"I do this from the bottom (of my heart) because I care greatly about our city. As a former principal and teacher, you develop a love for the young people and if they are not coming out of K-12 ready to hit the workforce, where they have the skills that they can perform in society, then it doesn't work for them, and the numbers are there for us," White said.
The bill passed overwhelmingly in both the House and Senate along party lines.
Across the House and Senate, Democrats strongly opposed the takeover legislation, calling it possibly unconstitutional and questioning motivations.
Republicans in the House said the legislation needs to happen because of the poor academic performance of MSCS in conjunction with the school board not acting enough on the academics.
State Rep. Kevin Vaughan, a Republican from Collierville, said he changed his position on the takeover. Initially, he wanted to wait until the state audit findings came back from MSCS, but he said the state can't wait to take action.
"Giving another year away while we wait, it's not going to change itself organically. That is not going to be the case," Vaughan said. "We're not going to suddenly see a 15-year trend turn on a year in one year's time without some type of catalyst that provides additional information and additional review of what the duly elected school board is doing."
Some Senate Democrats called the Senate sponsor's language about Memphis inappropriate. Taylor said the city of Memphis is known for three things: good barbeque, high crime rates and a bad school system.
Sen. London Lamar, a Democrat from Memphis, called the comments, along with Taylor's comparison of Memphis to athlete's foot, inappropriate, offensive and unacceptable.
Lamar pointed out a contradiction in the bill by removing the income cap for the educational savings account for private school tuition, while the bill specifically targets school districts that mainly serve low-income students.
"Why would we remove the income cap on these vouchers if it's supposed to be targeting those low, low economic disadvantaged areas? So it makes no sense that we're taking away the income cap," Lamar said.
Lamar accompanied other Democrats in the Senate in voting against the bill.
State Sen. Page Walley, a Republican from Savannah, said that because the bill has statewide implications, it could lend a hand to some of his district's smaller and impoverished districts.
"I think this might be something that could be beneficial if we need it," Walley said. "I don't think we've met all the criteria yet, but if we do, I think that this might be something that could even help our elected school board members."
Another Memphis Democrat, Sen. Raumesh Akbari, said the legislation creates more bureaucracy, less transparency and takes the power away from the people of Memphis.
"I understand we need to do more to help our school systems, but it's not just a Memphis problem, it's a statewide problem, and this targeted legislation is not one that's going to improve what's going on," Akbari said.
If a school district has 50% or more of students who are economically disadvantaged, 50% of students are not meeting grade level expectations in math and English and has at least one school identified as a priority school, the commissioner of education can recommend takeover.
What comes next is the appointment of the board of advisors.
The state-appointed advisory board will include:
Three members appointed by the governor;
Two members appointed by the speaker of the Senate;
Two members appointed by the speaker of the House of Representatives;
The mayor of the county in which the district is located, or the county mayor's designee; and
If applicable, the mayor of the city in which the school district is located, or the city mayor's designee.
The commissioner of education will be able to recommend the removal of the superintendent, one or more elected school board members and converting public schools into charter schools.
If an elected school board member is removed, the "local legislative body" will have appointing authority to fill the vacancy. The individual who fills the vacancy will hold the position until the next election.
The board of advisors will be in place for at least four years, with the option for a two-year extension and will be compensated the same as elected school board members.
The board of advisors, within 60 days of its appointment, will receive a list of underutilized properties from the district. From there, the board of advisors will come up with recommendations to turn the underutilized or vacant properties into public charter schools.
Within the first 90 days, the board of advisors will complete a comprehensive needs assessment. The comprehensive needs assessment will look at a wide range of topics, from teacher retention to textbooks to school facilities.
Based on the comprehensive needs assessment, the board of advisors will then present a transformation plan to the local school board. The transformation plan will act effectively as a road map to improve student outcomes, lower chronic absenteeism and improve early child literacy.
The board of advisors, while their meetings will be closed to the public, will have their recommendations for each agenda item on the elected school board meetings read into the meeting minutes.
