logo
Goodbye disposable vapes: What are the new rules from tomorrow?

Goodbye disposable vapes: What are the new rules from tomorrow?

1News16-06-2025
Disposable vape fans will see their habit go up in smoke from Tuesday, as tough new vape rules kick in.
Here's what you need to know about changes to vape sales and advertising.
What's being banned?
The distribution, manufacture, sale and supply of disposable vapes is being banned from tomorrow.
"We are getting rid of vapes that are most popular among young people, and that can only be positive," Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said in announcing the changes last year.
ADVERTISEMENT
The 2023/24 NZ Health Survey found 10.5% of people aged 15 to 17 vaped daily.
However, pod-style vaping devices will still be sold.
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including a push to lift our superannuation age, rising Middle East tensions, and Auckland's amateur footballers face off against global giants. (Source: 1News)
They contain pre-filled pods which are swapped out to refill the vape.
Also, as of tomorrow, vaping devices, products and packaging can no longer be displayed at general retailers.
Specialist vape stores must not display products in any way that makes them visible from outside their place of business - that includes advertising, display in online stores and in vending machines.
There are also many new restrictions on advertising to promote or encourage the use of vaping products, including to existing customers. The new raft of advertising restrictions means businesses could face a $2000 infringement fine.
ADVERTISEMENT
For instance, the Government says it would violate the new regulations if a shop is advertising or posting about vaping products on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter or Google business listings.
"From June 17, we will no longer be able to show images of the products," one online vape retailer says on its website.
There's quite a lot of detail in the new advertising rules, and a full breakdown can be found on Health New Zealand's website.
Research finds people who vape are more than twice as likely to develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. (Source: 1News)
Also, as of Tuesday, vaping specialist retailers can no longer use various promotional techniques such as giving away free vaping products, discounts, offering rewards, cash rebates or gifts for the purchase of vaping products, or offering lotteries or games to people who buy vaping products.
Haven't there already been some restrictions on vapes?
Yes, as part of the series of changes to the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products Act 1990 last year. The new changes are the second line of alterations, which began coming into effect in December.
ADVERTISEMENT
As of December, fines for selling to minors and publishing prohibited advertisements were increased, and new vape speciality stores were forbidden from opening within 100 metres of early childhood education centres.
There were already location restrictions saying speciality vape stores had to be at least 300 metres from schools or marae.
In introducing the amendments to smoking regulations last year, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said, "New Zealand was too slow to effectively regulate vaping, and youth vaping rates are too high".
Associate Health Minister Casey Costello. Photo: Nick Monro/RNZ (Source: rnz.co.nz)
"We have collectively agreed that, we have recognised that, and we know that we can do better. We have to stop young people from taking it up as a habit."
The ban on disposable vapes was put off for six months to allow retailers to prepare for the changes.
Jonathan Devery, chairperson of the Vaping Industry Association of New Zealand (VIANZ), said the group does support the disposable vapes ban, with a few caveats.
ADVERTISEMENT
He said while VIANZ "supports the intent behind the policy - to reduce youth access and address the environmental impact of single-use products - the association is urging caution about the potential unintended consequences".
University of Otago public health professor Janet Hoek, a leading researcher into vaping, said whether or not the ban will make a difference will depend on enforcement and product innovation by the industry.
Will people just switch from disposable vapes to refillable pods?
"I would expect [the ban] to reduce youth vaping given young people are very price sensitive," Hoek said.
"However, if the industry responds, as I think it is likely to do, by introducing cheaper pod vapes, the impact will be much less limited than we might hope."
University of Otago Professor Janet Hoek. (Source: Supplied)
"They're not a straightforward replacement," Devery said.
ADVERTISEMENT
"There's a real risk that removing the most convenient smoking cessation option could drive consumers back to cigarettes."
Hoek said many manufacturers may look for loopholes they can exploit with bans.
"Disposable vapes are typically inexpensive [i.e., may cost less than $10 a device], so the vaping industry may respond by introducing new lower-priced reusable vapes," Hoek said, saying she had seen pod starter kits - without pods, which cost extra - being advertised for under $10.
