How many days and votes does it take to elect a pope? History offers some clues
How long does it take to choose a pope?
It's hard to say precisely, since the Vatican doesn't publish official data on the number of votes or tallies in past conclaves, and sources compiling their own data are not in complete agreement.
But historical figures provide a few clues.
The longest conclave since the 20th century took 14 rounds of balloting across five days, ending with the election of Pius XI in 1922. The shortest was the conclave that elected Pius XII in 1939, which took three ballots in two days.
Cardinals must reach a two-thirds majority to elect a pope. That was somewhat easier in conclaves past: In 1922 there were just 53 voting cardinals, and until 1978 there were fewer than 100 each time. This year there are 133, so 89 votes are needed.
Here's a look at the duration of conclaves in recent history, according to multiple sources including Catholic and other Italian publications:
- 1914: Benedict XV: 10 ballots, 3 days
- 1922: Pius XI: 14 ballots, 5 days
- 1939: Pius XII: 3 ballots, 2 days
- 1958: John XXIII: 11 ballots, 4 days
- 1963: Paul VI: 5 or 6 ballots, 3 days
- 1978: John Paul I: 4 ballots, 2 days
- 1978: John Paul II: 8 ballots, 3 days
- 2005: Benedict XVI: 4 ballots, 2 days
- 2013: Francis: 5 ballots, 2 days
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
'Labour is sucking the confidence out of business,' says Ex-BoE chief economist
Andy Haldane is demob happy. He's ready to get on the road, first to his holiday home on the Kentish coast and then to France and Italy before finishing off the year in the southern hemisphere to catch the cricket. His six-month break has been a long time coming – it's about five to ten years too late, Haldane, 57, laughs. It's the first extended time off he has had since joining the Bank of England as a graduate trainee, rising to become chief economist and something of a rock star in the dry world of central banking. His provocative speeches made world headlines as he shot down much of the orthodoxy of the financial system, drawing on evolutionary biology, and even coming out for the Occupy movement after the 2008 crash. Then in a surprise – some would say premature – move he left the Bank in the pandemic to lead the Royal Society of Arts, as well as to give him room to shoot the breeze, free from 'central bank shackles' and engage in broader policy-making. Which he did, advising the Tories on Levelling Up, and he still sits on the Treasury's Economic Advisory Council. Now he's off again. We met at his office at the Royal Society of Arts, where the bookshelves are already empty and his desk is clear. This time he's taking the break to 'cleanse his brain' to work out what to do next after 32 years in the saddle. He says: 'I like change, and I love ambiguity – it creates opportunity.' But there's no ambiguity about Haldane's long list of ways to get Britain back on its feet. For a start, if he were still on the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee, he would have voted for a cut at its last meeting. More pertinently, Haldane would have voted for base rate cuts going back to the start of last year, well before the MPC's first cut in August. 'That was too late. It would have been less painful if rates had been lower. The economy has been crabbing sideways for at least three years, and lower rates would have cut households some slack.' He accepts most MPC members voted against a cut due to fears the Middle Eastern conflict will fuel inflation, saying: 'It's tricky. When you have missed out on the upside, there can be a bit of scarring.' Scarring for the MPC or economy? 'Both,' he replies, grimacing. 'Some members of the MPC are not looking closely enough at the quantitative data. It's clear the labour market is shedding jobs. We can't miss getting it right again.' Famously, Haldane is one of a handful of economists who did not miss out on the upside. He warned that the inflation genie was escaping the bottle in late 2020, calling for rate rises when his peers dubbed rising prices post-Covid and post-Ukraine 'transitory'. His prescience is just one reason why so many in the City, across the political divide, say Haldane is the smartest Governor we never had, and should have been appointed instead of Andrew Bailey. What does he say? 'I loved the job I was doing. I didn't want to be Governor,' he answers, politely. Leaving the Bank has certainly allowed him to fire more missiles from the sidelines, most recently criticising Rachel Reeves' Budget as full of 'mistakes, rookie errors'. He blames her policies – especially the increase in employers' National Insurance, and harping on about the black hole left behind by the Tories – for sucking the confidence out of British business. The Chancellor's non-dom policy – already driving the wealthiest out of the country – should be refined or reversed, because it will lead to net fiscal losses for the Treasury, he says. So too would Reform UK's Britannia card idea, which is too lax. A 'better balancing point' needs to be struck. What drives him to distraction is the lack of serious soul-searching on the big issues, such as tax or welfare spending. He says: 'The poor level of debate at Westminster, in think-tanks, the civil service, academia and elsewhere is deeply depressing. Politics doesn't seem to be growing great thinkers like the late Nigel Lawson, the last great tax reformer, any more.' Instead, politicians should go 'big, bold, plural and at scale'. He adds: 'We need to supercharge supply-side reforms. There must be greater incentives for entrepreneurship and businesses.' Reconfiguring the 'onerous' tax code is not enough. Scrapping stamp duty on housing would help. He says: 'It glues up the housing and jobs market – we have the lowest level of people moving jobs since the financial crisis. We are taxing mobility, and so preventing living standards from rising.' Why, he asks, do we give capital investment exemptions on machinery but not on training people? And why is debt favoured over equity? How mad is that? 'Shiny billion-pound projects like new nuclear power stations or railways are great but if we don't have the skilled workforce, what's the point? Why do so many of our universities not have graduate apprenticeship schemes?' Apprenticeships are down by a third, he adds, so the apprentice levy needs to be made workable with business urged to play a bigger role. And change is possible. 