The legislation removes the income requirement for the Education Savings Accounts, a pilot program that predated the Tennessee Education Freedom Scholarship Program.
Students who apply and receive Education Savings Account dollars had to be eligible to receive free and reduced lunch based on income. Now, the income provision has been taken away if a student attends a MSCS school.
The legislation will go into effect in the 2025-26 school year.
Brooke Muckerman covers politics and education for The Commercial Appeal. She can be reached at 901-484-6225 and brooke.muckerman@commercialappeal.com.
This article originally appeared on Memphis Commercial Appeal: Tennessee legislature OKs Memphis-Shelby County Schools takeover bill

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dem senator agrees with GOP that Trump's making progress on trade war
Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. John Fetterman admitted that his party had gotten it wrong about President Donald Trump's tariffs, saying that, so far, the U.S. trade war is 'going well.' Asked by Fox News Digital whether he thought the Trump administration was winning the trade war, Fetterman responded, 'Absolutely.' Advertisement 'I'm a huge fan of Bill Maher, and I mean, I think he's really one of the oracles for my party, and he acknowledged it, it's like, hey, he thought that the tariffs were going to tank the economy, and then he acknowledged that it didn't,' said Fetterman. 'So, for me,' he went on, 'it seems like the E.U. thing has been going well, and I guess we'll see how it happens with China.' This comes as Trump is increasing the tariff on Canada from 25% to 35% beginning on Friday, after the U.S. neighbor to the north failed to help curb the imports of fentanyl and other illicit drugs. The White House noted that Trump signed an executive order on Thursday to increase the tariff in an effort to hold Canada accountable for its role in the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S. Advertisement 3 Sen. John Fetterman admitted Democrats are wrong about President Trump's tariffs, claiming that the trade war is 'going well.' AP Additionally, Trump signed another executive order on Thursday to modify the reciprocal tariff rates for some countries to further address the United States' trade deficits. The action reflects Trump's efforts to protect the U.S. from foreign threats to national security and the economy by securing 'fair, balanced and reciprocal trade relationships,' the White House said. Earlier this year, Trump announced an additional 10% tariff on all countries as well as higher tariffs for countries the U.S. has large trade deficits with. Advertisement The tariffs became effective on April 9. Since then, Trump and his team have since made several trade deals with several countries. The U.S. struck a deal with the European Union in which the EU agreed to purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy and make new investments of $600 billion by 2028. The EU also agreed to accept a 15% tariff rate. Advertisement The U.S. also made a deal with Japan, which agreed to invest $550 billion in the U.S. to rebuild and expand core American industries. 3 President Trump has raised the tariff rate on Canada from 25% to 25%. / MEGA Japan also agreed to further its own market to U.S. exports, and like the EU, Japan agreed to a baseline 15% tariff rate. However, many Democrats are digging in their heels against Trump's tariffs strategy, saying the negative effects are still on the horizon. Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., forecast that, despite the increased revenue, 'within a few weeks or months, you'll start seeing significant increases in most things you buy. And also, you will see disruption in terms of a lot of our industries, because they're not able to access product or supply.' 'When you have across-the-board tariffs, it does operate like a national sales tax, and I think people are going to be more and more hurt,' predicted Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md. 'This is the president who said he was going to come in and reduce prices. Prices are going to rise, and they're going to rise more over time,' said Van Hollen. Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that 'Donald Trump may beat his chest and say, 'Man, I made him take a 15% tariff or 25% tariff,' but also understand that every one of those trading partners is now looking hard all around the rest of the world to find other customers, because Donald Trump is signaling loud and clear that the United States under Donald Trump is not a reliable trading partner. And that's not good for any of us.' Advertisement Warren also claimed that Trump's tariffs are the reason the Federal Reserve has not lowered U.S. interest rates. 