Phone silence — with conditions — can enhance learning
Even though it may be late to the party, the Nebraska Legislature is making the right call by advancing a bill banning student cellphone use at school. A number of school districts already curtail students' phone time on campus.
If passed, Legislative Bill 140 would require Nebraska's 245 public school districts to get on the 'ban wagon' by adopting policies that would be within the scope of the law while preserving a district's prerogative to shape its own local details. LB 140 was introduced by Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue at the request of Gov. Jim Pillen.
Aside from the mind-numbing, time-wasting game of whack-a-mole teachers play patrolling their classrooms for cellphone use, the research about screen time's effect on students' minds and academic performance is clear and emerging. One study published in the 'Journal of Experimental Psychology' also identified cellphones as negatively impacting social development among middle and high school students.
In his book 'Stolen Focus,' Johann Hari cites research that indicates today's young people have far less concentration power than previous generations. And, as the title of his book suggests, their focus was 'stolen' from them through a combination of devices, algorithms and marketing.
Some of these studies reported that the average college student spends at most about 65 seconds on a task before needing to refocus.
Refinding your place or your thought or even your bearings after an interruption — what Hari calls the 'switch cost effect' — can be debilitating. We increase our mistakes, decrease our creativity and poke holes in our mind's ability to retain. He cites studies, which reveal that once our focus is interrupted — via classmate, text message, TikTok video, whatever — we need 23 minutes to reach the level of concentration before the interruption.
While LB 140 is rightly aimed at our youngest minds, adults are neither immune nor invulnerable to cell phone disruption. Hari, whose book was highlighted in this space several years ago, said the average office worker's continuous concentration tops out at three minutes, and the average Fortune 500 CEO gets about 28 minutes of uninterrupted focus a day.
The data is clear: Banning cellphones in schools has science on its side. Plus, perhaps the art of face-to-face conversation, on life support in many of modern society's precincts, may live to tell the tale.
A principal, in one of the state's largest high schools, in its second year of students checking in their cellphones before the first bell and picking them up after school, told me that the strangest thing was happening, especially at lunch. Students were talking to each other.
Before we give LB 140 the checkered flag though, let's tap the brakes a little. I love my cellphone with the fervor of a high school student. In my pocket I have a computer, a camera for stills or video, a jukebox, an editing studio, a small theater, a word processor, an interpersonal and professional communications hub, an encyclopedic information retrieval center, a personal valet who can order coffee, find a weather forecast and write a 500-word essay on the symbolism in 'MacBeth,' and, remarkably, answer seemingly any question my life poses.
Shutting down such a universally-useful device for hours on end should come with solid rationale and certain conditions.
For starters, young people have an innate and perhaps outsized sense of hypocrisy. As we develop policies that reduce phone use in school, the adults who maintain these guidelines would do well to model the same behavior. Leveling up on Candy Crush Saga while you monitor study hall would be a poor play.
Let's also remember that many parents get a sense of security knowing their children have phones they can use in case of an emergency. Sadly, we live in a world of active shooters and other distempers with which schools are faced. If LB 140 becomes state law, in addition to determining when and where students can use their phones on campus, districts would do well to have an unambiguous plan that underscores student safety and defines clear lines of communication in emergencies. The bill itself contemplates exceptions for emergencies.
I occasionally play 'There oughtta be a law.' Perhaps you do, too. Here's one: A cellphone conversation in a restaurant loud enough for the entire section to hear not only steals my focus, it can ruin a nice meal. And, if that law oughtta be, let's double the fine for using the speaker setting.
