Elon Musk's Cybertruck dream is turning into a Cyberdud nightmare as Tesla sales plunge to shocking lows
once touted the
Cybertruck
as a game-changing marvel, an all-electric, steel-clad juggernaut built to disrupt the pickup market and redefine automotive design. With its sci-fi styling and bold promises of performance and durability, it was more than just a vehicle; it was a symbol of
Tesla
's audacious innovation. When deliveries began in late 2023, the Cybertruck generated massive buzz, with early units selling out quickly and fans lining up to be part of the future. But less than two years after its launch, the Cybertruck is falling dramatically short of expectations, raising questions about whether one of Musk's boldest bets is quietly becoming one of his most high-profile flops.
In the second quarter of 2025, Tesla delivered just about 5,000 Cybertrucks, a fraction of the originally projected volumes. Overall, Tesla's global vehicle deliveries fell 14 percent year-over-year to 384,122 units, marking the second consecutive quarterly decline. Quality issues, including a major recall involving exterior panels detaching, and intensifying competition have compounded the Cybertruck's woes. Tesla's ambitious dream of revolutionizing the pickup truck market is now facing harsh realities, turning what was once a bold innovation into a costly misstep.
Cybertruck sales disappoint with only ~5,000 units delivered in Q2 2025
Tesla does not disclose Cybertruck sales separately, but analysis of available data reveals that Cybertruck deliveries in Q2 2025 were approximately 5,000 units—a steep drop compared to initial expectations and far below Elon Musk's earlier forecasts of hundreds of thousands annually. The 'other models' category, which includes the Cybertruck, Model S, and Model X, saw only 10,394 deliveries in Q2, down 20% from the previous quarter and 52% from the same quarter last year. This indicates that Cybertruck sales are not only low but also declining.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
Production and inventory challenges at Tesla's Texas gigafactory
Tesla produced 410,244 vehicles in Q2 2025, nearly matching last year's production, but deliveries lagged behind at 384,122 units. The
Texas Gigafactory
, where the Cybertruck is assembled, has faced production slowdowns and staffing cuts in response to weak demand. Industry insiders report that Tesla has a significant inventory backlog, with unsold Cybertrucks reportedly accumulating to about two years' worth of current sales volume. This inventory glut highlights the gap between Tesla's production ambitions and market realities.
Recalls and quality issues damage Cybertruck's reputation
The Cybertruck has been hit by at least eight recalls since its launch in November 2023, the most notable being a recall of 46,000 units due to stainless steel exterior trim panels detaching, especially in cold weather when adhesives failed. This defect forced Tesla to temporarily halt deliveries and conduct repairs, severely undermining the vehicle's marketed image as 'indestructible.' Customer reports of panels falling off have damaged consumer confidence and contributed to the vehicle's poor sales performance.
Pricing and market competition weigh on demand
Tesla's pricing strategy has also hindered Cybertruck sales. The base rear-wheel-drive model was introduced at around $70,000, but it lacks many premium features, limiting its appeal. Higher-priced variants exceed $100,000, putting the Cybertruck at a disadvantage against more affordable and conventional electric pickups from competitors. Meanwhile, the electric vehicle market is becoming increasingly crowded, with Chinese manufacturers and legacy automakers offering compelling alternatives that have chipped away at Tesla's market share.
Elon Musk's controversies impact Tesla's brand and sales
According to reports, Elon Musk's increasingly polarizing political activism and public controversies have severely damaged Tesla's brand reputation, contributing to a sharp decline in sales worldwide. According to the 2025 Axios Harris Poll, Tesla's brand ranking plummeted from 8th place in 2021 to a dismal 95th out of 100 companies, placing last in categories such as character, ethics, and citizenship. Musk's vocal support for controversial political figures, including a high-profile alignment with President Donald Trump, sparked protests and boycotts across the U.S. and Europe, alienating many potential customers and eroding trust in the Tesla brand.
This reputational fallout has translated into tangible business consequences. Tesla's vehicle deliveries fell 14% year-over-year in Q2 2025, with European sales plunging nearly 50% amid intensifying competition and consumer backlash linked to Musk's public image. While the global EV market continues to grow, Tesla struggles to maintain its foothold, losing ground to rivals like BYD. Analysts attribute much of Tesla's sales decline to the negative perception surrounding Musk's leadership and political entanglements, which have undermined consumer confidence and investor sentiment alike.
