logo
Judge rules in favor of Texas woman after SWAT destroyed her house while pursuing a fugitive

Judge rules in favor of Texas woman after SWAT destroyed her house while pursuing a fugitive

Yahoo11-06-2025

Five years after police destroyed cancer survivor Vicki Baker's house while pursuing a fugitive, a federal judge has ruled that the Texas city she used to call home must pay her for the damage.
"I've continued fighting this long, because if this can happen to me, it can happen to anyone," Baker told Fox News Digital in an emailed statement. "This case has always been about more than the money for me. I want to see real change."
Baker's ordeal started in July 2020, when she moved to Montana and was in the process of selling her home in McKinney, Texas.
'This Is Personal': Marine Veteran Reacts To Judgment On Federal Loophole Police Used To Seize His Cash
Wesley Little kidnapped a 15-year-old girl, fled from police and took refuge in Baker's home. Police surrounded the house and Little eventually released the teen but refused to surrender, according to court documents.
A SWAT team tried to draw him out by launching a barrage of tear gas canisters at the house, shattering windows and punching holes in walls.
Read On The Fox News App
When police finally entered the house, they discovered that Little had killed himself.
Baker's daughter's Chihuahua was inside during the onslaught and was left blind, deaf and sick from the tear gas and explosions. The dog eventually had to be put down, Baker said. A hazmat crew disposed of almost everything inside the house because it was saturated with a toxic film from the teargas, according to court documents.
Damage to the home totaled at least $50,000, according to Baker and her attorneys at the nonprofit civil liberties law firm Institute for Justice.
But her insurance company refused to cover the bulk of the damage because her policy — like most — excludes damage caused by the government.
Justice Department Halts Dea's Random Searches Of Airport Travelers After Report Finds 'Serious Concerns'
Baker tried to file a property damage claim with the city of McKinney, but officials refused to pay, citing qualified immunity, a doctrine often used to shield police and other government agencies from being sued for violating people's rights or destroying property during the course of their work.
The Institute for Justice sued under the Fifth Amendment and the Texas Constitution, arguing that police may have been authorized to seize Baker's home in the interest of pursuing a dangerous fugitive, but that they should have to pay her just like they would if the government seized a home to build a road or other infrastructure.
A prolonged legal saga followed, with one federal judge ruling in 2022 that Baker should be compensated and a jury awarding her nearly $60,000 in damages. The following year, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed her Fifth Amendment win.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case last year, but Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch acknowledged the high court has yet to address whether the government can require individuals to bear the cost of police actions.
Last week, a U.S. district court judge ruled again that Baker is entitled to $59,656.59 plus interest under the Texas Constitution.
"This ruling makes it clear that the Texas Constitution's promise of just compensation applies when police destroy innocent people's property, and that this entire lawsuit could have been avoided if the city simply did the right thing in the first place," IJ attorney Jeffrey Redfern, who represented Baker, said in an emailed statement to Fox News Digital.
The City of McKinney is "evaluating its options for appealing this ruling," a spokesperson confirmed to Fox News Digital.
The city previously offered to pay the full amount of the damage to settle the case, but Baker's team says they refused to settle unless the city also changed its policies to protect all homeowners from similar actions in the future.
Redfern said he still hopes the Supreme Court will hear a case similar to Baker's in the future so "we can ensure that the United States Constitution also protects innocent property owners in cases like this."
"I want to make sure that cities around the country are doing the right thing and paying just compensation to people in similar situations," Baker said.Original article source: Judge rules in favor of Texas woman after SWAT destroyed her house while pursuing a fugitive

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More NYC dogs mauled by other pooches without consequence as state bill to close legal loophole stalls: ‘Should not be happening'
More NYC dogs mauled by other pooches without consequence as state bill to close legal loophole stalls: ‘Should not be happening'

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

More NYC dogs mauled by other pooches without consequence as state bill to close legal loophole stalls: ‘Should not be happening'

