Once Legislature adjourns, all eyes will be on Lombardo's veto pen
As of late Sunday, 223 bills were listed by the Nevada State Legislature as being in Gov. Joe Lombardo's office, and dozens more are headed his way. So far, the first-term Republican governor has vetoed just one bill and signed 169.
For comparison, Lombardo vetoed 75 bills in 2023, setting a single-session veto record. He signed 535 bills.
Nevada governors usually have five days, excluding Sundays, to veto a bill after it gets to their desk. Legislative rules extend that timeframe to 10 days in the waning days of the session. That means vetoes could be announced into next week.
So what might Lombardo veto this year? Below are the bills the Nevada Current has covered that are now on veto watch. We've organized them by how bipartisan their journey through the Legislature was. That said, Lombardo last session did veto bills that passed unanimously, and he signed bills that the Republican caucuses voted against.
Assembly Bill 44 (Attorney General Aaron Ford, D) seeks to crack down on 'knowingly deceptive' price fixing. All Republicans opposed the bill, as did a few Democrats.
Assembly Bill 201 (Assemblymember Erica Roth, D) would expand efforts to automatically seal eviction records.
Assembly Bill 209 (Assemblymember David Orentlicher, D) would grant sex workers immunity from criminal liability from prostitution-related offenses if they call 911 seeking medical assistance.
Assembly Bill 223 (Assemblymember Venicia Considine, D) would give tenants more power to hold landlords accountable for failing to provide livable conditions.
Assembly Bill 280 (Assemblymember Sandra Jauregui, D) proposes rent stabilization for seniors.
Assembly Bill 283 (Assemblymember Max Carter, D) would restructure the eviction process.
Assembly Bill 411 (Assemblymember Sandra Jauregui, D) would allow prescriptions for drugs used for medical abortions and miscarriage management to list the name of the prescribing health care practice, rather than the name of the specific individual providing the prescription.
Assembly Bill 441 (Assemblymember Daniele Monroe-Moreno, D) would change how Opportunity Scholarships are administered.
Senate Bill 350 (State Sen. James Ohrenschall, D) would extend the time period the state has for carrying out an execution of someone on death row.
Assembly Bill 398 (Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, D) would provide additional pay for public school district teachers in hard-to-fill positions and establish a fund for broader charter school raises. Yeager amended the charter school provision into the bill after Lombardo threatened to veto the K-12 education budget over the issue. AB 398 passed the Legislature with broad bipartisan support, with only Democratic Assemblymember Natha Anderson opposing. After its final vote, Lombardo signed the K-12 budget bill, a strong sign he will likely sign AB398.
Assembly Bill 555 (Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, D) would prohibit private insurance companies from charging people more than $35 for a 30-day supply of insulin. The bill received broad bipartisan support, with only Senate Republicans John Ellison and Robin Titus opposing.
Assembly Bill 452 would ensure customers receive full refunds with interest for overcharges and extend regulatory timelines for rate case reviews. The bill received bipartisan support, with eight of 15 Assembly Republicans supporting the bill. All eight Senate Republicans voted for the bill after an amendment.
Assembly Bill 96 would mandate that cities and counties with populations exceeding 100,000 people include 'heat mitigation' as part of their master plans. The bill passed with some bipartisan support. Three of 23 Republicans supported the bill.
Assembly Bill 457 (Assemblymember Venicia Considine, D) originally sought to close a potential loophole that can be used by corporate landlords to avoid paying the state's commerce tax. It has now been amended into a study on the issue. Only one Republican, Assemblymember John Steinbeck, supported the bill.
Assembly Bill 217 would prohibit school employees from granting permission to immigration officers to enter a school, or provide student records, including information on a student's family, without a warrant. Six of 23 Republicans joined Democrats in support.
Assembly Bill 185 (Assemblymember Natha Anderson, D) would bar most HOAs from prohibiting licensed home-based childcare operations within their communities. Fourteen of 23 Republicans opposed.
Senate Bill 69 (Storey County) would require companies seeking massive tax abatements to enter into agreements to defray the costs of the government-provided services they would require. Seven of 23 Republicans opposed.
Assembly Bill 215 (Assemblymember Daniele Monroe-Moreno, D) would prohibit high school teenagers from working between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. before a school day. The bill received broad bipartisan support, with just three Senate Republicans voting against it.
Assembly Bill 502 would boost the state's ability to investigate and enforce prevailing wage violations. The bill received broad bipartisan support,with only two Assembly Republicans opposing.
Assembly Bill 112 (Assemblymember Duy Nguyen, D) would allow workers covered by collective bargaining agreements to use their accrued leave to care for family members. The bill passed the Legislature with some bipartisan support.
Senate Bill 121 (State Sen. Dina Neal, D) changes what homeowners' associations are allowed to require of new residents. Eight of 23 Republicans supported.
