EU plans to add carbon credits to new climate goal, document shows
The Commission is due to propose a legally binding EU climate target for 2040 on July 2.
The EU executive had initially planned a 90% net emissions cut, against 1990 levels, but in recent months has sought to make this goal more flexible, in response to pushback from governments including Italy, Poland and the Czech Republic, concerned about the cost.
An internal Commission summary of the upcoming proposal, seen by Reuters, said the EU would be able to use "high-quality international credits" from a U.N.-backed carbon credits market to meet 3% of the emissions cuts towards the 2040 goal.
The document said the credits would be phased in from 2036, and that additional EU legislation would later set out the origin and quality criteria that the credits must meet, and details of how they would be purchased.
The move would in effect ease the emissions cuts - and the investments required - from European industries needed to hit the 90% emissions-cutting target. For the share of the target met by credits, the EU would buy "credits" from projects that reduce CO2 emissions abroad - for example, forest restoration in Brazil - rather than reducing emissions in Europe.
Proponents say these credits are a crucial way to raise funds for CO2-cutting projects in developing nations. But recent scandals have shown some credit-generating projects did not deliver the climate benefits they claimed.
The document said the Commission will add other flexibilities to the 90% target, as Brussels attempts to contain resistance from governments struggling to fund the green transition alongside priorities including defence, and industries who say ambitious environmental regulations hurt their competitiveness.
These include integrating credits from projects that remove CO2 from the atmosphere into the EU's carbon market so that European industries can buy these credits to offset some of their own emissions, the document said.
The draft would also give countries more flexibility on which sectors in their economy do the heavy lifting to meet the 2040 goal, "to support the achievement of targets in a cost-effective way".
A Commission spokesperson declined to comment on the upcoming proposal, which could still change before it is published next week.
EU countries and the European Parliament must negotiate the final target and could amend what the Commission proposes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Google makes new proposal to stave off EU antitrust fine, document shows
BRUSSELS, July 2 (Reuters) - Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab has proposed fresh changes to its search results in an attempt to fend off growing criticism from rivals, a week before a key meeting that could lead to yet another EU antitrust fine, according to a document seen by Reuters. The U.S. tech giant has been under pressure after being hit in March with European Union antitrust charges of unfairly favouring its own services such as Google Shopping, Google Hotels and Google Flights over competitors. The company, owned by Alphabet, will meet its rivals and the European Commission to discuss its proposals during a July 7-8 workshop in Brussels, the document said. The EU's landmark Digital Markets Act, under which Google has been charged, sets out a list of dos and don'ts for Big Tech aimed at curbing their power and giving rivals more room to compete and consumers more choice. Last week, Google offered to create a box at the top of the search page for a so-called vertical search service (VSS) which would contain links to specialised search engines as well as to hotels, airlines, restaurants and transport services. The latest offer, called Option B, is an alternative to last week's proposal, according to a Google document sent by the Commission to involved parties and seen by Reuters. "Under 'Option B', whenever a VSS box is shown, Google will also show a box that includes free links to suppliers," the document said. The box for suppliers - in essence hotels, restaurants, airlines and travel services - would be below the VSS box, with Google organising the information about the suppliers. Option B "provides suppliers opportunities while not creating a box that can be characterised as a Google VSS", the document said. "We've made hundreds of alterations to our products as part of our DMA compliance," a Google spokesperson said. "While we strive for compliance, we remain genuinely concerned about some of the real world consequences of the DMA, which are leading to worse online products and experiences for Europeans." Google risks a fine as much as 10% of its global annual revenue if found in breach of the DMA.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EU is 'blocking Britain's bid to join Mediterranean trade zone' despite Keir Starmer's 'reset' with Brussels
The EU is unwilling to allow Britain to join a pan-European trade zone despite Sir Keir Starmer 's efforts to 'reset' the UK's relations with Brussels, it has emerged. The Government recently published a trade strategy that hailed membership of the Pan-Euro-Mediterranean Convention (PEM) as an 'opportunity' for the UK. Ministers said they would 'consider the benefits' of joining the PEM as part of efforts to boost British exports. The PEM allows for tariff-free trade of some goods from across dozens of countries in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East. But, according to the Financial Times, the European Commission has made clear to Britain that it would not currently support UK membership of the PEM. EU officials said Brussels bosses had decided that the UK joining the PEM was not currently in the bloc's interests, the newspaper reported. The EU is said to fear it would increase the risk of products unfairly qualifying for low-tariff access to the bloc. It comes despite Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently striking a 'reset' deal following a UK-EU summit in London. The Government recently published a trade strategy that hailed membership of the PEM as an 'opportunity' for the UK The agreement, signed in May, covered fishing, trade, defence and energy and represented the biggest change in Britain's relations with the bloc since Brexit. Although the PEM is not exclusively an EU arrangement, trade experts said Britain would need EU co-operation to join because it would require a rewriting of the post-Brexit trade deal. Sam Lowe, trade lead at consultancy Flint Global, said: 'For it to be meaningful for the UK, the EU would need to agree to incorporate the PEM rules of origin into the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. 'This gives the EU de facto blocking powers.' David Henig, a former UK trade negotiator now at the ECIPE think-tank, said: 'The EU isn't united on the importance of the UK reset and issues like PEM can easily be caught up in this even though technically straightforward. 'The UK Government is going to have to work hard in London and Brussels to build momentum.' Although they have left the door open to joining the PEM, the Prime Minister has repeatedly ruled out rejoining the EU's single market or customs union. A Government spokesperson said: 'This Government has secured a new agreement with the EU to support British businesses and jobs and put more money in people's pockets. 'We have also published a new Trade Strategy setting out how we will boost trade further. 'We aren't going to provide a running commentary on our ongoing discussions with the EU.'
