Union MoS Margherita inaugurates 73rd Edition of India International Garment Fair
The inauguration took place in the presence of Chairman AEPC Sudhir Sekhri, prominent industry leaders and a large number of international buyers and exhibitors.
Delivering his inaugural address, Margherita said, '73rd edition of the India International Garment Fair (IIGF) is Asia's largest and most dynamic garment fair. This fair is not just a showcase of fabrics and fashion; it is a celebration of the creativity, craftsmanship, and confidence of Indians. This year, with an exhibition area of over 21,000 square metres and participation from buyers across 80 countries spanning North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia, Oceania, Africa, and Eurasia, this edition reaffirms the growing global trust in Indian textiles.'
Minster further underlined, 'Under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji, and the guidance of Minister of Textiles Giriraj Singh ji, the Ministry is focused on expanding India's global footprint in textiles and apparel. We are not just aiming for volumes, we are working towards value, versatility, and visibility.'
The textile and apparel industry contributes 2.3 per cent to India's GDP, 13 per cent to industrial production, and 12 per cent to exports.
In 2023-24 alone, we exported textile products worth $34.4 billion, with apparel accounting for 42 per cent of that. We now aim to cross $100 billion in textile exports by 2030, and every MSME, every entrepreneur, every exporter has a role in achieving this, Margherita highlighted.
He also emphasised that with over 80 per cent of India's textile sector being MSME-driven, it is important to focus on boosting productivity, ensuring steady raw material supply, and reducing import dependence to stay competitive.
Highlighting on the road ahead, the Minister underlined, 'On the trade front, the India-UK Free Trade Agreement, and our ongoing negotiations with the EU and US, will open new avenues for growth. These are high-value, quality-conscious markets, and we are committed to equipping Indian exporters with the right strategy, standards, and compliance to seize these opportunities.'
Commenting on the 73rd Edition of IIGF, Sudhir Sekhri, Chairman, AEPC and IGFA, said, 'I am happy to share that IIGF will provide a strong platform for the Indian apparel exporters to capitalise on India's momentum for growth. India's textile sector is at a pivotal moment, where the acceptability of 'Made in India' brands is more than ever before in the global sourcing arena. With the right policy push, innovation, and global partnerships, this could be the decade where India emerges not just as a volume player, but a value-added global garment exports powerhouse.'
The 73rd edition of IIGF focuses on showcasing the latest apparel trends tailored to meet the requirements of the European Union, the USA, and other Western markets. A large number of them are based on sustainable manufacturing practices. This year's event will highlight India's prowess in design, pattern and technological advancements, reflecting our unwavering commitment to innovation and responsible production.
While highlighting the objective of the Fair, Chairman AEPC stated that IIGF will support MSMEs by helping them enter and grow in international markets while showcasing the latest fashion collections to a global audience. This will also facilitate buyer connections and drive industry growth through exposure and engagement.
The India International Garment Fair features 361 exporters showcasing across 9,375 sq. mtrs. The fair features participation from 12 states across India. Key participating states include: Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, West Bengal and Haryana.
The total number of countries represented at the 73rd IIGF is 79. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
23 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Rupee eases amid weakness in equities
Indian Rupee fell today as some weakness in local stocks weighed on the currency. INR currently trades at 85.67 per US dollar, down 8 paise on the day. The US dollar edged up a bit after dropping to lowest level in over three and half years. Fed Chair Powell reaffirmed a data-dependent stance while acknowledging tariff-linked inflation as a limiting factor. The Senates narrow approval of a tax-and-spending bill, projected to balloon the national debt by $3.3 trillion, added to market anxiety and kept the US currency under check. Meanwhile, the domestic equity benchmarks ended with modest losses today, weighed down by ongoing uncertainty surrounding the India-US trade talks. Investors remained cautious, adopting risk-off approach. As per provisional closing data, the barometer index, the S&P BSE Sensex, fell 287.60 points or 0.34% to 83,409.69. The Nifty 50 index lost 88.40 points or 0.35% to 25,453.40.
