For the middle class, one great, big, beautiful betrayal
That's certainly true of the so-called 'big, beautiful bill,' passed by the House and Senate last week and signed into law by President Trump on July 4. Its enactment required breaking almost every rule governing the legislative process. And in its final form, it betrays everything the Republican Party used to stand for, to say nothing of the promises President Trump made to middle-class voters in 2024.
Both houses of Congress have rules to prevent this kind of legislation. In the normal order of business, bills must deal with one subject only; bills can be voted on only after being considered and approved by the appropriate committees; time must be allowed for members to read and study a bill before voting on it; and, in the Senate, major spending bills require 60 votes to move to the floor. Every one of those rules was broken or sidestepped to force passage of the 'big, beautiful bill.'
The end result is a mammoth new law that's a political triumph for Trump, but can only be described as a 'big, beautiful betrayal' of the middle class — as even Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who ended up voting for the bill, admitted. 'We cannot be a working-class party if you are taking away health care for working-class people,' Hawley warned.
And that's exactly what the bill does. According to the Congressional Budget Office, because of cuts to Medicaid contained in the bill, 11.8 million Americans will lose their existing health coverage and another 3.3 million Americans will lose access to food stamps under the SNAP program.
Those cuts to social programs are necessary, the White House argued, to pay for extension of the 2017 tax cuts, which had been due to expire at the end of the year. But even those tax cuts do little to help the middle class. After eight years, we know who's benefited most from the 2017 tax cuts: the wealthiest of Americans, the same ones who will benefit most from their extension. According to the Tax Policy Center, 60 percent of the bill's tax savings would go to the top 20 percent of households and more than one-third would go to those making $460,000 or more. Again, that's good news for West Palm Beach, but it doesn't do much for working families in Youngstown, Ohio.
Republicans tried to downplay their extension of tax cuts for the very wealthy by adding a provision to eliminate taxes on tips and overtime. But there's a big difference. Under the legislation, extension of the 2017 tax cuts for the rich is permanent, but the freedom from taxes on tips expires in 2028. Nor will it help all that many people. Waiters would still have to pay state and local taxes. And, according to the Yale Budget Lab, more than one-third of wait staff don't earn enough money to owe any federal taxes in the first place.
Included in the 940-page bill are scores of unrelated provisions — an increase in the Pentagon budget; more money for enforcement at the border; funds to renovate the Kennedy Center; a fee for citizens who sign up for a space launch with a private company; elimination of a fee on purchase of gun silencers; moving the Space Shuttle Discovery from the Smithsonian to a museum near Houston; a special tax break for whaling captains in Alaska; and $40 million to create Donald Trump's pet project, the 'Garden of American Heroes.'
All of this comes with a big price tag. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office determined that the bill would add at least $3.4 trillion to the national debt over the next ten years. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget puts the total at $4 trillion or more.
One thing for sure. After passage of this bill, with GOP votes only, Republicans can no longer call themselves the party of 'fiscal conservatism.' As Elon Musk said after the vote: 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame.'
In addition to the very wealthy, the ones who benefit most from the 'big, beautiful bill' may be the Democrats, who have been struggling to find a winning message for 2026. Now they've got one: Trump betrayed the middle-class Americans who voted for him. If Democrats can't use the bill to win big in the midterms, they don't deserve to win.
Bill Press is host of 'The Bill Press Pod.' He is the author of 'From the Left: A Life in the Crossfire.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
25 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
No need to take off your shoes. TSA has a new screening policy already in effect at some airports
Do you dread taking off your shoes when going through airport security? That requirement is going away at airports in the United States, which means agents for the Transportation Security Administration will allow you to keep your footwear on when you undergo a security screening. Kristi Noem, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, announced the change Tuesday afternoon. 'We know that when President Trump was elected that he pledged to make life better for all Americans and that includes those who are travelers going through our busy airports,' Noem said. Noem said it's important to streamline the process as the U.S. is looking forward to big events such as the Olympics and that World Cup that will bring in 'record travelers.' 'Many people will be on airlines traveling in and out of our airports and it's important we find ways to keep people safe but also streamline and make the process much more enjoyable for every single person,' she said. The American Federation of Government Employees also confirmed that some airports adopted the new policy Friday ahead of the change being implemented more widely, and agency trainers were working to update TSA officers, the Washington Post reported. Airplane travelers will still go through multiple layers of screening including identity verification, screening of carry-on luggage and individual screening — all without needing to take their shoes off. There could be an instance when a TSA agent determines additional screening is needed and travelers will be asked to take their shoes off, Noem said. As of Tuesday, the policy had already quietly rolled out at airports that included Baltimore/Washington International Airport, Fort Lauderdale International Airport, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, Portland International Airport, Philadelphia International Airport and Piedmont Triad International Airport in North Carolina, according to CBS News. Noem said the new policy would be quickly implemented at airports across the nation. Every airport has different screening equipment with varying capabilities, but Noem said her federal agency had 'evaluated the equipment that every airport has' and was '\fully confident' that with the removal of the no-shoes policy, airports would 'still have the security needs in place at every single checkpoint.' It's unclear when Los Angeles International Airport will roll out the new policy. LAX officials referred The Times' questions about the change to the TSA. By the way, the TSA's new shoe-screening policy will only benefit travelers who go through the regular security checkpoint. Travelers who have applied for, enrolled and paid for expedited screening through TSA PreCheck or Clear are already exempt from taking off their shoes during screening. The practice of having travelers toss their shoes in a bin to be screened was established in 2006 after an