City dogs continue to be mauled by other pooches without consequence because a state bill prompted by the horrific Penny the Chihuahua attack has stalled, animal activists say. Upper West Side resident Jennifer Busse told The Post a pit bull who was illegally off his leash mauled her tiny 13-year-old shih tzu-chihuahua mix Forrest in Riverside Park earlier this month — and that the NYPD said there are still no avenues in the criminal-justice system to punish the four-legged attacker's careless owner. 'Something needs to change,' Busse fumed. 4 Chihuahua mix Forrest was attacked by a vicious dog in Riverside Park on June 6 — but current laws prevent police from taking criminal action, owner Jennifer Busse told The Post. Courtesy of Jennifer Busse She said Forrest was sleeping in the grass at the Manhattan park June 6 when he was suddenly pounced on by the pit bull in front of her screaming terrified children, ages 6 and 8. Busse said her poor pooch lost vision in his right eye while being left with more than a dozen puncture wounds from the attack. Yet cops said their hands were tied, according to Busse. 4 Joe Columbus' pit bulls are accused of mauling Penny. Obtained by NY Post 4 Penny recovers at her owner's apartment after being attacked by two dogs on the Upper West Side last month. Gabriella Bass 'Due to current laws, harm or death to an animal caused by another animal is not a criminal matter,' an NYPD rep confirmed to The Post. The attack occurred just weeks after a similar incident involving Penny the Chihuahua on the Upper West Side made national headlines. The 16-pound Chihuahua was mauled by a pair of pit bulls near Columbus Avenue on May 3. The case prompted state Assemblywoman Jennifer Rajkumar last month to introduce a bill that seeks to allow owners to be potentially criminally charged for pet-on-pet injuries, as opposed to only facing a possible civil lawsuit. 'Pets are not property, they are family,' Rajkumar said at the time. But the legislation remains stalled in the Assembly's Agriculture Committee, although it's unclear exactly why. 4 Assemblywoman Jennifer Rajkumar proposed 'Penny's Law' in the state legislature last month. Stephen Yang The bill would make it possible to levy charges against careless owners, including 'cruelty to animals through negligent handling of a dog' and 'leaving the scene of an animal attack.' It would also impose harsher penalties for those who repeatedly violate city leash laws. The bill is named after Penny. 'This lack of accountability has permitted numerous dog owners to allow their pets to attack other dogs,' Rajkumar said last month. 'The same owners will allow the behavior repeatedly, often dismissing it as 'playing' or 'a dog being a dog.' ' Busse said, 'I totally understand that people who are homeless have [some of] these animals for companionship for protection. 'But at a certain point, this kind of situation is so unsafe for the community.'

Americans at risk ‘anywhere' after 6 illegal immigrants are charged in mother's murder: congressman
Americans at risk ‘anywhere' after 6 illegal immigrants are charged in mother's murder: congressman

New York Post

time13 hours ago

  • New York Post

Americans at risk ‘anywhere' after 6 illegal immigrants are charged in mother's murder: congressman

