&w=3840&q=100)
From blueprint of bases to IT systems, Russia's nuclear secrets revealed online
In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Russia's President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces via videoconference at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence outside Moscow on April 26, 2025. AP Photo
In the barren Russian Ural mountains' Yasny town, Russia built one of the world's most secure military complexes that houses the country's ground-based, long-range nuclear-capable missiles. But that was until yesterday. Today, the complex's insides are on the internet where you can take a virtual tour.
In an unprecedented scoop, Danish outlet Danwatch and German magazine Der Spiegel obtained around 2 million documents related to the Russian nuclear programme that reveal in exhaustive details the layout of nuclear weapons' complexes, the expansion of the nuclear weapons programme, and the security features in place at these top-secret sites.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In the post-Cold War world, it is for the first time that such details have been obtained, according to Hans M Kristensen, the Director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists (FAS).
'Until now, we have only been able to monitor these bases from above using satellite imagery. Now, with the help of these unique drawings, we can now for the first time get inside the buildings and all the way underground. It's completely unprecedented,' Kristensen told Danwatch and Der Spiegel.
The photograph shows the satellite view of the Russian nuclear weapons complex in the town of Yasny. (Photo: Google Earth)
The scoop has been reported at a time when Russian war on Ukraine is in its fourth year. Throughout the war, Russian officials, including President Vladimir Putin and his top aides, have invoked nuclear weapons. Dmitry Medvedev, a former President of Russia and a key ally of Putin, has threatened Western nations with nuclear strikes over continued support of Ukraine.
Inside Russia's nuclear weapons complexes — literally
While foreign governments as well as researchers can monitor Russian military complexes, or complexes of any country, from satellite images, the documents unearthed by Danwatch and Der Spiegel offer unprecedented inside those structures.
While it has been known from satellite images that Russia has been expanding its nuclear weapons capabilities for nearly a decade, exactly how it has been expanding has been revealed in these documents.
Consider this: the documents reveal what type of steel is supposed to be used in a nuclear weapons complex, how dense construction material should be, how thick insulation should be, whether ceiling beams should be exposed or concealed, and how long should lightning rods be, and what the quality of hinges on security windows should be.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The documents have hundreds of original blueprints related to the nuclear warheads and missiles' storage sites. These documents also lay bare the IT systems, electrical installations, and water supply network, and heating and ventilation systems installed in such sites.
This is a screenshot of one of the documents that Danwatch has shared on the website as part of the trove of around 2 million part of their discovery.
The documents also reveal the multi-layer security arrangements. They show that bases have three layers of electric fences around the outer perimeter, seismic and radioactivity sensors, explosion-proof doors and windows, reinforced concrete buildings, and alarm systems with magnetic contacts and infrared (IR) sensors.
The internal layout is described such that it lays bare where soldiers eat, sleep, and relieve themselves. The documents also describe which rooms in the complex store the protective gear and where weapons are kept. Even control rooms of nuclear weapons complexes are mentioned in these documents.
'This is ultimate intelligence'
With such details, mounting an attack on such complexes or infiltrating such complexes in times of conflict would become much easier as you would know the weak spots, where weapons are stored, and what security arrangements are in place.
Former British intelligence officer Philip Ingram told Danwatch and Der Spiegel that these documents are 'the ultimate intelligence'.
'Material like this is the ultimate intelligence. If you can understand how the electricity is conducted or where the water comes from, and you can see how the different things are connected in the systems, then you can identify strengths and weaknesses and find a weak point to attack,' said Colonel (Retired) Ingram, who served in the Intelligence Corps of the British Army.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
ALSO READ: When Ukraine gave up world's 3rd-largest nuclear arsenal, did it set stage for Russian invasion?
Kristensen of the Federation of American Scientists said that the documents are the deepest dive yet into Russia's nuclear weapons programme.