'Look at the amazing job Jesse Norman MP is doing at Hereford with his New Model Institute for Technology & Engineering and the launch in Manchester of a new technical baccalaureate.' Spending on skills is falling: the latest international league tables show the UK's expenditure on training is in the relegation zone. 'How can it be that we have a million 'Neets' – those aged 16 to 24 not in education, employment or training? It's an economic blight, but also a personal blight.' His solution? Scrap GCSEs, exams designed for the late Victorian age. 'If a third of youngsters are emerging functionally illiterate and innumerate from school, then something is very wrong. We need a broader-based system of education based on hands and hearts, and creativity, where we smash the ceiling internationally.' Britain's 'economically inactive' – the nine million people of working age who are not in work – must be helped back into the workplace. 'The impact on their mental health, families and communities is enormous,' he says. 'We need to scrap Jobcentres. That's where people used to go for benefits.' Yet, Haldane remains an optimist. The reset button for growth, he says, could come from higher spending on defence and security, which could prove 'jobs-rich, skills-rich across the country'. 'The country would understand that,' he says. 'The bond markets would understand that.' After all, growth is the great redeemer for bond markets, he says. 'They know tomorrow's growth pays for today's borrowing. But it requires politicians to go big and be bold. If not, forget it.' Is he worried that bond yields – the interest the Government pays on its debt – are back up to levels last seen during the Liz Truss era? The Truss period, he points out, coincided with bond yields shooting up around the world after an anomalous 20-year period of low inflation and low interest rates. 'The global cost of money has gone up. Reality has been reasserted in the markets. We are back up to the UK batting average.' Haldane may be footloose but still has a clutch of 'passion' projects: he's the new chancellor of Sheffield University, where he read economics, and chairs the Glasshouse International Music Centre in Gateshead – homage to his spiritual roots in Sunderland, where he was born, and his family's brass band tradition. Will he be looking for a new desk job after his break? 'Who knows? I might love daytime TV and dog-walking,' he says with the biggest of laughs. 'Or, come December, I might decide to manufacture cider by the champagne method.' And when the Governor's job comes up again in three years' time, would he be interested? He smiles. Judging by the look in his eye, of course he would.
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
EU plans to add carbon credits to new climate goal, document shows
BRUSSELS, June 28 (Reuters) - The European Commission is set to propose counting carbon credits bought from other countries towards the European Union's 2040 climate target, a Commission document seen by Reuters showed. The Commission is due to propose a legally binding EU climate target for 2040 on July 2. The EU executive had initially planned a 90% net emissions cut, against 1990 levels, but in recent months has sought to make this goal more flexible, in response to pushback from governments including Italy, Poland and the Czech Republic, concerned about the cost. An internal Commission summary of the upcoming proposal, seen by Reuters, said the EU would be able to use "high-quality international credits" from a U.N.-backed carbon credits market to meet 3% of the emissions cuts towards the 2040 goal. The document said the credits would be phased in from 2036, and that additional EU legislation would later set out the origin and quality criteria that the credits must meet, and details of how they would be purchased. The move would in effect ease the emissions cuts - and the investments required - from European industries needed to hit the 90% emissions-cutting target. For the share of the target met by credits, the EU would buy "credits" from projects that reduce CO2 emissions abroad - for example, forest restoration in Brazil - rather than reducing emissions in Europe. Proponents say these credits are a crucial way to raise funds for CO2-cutting projects in developing nations. But recent scandals have shown some credit-generating projects did not deliver the climate benefits they claimed. The document said the Commission will add other flexibilities to the 90% target, as Brussels attempts to contain resistance from governments struggling to fund the green transition alongside priorities including defence, and industries who say ambitious environmental regulations hurt their competitiveness. These include integrating credits from projects that remove CO2 from the atmosphere into the EU's carbon market so that European industries can buy these credits to offset some of their own emissions, the document said. The draft would also give countries more flexibility on which sectors in their economy do the heavy lifting to meet the 2040 goal, "to support the achievement of targets in a cost-effective way". A Commission spokesperson declined to comment on the upcoming proposal, which could still change before it is published next week. EU countries and the European Parliament must negotiate the final target and could amend what the Commission proposes.
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Fierce opposition to deal aimed at tackling small boats crisis
Five EU countries – Italy, Greece, Spain, Malta, and Cyprus – have raised concerns about a proposed "one in, one out" migration deal between the UK and France. The deal, reportedly being negotiated by Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, would involve Britain returning small boat migrants to France in exchange for asylum seekers with UK family ties. These five nations, often the first point of entry for irregular migrants, fear the agreement could lead to asylum seekers being returned to their shores under existing EU rules. They have formally objected to the European Commission, arguing against a bilateral deal that could have direct or indirect consequences for other member states. The proposed UK-France deal is expected to be unveiled during Emmanuel Macron's visit to London in early July, following a significant increase in small boat crossings to the UK in early 2025.
