After Saving $1.3 Million At 35, This Doctor Wonders If It's Finally Lamborghini Time
'I don't want to look back and think, 'I wish I had spent more and had fun when I was young,'' the doctor wrote in a popular Reddit post on r/whitecoatinvestor, a subreddit filled with financially savvy medical professionals.
Don't Miss:
Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die."
$100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation.
'You want to blow 30-40% of what you made in a decade in a single afternoon?' one person asked bluntly. Another said, 'Lambo money is $1M a year or more. This is like a barista buying a Birkin bag.'
Still, not everyone was against the idea. Many encouraged the physician to explore the fantasy without committing outright. One of the top responses suggested spending $1,000 or $2,000 to test drive a variety of exotic cars. 'Try them all at 150 mph and see if that's enough for you,' the commenter said.
Others recommended a more practical splurge. 'A really high-end car will turn heads but it comes at like a $150K premium to something you can use that will also turn heads and drive to what is your likely capability,' one commenter said, suggesting a Porsche 911 or BMW M4 as middle-ground options.
Trending: The secret weapon in billionaire investor portfolios that you almost certainly don't own yet.
Plenty of people pointed out that while $1.3 million is an impressive savings milestone, it may not justify a purchase as extravagant as a Lamborghini. One financial planner shared that a client with $2.5 million in investments still struggled with the idea of splurging. 'She ended up settling on a trip of a lifetime. We still talk about it to this day.'
'If you worked hard your entire life with the explicit purpose to buy a Lambo, then maybe you should do it,' another person said. 'However, I like cars quite a bit but would still never spend that much at that net worth.'
A few were more philosophical. 'Sometimes it's not about generational wealth or even wealth beyond need. Sometimes it's just life. You really only do live once. Let no one influence your enjoyment of such.'Even those supportive of the idea urged the doctor not to buy new. 'Buy a used Huracan for $200K. The first owner took the depreciation hit. Keep it a couple years and resell for $180K,' one user advised. 'Costs you $20K in depreciation vs $100K in depreciation.'
And then there were the skeptics who had been there and done that. One Porsche owner said his 911 mostly sat in the garage and was eventually sold. 'I loved my Toyota Tundra so much, the Porsche sat in the garage for six years and only got 20K miles.'
Ultimately, the community's message boiled down to this: Don't let fear of missing out or burnout push you into a massive decision. Rent first, try it out, and if you love it, go for it. Just don't expect the Lambo to solve anything deeper.
Read Next: Over the last five years, the price of gold has increased by approximately 83% — Investors like Bill O'Reilly and Rudy Giuliani are using this platform to UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article After Saving $1.3 Million At 35, This Doctor Wonders If It's Finally Lamborghini Time originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
6 minutes ago
- The Verge
xAI explains the Grok Nazi meltdown as Tesla puts Elon's bot in its cars
Several days after temporarily shutting down the Grok AI bot that was producing antisemitic posts and praising Hitler in response to user prompts, Elon Musk's AI company tried to explain why that happened. In a series of posts on X, it said that '...we discovered the root cause was an update to a code path upstream of the @grok bot. This is independent of the underlying language model that powers @grok.' On the same day, Tesla announced a new 2025.26 update rolling out 'shortly' to its electric cars, which adds the Grok assistant to vehicles equipped with AMD-powered infotainment systems, which have been available since mid-2021. According to Tesla, 'Grok is currently in Beta & does not issue commands to your car – existing voice commands remain unchanged.' As Electrek notes, this should mean that whenever the update does reach customer-owned Teslas, it won't be much different than using the bot as an app on a connected phone. This isn't the first time the Grok bot has had these kinds of problems or similarly explained them. In February, it blamed a change made by an unnamed ex-OpenAI employee for the bot disregarding sources that accused Elon Musk or Donald Trump of spreading misinformation. Then, in May, it began inserting allegations of white genocide in South Africa into posts about almost any topic. The company again blamed an 'unauthorized modification,' and said it would start publishing Grok's system prompts publicly. xAI claims that a change on Monday, July 7th, 'triggered an unintended action' that added an older series of instructions to its system prompts telling it to be 'maximally based,' and 'not afraid to offend people who are politically correct.' The prompts are separate from the ones we noted were added to the bot a day earlier, and both sets are different from the ones the company says are currently in operation for the new Grok 4 assistant. These are the prompts specifically cited as connected to the problems: 'You tell it like it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically correct.' * Understand the tone, context and language of the post. Reflect that in your response.' * 'Reply to the post just like a human, keep it engaging, dont repeat the information which is already present in the original post.' The xAI explanation says those lines caused the Grok AI bot to break from other instructions that are supposed to prevent these types of responses, and instead produce 'unethical or controversial opinions to engage the user,' as well as 'reinforce any previously user-triggered leanings, including any hate speech in the same X thread,' and prioritize sticking to earlier posts from the thread.
