Scientists make critical discovery after zapping next-gen batteries with X-rays: 'An example of great synergy'
It seems that oxygen gas molecules that had been blamed for cell performance problems were formed by the X-ray scans that found them, according to the findings.
The discovery happened at the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, or Skoltech, with aid from international labs.
"Thankfully, our latest study relegates the molecular oxygen hypothesis to history," assistant professor Dmitry Aksyonov said in a news release. He co-authored the report. "By examining the data from major X-ray scattering experiments, we have demonstrated that the O2 molecules trapped in the cathode material and supposedly responsible for its worsening performance are likely the artifact of the experiment."
When batteries operate, ions move between the anode and cathode through the electrolyte. Experts in labs around the world are trying to find cheaper, more planet-friendly parts while improving performance. As a result, substances, including potassium, silicon, and sodium, are being tapped for various types of packs.
Nickel-manganese-cobalt, or NMC, cathodes are among the promising components being studied. Skoltech said that the electrode could provide for 30% more energy storage, a boon for electric vehicles and other battery-reliant tech if the bugs are worked out.
Success is vital to advancing the transition to a cleaner energy system and eliminating heat-trapping air pollution, which is impacting even our food system, according to a farm production and rising temperature study published by Wiley.
Now, experts examining NMC cathodes can cross oxygen off the list of culprits behind voltage fade and capacity drop. The findings "suggest that the issue of … deterioration be approached from a different angle," per the release.
It's good news, because the oxygen is entrenched after forming, making it tough to mitigate.
"Stabilizing cathode materials … will be easier than if the molecular oxygen hypothesis had proved right," the release stated.
Should the U.S. invest more in battery innovations?
Absolutely
Depends on the project
We're investing enough
We should invest less
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
For their part, lithium-ion batteries are already charging faster than ever before. They can provide hundreds of miles in about 15 minutes if using a fast hookup, such as one of Tesla's 60,000-plus Superchargers. They are now available to most rides with an adapter. And the U.S. Department of Energy reported that the median EV range increased to 283 miles for model year 2024.
What's more, costs are expected to drop. Goldman Sachs estimated that pack prices could plummet by 50% next year thanks to better tech, cheaper parts, and more recycling.
It's a great time to switch, too, as tax breaks worth $4,000 and $7,500 for used and new EVs remain available. That's in addition to the $1,500 you can bank annually in gas and maintenance costs, and the thousands of pounds of air pollution the DOE estimated will be prevented when parking your gas car.
At Skoltech, the team credited modeling experiments — originating from across the continent at the Collège de France and University of Montpellier — for making the cathode findings possible.
Even better batteries could soon be a result.
"This study is an example of great synergy between experiments, theory, and computer modeling," research scientist Andrey Geondzhian said.
Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
10 hours ago
- The Hill
US military ramps up drone warfare with Hegseth directive
WASHINGTON (NewsNation) — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth issued a new directive to fast-track U.S. drone production and 'cut red tape,' he announced in a video posted to social media. A new Pentagon memo outlined the U.S. military's need to keep pace as global military drone production has skyrocketed lately, and the war between Russia and Ukraine has revealed the increasing importance of using more drones for modern warfare. Hegseth made the announcement of the major overhaul in U.S. military drone policy in a social media video where he can be seen flanked by operating drones. Hegseth said the Pentagon is cutting 'red tape' and speeding up production. He also said he wants service members from all branches of the military to be trained in drone operations. 'We were brought here to rebuild the military and match capabilities to the threats of today,' said Hegseth. 'So while our adversaries have produced millions of cheap drones before us, we were mired in bureaucratic red tape, not anymore.' In June, nearly a third of Moscow's strategic bomber fleet was destroyed or damaged with cheaply made drones that were snuck into Russian territory. Ukrainian officials say the covert operation took only a few hours. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said 117 drones were used in the operation in which four military airfields were attacked, resulting in the severe damage or destruction of 34% of Russia's fleet of air missile carriers.