3 Fetterman still remains isolated from his party, taking Trump's side in the trade war, as many Democrats argue that negative effects are still on the horizon. AP 'Jerome Powell said last month that he would have lowered interest rates back in February if it hadn't been for the chaos that Donald Trump was creating over trade. And the consequence has been that American families have, for six months now, been paying more on credit cards, more on car loans, more home mortgages, all because Donald Trump has created chaos,' she said. Meanwhile, Republicans whom Fox News Digital spoke with urged the president to double down on his tariff strategy. Advertisement 'I think it's exactly the right approach. It's what I have been urging the president to do, and I think the successes he's winning are big wins for America,' said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. In response to Democrats still predicting economic fallout because of the tariffs, Cruz sarcastically remarked, 'I'm shocked, shocked that Democrats are rooting for the economy to do badly under President Trump.' 'It'd be nice if some Democrats would put their partisan hatred for Trump aside and actually start working together for American workers and American jobs. Unfortunately, I don't see a whole lot of Democrats interested in doing that right now,' said Cruz. Advertisement Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., while agreeing that the tariffs have been successful, voiced that he hopes the goal is to ultimately achieve reciprocal zero percent tariffs between the U.S. and its trade partners. 'Clearly, the president got a good deal from one perspective. The Europeans just caved, they did. Fifteen percent tariffs on them, zero on us, commitment to invest in our country. But the part of the deal I like the most, the E.U. and the president agreed that a whole bunch of goods would be tariff-free. That is, no American tariffs and no E.U. tariffs. It's called reciprocity, and ideal reciprocity is zero on both sides,' he explained. 'That's what I would like us to achieve in all the trade deals,' Kennedy explained. 'Let the free enterprise system work. May the best product at the best price win. That, to me, would be the perfect situation.' Fox News Digital's Greg Wehner contributed to this report.


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Florida GOP, DeSantis may follow Texas's lead
Florida Republicans are increasingly pushing to redraw the state's congressional lines following a similar move by the Texas GOP. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said Wednesday he is 'very seriously' looking at asking the state Legislature to redraw the state's congressional map, arguing the 2020 census is flawed. Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-Fla.) came out in favor of redistricting in a post on social platform X, writing that 'Texas can do it, the Free State of Florida can do it 10X better.' Florida Republicans say they were already headed in this direction following a state Supreme Court decision that upheld a congressional map supported by DeSantis and state Republicans. But the plan is gaining even more traction in the wake of Texas Republicans' unveiling of a new congressional map. 'It's picking up steam,' Florida GOP Chair Evan Power told The Hill. 'We were probably heading there with the court decision, but Texas made it top news.' Florida has seen an uptick in population growth following the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. The state has also become solidly Republican over the past decade, with Republicans growing their representation in Congress and once-Democratic strongholds like Miami-Dade and Osceola counties flipping from blue to red. A number of Democratic-held congressional seats could be impacted if redistricting were to take place, including those held in south Florida by Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jared Moskowitz and Lois Frankel. Rep. Kathy Castor (D) in the Tampa area and Rep. Darren Soto (D) outside of Orlando have also been floated as possible targets. Florida Republicans already hold a 20 to 8 advantage over Democrats in the congressional delegation. Republicans were boosted last month when the state's Supreme Court ruled to uphold a congressional map that blocked a challenge to the elimination of a majority-Black congressional district in the north of the state that previously was represented by former Rep. Al Lawson (D). The area that comprised the former congressional district is now divided among three Republican lawmakers. But DeSantis is not stopping there. The governor has argued that Florida got a 'raw deal' in the 2020 census when the state only gained one congressional seat. The governor said last month he had relayed his concerns to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick after he was sworn in earlier this year and that the Trump administration could be pursuing redoing the census. Additionally, the governor said he believes Florida's Fair District amendments, which a majority of voters approved of in 2010, could conflict with the U.S. Constitution. The amendments say that districts cannot be drawn in a way that hinders minorities voting for their choice of elected representatives. 'There's a lot of people who believe that the Fair District Amendments is unconstitutional, because what it does is, it mandates having race predominate,' DeSantis said this week. 