Broader sales trends reflect Tesla's struggles
Tesla's total vehicle deliveries in Q2 2025 were 384,122, down 14% from 443,956 in Q2 2024. The Model 3 and Model Y remain Tesla's best sellers, accounting for 373,728 deliveries, while other models including the Cybertruck delivered just over 10,000 units. Tesla's stock has suffered, closing 2025 down 26%, with a market capitalization below $1 trillion for the first time in years. Despite these setbacks, Tesla continues to invest in autonomous driving and new product development to regain momentum.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk remains optimistic about doubling U.S. production over the next two years, but analysts are skeptical about near-term Cybertruck recovery. With quality issues unresolved and demand weak, forecasts for Cybertruck deliveries in 2025 hover around 20,000 units, a far cry from initial ambitions. To revive the Cybertruck, Tesla must address manufacturing defects, adjust pricing strategies, and repair its brand image.
Discover everything about the
automotive
world at
Times of India
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
43 minutes ago
- Economic Times
X withholds public access to Reuters and Reuters World accounts in India
X, formerly Twitter, withheld public access to official handles of Reuters and Reuters World in India on Sunday morning despite the ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) saying there's no requirement from the Government of India to withhold the two handles were withheld in India by X 'in response to a legal demand,' said a notification on the platform. On May 9, X had withheld its own Global Government Affairs (@GlobalAffairs) account within India. This occurred hours after X, through this account, had tweeted on the night of May 8 that the Indian government had directed X to block over 8,000 accounts in India. Later, X unblocked the Global Government Affairs account. 'There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold Reuters handle. We are continuously working with X to resolve the problem,' an official spokesperson for MeitY said in a statement.X and MeitY did not respond to ET's requests for comment on the reason for withholding these accounts in the Elon Musk-owned microblogging platform has sued the Indian government in the Karnataka High Court over previous blocking orders sent by the government under a section of the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000 without adequate safeguards. The final hearing in the case is scheduled July 8. X has made a plea to amend its petition filed in the Karnataka High Court four months ago, making an additional demand to scrap Rule 3(1)(d) of the Information Technology Rules that empowers government agencies to order intermediaries to remove content from their platforms. The original petition, filed in March, had sought the court to declare that Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act, 2000 does not authorise the government to issue information blocking orders to intermediaries, or social media platforms, like X. Section 79(3)(b) provides for authorities to remove immunity from liability accorded to intermediaries if they failed to comply with orders to take down unlawful content. In conjunction with Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, it also allows them to issue takedown orders.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘India has drawn its red lines…': Ahead of Donald Trump's tariff deadline, officials say ‘ball in US court' on trade deal; here's what's happening
India's largest trading partner since 2021-22 has been the United States. (AI image) India-US trade deal: Ahead of US President Donald Trump 's July 9 tariff deadline, India has drawn the red lines on a mini trade deal. According to Indian officials, the decision on the mini or interim trade deal now rests with America. Sources told PTI that should matters be resolved, an interim trade deal could be announced prior to July 9, which coincides with the conclusion of the 90-day suspension period of Trump-era tariffs announced on April 2, affecting multiple countries including India. India-US Trade Deal: India Draws Red Lines As negotiations continue for the proposed interim trade agreement between India and the US, India has established firm boundaries on crucial sectors including agriculture and dairy. "India has drawn its red lines... now the ball is in the US court," sources told PTI. India and the US spoke of discussions for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) in February, setting a timeline to complete the first phase by autumn (September-October) this year. Prior to this milestone, both countries are working to establish an interim trade arrangement. Also Read | India-US trade deal: 'Don't make deals based on deadlines, national interest paramount', says Piyush Goyal as Donald Trump's tariff date nears Following the US implementation of an additional 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian products on April 2, which was temporarily suspended for 90 days, America's 10% baseline tariff remains active. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 아픈 사람의 99%는 목이 뭉쳐있습니다. Undo 아픈 사람의 99%는 목이 뭉쳐있습니다. Undo 아픈 사람의 99%는 목이 뭉쳐있습니다. Undo 아픈 사람의 99%는 목이 뭉쳐있습니다. Undo India seeks complete exemption from the 26% tariff. "If the proposed trade talks fail, the 26 per cent tariffs will come into force again," one of the sources said. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal emphasised last week that India's approach to trade agreements is not deadline-driven, and the country will only proceed with the US trade deal when it is completely finalised and aligns with national interests. Trade agreements can only materialise when they provide mutual advantages to both participating nations, ensuring a beneficial outcome for all parties involved, he had stressed. "National interest should always be supreme. Keeping that in mind, if a deal is made then India is always ready to deal with developed countries," Goyal had said on July 4. India-US Trade Deal Issues Following discussions in Washington regarding an interim trade agreement, the Indian delegation has returned. Outstanding issues remain concerning tariffs on steel, aluminium (50 per cent) and auto (25 per cent). India has taken a firm stance regarding duty concessions to the US on agricultural and dairy products, considering their sensitive nature. Notably, India has maintained a consistent policy of keeping its dairy sector protected in all previous trade agreements. The Donald Trump administration has initiated correspondence with 10-12 nations regarding reciprocal tariff rates, with plans to finalise the process by July 9. India awaits clarity on whether a trade agreement with Washington can be reached before the US president's tariff deadline. The specific countries involved have not been disclosed by Trump. The implementation of reciprocal tariffs is scheduled to commence from August 1. The negotiations involve potential duty adjustments, with the US seeking concessions on industrial goods, electric vehicles, wines, petrochemicals, dairy products and agricultural items including apples, tree nuts and alfalfa hay. India's considerations for duty reductions focus on labour-intensive industries, encompassing apparels, textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, plastics, chemicals, oil seeds, shrimp and horticultural products. Also Read | India-US trade deal: What's the deadlock about? Top issues blocking agreement as Donald Trump's 26% tariff deadline looms India-US Trade Ties India's largest trading partner since 2021-22 has been the United States. The bilateral trade figures for 2024-25 reached $131.84 billion, comprising $86.51 billion in exports, $45.33 billion in imports, resulting in a trade surplus of $41.18 billion. In the April-May period of the current fiscal year, India's merchandise exports to the United States increased by 21.78 per cent, reaching $17.25 billion. Similarly, imports grew by 25.8 per cent to $8.87 billion. Services trade between the two nations expanded from $54.1 billion in 2018 to approximately $70.5 billion in 2024. Also Read | 'Take it or leave it': Donald Trump says US tariff letters ready for 12 countries ahead of July 9 deadline; will be sent out from... The United States represents a significant market for Indian enterprises, particularly in sectors including professional, scientific, and technical services, manufacturing, and information technology. In terms of India's overall trade composition, the United States contributes approximately 18 per cent of total goods exports, over 6 per cent of imports, and roughly 11 per cent of bilateral trade. The United States invested $70.65 billion in India during the period from April 2000 to March 2025, positioning itself as the third most significant investor. India's primary exports to the United States in 2024 comprised pharmaceutical formulations and biologicals worth $8.1 billion, telecommunications equipment valued at $6.5 billion, precious and semi-precious stones amounting to $5.3 billion, petroleum products at $4.1 billion, precious metal jewellery including gold at $3.2 billion, cotton garments with accessories totalling $2.8 billion, and iron and steel products worth $2.7 billion. The key imports consisted of crude oil valued at $4.5 billion, petroleum products worth $3.6 billion, coal and coke at $3.4 billion, processed diamonds at $2.6 billion, electrical machinery amounting to $1.4 billion, aviation components at $1.3 billion, and gold imports worth $1.3 billion. Also Read | US plans 'economic bunker buster' bill: Will Donald Trump impose 500% tariff on countries importing oil from Russia? How it may impact India Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'President Elon'? Musk launches 'The America Party' after spat with Donald Trump - is it viable?