India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
Retiring without children? Here's how to plan for a comfortable and secure future
In India, family has always been the backbone of support, especially during old age. Children are often seen as the ones who'll stand by you, manage your medical needs, and take care of your finances when you can't. But what if you don't have children? How do you plan for those later years when you know you'll have to stand strong on your own?advertisementToday, more and more Indians are choosing to remain child-free or find themselves without direct heirs for various reasons. For them, retirement planning isn't just about saving money and building a corpus, it's about securing comfort, care, dignity, and independence in their golden spoke to Ajay Kumar Yadav, Group CEO and CIO, Wise Finserv Private Wealth, and Sameer Mathur, MD and Founder of Roinet Solution, to understand how people can protect their future, health, and peace of mind when they don't have children to lean YOUR OWN SAFETY NET Sameer Mathur sums it up best: 'Without the usual safety net of children to fall back on for support—be it emotional, financial, or in managing health, these individuals need to plan more carefully and independently.'In other words, your savings have to stretch further. He advises building a retirement fund worth at least 20–25 times your expected annual expenses. For instance, if you think you'll need Rs 6 lakh a year to live comfortably, you should aim for a corpus of around Rs 1.0–1.2 crore, at the very Kumar Yadav, Group CEO and CIO at Wise Finserv Private Wealth, adds another layer, 'Ensure that 60–70% of your monthly expenses are covered through guaranteed income asset classes such as annuities, bonds, or other fixed income instruments that generate cash flows regularly.'Sameer Mathur also points to annuity plans from LIC or the National Pension System (NPS) as smart picks for those retiring without children, since they provide steady income for life. Additionally, systematic withdrawal plans (SWPs) from mutual funds can help you handle surprise costs without depleting your main PLAN FOR RISING COSTSMedical costs in India are climbing every year. And when you don't have children to take you to the doctor or manage your medicines, you need to plan advises, 'Start with a comprehensive health insurance policy early in life. It's your first line of defence. Build a separate medical fund for costs like home care, nursing, or treatments insurance may not cover.'Yadav agrees: 'To handle inflation-linked health expenses, make a separate medical and elder care fund, ideally 20–25% of your total corpus.'Also, check out senior-specific insurance plans that include add-ons for critical illness, day-care procedures, and even home healthcare. If you can find it, long-term care insurance or a dedicated elder care fund can go a long way in paying for nursing staff or assisted living expenses that children would usually help CARE: YOUR BACKUP TEAMadvertisementGrowing old alone doesn't have to mean feeling lonely or helpless. Senior living communities are slowly finding acceptance in India. Many offer not just a place to stay but medical facilities, social activities, and a sense of reminds us: 'Consider senior living communities that offer medical support and social connection, they're slowly becoming more accepted in India.'The key is to plan and choose what suits you best, whether that's hiring home help, shifting to a retirement community, or keeping funds ready for assisted living if you ever need MATTERS: PUT IT IN WRITINGOne of the biggest risks for people without direct heirs is not having clear legal instructions. In India, family disputes over property are common, especially when there's no explains,'A clear and updated will is essential, it ensures your assets go exactly where you want them to, whether it's to extended family, close friends, or a cause you care about.''Draft a clear and registered Will that outlines how your assets should be distributed, whether to family members, friends, or charities,' echoes Yadav. He also suggests setting up a private trust if you have significant from a will, appoint someone you trust as Power of Attorney to handle your finances if you're ever unable to do so. A Living Will or Advance Directive can make sure your medical wishes are respected, especially when you can't speak for WITHOUT CHILDREN: A LIFE BY DESIGNNot having children doesn't have to mean your later years are uncertain. As Ajay Kumar Yadav says, "Planning for retirement without children isn't about what's missing, it's about what's possible. With the right financial discipline, legal foresight, and emotional awareness, you can build a future where your later years are defined not by dependence, but by dignity and choice."Simply put, your retirement should be a time to live life on your terms, secure, comfortable, and free. With some extra planning and the courage to prepare for the unexpected, that dream is entirely possible, even if you're doing it prepared, stay independent, and live the life you've worked so hard for.- Ends advertisement
India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
Non-compete clauses blocking job switch are not enforceable, says Delhi High Court