incident in December 2001 when, months after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a man boarded a flight with homemade bombs hidden within his shoes. During an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami, British man Richard Colvin Reid tried to detonate his shoes but struggled to light the fuse, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crew members and passengers restrained Reid; the flight diverted to Logan International Airport in Boston, where officers took Reid into custody. Reid confessed to FBI agents that he made the shoe bombs, which held 10 ounces of explosive material, according to federal officials. In April, TSA announced it was working with the Department of Homeland Security to develop 'next generation passenger screening technology,' with a goal of make security screening more efficient, according to the agency. John Fortune, the Department of Homeland Security's science and technology directorate, is leading the department's airport passenger screening research. His team has already developed new ways to enhance current technology used in the screening machine that you stand in with your hands above your head, and created much sharper X-ray images, according to the federal agency. The TSA reported that Fortune and his team were currently researching a replacement or retrofit of the existing passenger screening systems, specifically to target shoes. 'How do you implement a shoe scan, or do you put it in with an existing portal system where the person is already standing while screening their shoes at the same time?' he said. 'Could it be put in place somewhere else within the checkpoint where it might increase efficiencies? Any real-time screening involves reimagining the checkpoint.' DHS did not answer The Times' question regarding Fortune's work and the announcement of the new policy on shoe removal. During Tuesday's announcement, Noem said the federal agency had the ability to implement other security screening technology and would be piloting several different security checkpoints across the nation 'that will allow individuals to come in through a security checkpoint and maybe not even have to interact with officers at all, walk through machines, keep their bag with them, not remove laptops.' She estimated the pilot programs could be explored over the next six to nine months.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Randall County GOP chair charged with felony election fraud
The chair of the Randall County Republican Party was booked into jail Monday on a state felony election fraud charge. Kelly Kenten Giles, 64, is accused of providing false information on his application and petition to run for the Randall County Republican Party Chair seat in December 2023 for a spot on the 2024 primary ballot, according to the grand jury indictment signed late last month. It is unclear what about his application or petition was considered fraudulent. The offense is typically classified as a misdemeanor, but because Giles is accused of doing it while serving as an elected official, it becomes a felony. Giles did not respond to a request for comment, nor did anyone else with the Randall County Republican Party. The Texas Republican Party Chairman Abraham George said he learned of the allegations Tuesday. 'The Republican Party of Texas is steadfastly committed to upholding election integrity and the principles of the rule of law,' George said in an email. 'I am resolute in my duty to ensure that our commitment to securing Texas elections is upheld, which entails conducting elections with integrity by our elected party officials.' Giles' arrest comes after years of Texas Republicans cracking down on election integrity in the years that follow the 2020 election, despite no such evidence of widespread fraud. This crackdown escalated days ago when a former Democratic state House candidate was indicted alongside nine others for alleged vote harvesting in South Texas. The chairman was reelected to his seat as GOP chairman in the 2024 March primary election with 51% of the vote against two opponents, Brien Maxwell and Pat Bohlender. He was originally elected to his seat in May 2023 by the County Executive Committee, according to the Amarillo Tribune. Giles' indictment was handed down June 25 and the warrant was issued. He was booked into the Randall County jail and has since been released, according to the jail log. His case is being prosecuted by the Texas Attorney General's Office of the Election Integrity after the Randall County District Attorney recused his office. Shape the future of Texas at the 15th annual , happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin! We bring together Texas' most inspiring thinkers, leaders and innovators to discuss the issues that matter to you. Get tickets now and join us this November. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump considers taking over D.C. government, chides New York
By Andrea Shalal and Jeff Mason WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday his administration was considering taking over governance of Washington, D.C., and suggested he could take similar action in New York because of his distaste for the leading candidate for mayor there. Trump has made a similar threat regarding Washington before, but has not followed through even as he criticized crime rates and bashed other institutions there. The president, speaking during a cabinet meeting at the White House, said his chief of staff, Susie Wiles, was in close touch with Mayor Muriel Bowser, who favors making the city a U.S. state. "We have tremendous power at the White House to run places when we have to. We could run D.C. I mean, we're ... looking at D.C.," Trump said. "Susie Wiles is working very closely with the mayor." Bowser's office declined to comment. The District of Columbia was established in 1790 with land from neighboring Virginia and Maryland. Congress has control of its budget, but voters elect a mayor and city council, thanks to a law known as the Home Rule Act. For Trump to take over the city, Congress likely would have to pass a law revoking that act, which Trump would have to sign. Becoming the 51st state would give Washington's roughly 700,000 residents voting representation in Congress. Democrats support that plan, while Republicans, who are reluctant to hand Democrats any politically safe seats in the House of Representatives and Senate, oppose it. Trump suggested his administration would run the city better with an appointed leader than the democratically elected government. "We would run it so good, it would be run so proper. We'd get the best person to run it," he said. "The crime would be down to a minimum, would be much less. And you know we're thinking about doing it, to be honest with you." While Trump said his administration had a good relationship with Bowser, he had less complimentary words for Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist who won the race to be the Democratic Party's nominee in New York's November mayoral election. Trump described Mamdani as a "disaster." A representative for Mamdani did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. "We're going to straighten out New York... Maybe we're going to have to straighten it out from Washington," Trump said. "We're going to do something for New York. I can't tell you what yet, but we're going to make New York great again also."