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
This tech CEO quit to redesign the 155mm shell — and upend how the West buys its weapons
Tiberius Aerospace unveiled Sceptre, a 155mm artillery shell with an extended range. The startup's open-platform model licenses the design to governments for local production. It's an approach that challenges traditional defense procurement, aiming at agility and innovation. A few weeks ago, a new defense tech startup stepped out of the shadows with a bold claim: it had built a radically advanced 155mm artillery shell called Sceptre. The ammo quickly grabbed attention for its promised combination of unprecedented range and precision. But its creator, tech entrepreneur Chad Steelberg, believes the real innovation isn't necessarily what Sceptre does — it's how it's made and sold. Speaking to Business Insider, Steelberg described Sceptre as an open weapons platform: licensed to governments, built locally, and updated like software. This frees up Tiberius Aerospace — his startup — to focus on R&D rather than managing huge manufacturing contracts. It's a model born not in a defense industry boardroom, but in the logic of Silicon Valley and the battlefields of Ukraine — one built for speed, iteration, and scale. The proposal is a radical step away from the highly centralized, slow-moving defense industrial base and contracting and acquisition processes that the Pentagon and other Western countries are wedded to, and it's sparked a mixture of curiosity and skepticism. A founder with a mission In late 2024, sickened by the Russian onslaught in Ukraine, Steelberg made a decision. He stepped down as CEO of the AI firm he had cofounded, Veritone, and handed the keys to his No.2. "I gave them four months' notice" before founding Tiberius Aerospace, he told BI. He knew nothing about aerospace back then, he said. But he knew people who did, bringing in a Navy SEAL commander, a former Apple hardware lead, and a top engineer from Raytheon. "You get the best people in the world," Steelberg said. "You put 'em in a room, lock the box, and say: let's solve this problem." That led to Sceptre, a rocket-propelled 155mm artillery shell that Steelberg says can hit targets up to 95 miles away— nearly triple the range of standard rounds — with precision, even in GPS-denied environments. The munition itself has undergone test firing on a M777 in the US. Given its differences from standard rounds (those without rocket assist) — which have a range of about 15 miles and require add-ons for rocket propulsion and precision guidance — it's a category-defying munition more comparable to an extended-range GMLRS. But, like the original 155mm round, it's fired from a howitzer. In artillery battles, range is critical; after all, that's part of the reason the HIMARS, a rocket artillery system, was so effective when it initially arrived in Ukraine: it gave Kyiv's forces much-needed reach in combat. Steelberg says it will "change the balance of power" on the Ukrainian battlefield and beyond, though it would need to be widely fielded first. Supplanting old-school procurement Tiberius won't actually be manufacturing Sceptre, offering an unusual "defense-as-a-service" model. The company plans to license the design to governments, which will pay $5 million upfront to gain manufacturing rights, and then $2.5 million a year to stay on board and get continual updates. They can then produce the munition in-country, using their own supply chains and industrial base. What makes this possible is Tiberius opening up its specifications for individual components — like batteries, guidance units, and fuel systems — to outside suppliers. Steelberg said suppliers will be encouraged to propose improvements, as long as the component fits within Sceptre's volumetric space. "We will certify it, test it, fire it on the range, qualify it as a version if it passes safety and efficacy," he said. This creates competition and choice for the governments buying it, he argued. It's a model inspired by the early days of Intel, leaning on an open architecture, Steelberg said. While major companies like Boeing regularly bring in subcontractors to provide parts, Tiberius' platform is built around encouraging an ongoing ecosystem around this logic — almost like an app store for defence tech, with Sceptre at its core. He suggested this would give governments the freedom to choose small, nimble manufacturers, support their own defense ecosystems, and reduce reliance on a handful of major contractors. Governments place an order — keeping the intellectual property — for the version of Sceptre they end up making. The bulk of Sceptre's main parts can be manufactured on simple, widely available CNC machines. This, Steelberg argues, cuts out the need for much of the heavy-duty facilities typically involved in munitions production and opens it up to much smaller players. "So now they're actually allocating dollars to support not just the end weapon they're looking for, but actually the industries and the providers that manufactured it," he said. The result, in his view, is a system that's more agile, more resilient, and better suited to modern warfare, where needs change faster than traditional procurement can keep up with. A global procurement quagmire As NATO countries scramble to rebuild their arsenals, the limits of the traditional procurement system are becoming harder to ignore. "In terms of ammunition, Russia produces in three months what the whole of NATO produces in a year," NATO secretary-general, Mark Rutte, warned recently. Autocratic regimes like Russia's can command industry at will. Democracies can't — and procurement systems built for peacetime tend to move at a glacial pace. In broad-brush terms: a government commissions a giant contractor, a timeline and price are agreed, and five, ten, twenty years later, a product rolls off the line. That model shuts out smaller players almost entirely. "The big, big problem honestly is that there's been a co-evolution of ministries of defense and big prime manufacturers," Steelberg said, describing it as "an intellectual and contractual moat that prevents anyone else from getting in." It's known as the "valley of death," where few new players can easily navigate Pentagon bureaucracy, or can bank on being around long enough to secure a contract. DOD is experimenting with newer and nimbler models — such as open platforms and schemes to partner with smaller companies — but nothing quite to the scale that Tiberius envisions. Paul Hough, a UK-based expert in defense procurement, shares Steelberg's calls for a shake-up of the system. "Before we start pushing tsunamis of money through the old procurement model and the old industrial base structure, we should stop, take a breath," he told BI. The yawning gap between