In a significant ruling that could have widespread implications, the Delhi High Court recently reaffirmed that non-compete clauses restricting an employee's right to work after leaving a company are unenforceable under Indian law. The judgment came in the appeal of Varun Tyagi, a software engineer, against his former employer, Daffodil Software Private Limited, which had sought to block him from joining a key client after resigning from the was the case?Varun Tyagi, an IT engineer, joined Daffodil Software in January 2022 and was later assigned to a government project run by Digital India Corporation, a business associate of Daffodil. Tyagi rose to a leadership position on the project, receiving specialised training and working closely with resigning from Daffodil in January 2025 and serving a three-month notice period, Tyagi accepted a job offer from DIC, which was to be effective from April 2025. Soon after, Daffodil, citing a non-compete and non-solicitation clause in Tyagi's employment contract with them, filed a suit before the court to restrain him from joining DIC. The company argued that this move could potentially harm their business interests and lead to the disclosure of proprietary employment agreement between Tyagi and Daffodil included a sweeping clause that prohibited Tyagi from soliciting or working with any business associates of Daffodil for three years after leaving the company and associating with any business associate he had interacted with during his trial court granted an interim injunction in favour of Daffodil, restraining Tyagi from joining DIC and from disclosing any confidential information. The court said there was a prima facie case in favour of the company and there existed a real risk of irreparable harm to Daffodil. Tyagi then challenged this decision before the Delhi High Court, arguing that the injunction and the non-compete clause violated his right to work and were void under Indian through his counsel, argued that non-compete clauses were a blanket prohibition, not just on competitors but also on clients and business associates. He further said that such a clause, which imposes a post-employment restraint, cannot be legally permitted under Indian law. Daffodil, on the other hand, argued that the non-compete was necessary to protect the company's interests, investments and intellectual property. They further argued that Tyagi had access to confidential information and proprietary knowledge that could potentially harm Daffodil's business did the High Court say?Justice Tejas Karia, who heard Tyagi's appeal, examined whether there was any legal foundation of non-compete clauses in India. The Court said that Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 clearly says that any agreement that restrains anyone from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business, except in the case of the sale of goodwill, shall be court clarified that Indian law, unlike English law, does not recognise the validity of 'partial' or 'reasonable' restraints. Citing several Supreme Court judgments, the court held that any post-employment restriction, no matter how limited, should be considered void unless it falls under the narrow exception for the sale of the High Court also found that Daffodil did not own the intellectual property or confidential information in question; rather, it belonged to DIC, the client. Most importantly, the court held that the non-compete clause, as drafted, was an impermissible restraint on Tyagi's right to work and was thus void under Section 27 of the Indian Contract have the courts said earlier?Indian courts have consistently held that non-compete clauses restricting an employee after they leave employment are void and unenforceable. Such clauses are seen as a restraint of trade and contrary to public policy, as they may deprive individuals of their fundamental right to earn a livelihood. This is, however, for enforcement of non-compete clauses post-employment only. Restrictions that apply during the period of employment are generally valid. Employers can prohibit employees from working with competitors or starting a competing business while still employed, provided the restrictions are reasonable and protect legitimate business there are certain exceptions that have evolved over time through judicial interpretations, in which a non-compete clause may be upheld. For example, courts may uphold non-compete clauses if they are specifically designed to protect trade secrets, proprietary information, or confidential data, provided the restrictions are reasonable in scope and duration. Additionally, as stated in Section 27, non-compete agreements that are part of a sale of business or goodwill may be enforceable to protect the buyer's the case of Superintendence Co. of India v. Krishan Murgai (1981), the Supreme Court of India emphasised that any agreement restraining a person from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business would generally be void, except with the limited exception to the sale of goodwill. 'The right to livelihood and to pursue any occupation is paramount and cannot be curtailed by such contractual restrictions' the top court the case of Niranjan Shankar Golikari v. Century Spinning & Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (1967) the Supreme Court held that negative covenants or restrictions during the period of employment are valid if they are reasonable and necessary to protect the employer's interests, such as trade secrets or confidential information. However, restraints that operate after the termination of employment are generally void under Section 27. The court struck a balance, stating that while protecting trade secrets is legitimate, post-employment restrictions on an employee's right to work are not recently, in the case of Manipal Business Solutions v. Aurigain Consultants (2022), the Supreme Court held that restrictions on associating with a business associate or client post-employment are void under Section 27. The Court also held that such clauses, even if agreed upon, cannot be enforced after the employment relationship ends, as they amount to a restraint of trade and violate the right to livelihood.- Ends