Too much? Not the Legislature's lane? Sure. But being on the proper side of the fight for our children's focus, concentration and, in a very real sense, their futures, is just right.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Is New 'Superman' Movie Anti-Israel? What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Superman, the new blockbuster from DC has made a box office splash. However, political figures from the right and left have quickly taken to social media in a bid to read into the meaning behind the film, namely, whether it is about the war in Gaza. Newsweek has reached out to DC via email for comment. This article includes some spoilers as to the plot of the film. Why It Matters The current conflict between Israel and Hamas began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched an attack on Israel in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage. Israel retaliated and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to eradicate Hamas. People cross the street near billboards advertising the new "Superman" film in Times Square in New York City on July 9, 2025. People cross the street near billboards advertising the new "Superman" film in Times Square in New York City on July 9, 2025. CraigThe Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza reports that as of July 16, at least 58,573 people have been killed in Gaza, and a further 139,607 people injured. There is a widespread humanitarian crisis in the territory, with nearly all of the population having been displaced, according to the U.N. What To Know Superman, directed by James Gunn, was released on July 11 and rebooted the Superman franchise. The film marks Gunn's first entry into the DC Universe but he is known for his work on the Marvel film, Guardians of the Galaxy and began work on Superman in 2022. His latest film has exceeded box office and critical expectations, officially hitting $217 million following its first weekend in cinemas Variety reported. As of press time, it has an 83 percent Tomatometer score and a 93 percent Popcornmeter score on Rotten Tomatoes. Viewers of the film have drawn parallels between it's content and the war between Israel and Gaza. This has been applauded and condemned online in equal measure. "I saw the new Superman film last night. Tell me why it is as anti-Israel as people were making it out to be," the TikTok creator @blondebirchtree said in a video that has been viewed over 193,000 times. "All week people on Twitter have been saying it's explicitly anti-Israel... Without a doubt that is the most pro-Palestine I have seen a mainstream film ever be," @blondebirchtree continued in the video. A further video from this creator has the text overlay "they weren't lying about the new superman film being anti Israel," and has been viewed 3.7 million times as of reporting. "It's pretty clearly supposed to be Israel and Palestine," the TikTok creator @Coleleightonfilm said in a video viewed over 20,000 times on the platform. The parallel has also been drawn by popular left-wing Twitch steamer and social media personality, Hasan Piker, who uploaded a video to YouTube titled: "Superman just EXPOSED Israel On The Big Screen." Piker refers to Israel, as well as Netanyahu as the film's major plot point, and says: "If you think this movie pulls punches from criticizing Israel, it does not." One Reddit user, posting to the thread r/Jewish wrote that it is: "Sad to see Superman (2025) being used as anti-Israel propaganda." There have been calls on social media to boycott the film. The film's plot includes Superman stopping an invasion by the fictional country of Boravia, an ally of the U.S. However, the film isn't about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, according to Gunn. He told "When I wrote this the Middle Eastern conflict wasn't happening. So I tried to do little things to move it away from that, but it doesn't have anything to do with the Middle East." The film has political undertones, and it may be the case that social media users are mapping these undertones onto the conflict. Gunn told The Sunday Times earlier this month that the story is about: "An immigrant that came from other places and populated the country." What People Are Saying James Gunn, the director of Superman speaking to The Sunday Times: "For me it is mostly a story that says basic human kindness is a value and something we have lost…Yes, it plays differently, but it's about human kindness and obviously there will be jerks out there who are just not kind and will take it as offensive just because it is about kindness. But screw them." Hasan Piker, popular left-wing Twitch steamer and social media personality speaking in a video shared to YouTube: "It's very clearly Israel Palestine." One social media user wrote on X in a post viewed 4.5 million times: "yall were not kidding about how anti-israel and pro palestine that superman movie was, and they were not slick with it AT ALL." What's Next The film was released less than a week ago, so reactions may well continue to build on social media over time.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rosie O'Donnell says she ‘expected' Trump to threaten her citizenship after ‘20 years of abuse'