Senate Bill 348 (State Sen. Julie Pazina, D) would increase the fee hospitals pay the Nevada State Public Health Lab for a newborn screening panel to expand newborn screenings for rare diseases. Thirteen of 23 Republicans supported.
Assembly Bill 241 (Assemblymember Sandra Jauregui, D) would require counties to speed up the process to rezone land currently designated commercial use into residential or mixed use. Three Republicans supported.
Assembly Bill 121 (Assemblymember Venicia Considine, D) would require all non-optional fees, such as sewer and water, be listed in advertisements for rental properties. It would also require landlords to offer a way for tenants to pay rent without added processing fees. Three Republicans voted for the bill.
Assembly Bill 211 (Assemblymember Venicia Considine, D) would allow a third party to take over the property until repairs are made and living conditions improved. The bill passed with broad bipartisan support, with only Republican state Sen. Robin Titus opposing.
Senate Bill 88 would discharge medical debt from those incarcerated once they leave prison. The bill received broad bipartisan support.
Senate Bill 54 would require the state's Department of Health and Human Services to apply for a federal waiver and amend the state Medicaid plan to cover medical respite care for people experiencing homelessness.
Assembly Bill 321 (Assemblymember Jovan Jackson, D) seeks to establish a pathway for formerly incarcerated people to work as firefighters with the Nevada Division of Forestry.
Assembly Bill 104 would establish the Nevada Voluntary Water Rights Retirement Program, which would allow willing landowners to sell their water rights back to the state through the year 2035.
Assembly Bill 277 (Assemblymember Rich DeLong, R) would make the Net Proceeds of Minerals Bulletin public again.
Assembly Bill 176 (Assemblymember Selena Torres-Fossett, D), known as the Right to Contraception Act, would strengthen protections against a state or local government burdening access to contraceptive measures.
Senate Bill 353 (State Sen. Marilyn Dondero Loop, D) would increase Medicaid reimbursement for mental health providers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Education Department will release some frozen grants supporting after-school and summer programs
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Education Department will release some previously withheld grant money for after-school programs, days after 10 Republican senators sent a letter imploring the Office of Management and Budget to allow the funds to be sent to states. President Donald Trump's administration on July 1 withheld more than $6 billion in federal grants for after-school and summer programs, adult literacy and English language instruction, as part of a review to ensure spending aligned with the White House's priorities. About $1.3 billion of that funding supported after-school programming for children. In a letter sent Wednesday, Republican senators said the withheld money supported programs that had longstanding bipartisan support and were critical to local communities. 'We share your concern about taxpayer money going to fund radical left-wing programs,' the senators wrote. 'However, we do not believe that is happening with these funds.' ____ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Annie Ma, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Stupid as hell': GOP congressman blasts Hegseth on Confederate base names
GOP Rep. Don Bacon, who helped lead the effort to change military base names, voted for a draft law defunding efforts to reverse the changes. A Republican congressman blasted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's push to resurrect banned Confederate base names via proxy as 'stupid as hell' in an interview with USA TODAY. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, joined House Democrats on July 15 to approve a defense bill amendment seeking to block the name changes. The retired Air Force brigadier general described the move as a "rebuke" of Hegseth and Trump's use of a loophole to restore Confederate names. While it was unclear if the measure would make it into the final defense bill, Bacon had harsh words for Hegseth's moves to fiddle with legally mandated efforts to remove the names of Confederate generals from U.S. military bases. 'I think they're trying to be too cute by Hegseth on this, saying, 'Well it's Bragg, but it's a different Bragg," Bacon said July 18, referring to the now twice-renamed Army base in North Carolina. "To me, it looks stupid as hell.' More: Fort Who? Republicans join House Dems to bar Hegseth's military base name changes Bacon co-sponsored the original bipartisan push to prohibit U.S. base names honoring Confederate figures, which became law in January 2021. Although President Donald Trump vetoed the bill, lawmakers overrode him and forced the Pentagon to find new names that didn't honor Confederates. In 2022 the Biden-era Defense Department implemented recommendations of a bipartisan Naming Commission, renaming posts to honor figures such as five-star general and former President Dwight Eisenhower. But Hegseth reversed those changes by again renaming the bases − this time for U.S. servicemembers whose surnames matched those of their earlier Confederate namesakes. The House Armed Services Committee-approved draft defense policy bill for fiscal 2026 would protect the Naming Commission's recommendations by barring the Pentagon from using official funds for base name changes. Bacon, who represents Omaha, and fellow Republican Rep. Derek Schmidt of Kansas joined Democrats in a dramatic late-night vote to approve the amendment, which was authored by Rep. Marilyn Strickland, D-Washington. The Senate Armed Services Committee passed a limited-but-similar measure in its version of the bill to block renaming of bases in Virginia. "Congress has made it clear where we stood," Bacon said, adding the re-renamings "fly in the face of what Congress intended." In February, Hegseth reversed Fort Liberty's name to