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Brexit a 'disaster' that 'ruined the country' - referendum 'should be repeated'
On the ninth anniversary of the day the UK voted to leave the EU, we asked readers to have their say on whether Brexit has been a success - and Mirror readers had a lot to say on the matter. Brexit has been slammed as a 'complete disaster' that 'ruined most of the country' in a poll marking nine years since the UK voted to leave the EU. Mirror readers slammed the European Union referendum, overwhelmingly voting that Brexit has failed. The UK marked nine years since the Brexit referendum on June 23 2025. The vote - which signalled the UK's intention to leave the European Union - ultimately ended a 47-year relationship with the political and economic bloc. Brits narrowly voted to leave the EU by 51.9% to 48.1%, a decision which lead to years of uncertainty across the country. A flurry of four different Conservative prime ministers ensued over a space of five years - including Liz Truss, whose premiership lasted just 49 days. Leaving the European Union has been proven to have made Brits' lives worse in at least six ways. Airport and port queues have grown drastically, food prices have spiralled out of control and small businesses have been forced to shut down. It has also become harder to work or study in the EU, music artists have been hit by a wave of barriers and NHS jobs have been left in chaos. To mark the 9th anniversary of the day the UK voted out, we asked readers to give their opinions on Brexit, with over 25,000 people voting in the poll. In response to the question 'do you think Brexit has failed?', an overwhelming 71% (18,565) voted yes, slamming the referendum as a 'disaster', while just 29% (7,520) voted no. Similarly, in response to the question 'do you feel better off since Brexit?', 78% (20,072) said no, while just 22% (20,072) said yes. We also asked 'should there be a second Brexit referendum?' and 'would you like to rejoin the EU?' - responses in both sections backed yes, with 66% (17,129) and 68% (17,572) respectively. There's still time to take the poll below - if you can't see it, click here. Results may change from those written above. What readers think In response to the poll, readers shared their thoughts in the comment section. Viking888 wrote: 'Brexit is a complete disaster. Ruined the country and most of the population.' While Bigal72 said: ' If it's been such a success why is the pound still 10% down making 40% of our food dearer.' Iron57 said: 'As far as the average person in the street is concerned, much of the pro Brexit propaganda that surrounded the leave campaign has been completely debunked. It's time for a proper debate where those wanting to remain can get their voices heard instead of having to listen to a steady stream of lies and half truths for those wanting to leave. Perhaps the remainers will also wake up this time and join the debate from the beginning rather than waiting until debate is lost.' Notanalt wrote: 'You got what you voted for, we left the EU, that the reality isn't whatever British exceptionalism fantasy you dreamed up for yourself is not the fault of anyone but you!' Suggesting Brexit is a failure, LynxVegas said: 'A vote like this should have had the agreement of every hamlet, village, town, city, county, region and country in the UK, British Isles, Commonwealth, plus all British ex-pats abroad, not just those living in the UK. A straight majority was unfair to so many people who wanted to stay in the EU. What are Brexiteers scared of? Lets have another vote.' Gozoman: 'The majority of people is not satisfied with the outcome of the previous referendum and after 5 years it should have been repeated.' However, on the opposing side of the debate, Nikgee said: 'Brexit has and hasn't failed. The main reason why Brexit failed was down to the politicians who screwed up the transition from the EU to being out.' What do you think? Do you agree with the readers' comments above? Nine years on from the Brexit referendum, h as leaving the EU has been a failure? Take our poll and have your say in the comments below.
