Assembly bypolls: Ludhiana (West) in Punjab sees 33 pc turnout
The voting started at 7 a.m. In the first two hours, the polling percentage was 8.50 per cent, which rose to 21.51 per cent by 11 am. The polling at 194 polling booths will continue till 6 p.m.
The counting of votes will be held on June 23 simultaneously with four other Assembly seats -- two in Gujarat and one each in Kerala and West Bengal.
The state ruling Aam Aadmi Party is eyeing to retain the seat, and the main Opposition Congress is aiming to win back the seat that it had represented six times. In total, 14 candidates are in the fray for the urban seat.
The BJP and the Shiromani Akali Dal have also fielded candidates for the seat. The main contest largely seems between AAP's candidate Sanjeev Arora, the party's Rajya Sabha member and local industrialist, Congress' former minister Bharat Bhushan Ashu, who represented the seat twice from 2012.
Ashu was defeated by his friend-turned-foe Gogi, 58, by a margin of 7,512 votes in the 2022 Assembly poll.
The BJP has fielded Jiwan Gupta, the party's state unit core committee member, while its former ally, Akali Dal, reposed faith in Parupkar Singh Ghuman, a former president of the Ludhiana Bar Association.
Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) Sibin C. said 1,74,437 electorates, comprising 84,825 women and 10 third-gender voters, will cast votes at 194 polling booths set up at 66 locations. These include 10 model polling booths, one all-women, one eco-friendly and one booth operated by Public Works Department (PWD) staff. Additionally, 13 booths have been declared critical, where paramilitary forces have been deployed.
To facilitate senior citizens, persons with disabilities and voters with medical issues, home voting was conducted with 239 participants. He said security checkpoints have been established at 54 locations across the constituency, and all activities are being closely monitored by the security forces.
By fielding the Rajya Sabha MP, speculations in political circles are rife that AAP convener Arvind Kejriwal, who's active in the state politics after facing humiliating defeat not only of his party but his bastion in Delhi Assembly elections, is going to the Rajya Sabha in his place in case Sanjeev Arora wins the bypoll. However, the party denies that Kejriwal is moving to the Rajya Sabha.
Interestingly, in October 2024, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) carried out a raid at the residence of AAP candidate Arora as part of a money laundering probe linked to a land 'fraud' case.
The BJP, which is expanding its footprints in the state's Hindu-dominated urban constituencies, is eyeing to give a tough contest to both the state ruling AAP and the Congress by fielding a strong and credible local face with grassroots connect.
In the run-up to the polling, the Bharatiya Janata Party carried out a scathing attack on the three-year rule of AAP's governance in Punjab, accusing them of transforming the state into a 'rehabilitation centre' for Kejriwal's rejected Delhi loyalists.
BJP leaders like Tarun Chugh, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta and Manjinder Singh Sirsa claimed that AAP is systematically placing its favoured individuals in key administrative positions, effectively undermining Punjab's autonomy.
They argued that Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann has been reduced to a 'rubber stamp' while Kejriwal operates as a remote puppet master.
AAP state President Aman Arora has claimed that the atmosphere during the campaign indicated that the AAP candidate Arora is heading towards a massive victory.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Kerala vs Chhattisgarh: Nun arrests expose BJP's double standards on Christian Minorities
By Dayal Paleri and Kunal Shahdeo The arrest of two Catholic nuns hailing from Kerala in BJP-ruled Chhattisgarh on July 25 — on charges of forcible conversion and human trafficking — has triggered a fresh political uproar. A sessions court in Chhattisgarh denied them bail and referred the matter to an NIA court. While Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai defended the arrest as a 'matter concerning the safety of our daughters,' various Opposition parties and civil society groups condemned it as an instance of 'systematic persecution' against Christian minorities. While the Bajrang Dal was allegedly involved in mobbing the nuns at Durg railway station prior to the arrest, the incident has created a clear political dilemma for the BJP unit in Kerala. The state leadership denounced the arrest and distanced itself from the Chhattisgarh CM and the Bajrang Dal. At first glance, the Kerala BJP's response might appear as a contradiction, an instance of political doublespeak aimed at salvaging the party's outreach to the Christian vote bank in the state. But there are two significantly deeper dynamics that the instance reveals. First, the episode threatens to expose the limits of the BJP's project of political inclusion of Christians in Kerala and the larger fragility of their minority outreach, especially at a time when the party under the new state president is attempting to rebrand itself around the language of development, inclusion, and moderation. Secondly, and more importantly, the seemingly contradictory stances taken by the BJP units in Kerala and Chhattisgarh vis-à-vis the rights of Christian minorities may actually reflect a deeper coherence, tied less to religion than to the caste and class location of the Christian community in the respective regions. In other words, the BJP's friendliness towards Christians in Kerala and hostility and anxiety over 'conversion' to Christianity in Chhattisgarh cannot be explained through 'hypocrisy', but should be understood with respect to the differential social profiles of Christians in both places. The BJP in Kerala has initiated a serious effort at social engineering to overcome its long-standing electoral marginality. This marginality is shaped by the state's significant religious minority population and the strong social base of the Communist and Congress parties among both upper- and backward-caste Hindus. One part of the BJP's strategy seems to be expanding its support beyond the upper castes and making political inroads into the Christian population, especially the Syrian Christians, who have shown signs of drifting away from their historical loyalty to the Congress. Some of the BJP's recent political campaigns, including the