A South Carolina congressman is warning of threats that face Americans 'anywhere' after four years of an open border following the random murder of a Lancaster mom of two last month. The comments come after Lancaster authorities charged six illegal immigrants, between the ages of 13 and 21, in connection with Larisha Thompson's May 2 murder. Advertisement She was shot to death while driving to meet friends in Rock Hill. 'Two children will not have a mother to come home to,' Republican South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman told Fox News Digital in a phone interview. 'It can happen anywhere, at any time. That's the sad part. We've seen it all over the country.' He added that while Laken Riley, the Augusta University student killed by illegal Venezuelan migrant Jose Ibarra in February 2024, has become 'the face' of crimes committed by those living illegally in the United States, there are similar victims in states across the country, including Thompson and others, such as Lizbeth Medina, Jocelyn Nungaray, Rachel Morin and Kayla Hamilton. 'The positive thing is: the border's secure now, but you've got to realize: four years of leaving the doors open to over 160 countries to put criminals and anybody else that wanted to come into the country,' Norman said. 'You wouldn't open your house up like that. Yet the Democrats are still not condemning what Joe Biden intentionally did. But it's a new day, and hopefully, [it is] going to be straightened out in time.' Advertisement 7 Larisha Thompson was shot to death while driving to meet friends in Rock Hill on May 2, 2025. Family handout Lancaster County Sheriff's Office deputies located Thompson, 40, deceased with a gunshot wound behind the wheel of her vehicle on Riverside Road in Lancaster, which is located about an hour south of Charlotte, North Carolina. On May 12, authorities announced the arrests of three adults – Asael Aminadas Torres-Chirinos, 21, Jarby Ardon Ramos-Odari, 18, and Jeyson Sobied Pineda-Salgado, 17 – and three juveniles, ages 13, 14 and 15, in connection with Thompson's death and a separate burglary that occurred on April 30. 'The unknown is what we fear,' Norman said when asked about people with criminal intentions who may have crossed illegally into the United States during the Biden administration. 'When you hear [FBI Director] Kash Patel talk about threats… the fact is that they're doing their best, but… we don't know who's here. And we're getting a lot of them out, but there's still the unknown of who's left here. And that's the problem. How many more deaths do we have to have that are just so senseless?' Advertisement 7 Jarby Ardon Ramos-Odari. Lancaster Co. Sheriff's Office 7 Rep. Ralph Norman arrives for a meeting at the Capitol Building on May 20, 2025. Getty Images Norman said he hopes prosecutors pursue the death penalty against the adult suspects accused of murdering Thompson. 'South Carolina is a great state,' Norman said, but added that people have 'got to be aware' and 'diligent.' Advertisement Lancaster Sheriff Barry Faile said Thompson's 'shooting defies any sense of decency in a civilized society,' during a May press conference. 'Ms. Thompson was going about her business on a Friday night, not bothering anyone. All of a sudden, these six men and boys – out to get something for nothing from someone they did not know and had no business bothering – pulled alongside her car, and Torres-Chirinos opened fire, killing Ms. Thompson,' Faile said at the time. 'There's no place in our society for acts like this or the people who commit them, and my hope is these six are never again among us.' The Department of Homeland Security has placed detainers on all six individuals charged, Faile said during a press conference, adding that the community is a 'much safer place today because these six individuals are off the streets.' Faile alleged that the suspects pulled up alongside Thompson and fatally shot her in what authorities described as a 'random robbery attempt.' Authorities believe the other five suspects were in the vehicle with Torres-Chirinos, who was driving and allegedly fired the fatal shot at Thompson. They are accused of attempting to enter her vehicle and then fleeing the scene upon realizing that it was locked. On April 30, deputies were dispatched to the Van Wyck Mart at 644 Rock Hill Highway before 8 a.m. to investigate a burglary. The store owner told deputies that surveillance video footage showed several young men trying to get into the store around 10:30 p.m. on April 29. When they could not get inside, they allegedly broke open a door on the northwest corner of the building, which opened up to a bathroom that had access to the inside of the store. The suspects are also accused of firing a handgun at a security camera and the bathroom door. Detectives collected ballistics evidence at the scene. 7 Jeyson Sobied Pineda-Salgado. Lancaster Co. Sheriff's Office Advertisement 7 Asael Aminadas Torres-Chirinos. Lancaster Co. Sheriff's Office The store the suspects allegedly broke into and the location of Thompson's murder are a seven-minute drive apart. Detectives determined that ballistic evidence recovered from the scene of the murder came from the same 9 mm handgun used at the burglary days before. Through digital surveillance, investigators also identified Torres-Chirinos at the scene of both crimes. They questioned him at the sheriff's office on May 8, and by the end of that day, they had identified, located and detained the five additional suspects. Advertisement 7 Mom Larisha Sharell Thompson was found dead in her car on May 2, 2025. 7 Lancaster officials announce the charges against the six illegal immigrants in the murder of Thompson. Fox News The three adult suspects are charged with murder, attempted armed robbery and second-degree burglary. Authorities believe Torres-Chirinos fired the handgun in both incidents, and he is charged with two counts of firearms possession during the commission of a crime and one count of firearms possession by an unlawful alien. A judge denied bond for all three men. Advertisement The three juvenile suspects are also charged with murder, attempted armed robbery and second-degree burglary. All six suspects are subject to removal from the United States under federal immigration law based on their immigration status, the sheriff's office said. Thompson's family is 'grieving and trying to get their heads around how something like this could happen,' Faile added.