"We saw this behaviour among tobacco companies as they tried to undermine the impact of increased tobacco excise taxes [they 'shifted' the tax to higher priced brands, away from lower priced brands and introduced entirely new brands to create a new 'super value' partition within the market]."
The results are prompting calls for tighter regulation and more support, Kate Nicol-Williams reports. (Source: 1News)
Devery of VIANZ said it's possible some vape sales may just go underground.
"There are also serious concerns about enforcement," he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Early warnings from the UK, where a disposable vape ban came into effect on June 1, suggest black market sales are likely to increase."
Hoek said there is a lot of concern that manufacturers may find ways around disposable bans - she pointed to "Big Puff" high-capacity throwaway vapes that have drawn concern in the UK with their own disposables ban.
What does this mean for the vaping industry?
"We have consistently called for a full ban on disposable vapes, rather than incremental technical fixes, and we welcome the environmental benefits it will bring," Devery said.
"But the transition must be managed carefully to avoid driving consumers back to smoking or into unregulated markets."
The industry group feels that some of the advertising restrictions may ultimately harm consumers and make it harder for retailers to interact with them.
"Many retailers, especially online, have relied on clear product information and guidance to help adults make informed choices," Devery said.
ADVERTISEMENT
A woman vaping. (Source: istock.com)
"New restrictions will limit what can be communicated, making it harder for consumers to understand available options or find support to switch."
"Retailers are still recovering from last year's rushed regulations that left them with unsellable stock and high compliance costs - from updating websites to in-store signage," he said.
Many retailers have discounted their products heavily before the bans take effect.
But should more be done to control vaping?
Hoek said she thought the new measures would help cut youth vaping, but more strategy was needed.
"There are many omissions from the measures (e.g., the high concentration of vape stores in lower-income communities; the location of vape stores right next to schools).
ADVERTISEMENT
"I would favour a more proactive strategy that reduced the appeal, availability, addictiveness and affordability of vaping products."
One of the key complaints about disposable vapes has been the waste they generate, Devery said.
Yellow disposable electronic cigarette in a teenagers hand. (Source: istock.com)
"Removing disposables will help cut vape-related e-waste by over 80% according to our industry estimates, but more must be done," he said.
"VIANZ recommends expanded take-back schemes like VapeCycle, producer-responsibility regulations, and better consumer education on safe disposal."
"I would favour a 'polluter pays' model, where vape companies are responsible for the costs their products create," Hoek said.
"Vape companies have been given clear rules to follow, and yet some are already looking for loopholes," Asthma and Respiratory Foundation chief executive Letitia Harding said in a statement.
ADVERTISEMENT
Will this help NZ meet its Smokefree 2025 goals?
Back in 2011, New Zealand's government set the goal of a Smokefree New Zealand by 2025. There have been concerns that the goal is falling short, with particular worries about Māori and Pasifika smoking rates.
Costello has maintained the Government's changes will continue to work toward the target.
"We do not want our young people vaping," Costello said in Parliament.
"We do not want them taking up this habit. We do not want them to be nicotine addicted. We also don't want anybody taking up tobacco and smoking."
Vaping (file photo). (Source: istock.com)
The current smokefree goal aims to have less than 5% of the population smoking by December, but the latest data reveals there are still about 300,000 daily smokers - 6.9% of adults - across the country.
ADVERTISEMENT
"VIANZ urges the Government to closely monitor the ban's impact on smoking rates, particularly among priority groups, and ensure regulations don't inadvertently harm those most vulnerable," Deverey said.
"Vaping regulation must be viewed in the context of the devastating harm caused by smoking, which kills two out of every three users."
"Strong rules and environmental responsibility are essential, but the broader goal must remain to reduce smoking and improve public health outcomes."
Hoek said it's important vaping retailers were brought along on that goal.
"People who sell vaping products should be able to help people switch successfully from smoking to vaping," she said.
"We also need to let people know that, once they have switched completely to vaping and no longer think there's a risk they would return to smoking, they should stop vaping.
"That latter message isn't [for obvious reasons] communicated by vaping companies or retailers."
ADVERTISEMENT
By Nik Dirga of rnz.co.nz
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM wants NZ to get behind development, stem tide of Kiwis leaving for Oz
PM wants NZ to get behind development, stem tide of Kiwis leaving for Oz