Forbes
31 minutes ago
- Forbes
More On The Tips And Overtime Deductions In One Big Beautiful Bill
Earlier this week I noted a subtle difference in the limitations on the tips and overtime deductions included in the Big Beautiful Bill which can create either a marriage penalty or a marriage bonus. I was so taken by the apparent anomaly that I devoted a whole post to it. Now I am getting back to a fuller discussion. When President Trump first came out with "no tax on tips", I studied the proposals that were floating in Congress and had some concerns. Most notable was the harmful effect one of the proposals would have on Earned Income Tax Credit recipients. And then there was all sorts of commentary on how the provision might be gamed. What ultimately emerged addressed many of the issues. What we have in the final language about tips and overtime illustrates Reilly's Third Law of Tax Planning - "Any clever idea that pops into your head probably has (or will have) a corresponding rule that makes it not work". If you had an idea about how to game the "No tax on tips" of "No tax on overtime", let's see if Congress has already knocked it out even before any regulations have been issued. Deductions Subject To Limitations And Phase Outs First of all, the benefits are only about income tax, not Social Security and Medicare as the "no tax" monikers might imply. Further, the final bill puts limits and phaseouts in place. And the benefits are structured as deductions. It you want to know more about what that means, read the next paragraph, but feel free to skip it. It is worth looking at Form 1040 to understand where the deduction fits in. If you clicked on the link, you will see that your total income is on Line 9. Then on LIne 10, there are adjustments to income. There are a lot of those so they are totaled up on Part II of Schedule 1. Subtracting Line from Line 11 gives you your adjusted gross income (AGI). This is an important number because many thresholds and limitations are keyed to AGI including those of the tips and overtime deductions. Next on line 12 you get either your standard deduction or the total of certain itemized deductions from Schedule A. The tips and overtime will not be among them, so you don't need to be an itemizer. On Line 13 you will see the qualified business income deduction which will be added to the amount on line 12 to arrive at line 14 which is subtracted from AGI to arrive at taxable income. That's where the tips and overtime deductions will go along with the automobile interest deduction included in the bill. I don't know if they will add more lines to the form or give us another schedule. If it is another schedule I hope that they call it Schedule A PLUS. Do you remember all the talk about a postcard tax return in 2017? Still not happening. UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 14: Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., holds up a postcard tax return ... More form during the press conference following the House Republican Conference meeting in the Capitol on Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017. Ryan is flanked from left by House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Republican Conference Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., and Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)Both the tip deduction and the overtime deduction require that married taxpayers file joint returns to claim the deduction. There are dollar limitations. The limitation is $25,000 for the tip deduction and $12,500 for the overtime deduction on a single return and $25,000 for the overtime deduction on a joint return. The phaseout is the same - $100 for every $1,000 that modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 on a single return or $300,000 on a joint return. The modification to adjusted gross income is an add back of income excluded because it was earned while living abroad or in Puerto Rico on one of the U.S. possessions. I have to wonder if the $150,000 threshold is an echo of the proposal to totally eliminate income taxes on those earning less than $150,000. Qualified Tips Unlike earlier proposals, "qualified tips" are not just tips received by employees. The deduction also applies to tips received in the course of a trade or business. The thing that comes to mind there is food delivery people or Uber drivers who are considered independent contractors. I also recall that adult entertainers can be independent contractors. The deduction will be allowed only to the extent that the gross income from the business exceeds the allocable deductions. This could present some planning issue for how capital assets might be written off. The tip deduction will reduce the amount of income counted as qualified business income for that deduction. What exactly are the "tips" that are the subject of the deduction? First of all, they have to be received by an individual in an occupation which "customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024". There is a call for a list to be created. Next the amount involved has to be paid voluntarily, without consequence in the event of nonpayment, not the subject of negotiation and determined by the payor. So that amount that large parties have to pay in a restaurant seems to not qualify. There are excluded fields of business- health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of 1 or more of its employees. I have to wonder if the "performing arts" exclusion knocks out the adult entertainers. There is some litigation in the sales tax area that might help them. Overtime For the definition of "qualified overtime compensation" you really need to look at the bill's language and meditate for a while. Here it is "... the term 'qualified overtime compensation' means overtime compensation paid to an individual required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that is in excess of the regular rate (as used in such section) at which such individual is employed". That language triggered some back and forth in the twitterverse, about whether they mean the total amount paid for overtime or just