S.F. drag performer detained by ICE after asylum hearing
S.F. drag performer detained by ICE after asylum hearing

San Francisco Chronicle​

time21 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

S.F. drag performer detained by ICE after asylum hearing

A San Francisco drag performer was detained by immigration enforcement officers after his asylum hearing in immigration court Thursday morning, one of the latest among at least 20 people in San Francisco to be subject to a new Trump administration practice of courthouse arrests. The man, an immigrant from Central America who performs under the drag name Hilary Rivers, is gay and has a pending asylum application based on 'traumatic and severe' persecution he experienced in his home country that led him to flee to the U.S., according to Milli Atkinson, legal director at the San Francisco Immigrant Legal Defense Collaborative, who heads up the city's Rapid Response Network that responds to immigration enforcement actions. At Rivers' immigration hearing, the government attorney moved for the case to be dismissed, but the judge denied it. Rivers was arrested as he was leaving court, Atkinson said. A Rapid Response Network attorney on site was able to advise Rivers on his rights to prevent the government deporting him in error, Atkinson said. His attorney has since located him at an ICE detention facility in Bakersfield, she said. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Hilary-River's (@hilary_riversh) The Chronicle has reached out to Immigration and Customs Enforcement for comment. U.S. law grants asylum seekers like Rivers the right to remain in the United States while their asylum claim is pending, but the government has argued that it has the right to detain such individuals, which has been challenged in court before. Under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment's right to due process, immigrants also generally have the right to a hearing in front of an immigration judge before they're deported, with some exceptions. However, since late May, federal immigration authorities under President Donald Trump's administration have started a new practice where the government attorney in an immigration hearing would file a motion for the judge to dismiss the case so that the person would lose protections from deportation afforded to those with pending immigration proceedings. After the judge dismisses it, ICE agents would arrest the immigrant and detain them for expedited removal, or deportation without a hearing, a federal power that's under Biden was reserved for those arrested at the border within two weeks of their arrival. Authorities have also been detaining people whose cases were not dismissed by immigration judges, including Rivers, Atkinson said. Of the, at least 20, people who the San Francisco Rapid Response Network confirmed had been subject to 'courthouse arrests,' she said only two of them had cases dismissed by judges. The rest, she said, are still in active proceedings and the majority have a pending asylum application. Atkinson said she has confirmed that the government then moves a person's case to appear before an immigration judge who is more willing to grant the motion to dismiss, so they can deport the person. 'It's a complete, flagrant violation of what our asylum system was built on,' Atkinson said. 'He was doing everything, complying with every rule there could possibly be. Every day he's been in the U.S. has been lawful.' Rivers was paroled — legally admitted — into the U.S. through a Biden-era program called CBP One, which granted permission to about 900,000 migrants to enter the U.S.-Mexico border. Trump has since cancelled the program and revoked parole from those who entered through it, but the move is facing legal challenges. The Trump administration justified the mass revocation of parole as a way to secure U.S. borders and protect nation security. Trump has argued the program was illegal in the first place. The night before he was detained, Rivers performed at a long-running queer pride pageant event called Miss & Mr. Safe Latino, started 30 years ago in response to the HIV epidemic at the now-closed Mission District bar Esta Noche, which had been a hub for queer Latinos. 'There's not a more textbook case of what asylum was created for than a case like his,' Atkinson said. 'To have them take him away from his community during Pride Week, when he's fleeing persecution for his queer identity, and when he had just participated in that pageant … is just horrific to me, is just a disgrace, and people should really be outraged and ashamed by what our government is doing.' Advocates have voiced concern over bad conditions in overcrowded ICE detention facilities as the Trump administration detained a record 56,000 people as of June 15, about 72% of whom have no criminal records, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a data organization. The courthouse arrests have caused a 'real panic' in the undocumented immigrant community, causing people to be afraid to go to their hearings, Atkinson said. But if they fail to appear for their hearings, they can be ordered deported.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store