1News

time5 hours ago

  • 1News

PM wants NZ to get behind development, stem tide of Kiwis leaving for Oz

National leader Christopher Luxon has told his party's annual conference that the country needs to "say yes" more. Addressing about 550 delegates, MPs and supporters at the Air Force Museum of New Zealand in Christchurch yesterday, Luxon bemoaned "activists" who opposed housing developments, agriculture, cruise ships and mines. "If we're serious about keeping Kiwis at home, creating jobs and increasing wages for all New Zealanders, we can't afford to keep saying no to every opportunity that comes our way." Opposition parties have heavily criticised the Government for its economic policies and laid the blame at its feet for the 30,000 New Zealanders who moved to Australia last year, but Luxon said the opposition would make it worse. "Take a look at Australia," he said. "If they shut down their mining industry or their energy industry tomorrow, as Labour and the Greens want to do here, I guarantee you would see fewer Kiwis moving across the ditch." ADVERTISEMENT Prime Minister Christopher Luxon addresses 550 delegates at the annual National Party conference in Christchurch. Photo: RNZ / Giles Dexter (Source: Luxon's speech came hot on the heels of an announcement from the United States that it would increase tariffs to 15%. Still digesting the announcement and what it would mean for New Zealand exporters, Luxon acknowledged "challenging" global conditions. "We can't just batten down the hatches and hope for the best," he said. Luxon's speech made no mention of National's coalition partners, New Zealand First or ACT, or even the word "coalition" itself, although deputy Nicola Willis acknowledged the "energy" it took to keep Winston Peters and David Seymour under control. Instead, Luxon's speech was heavy on shout-outs to his National ministers and their policies, and also on blaming the previous government for the cost-of-living struggles New Zealanders currently faced. "In the years to come, immediate action on the cost of living isn't enough," he said. ADVERTISEMENT "The last government spent billions of dollars in failed handouts, only to watch inflation roar and the economy falter. "We have to keep our eyes on the prize." Echoing his speech at Monday's post-cabinet press conference, Luxon leaned on the economic policies the Government had introduced, such as tax changes, FamilyBoost and the removal of the Auckland Fuel Tax. "We're doing what we can," he said. The speech contained an announcement that the Government would make it easier to get a concession on Department of Conservation (DOC) land. "That means more certainty for businesses, less bureaucracy and much faster decisions, so the businesses that should be operating can get up and running." There would still be restrictions on some parts of the DOC estate. ADVERTISEMENT "Where it does make sense, we need to get to the 'yes' much faster - instead of being bogged down in process and uncertainty," Luxon said. Charges of $20-40 for foreign visitors to high-volume sites, such as Cathedral Cove, Tongariro Crossing, Milford Sound, and Aoraki Mount Cook, were being introduced, but New Zealanders would be exempt from the fees. Party president Sylvia Wood, who was re-elected at the conference, said the party would select candidates for the 2026 election shortly. Speaking to media afterwards, Luxon said there was more to do 18 months into the term. Before the 2026 election, Luxon said he expected to be judged on rebuilding the economy, restoring law and order, lowering the cost of living, and delivering better health and education. "Everyone's dealing with a really challenging global environment right now, but what we can do is control what we can control and that New Zealand has a plan. We can navigate some pretty choppy seas to get to the destination that we want to get to, but for that to happen, you've got to have the right people with the hands on the tiller, which is us." He committed to leading the party into the 2026 election and staying on another three years, if re-elected. ADVERTISEMENT While joking he wanted 100% of the vote, Luxon talked up National's relationship with ACT and New Zealand First. "I'm very proud of the fact that we've worked incredibly well with the three parties in a coalition in the way that we have," he said.

Ex-National Party president Peter Goodfellow on what threatens 2026 re-election
Ex-National Party president Peter Goodfellow on what threatens 2026 re-election

NZ Herald

time10 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Ex-National Party president Peter Goodfellow on what threatens 2026 re-election