promising prototypes from small companies and actual military adoption is further complicated by the fact that innovation increasingly comes from the private sector. In the 1960s, governments funded around 60% of global R&D, according to Casey Purley, director of the Pentagon's Army Applications Laboratory. Today, she says it's about 20%, with commercial firms — often tech companies — picking up the slack. "From AI to robotics, we need to work with companies we historically haven't," she told a recent conference in London. Quality control Cynthia Cook, director of the Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that Steelberg's model "does have the potential for production where some parts are made by primarily commercial suppliers. "This could be a way of engaging the full industrial base beyond the more narrow slice of companies that are understood to be defense contractors," she told BI. Capt. Bradley Martin, a RAND researcher who specializes in supply chain security, added that "much of the barrier-to-entry problem is solved because a company is only providing a small part of a larger system." But other issues deserve scrutiny, they said. Although Tiberius plans to take charge of certifying components, quality assurance could prove cumbersome, Martin said. Another major issue will be tracking the provenance of materials used by the companies supplying components, he added. "If a company's normal supply chain is heavily China-based, we would be creating a vulnerability," he told BI. Surge production vs just-in-time The US's standard-issue 155mm shells are manufactured by government-owned facilities, so production can lay dormant but be surged relatively easily. That's not really the case for non-standard shells. If companies in the US are not dedicated to producing parts for Sceptre and move out of the business due to a lack of contracts, they'll "need to be attracted back — and they may have other business," Cook said. Hough said that Sceptre may be cheaper and faster to produce in small batches, but he argued that it misses the broader context. Artillery is still primarily an area-effect weapon, he said. The heavy weapons are indirect fire capabilities used for wide destruction and suppression, so while there is a place for the exquisite, precision-guided munitions, unless doctrine changes, precision rounds "are unlikely to supplant area (dumb) rounds," he said. Hough said that, after Ukraine, militaries are prioritizing large stockpiles over just-in-time flexibility — a trend that doesn't appear to align with Tiberius' more agile model. He added that some stages of shell production, including when explosives are inserted into the casing, are also "not a trivial exercise" and favor longer, centralized production runs. For Hough, Tiberius' licensing model may be best used by the military in the same field from which Steelberg took his inspiration — software. "I hope that the Tiberius model works," he said. "But at this point it appears to be a novel potential addition rather than a fundamental change to the established supply chain." Whatever happens, though, he added, "we do need people that challenge this." For Steelberg, his mission is one inspired by Winston Churchill's famous "blood, toil, tears and sweat" speech. But for him, enough blood and tears have been spilled already. "I absolutely am willing to give you my toil and my sweat," he said. But if the West doesn't resolve its procurement issues, "we will be spilling our blood and our tears."
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
A star-studded film about Sam Altman is coming. Vote here on your favorite business movie.
Movie-goers will be able to decide for themselves in 2026, when a movie about Altman's dramatic five-day firing and re-hiring at OpenAI is set to come out. The $40 million film, " Artificial," is funded by Amazon. And, as Puck News reports after obtaining an early draft of the script, the movie could ruffle some feathers in the Big Tech world. The movie will focus on OpenAI co-founder and former board member Ilya Sutskever 's reported role in trying to push Altman out, per Puck News. Few people end up looking good in the dramatized, Hollywood-ified version of the story, least of all Altman, according to the report — and it sounds like Elon Musk and Dario Amodei will also be portrayed at least briefly on screen. So, who will be depicting the real-world tech execs in Hollywood's retelling? A few key roles have already been cast, according to IMDB. Here's what we know so far about the cast list. Andrew Garfield as Sam Altman Andrew Garfield is slated to play Altman, and it's not the actor's first foray into the world of tech dramas. He starred in " The Social Network" as Facebook cofounder Eduardo Saverin. Garfield is also known as Spider-Man and recently starred in the teary drama "We Live in Time." Yura Borisov as Ilya Sutskever Yura Borisov has been cast as Ilya Sutskever. The Russian actor snagged an Oscar nomination for his role in " Anora" as a surprisingly tender henchman. Sutskever was crucial to OpenAI's success during nearly a decade at the company. He was on the board in November of 2023 and reportedly voted to oust Altman, but later said he regretted his "participation in the board's actions." When Altman eventually returned, Sutskever's role at the company moving forward was a big question mark — he was not as present in the San Francisco offices in the weeks following and hired his own lawyer, as BI previously reported. Six months after the failed ousting of Altman, Sutskever left OpenAI altogether. He's since started a research lab promoting "safe superintelligence." Sutskever is pretty much the only person to come out of the Hollywood version of the story looking good, according to the script Puck News saw. Monica Barbaro as Mira Murati Monica Barbaro, who starred in the Oscar-nominated film "A Complete Unknown," has been cast as Mira Murati, OpenAI's former chief technology officer. Murati stepped in to temporarily fill Altman's shoes while he was on the outs, before returning to her job as CTO. She left OpenAI in September 2024 and has since founded Thinking Machines Lab, a secretive AI startup that is developing AI models focused on human and AI collaboration. The company has hired OpenAI alums. What's your favorite business movie? Here at BI, our editors have their own go-tos. Andy Kiersz likes "Trading Places" and "Margin Call," while Jack Sommers is partial to "Steve Jobs." For both Pete Gelling and Graham Flanagan (whose opinion might hold extra weight as chief video correspondent), "The Secret of My Success" is a winner (though Gelling likes "Dumb Money," too). Taylor Berman agrees that "Trading Places" is best, and Steven Tweedie opts for a modern classic, "The Social Network." But what about you?