'Your research is the deepest into the structure of these facilities that I have seen in the public domain. And we have to go all the way back to the buildings and systems of the 60s and 70s, where I remember seeing similar blueprints. Seeing it on these new systems, that's a whole new chapter,' Kristensen told Danwatch and Der Spiegel.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
Amid rising outrage over starvation in Gaza, Netanyahu discusses annexation & blockade
Even as Israel's condemnation over the starvation in the Gaza Strip is rising by the day in the international community, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has discussed annexing the Palestinian enclave and blockading the area yet again, according to reports in the Israeli media. read more Even as Israel's condemnation is rising by the day over the starvation in the Gaza Strip, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has held discussions about the annexation of the Palestinian enclave and blockading it yet again, according to Israeli media reports. Such discussions go in sharp contrast to the public statement by Netanyahu's office that admitted that the 'situation in Gaza is difficult' and said the government was working to ensure the flow of large quantities of aid into Gaza. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Netanyahu held a Cabinet meeting on Monday on Gaza in which the military presented a new plan for the 'siege' of Gaza, according to the Kan broadcaster. Separately, other Hebrew-language outlets reported that Netanyahu and his Cabinet discussed the complete occupation or annexation of Gaza. Unlike occupation, which is temporary control of an area, annexation means the permanent absorption of a territory by another country and asserting sovereignty over it, such as the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014. Despite decades of Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories of West Bank and Gaza (until 2005), Israel has not annexed these territories. Annexation would amount to the most extreme step that Israel did not take even during decades of Gaza's occupation. Netanyahu discusses annexation & blockade of Gaza Under the new plan presented by the military, Israel would again cut off all humanitarian aid to Gaza, according to the Kan broadcaster. Other outlets reported that, if Hamas would continue to reject Israel's terms to end the war, Israel could completely occupy or annex entire Gaza. However, these reports said that Israel would give negotiations a chance before considering these actions. The Kan broadcaster reported that, under the plan presented by the military, Israel would dramatically 'expand' its ground operations in Gaza, including to areas where it has not yet operated, to 'tighten' pressure on Hamas. So far, Israel has expanded the control to around 75 per cent of Gaza. Separately, Maariv reported that Israel would start annexing parts of Gaza if Hamas would reject efforts for deal for a ceasefire and the release of hostages. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In another report, Haaretz newspaper reported that Israel would first annex areas in the 'buffer zone' along the Israel-Gaza border and then annex areas in northern Gaza near the Israeli cities of Sderot and Ashkelon and gradually continue the annexation until the annexation of the most or all of the strip. The newspaper further reported that the annexation of Gaza was part of Netanyahu's attempt to keep extremist ministers Bezalel Smotrich and his party in his ruling coalition. Netanyahu's Likud party does not have a majority of its own in the party and relies on support from far-right parties of the likes of Financial Minister Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
India's trade talks with the US face new test as EU deal shows major gaps
The newly announced US-European Union (EU) trade agreement, hailed as 'historic' by the White House, is already under scrutiny, not because of what it includes, but because of how differently both sides are likely to interpret it. It also raises concerns for India, which is currently negotiating a similar trade deal with the Donald Trump -led US administration. The Trump administration's sweeping claims, from $750 billion in energy purchases to EU procurement of American defence equipment, are being met with diplomatic silence in Brussels. The mixed messaging is fueling unease in Indian trade and diplomatic circles, where negotiators fear falling into similar traps of post-deal narrative asymmetry. What's the latest The White House has released a detailed fact sheet celebrating the new trade deal with the EU, calling it a 'generational modernization' of the transatlantic alliance. The document claims the EU will eliminate all tariffs on US industrial goods, invest $600 billion in the US, and buy $750 billion worth of American energy by 2028. The agreement, the White House claims, includes new commitments on digital trade, defence procurement, pharmaceuticals, and regulatory cooperation—presented as a landmark win for American exporters. But analysts have pointed out inconsistencies and exaggerated claims. A viral thread on X by an Euronews journalist Jorge Liboreiro breaks down section-by-section how many of the 'commitments' are vague, previously announced, or not backed by official EU documentation. European leaders too have voiced concerns. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that while the EU was able to protect its core interests, he would have welcomed further easing of transatlantic trade, reported CNBC. In a social media post, France's minister for Europe Benjamin Haddad called the deal 'unbalanced', even as it would bring 'temporary stability' to some sectors. Disputed claims in US-EU trade deal Several core elements of the deal, as presented by the US, are already raising eyebrows: Pharmaceutical tariffs: The US claims the EU will impose a new 15 per cent tariff on American pharma exports, raising questions about timing and legality under World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. Trade experts point out that EU pharma tariffs are already low and increasing them would be politically untenable in Europe. There is also confusion on whether this refers to a penalty or a removal of existing barriers. Also read: Trump gets economy he wants, but growth risks may spoil his victory lap Defence procurement: According to the White House, the EU has agreed to buy 'significant amounts' of American military equipment. But EU procurement is driven by individual member states and typically falls outside the scope of trade pacts. Analysts say such a claim is more aspirational than contractual. Digital trade: The White House fact sheet states that the EU has promised not to impose 'network usage fees' and will maintain zero customs duties on electronic transmissions. Yet, there is no clear confirmation from the EU side. The language around 'unjustified digital trade barriers' appears to target European data regulations, which the EU defends as sovereignty issues. Agriculture and metals: While the US outlines tariff removals and 'meaningful quotas,' it's unclear how this aligns with the EU's Common Agricultural Policy or its strict food safety rules. The US also claims sectoral tariffs on metals (50 per cent on steel, aluminium, copper) will remain, but this is inconsistent with ongoing WTO disputes. Massive EU investment in the United States: The fact sheet states that an investment of $600 billion will be made by the European Union in the United States over the course of Trump's term. This new commitment is being made in addition to the more than $100 billion already invested annually by EU companies in the United States. Energy buyout: A total of $750 billion worth of US energy exports will be purchased by the European Union through 2028. Through this, American energy dominance will be strengthened, European reliance on adversarial sources will be reduced, and the trade deficit with the EU will be narrowed. Why it matters for India India is in delicate trade negotiations with both the US and the EU. The ambiguity in the US–EU deal serves as a cautionary tale. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal described the talks as 'making fast progress' and even 'fantastic", while noting unresolved issues, especially over agriculture and dairy tariffs. Indian markets remain jittery, with benchmark indices hovering instead of rallying, weighed down by anxiety around potential fallout from stalled trade talks and looming tariffs Several of the US-EU deal's themes like pharmaceutical exports, digital economy regulation, and food safety barriers directly overlap with India's areas of concern. For instance, India is a major exporter of generic drugs to the EU (total pharmaceutical exports reached about $30.5 billion in FY25, marking a 9-10 per cent increase from the previous year. Europe accounted for approximately 18.9 per cent of these exports — equivalent to roughly $5.8 billion in total pharma shipments to the EU and other European countries). If regulatory harmonisation with the US tightens EU standards, Indian pharma firms could face tougher compliance rules. Meanwhile, the emphasis on strong rules of origin and digital sovereignty could also affect India's digital services exports and its ambitions to craft its own data laws without external pressure. On agriculture, India's long-standing resistance to opening up dairy and processed food sectors could come under greater scrutiny in future deals, especially if the US uses the EU agreement as a template. What are the pain points in the India-US trade deal? The India-US trade deal, still under negotiation, has several unresolved tensions. Tariff issues and deadlines: The US had set an August 1, 2025 deadline threatening tariff increases on Indian exports, but trade talks have not concluded, causing uncertainty and business slowdown in sectors like gems, textiles, toys, and automobiles. The US is poised to implement higher tariffs (up to 26 per cent) on Indian imports if no deal is reached. But India is being cautious due to complications