one around 'love jihad', have found resonance among the key leadership of the Syrian Church. The open endorsement from certain Church leaders and the party's victory in the Thrissur Lok Sabha seat, which has a large Christian population, could be seen as early markers of success. Under the leadership of Rajeev Chandrasekhar, the party has carried out organisational changes, with a noticeable increase in Christian representation at local and district levels. Public gestures such as the Sneha Yatra, where BJP leaders visited Christian homes during Easter and Christmas, were seen as instances of successful outreach. However, recent developments have revealed visible tensions that suggest the limits of this strategy. The BJP's failure to keep its promise of providing land titles to Christians and resolving the Munampam dispute has cast a shadow over its Christian appeal. Around the same time, Organiser published an article accusing the Church of land encroachment. More radical affiliates of the Sangh, such as the Hindu Aikya Vedi, continue to raise similar anti-Christian concerns in public, highlighting the internal dissonance regarding minority inclusion within the larger Hindu nationalist camp. These developments indicate that the BJP's attempt to include Christians remains constrained by ideological fault lines and unresolved dilemmas. It is in this context that the arrest of the nuns deepens the Kerala BJP's minority dilemma. The Catholic Bishops' Conference of India issued a strong statement criticising the arrest. Deepika, the mouthpiece of the Church, published a sharp editorial condemning the episode as an 'arrest of the Constitution.' In Kerala, Christians, particularly the Syrian Catholic, occupy an upper-caste, economically entrenched position, with deep institutional roots in education, healthcare, and civil society and distinguish themselves from other Christians, including lower-caste groups within the state and communities in other parts of the country. Crucially, they pose no threat of ongoing conversion, nor do they disrupt the prevailing social order. Their political inclusion, therefore, generates minimal ideological friction within the Hindu nationalist framework and is instead read as a form of elite coalition-building with an electorally useful minority. The dynamics in Chhattisgarh present a stark contrast. Here, Christianity is largely practiced by Adivasi communities, and conversion is viewed not merely as a matter of faith but as a disruption of social order, challenging caste dominance, state control, and the Sangh Parivar's ongoing project of culturally absorbing tribal populations into the Hindu fold. In this context, Christianity is often interpreted as a form of social dissent, a way for Adivasi communities to assert dignity, seek rights, and resist assimilation. Consequently, even routine acts of Christian charity or community engagement are swiftly criminalised, often framed as 'forced and fraudulent conversions' or violations of public order. The arrest of the nuns, then, is not an exception but a reflection of this entrenched logic of suspicion and control. What may appear, then, as hypocrisy is in fact a regionally calibrated ideological posture. The BJP's relationship with Christianity is not defined by theological opposition, but by whether the presence of Christians reinforces or disrupts dominant caste and class arrangements. Where Christians are institutionally powerful and caste-aligned, they are accommodated; where they are subaltern and assertive, they are policed. The arrest of the nuns thus reveals more than just the party's ambivalence toward minorities; it lays bare the fragile architecture of its minority outreach, held together by uneven calculations of caste, geography, and political expediency. What we see in the contrast between Kerala and Chhattisgarh is not an exception to the rule but a blueprint of conditional inclusion, shaped by ideological constraints that remain central to the Hindu nationalist project. Paleri is an assistant professor of social sciences at NLSIU, Bengaluru. Shahdeo is an academic fellow at NLSIU, Bengaluru
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India always supported a negotiated two-state solution: Govt. on Gaza conflict
India has always supported "a negotiated two-state solution" that would see the establishment of a sovereign, independent and viable State of Palestine within secure and recognised borders, living side by side in peace with Israel, the government told the Rajya Sabha on Thursday (July 31, 2025). The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) was asked whether India's support for the Palestinian cause has been an "integral part of our foreign policy". Parliament Monsoon session Day 9 LIVE "India's policy towards Palestine has been longstanding. India has always supported a negotiated two-state solution, which would see the establishment of a sovereign, independent and viable State of Palestine within secure and recognised borders, living side by side in peace with Israel," Minister of State (MoS) for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh said in a written response to the query. India has "strongly condemned the terror attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023 and the loss of civilian lives in the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict", he said. "India remains concerned at the security situation and has called for a ceasefire, release of all hostages and peaceful resolution of the conflict through dialogue and diplomacy," Mr. Singh added. The MEA was also asked whether India, on June 12, abstained from voting on a UN General Assembly resolution demanding an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of hostages and unimpeded humanitarian aid. Mr. Singh said India has emphasised the need for safe, timely and sustained delivery of humanitarian assistance to the people of Palestine. "India has also reiterated that bringing Israel and Palestine closer contributes to creating conditions for early resumption of direct peace negotiations," he said. India has reiterated the above position in various bilateral and multilateral forums, such as the UN, BRICS, NAM and Voice of Global South, the minister said. "In line with the above-stated policy and taking into account the lack of negotiations and overall imbalance of the resolution text, India abstained in the vote on the recent resolution in the UNGA Emergency Special Session on 12.06.2025," he said.