'Desley, I love you very much,' Goodfellow said, his voice catching in his throat. His final message to the party faithful was his best wishes in the 'fight to win the party vote in 2026'. Former National Party board member Peter Goodfellow (right) speaks at the party's annual conference in Christchurch alongside current party president Sylvia Wood. Photo / Adam Pearse Despite a party vote target in the mid-40s, National hadn't registered above 40% since January last year and hadn't breached 35% since April across several opinion pollsters. It received 38% in the 2023 election. Speaking to the Herald on Sunday, Goodfellow praised National's work while in Government but said the party's chief threat to re-election was the economy. 'I think people have responded really well on education with Erica [Stanford], I think Simeon [Brown] is doing a fantastic job in health, but it's the economy. 'If the economy suffers another shock then I think that the public can get tired of it and want change. 'I'm not seeing that at the moment, but there's a potential for that to happen if there were another series of shocks or a trade war.' Just hours before Goodfellow's farewell, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon confirmed Trade Minister Todd McClay would shortly travel to the United States to discuss President Donald Trump's announcement of 15% tariffs on New Zealand goods, an action Luxon described as 'blunt'. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon (front) speaks to media in Christchurch alongside Conservation Minister Tama Potaka (left) and Tourism Minister Louise Upston at the National conference. Photo / Adam Pearse The news was an unwelcome development for the Government, given the potential for further pain for exporters, which would slow any economic recovery. Recent polls affirmed the cost of living as the primary issue for voters, with the latest Ipsos Issues Monitor finding people trusted Labour more than National to lower prices. Goodfellow acknowledged New Zealanders were 'tired' of not seeing meaningful cost-of-living relief. 'My understanding is there'll continue to be relief for that middle New Zealand, but it's almost like they're saying it's not enough, it's almost never going to be enough.' A self-professed early adopter of the 'survive til 25' slogan used in 2024, Goodfellow argued economic growth hadn't been overestimated, but Trump's approach to trade had eroded confidence. 'The issue is, how do you get a bit of momentum and that confidence again?' Former Prime Minister Sir John Key (right) and Peter Goodfellow speak after the latter's selection as party president in 2009. Photo / NZPA Goodfellow stepped down as National president in 2022, but had previously voiced his original intention to resign in 2016. 'John Key and I did discuss at the beginning that we shouldn't leave together,' he said. 'I just thought, 'Well, I don't want to do this role for a huge, long time', but then we lost the election and then we had a period of some stability and coming into the 2020 election, the board wanted me to continue on as the president. 'Then we had a couple of leadership changes which just again meant they wanted that stability and continuity at the party and at the board level and I think that actually worked out pretty well.' Amid a disastrous result in the 2020 election, Goodfellow faced pressure over the party's candidate selection processes when the actions of several standing in 2020 hurt National's chances. He also endured a challenge for the party presidency from former Speaker of the House Sir David Carter, who in 2021 said he had 'zero confidence' in Goodfellow's ability to right the ship. Goodfellow described that period as a 'very unstable time for the party'. 'I never thought I would ever develop such a thick hide,' he said. 'There's a lot of criticism in the world and in politics, but not all of it is justified. 'I knew I was supported by the board and the decisions that we were making and that's why ultimately [Carter's] challenge didn't succeed.' However, Goodfellow acknowledged changes to the party's vetting proved some of the criticism was warranted. 'The vetting was very casual 20 years ago, maybe because people knew who the candidates were, but suddenly, more recently, we have people not known to the party coming in from the outside and we clearly did what we thought was good vetting, but there are some instances of behaviour that you can't pick up, no matter how good you're vetting. 'Many [candidates] are suitable ... but they don't necessarily understand what's going to be involved and what's going to be required. 'The challenge then is, are they telling you everything that's going on and increasingly, we have to be more diligent to make sure that our members are respected by not having candidates put up in front of them that aren't suitable.' Asked to describe his lasting legacy with National, Goodfellow pointed to the various special interest groups within the party and his mission to make the party more inclusive. Those groups included the party's younger and older members' wings, as well as collectives of members from Chinese, Indian, Filipino, rural, Māori and Pasifika communities. 'I know that there was no such inclusion before it, it was very much a traditional-looking party,' Goodfellow said. 'Within the party, it's good for us to have groups that represent that culture, but also share the values and the philosophy of the National Party and want to be engaged in it.' Adam Pearse is the Deputy Political Editor and part of the NZ Herald's Press Gallery team based at Parliament in Wellington. He has worked for NZME since 2018, reporting for the Northern Advocate in Whangārei and the Herald in Auckland.