Rosie O'Donnell said she wasn't surprised that President Trump threatened to revoke her US citizenship, claiming that she's endured '20 years of abuse' from her longtime foe. The former talk show host took to social media Tuesday to slam the 'absurd' attack after the president triggered a social media brawl with O'Donnell when he branded her a 'threat to humanity' in a fiery post on his platform. 'I'm safe here in Ireland. I'm out of the reach of the tangerine Mussolini,' the former talk show host said in a nearly 10-minute TikTok video addressing her longstanding feud with Trump. 'I have to say that I was expecting him to do something as absurd as he did for a few reasons. Number one, I read Project 2025. Number two, I've had 20 years of abuse from him so I knew it wasn't going to stop, and number three, I know myself well enough to know that I wasn't going to shut up.' O'Donnell, 63, moved overseas to the Dublin suburb of Howth with her 12-year-old non-binary child in January in response to Trump's victory against Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election. She called the move a 'necessity' to protect her family, saying her 'heart couldn't take the pain' of what Trump was planning – or what he has already done. But the actress, who was born on Long Island, remains unfazed by the president's warning shot. 'Can't take away someone's citizenship, they have to renounce it themselves in the constitution, so, you know, I'm not that worried,' the 'A League of Their Own' star remarked. 'However, the Supreme Court has given him unbridled powers and I believe his dementia forces him to think that he is actually a king. We don't have kings in America. That's why we started America, not wanting to have kings, no monarchy. Liberty and justice for all, for all people in the United States.' Under current law, Americans cannot lose their US citizenship status even if they obtain citizenship elsewhere. On Saturday, the commander in chief raged on Truth Social that he's giving 'serious consideration' to taking away the former TV personality's citizenship. 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great County, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,' Trump wrote. 'She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her. GOD BLESS AMERICA!' The actress quickly fired back with a flurry of Instagram posts ripping Trump as a 'dangerous old soulless man' who craves 'loyalty' and picturing him with notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. While it remains unclear what legal grounds Trump could invoke to strip O'Donnell of her citizenship, she claimed the prez was clearly 'rattled,' as she was still living 'rent free' in his 'collapsing brain' nearly two decades after their infamous feud erupted in 2006. In her latest post, the activist made it clear she has no intention of ever renouncing her citizenship. 'I will never renounce my American citizenship,' she said. 'I am waiting happily for my Irish citizenship so that I can be a dual citizen, but I will never renounce my American citizenship, ever.'


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Rosie O'Donnell slams Donald Trump as 'tangerine Mussolini' as feud escalates
Rosie O'Donnell and President Donald Trump's decades-long feud continues to intensify. The former cohost of "The View," 63, took aim at the president, 79, in social media posts July 15 and 16, days after Trump threatened to revoke the American-born actress and host's U.S. citizenship, despite the lack of constitutional power to do so. During a 10-minute-long TikTok video July 15, O'Donnell took aim at the president, saying she is "safe here in Ireland, I'm out of the reach of the 'tangerine Mussolini'" in reference to disgraced Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. O'Donnell moved to Ireland earlier this year with her son Clay, 12, telling her fans that Trump's re-election inspired her relocation. In her July 15 post, O'Donnell added that she was "expecting (Trump) to do something as absurd as he did" because "I've had 20 years of abuse from him, so I knew it wasn't going to stop." The friends-turned-foes' feud date back to O'Donnell's days on the panel of ABC's "View" talk show, which she co-hosted from 2006 to 2007 and again from 2014 to 2015. On the show, O'Donnell infamously mocked Trump as "the moral authority" during a 2006 episode although he has multiple children with different women. In her July 16 post, O'Donnell said that she moved to Ireland because "it got sad and scary for me with the election of the current president, so I knew I had to take care of my kid — my non-binary, Autistic kid. And the way that people marginalize and attack the Trans community, especially politically, is unfathomable to me, and so unbearably cruel." In a Truth Social post July 12, Trump took aim at O'Donnell "because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship." "She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her. GOD BLESS AMERICA!" Trump wrote. A rep for O'Donnell directed USA TODAY to her client's statement on Instagram, saying that "nothing else will be said." In March O'Donnell said on TikTok that she is "in the process" of obtaining Irish citizenship through family descent. Under current U.S. law, Americans cannot lose their citizenship even if they obtain citizenship in a foreign country.