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Terrorism was never saffron, will never be: CM Fadnavis
Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Thursday (July 31, 2025) hailed the acquittal of all the accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, saying 'terrorism was never saffron and will never be', while Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde said the verdict has wiped off the stigma on the Hindu community. VIDEO | Mumbai: Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis (@Dev_Fadnavis) briefs media on NIA court acquitting all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. He says,"The truth of how Congress-led UPA government tried to set the 'saffron terrorism' narrative and planted the Malegaon… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) July 31, 2025 Mr. Shinde claimed that Hindus can never engage in anti-national activities and hit out at the Congress for coining the 'absurd term of Hindu terrorism'. The Opposition Congress hit out at CM Fadnavis, saying the Chief Minister had 'no regrets' over the loss of innocent lives in the blast and that his reaction over the court verdict showed his 'political mindset'. It also sought to know if the government would challenge the court's decision in the Higher Court as it did after the 7/11 blasts case, where the accused were acquitted. Nearly 17 years after the Malegaon blast claimed six lives, a special court in Mumbai on Thursday (July 31, 2025) acquitted all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit, noting there was 'no reliable and cogent evidence' against them. Reacting to the verdict, CM Fadnavis said on X, 'Terrorism was never saffron, is not and will never be.' In a post on X, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde said, 'Truth is never defeated. After a long battle of seventeen years, a special court has acquitted seven alleged accused in the Malegaon bomb blast case. It is true that justice was delayed, but it has once again been proven that truth is never defeated.' He said Shiv Sena has unequivocally supported the patriots who were falsely accused and imprisoned in the Malegaon blast case. 'This is because Shiv Sena never had any doubt that their cause was just. Colonel Purohit, Sadhvi Pragya, and the other seven individuals had to endure immense mental and physical torment due to these accusations. The Hindu community will never forget this injustice,' Mr. Shinde said. 'Hindus can never engage in anti-national activities, because patriotism is a sacred duty for those who follow Hinduism. The absurd term 'Hindu terrorism' was coined by conspiratorial Congress leaders. What answer do they have now for such blatant falsehoods?' he asked. 'A dark chapter has ended today. The stigma on the Hindu community has been wiped away. The slogan 'Say with pride, we are Hindus' will now resonate across the country with a hundredfold louder voice; there is no doubt about it,' Mr. Shinde said. State Revenue Minister Chandrashekar Bawankule said the verdict of the special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court in the Malegaon bomb blast case was not merely a judicial decision but an exposure of a long-running political conspiracy to defame. Editorial | By evidence alone: on the 2008 Malegaon blast trial The court clearly noted that there was no concrete evidence behind any of the allegations. But a more serious matter is that the Congress deliberately used the term 'Hindu terrorism' in its propaganda, attempting to defame the Hindu community and its faith worldwide, he said. The Congress committed an unforgivable crime by trying to place Hinduism, in the ranks of terrorists, which rather has been a symbol of humanity and tolerance for centuries. Today, the court has upheld the truth, and now the Congress must apologise to the Hindu community, Bawankule demanded. 'A Hindu has never been a terrorist and never will be. The court's decision today has delivered a resounding slap to those who defamed Hindus,' he said. State congress president Harshwardhan Sapkal said terrorism has no religious colour. Congress has always condemned terror and demanded strict action against the accused. The Malegaon blast case was investigated by (then ATS chief) late Hemant Karkare, who sacrificed his life for protecting the country, he told reporters. 'If he and late state home minister R.R. Patil were alive today, what would the court verdict have been? This is what people are thinking,' he said. Mr. Sapkal said several questions have been raised in connection with the case. 'Who are the accused? Mumbai train blasts and Malegaon blasts are acts of terror. The government immediately moved the Supreme court after the 7/11 blasts case accused were acquitted. Will the government act in a similar way now?' he asked. Reacting sharply to the Chief Minister's comment, state Congress spokesperson Sachin Sawant said, 'Innocent people died in the Malegaon blast, and the government could not deliver justice to them, yet the Maharashtra Chief Minister has no regrets. His tweet (post on X) reveals his political mindset.' This is precisely why questions have been raised about the attitude of the investigative agencies, he said. 'These people view terrorism through a political lens as well. Individuals associated with the BJP and RSS had even labelled a brave officer like martyr Hemant Karkare a traitor,' he alleged. 'Was it this same political mindset that led to Rohini Salian being asked to take a soft stance against the accused and to slow down the investigation? Witnesses were offered inducements. A witness like Randhir Singh was given a ministerial position in Jharkhand,' Mr. Sawant said on X. When asked, senior Congress leader and former Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde refused to comment on the verdict.