Couple take previous home owner to court after she refuses to leave
Couple take previous home owner to court after she refuses to leave

Otago Daily Times

time11 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Couple take previous home owner to court after she refuses to leave

A couple who bought a Pāpāmoa Beach house needed a High Court order to remove the previous owner after she refused to leave the property. New owners Benjamin and Chelsea Brown bought the two-bedroom home at a mortgagee sale this year, with settlement taking place on May 21. But the previous owner, Terina O'Connell, said she had been trying to "negotiate a solution with ASB for two years" and had not consented to the sale of her home. As a result, she refused to move out and even went as far as reaching out to people on social media and asking them to come to her home and support her before settlement day. The new owners sought a trespass order on May 22 to remove O'Connell and her supporters, and when that didn't work, they took their case to the High Court. 'The bank does not own my property' According to a recently released High Court decision, Justice Dani Gardiner held a telephone conference on June 6, where O'Connell's position could be heard by all parties. The court was also referred to a Facebook post she made, where she invited supporters to join her at the house. There are two posts still on her Facebook page, in which she did a "call-out" for support, saying "all I know is that the supposed settlement is Tuesday, 20 May 2025 – tomorrow". She said the purchasers had "made a deal with the devil" and that "the bank does not own my property, I have no business with you and I am not bound by any contract you made". She posted that she "would appreciate some support at my home ... tomorrow afternoon ... tomorrow night and for the next couple of days". While not discussed in the High Court judgment, there was also a livestreamed Facebook interview that O'Connell did with Counterspin Media in which she explained her views on the "alleged debt" owed to the bank. In it, she said she had paused her mortgage repayments while the bank refused to provide her with documentation she had requested or answer questions she had. Judge: Any issues between her and bank, not new owners The judge summarised O'Connell's position as primarily taking issue with the mortgagee sale process conducted by ASB. O'Connell told the court she'd tried to "negotiate a solution" for two years, had not consented to the mortgagee sale and said ASB went ahead with the sale anyway. She also said ASB's solicitor advised her of the settlement date, but said she was told the couple's lawyer would contact her about vacating. O'Connell said that never happened and, the day after settlement, the new owner arrived at the property, followed by security guards and police, and she had been "harassed". She rejected the couple's claim that her presence at the house, with others, had posed a risk of damage to the property, adding they were there to "support her through this stressful time" and that she would experience emotional and financial hardship if forced to leave. But Justice Gardiner's decision said the Browns were the registered owners and any issues that O'Connell had before the mortgagee sale were "between her and ASB". "These issues do not affect the plaintiffs' legal ownership of the property," Justice Gardiner said. The judge said while it may have been unfortunate if O'Connell had been unaware the couple intended to take possession of the property immediately on settlement, that was the usual case. She also accepted there was a risk of damage to the property by O'Connell or her supporters. The High Court judgment also noted that while O'Connell remained at the property, the couple were in breach of their insurance policy, as they couldn't change the locks or get an electrical warrant of fitness. They were also unable to rent the property to service their mortgage, which placed them at risk of default. The judge made an order requiring O'Connell and any other occupants to vacate the property by Monday, June 9. Are mortgagee sales on the rise? Cotality New Zealand data showed a "minor lift" to 81 mortgagee sales in the second quarter of this year, up on the previous quarter when there were 52. This marked the highest number since the fourth quarter of 2023, when there were 101 mortgagee sales. However, Cotality head of research Nick Goodall said the number was "still very low in a longer-term context, especially compared to the Global Financial Crisis". "I think this illustrates a more stable financial lending environment over the last decade or so, as well as the willingness and ability of banks to work closely with borrowers who may be struggling, rather than resort to mortgagee sales, which doesn't really benefit either party." OneRoof has 58 properties currently listed as "mortgagee sales" in New Zealand, with the total number of properties listed sitting at just over 38,000. New Zealand Banking Association chief executive Roger Beaumont said banks are responsible lenders. They typically have dedicated teams to deal with those experiencing financial difficulty and mortgagee sales were "rare and always a last resort". "There are several options that banks may offer ... depending on their particular circumstances. That may, for example, include temporarily moving to interest-only repayments." Beaumont said in the six months from July to December 2024, there were 1.4 million home loans across 1.1 million customers. "As an indication of potential financial issues, of the total number of home loans in that period, 17,445 loans switched from principal and interest repayments to interest-only repayments." By Hannah Bartlett, Open Justice reporter

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store