'Whereas, neutrality should really be the constitutional standard.' Patronis also said in his X post that he believes the Fair District Amendments are unconstitutional 'because it violates freedom of speech AND elections are a states rights issue.' 'Time to add more conservatives to Congress, so we can better deliver on President Trump's agenda, finally win the war against woke, cut government waste, and create an economy that moves our country into a new age of prosperity,' Patronis said. Republicans argue that DeSantis and the state's Republicans could be setting an example for other red states to follow. 'DeSantis here sees an opportunity to be a trailblazer for the Republican Party in this sense in that he could be setting up a pilot program that Texas and some of the other states can actually follow,' a Florida Republican strategist said. 'Let's not disillusion ourselves, if he pulls this off, he will be a fan favorite of one person who sits at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,' the strategist added, referring to Trump. So far, Republicans in the Florida state Legislature have remained publicly quiet about the prospect of pursuing redistricting. This year's state legislative session was extended from 60 days to 105 days and saw tensions emerge between DeSantis and members of his own party. State Rep. Alex Andrade, a vocal Republican critic of DeSantis, said he has not spoken to his colleagues about redistricting. The state lawmaker noted he would support the effort only if the census was redone. 'I get the partisan argument,' Andrade told The Hill. 'I understand we could make hay right now and benefit Republicans but at some point do I care more about my party or the Constitution?' 'If the census were redone, I'd jump all over it,' he said. Florida Democrats warn that a move by DeSantis and the state's Republicans would set a negative precedent. 'It would mean that the governor and the state legislative branch would completely capitulate under Donald Trump,' state House Minority Leader Fentrice Driskell (D) said. 'It's not supposed to be that the president gets to act like a king and say 'do this on my behalf.'' In a Facebook video posted by Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), Soto accused Republicans of wanting to cheat in the election. 'They want to pick their voters rather than voters picking their representatives,' he said. 'You'll see us do whatever we can in the courts to make sure that the Fair Districts Amendments are enforced.' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Madison Andrus dismissed the effort from Florida Republicans as 'a bold-faced attempt to save their flailing midterm performance by rigging the game.' The effort comes as the nationwide redistricting war heats up and both parties seek to gain seats ahead of next year's midterm elections. In addition to Republicans in Texas and potentially Florida taking a look at redistricting, Democrats in states like California and New Jersey are also exploring their options. 'There's an opportunity and if it better reflects the makeup of a state whether that's Texas or Florida, or to Gavin Newsom's point even California, then you should do it,' a national Republican strategist said. 'These redistricting efforts, if they comply with the law and meet all of the various federal thresholds to get mapped through, if you do that and do it quickly, you're going to increase the likelihood that the president and Republicans in Washington and going to be able to keep pushing things forward,' the strategist continued.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After The Whole American Eagle Backlash, It's Emerged That Syndey Sweeney Is Indeed A Republican
Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican. A viral post on X by the user @time222smoke first claimed that the actor was a registered member of the party. According to publicly available voter registration records that BuzzFeed viewed, Sydney has been registered to the Republican Party of Florida since June 2024. The news comes after Sydney faced backlash for her "great jeans" American Eagle ad, in which she said, "Genes are passed down from parent to offspring, often determining traits like eye color, personality, and even hair color. My jeans are blue." Related: White House communications manager Steven Cheung subsequently called criticism that the ad acted as a right-wing signal for whiteness "dense liberal thinking" and 'cancel culture run amok.' Related: Sydney previously faced criticism in 2022 for posting a series of photos from a "surprise hoedown" she'd thrown for her mother's birthday, in which guests wore MAGA-style hats and one was spotted seemingly wearing a "Blue Lives Matter" shirt. In response, Sydney said at the time, "An innocent celebration for my moms milestone 60th birthday has turned into an absurd political statement, which was not the intention. Please stop making assumptions." BuzzFeed has reached out to representatives for Sydney for comment. Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Solve the daily Crossword