in recent US trade deals with other countries like Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Market access barriers: Indian negotiators face challenges in opening access for key sectors like agriculture and automobiles, which are significant job creators domestically. This impasse has slowed down finalising the deal. Digital taxation dispute: A significant sticking point is the US demand that India commit not to reintroduce the equalisation levy (a digital tax on online advertising, often called the 'Google tax'). Indian legal advisers have warned against accepting this as it represents a unilateral obligation on India without reciprocity from the US, potentially setting a risky precedent for future trade talks. India resisting unbalanced demands: US exporters have long demanded wider access to Indian agricultural markets, including genetically modified products, which India continues to restrict. In the dairy sector, Washington has repeatedly raised concerns over India's religious and safety standards on dairy imports. A pattern of overstatement by Trump administration This is not the first time Team Trump has oversold a trade deal. The first Trump-era USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) was described as a 'complete overhaul", though many provisions mirrored the NAFTA agreement it replaced. In the US-China Phase One deal (January 2020), Trump had claimed $200 billion in Chinese purchases of US goods, a target that was never met. Similarly, in the US-Canada dairy dispute, the US touted 'massive new access", which Canadian officials quietly disputed. These instances reflect a broader strategy: high-octane PR around trade deals. With a US election approaching, the narrative power of such agreements is not lost on either party. What's next for India? Both countries remain engaged in round-the-clock talks to resolve tariff issues and avoid the activation of a potential 26 per cent duty on Indian exports to the US. Negotiators are working to clinch at least an interim agreement that would secure India's preferential access and prevent tariffs from being reinstated.


Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Pakistan back in US calculus after years of isolation
ANI Pakistan's foreign minister Ishaq Dar Pakistan is back in US' decision-making circles after years of isolation amid intense lobbying by Islamabad and Washington's eagerness to reciprocate, notwithstanding its robust ties with India. From being courted by the US State Department for "anti-terror" operations to praises heaped by the US Central Command head to a possible trade deal, Islamabad has been able to make inroads into the Trump administration. Field Marshal Asim Munir's lunch meeting with Trump was the icing on the cake following which New Delhi raised the issue with Washington, people familiar with the matter hinted the US being deeply involved in working out trade deals globally, Pakistan has claimed that it is "very close" to an agreement that could come within days. However, the US has not presented any such timeline. "I think we are very close to finalising a deal with the US. Our teams have been here in Washington, discussing, having virtual meetings and a committee has been tasked by the prime minister to fine-tune now," Pakistan foreign minister Ishaq Dar said in a discussion at the Atlantic Council think tank in Washington last week. "It's not going to be months, not even weeks, I would say (just) days," he US State Department and Pakistan's foreign ministry, in separate statements after secretary of state Marco Rubio's meeting with Dar, said the two stressed in their discussion the importance of expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and mining.A post by Rubio on X after the meeting and the State Department's statement mentioned no timeline for finalising a trade deal. Sources familiar with Pakistan claimed that Islamabad has the habit of making tall and unsubstantiated claims while reality could be far from the truth. Pakistan's economy is staring at a crisis and a trade deal with the US may not boost the country's economic growth, the sources said. The US Central Command based in the Gulf has historically worked closely with Pakistan since the Cold War era. And last weekend, US Central Command chief General Michael Kurilla was conferred 'Nishan-e-Imtiaz (Military)' by the Pakistan President. The US general had recently backed Pakistan as a "phenomenal partner in countering terror". The honour for Kurilla coincided with the Pakistan foreign minister's visit to Washington. Rubio also thanked Dar for "Pakistan's partnership in countering terrorism and preserving regional stability". The two discussed harnessing Pakistan's critical minerals. The US is reportedly interested in acquiring antimony from Pakistan. Antimony is a metalloid used in various industries, including flame retardants, batteries, semiconductors, and even military claim that Pakistan has wooed the US through crypto business and the nomination of President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.