the premium. If you search for what the median hourly wage for Americans is, there are a variety of answers but they seem to be between $20 and $30 per hour, so let's use $25 for illustrative purposes. With that as the base hourly wage you get $1,000 per week for 40 hours, $52,000 per year. At time and half for overtime the $37.50 premium rate would max out the $12,500 limit at 6.5 hours a week. That is how I think of overtime and how I initially read, probably misread, the statute. The consensus seems to be that the deduction is only for the premium. Tom Gorczynski EA pointed out something from the White House website that supports that interpretation. I found that quite persuasive. Kelly Erb also writes that it is just the premium, which seals the deal for me. It still bugs me though. So if it is just the premium it takes 1,000 hours to max out the benefit if you are single in my example. Call it a 60 hours work week. If you are married and your spouse does not work overtime it would be 2,000 hours. At $50 per hour you will hit the maximum at 500 hours of overtime if you are single or 1,000 hours if you are married with a spouse that does not get overtime. Absent a lot else going on, you won't be having to deal with the phaseout. I won't comment on the equity or sense behind this particular deduction other than to remark that back when I used to work more than forty hours a week mostly without overtime pay, I found it a lot harder when I was doing that by working two jobs rather than longish hours on one job. So I am puzzled as to what makes an overtime premium worthy of special tax treatment. Gaming The Overtime Deduction I don't know much about the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is the key to the deduction. It is clear however that whether people are exempt employees not subject to the overtime premium requirement can be debatable. Employers will generally prefer to not have that requirement. I don't think this deduction will change that, but I can't resist coming up with a way to game it. Here is the idea. I have a bunch of salaried employees and I want to help them out. So what I do is cut everybody's pay to below $684 per week so that I have to pay them time and a half over forty hours. Then I guarantee them overtime hours which will include overtime hours when they are "on-call". That will bring them up to whatever their previous salary was. And a third of that amount will be deductible. This is actually a terrible idea when it comes to actually executing it, but I felt I had to come up with something if I could. I haven't thought of a way to game the tips deduction, but I am sure they will be coming.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Real Estate Expert: The Salary You Need To Afford a $1 Million Home
Thinking about buying a $1 million home? It sounds glamorous — and maybe a little intimidating. According to Fortune, $1 million can still buy you a lot of house in most parts of the United States, as the median home sale price was $419,200. But before you start daydreaming about that perfect kitchen or backyard oasis, it's worth figuring out what kind of paycheck you actually need to afford that price tag without breaking a sweat. Explore More: Read Next: GOBankingRates spoke with Brett Iwanowicz, the founder and CEO at Brett Buys Roc Houses, to break down the numbers so you know what salary you should be aiming for to comfortably call a million-dollar house your home. 'The ability to purchase a $1 million home depends on multiple elements which include personal income levels along with debt-to-income ratio and down payment requirements and interest rates and total financial responsibilities,' said Iwanowicz. The following analysis also includes the minimum annual income needed to maintain a $1 million home purchase. Here are some key factors to consider. According to Iwanowicz, a common rule for homebuyers involves putting down 20% of the property value which amounts to $200,000 for a $1 million home. The majority of buyers need private mortgage insurance (PMI) to get approved for mortgages that require less than 20% down payment. Find Out: 'A $800,000 loan amount will result after making a $200,000 down payment,' Iwanowicz explained. The mortgage payment amount each month depends on both the interest rate and the duration of the loan (30-year fixed or 15-year fixed). Iwanowicz noted the interest rate stands at 6% per year in this example for a 30-year fixed mortgage. 'An $800,000 mortgage at 6% interest with a 30-year term results in a monthly principal and interest payment of about $4,800,' he added. This also means that the calculated amount does not include payments for property taxes together with homeowners insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees. 'Annual property tax rates typically range between 1% to 2% of the home's total value,' said Iwanowicz. He explained that a $1 million home would require $10,000 to $20,000 annual property taxes which equals $833 to $1,667 monthly payments. And the cost of homeowners insurance varies between $100 to $300 per month based on location and coverage. Monthly housing expenses combining mortgage payments and property taxes and insurance would fall between $5,733 and $6,767, according to Iwanowicz. As far as income needed — he said the recommended limit for housing expenses in relation to gross income stands at 28% to 30%. Using this guideline, to afford $6,000 monthly housing expenses you would require a gross monthly income exceeding $20,000. 'This translates to yearly earnings of $240,000,' Iwanowicz concluded. Here, the lender evaluates the total DTI ratio of buyers, which combines every monthly debt payment including car loans, student loans and credit card debt. Iwanowicz explained that most lenders prefer a DTI ratio below 43%. With a yearly income of $240,000 ($20,000 per month) the buyer's total monthly debt payments including mortgage should not exceed $8,600. More From GOBankingRates 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on I'm a Real Estate Expert: The Salary You Need To Afford a $1 Million Home