Elon Musk has done many things few thought possible: Launching rockets, developing self-driving cars, and turning a major social media platform into his personal megaphone. Now, he's taking on his most ambitious project yet: blowing up America's entrenched two-party system. On Sunday, the world's richest man unveiled the launch of the 'America Party' a self-funded political force he claims will challenge what he describes as a corrupt and bankrupt "uniparty" dominated by both Democrats and Republicans. The move formalises weeks of growing hostility between Musk and Trump, transforming a simmering feud into full-blown political warfare. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' Musk declared on X, the social media platform he owns. — elonmusk (@elonmusk) Long one of Trump's biggest donors and closest policy allies, Musk now vows to bankroll challengers to Republican incumbents and push forward what he hopes will become the most consequential third-party bid in modern US history. The question now: Is this Musk's next great disruption or a high-profile experiment doomed by the very system he hopes to upend? Musk lashes out Musk's post was one of several attacks on both parties, but especially on Republicans who, in his view, have broken promises to reduce government spending. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Providers are furious: Internet access without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' he wrote. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth. ' Musk further accused Congress of representing a corrupt 'Democrat-Republican uniparty,' adding: 'Our country needs an alternative... so that the people actually have a VOICE.' But as the Washington Post's Prompt newsletter noted, many political observers see Musk's crusade as more performative than strategic. While he once led Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, Musk showed little real interest in cutting the national debt until the bill directly threatened his business incentives. Can Musk's 'America Party' succeed? Experts say not likely Jenna Bednar, a political scientist at the University of Michigan, echoed these concerns in an interview with The : 'In the United States' electoral system, third parties face nearly insurmountable organisational, institutional, and cultural barriers… Mr. Musk likes to build big and has ambitions for a national party. I don't see it becoming a serious rival to the two parties.' She added, however, that Musk 'could be enormously successful if he uses his wealth to support primary challengers… He could significantly reshape the Republican Party from within by freeing centrist Republicans from their fears of Mr. Trump.' Bednar also cautioned that 'there is a high likelihood that Mr. Musk's attention would wane; the earliest primaries are not until March 2026. He may move on to other projects long before then. ' Libertarian Party: Musk's cautionary tale As Musk builds the America Party from scratch, many experts point to the Libertarian Party as a cautionary tale. It remains the most consistently successful third party in modern US politics yet its influence remains marginal. Founded in 1971, the Libertarian Party has built robust ballot access, often appearing in all 50 states. It achieved its best-ever presidential performance in 2016, when Gary Johnson won 3.3% of the national vote over 4.4 million ballots. However, that momentum has yet to translate into broader national relevance. The party has found some success in local elections, winning hundreds of municipal offices and occasionally a state legislative seat. But it has never sent a member to Congress elected purely as a Libertarian. Figures like Justin Amash switched affiliation while in office but did not win re-election under the party banner. In short, even with decades of organising, broad ideological appeal, and consistent ballot access, the Libertarian Party has struggled to gain serious political traction. Musk may have resources far beyond any Libertarian candidate in history, but the same systemic barriers legal, financial, and cultural could confine the America Party to the same fate. Third-party struggles CNN highlighted how entrenched the two-party system has become, noting that even well-funded independents like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. or popular outliers like Lisa Murkowski often struggle to survive politically. 'You're roadkill in the middle,' Murkowski told The Assignment podcast. Furthermore, to qualify as a party in California, for instance, a new political group must either register 75,000 voters or gather over 1 million petition signatures. And to be nationally recognised, each state branch must request an advisory opinion from the Federal Election Commission, a time-consuming and expensive process. Despite this, Musk's immense personal wealth could theoretically change the game. Musk spent $277 million in the 2024 cycle, mostly through America PAC, and could do so again. However, even with endless money, Kappel warned: 'The hurdles for creating a new party and getting it on the ballot are extremely high… It's a multi-year project and will cost hundreds of millions of dollars.' Parties that rose, ruled — and vanished Musk's America Party may seem like a moonshot in today's entrenched two-party system, but American history is filled with once-powerful parties that vanished — and others that emerged to take their place. In the early days of the republic, the Federalist Party dominated under Alexander Hamilton, only to fade after the War of 1812. It was replaced by the Whigs, who briefly rose to prominence in the mid-19th century before collapsing over divisions on slavery. Out of the Whigs' ashes came the Republican Party — a fringe movement that, within a few years, swept Abraham Lincoln into the presidency. These historical shifts show that the American party system is not as fixed as it may seem. But the key ingredient for transformation wasn't just money or media power; it was a moment of crisis, a vacuum in political leadership, and deep national realignment. America Party's 2026 plan: Targeted disruption Musk proposed focusing on just a few vulnerable Senate and House races. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' he wrote. 'Crack the uniparty system through extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield.' Still, legal and structural challenges remain enormous. Musk has yet to register the party with the FEC and will need a legal framework to coordinate donations, meet ballot requirements, and recruit candidates. Former DOGE aide James Fishback has even launched a rival super PAC to counter Musk's influence. Called FSD PAC (Full Support for Donald), it aims to raise $1 million to back Trump-aligned candidates and oppose Musk-backed challengers. For now, Musk's America Party is more of a declaration than institution. But if his wealth, frustration, and ambition hold firm, it could reshape the GOP or become the most serious third-party movement America has seen in decades.