Fort Bragg by naming it for Pfc. Roland Bragg, who was awarded the Silver Star for his service in World War II. In March, Fort Benning followed, shedding its short-lived Fort Moore moniker for Cpl. Fred Benning, who received the Distinguished Service Cross during World War I. Trump in June then announced that all of the Army's base names would change to honor soldiers who shared names with their former Confederate namesakes. He and Hegseth have argued that the original names boost soldier morale and only changed due to so-called "wokeness" in the military. The defense secretary has also said the old names provide a "generational link" between veterans and modern troops. Bacon contends that Republicans shouldn't support the names, which were originally proposed by segregationist Jim Crow-era Southern Democrats during World War I and World War II. The name of Fort Benning, for example, was suggested by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, an organization that sought to rewrite history textbooks and erect monuments that honored the Confederacy and downplayed slavery's centrality to the Civil War. And perhaps Bacon's support has personal roots as well − the congressman's great-great-great grandfather, a Virginia-born abolitionist, moved to Illinois and fought for the U.S. Army during the Civil War, Bacon noted. The practical effect of the amendment remains to be seen, according to a defense official. The House and Senate will have to iron out the discrepancy between their approaches to base names before the chambers agree to a final version. More: Trump visits Fort Bragg. The base has been renamed twice in 2 years. Why? Meanwhile, the process of renaming the bases may be completed before the law takes effect, the official said. If that occurs, Bacon − who is retiring from Congress in 2026 − said he believes a future Democratic president is "going to change them all back." Contributing: Tom Vanden Brook and Cybele Mayes-Osterman, USA TODAY.


USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump to sue Murdoch over Epstein letter? Without Fox News, Trump is toast.
I'm sure Mr. Murdoch – who has likely buried more scandalous Trump stories that he's published – is quaking in his loafers over the threat of litigation. The unfolding Jeffrey Epstein scandal has a frightened and flailing President Donald Trump turning on his own supporters and, in a major escalation, threatening to sue Rupert Murdoch, the father of Fox News. I'd love to see how that works out for him. Trump's anger at Murdoch stems from a new Wall Street Journal report on a creepy birthday note Trump allegedly sent to Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in jail awaiting sprawling sex trafficking charges. The Journal reported the note featured a drawing of a naked woman with Trump's signature 'mimicking pubic hair' and included the line 'may every day be another wonderful secret.' If Trump takes on Murdoch over the Epstein scandal, Trump will lose Trump, of course, denied he wrote the letter, and apparently tried to get the newspaper and Murdoch himself to kill the story. The fact that they published the story tells me all I need to know about who to trust in this case, and it sure ain't the guy who lies constantly about crowd sizes and how great his polling numbers are. On July 18, Trump posted on social media: 'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ.' Opinion: Epstein files are so bad for Trump he's calling MAGA base 'weaklings.' Uh-oh. Delightful. I'm sure Mr. Murdoch – who has likely buried more scandalous Trump stories that he's published – is quaking in his loafers over that threat. Murdoch knows Trump, and he's certainly not afraid of him Earlier this year, shortly after Trump began his second term as president, he was singing an entirely different tune sitting alongside Murdoch in the Oval Office: 'Rupert Murdoch is in a class by himself, he's an amazing guy.' And that, right there, is a prime example of why Trump's usual scheming won't work this time. Murdoch knows Trump is a shameless opportunist, and surely isn't threatened or surprised by the president turning on him. Murdoch also, undoubtedly, knows Trump exists as a viable political figure almost solely because of the slobbering support he gets from Fox News. 'Stupid Republicans': Trump mocks GOP allies for seeking Epstein files release | Opinion If there were no Fox News, there would be no President Donald Trump. Fox News is the primary right-wing media megaphone that brainwashed the masses into accepting a morally bankrupt, transparent con artist as the leader of the free world, twice! The Epstein scandal is clearly more than Trump can handle So if Trump is willing to go to war with Murdoch and his media empire over the Epstein scandal, it tells us one thing: Whatever is in the Epstein files is so existentially bad for Trump he's willing to abandon the Greek chorus of Fox News blabberers who have long propped up his incessant lies and conspiracy theories. Opinion: Please stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein. You're making Donald Trump mad. As far as Murdoch choosing to toss gasoline on the Epstein fire with the Journal story, I'd like to believe it comes from a place of journalistic integrity, sunshine being the best disinfectant and such. But given everything Fox News and other Murdoch properties have done to melt the brains of Americans with right-wing propaganda, I don't trust that to be the primary motivation. Maybe Murdoch is just done with Trump and his nonsense Maybe Murdoch has just had it with a clearly addled Trump and his on-again/off-again tariff nonsense and erratic leadership. Whatever the reason, Trump is engulfed in a scandal he's not equipped to extinguish. He can threaten Murdoch all he wants, but if Trump loses Fox News, if that network starts taking the scandal seriously and the Journal keeps dogging the Epstein story, this president can kiss a good swath of his supporters goodbye. That would leave him largely alone. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.