Climate justice is now a legal duty
This ruling didn't come from nowhere. It followed a youth-led campaign that began in the Pacific with law students from the University of the South Pacific, young people from islands confronting rising seas and disappearing coastlines. Their vision was to use international law to clarify the duties of governments to respond to the climate crisis, giving the issue legal teeth.
From Fiji to France, Kampala to Kuwait, young people organised. Toolkits were shared. Letters were sent. Side events, workshops and diplomatic meetings unfolded across regions. I joined in the final stretch, working to rally support from the Arab League, briefing decision-makers and reminding them that climate change does not respect borders, wealth, or distance.
From the bench, the Court made clear: climate change poses an 'urgent and existential threat', and states are obligated to not only curb emissions but also regulate private industry, fund adaptation and ensure remedies for those harmed. Inaction could now amount to an internationally wrongful act, grounded in human rights and customary international law. Basically, preventing significant environmental harm and safeguarding human rights are two sides of the same coin.
This translates into four immediate implications. First, national climate plans must be robust, transparent and grounded in historical responsibility. Second, governments must deliver financial and technical support to vulnerable communities. Third, people displaced by climate impacts must not be denied refuge and nations threatened by rising seas continue to retain legal recognition. Fourth, any government that drags its feet now faces potential legal challenges at home or abroad.
Already, lawyers are citing the opinion in litigation in Europe and in challenges to regulatory rollbacks in the United States. This legal precedent equips activists and policymakers with a powerful tool: climate justice is no longer a moral appeal alone. It is written into international jurisprudence.
As I watched the judgment stream in, I thought of home. I thought of the longer summers, the failing rains and the conversations I have had with young Omanis eager to act. Although the decision was delivered in The Hague, its heartbeat belongs to young islanders who refused to wait for systems to catch up. Their government stood beside them and soon the world listened. This model of youth-led strategy, supported by institutions, offers a lesson that transcends geography.
A similar spark is already present here. In a regional survey I co-led during my time at the Arab Youth Council for Climate Change, 77 per cent of young Omanis said our country must do more to address the climate crisis. This is a generation that wants to restore ecosystems, rethink building codes and design careers that serve both people and planet. Their potential is not limited to the local. What they need are institutions that listen, partners that invest in their vision, and leadership that sees them as allies in shaping the future.
The advisory opinion affirms what science and lived experience have long suggested. Delay is no longer defensible. The law now supports the urgency that young people have carried for years. As we turn from international courts back to our classrooms, council halls and boardrooms, we do so with a responsibility that cannot be ignored. Oman's net-zero 2050 target must now shift from aspiration to action. Our future, like that of every nation, depends on whether we can transform legal obligation into real progress.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Why Oman's new performance-based allowance system matters
Something important just changed in Oman's private sector — and it didn't make much noise. But it should have. In June 2025, the Ministry of Labour issued Ministerial Decision No. 317/2025, introducing a new framework for annual allowances granted to Omani employees in the private sector. At first glance, it may appear to be a technical administrative update. In truth, it signals a quiet yet meaningful shift — one that could reshape workplace culture, redefine employee motivation, and nudge the private sector toward greater fairness and efficiency. For years, private sector employees received a flat annual allowance of three per cent. It made no difference whether an individual went above and beyond or simply met the bare minimum. As long as they completed a full year of service, the increase was automatic. This approach, while administratively simple, sent the wrong message. It blurred the line between high performers and underperformers, discouraged ambition, and dulled the incentive to innovate or improve. For many Omanis, it reinforced the perception that the public sector — with its clearer paths to recognition — was a more appealing career choice. The new system changes the equation. Allowances are now linked directly to performance evaluations, with rates ranging from five per cent for an 'Excellent' rating to four per cent for 'Very Good,' three per cent for 'Good,' two per cent for 'Acceptable,' and none at all for those assessed as 'Poor.' Another notable improvement is the timeline. The allowance is now payable after six months of employment rather than twelve, creating a more responsive and motivating structure. This means employees no longer need to wait a full year to see their efforts recognised and rewarded. Importantly, the reform introduces mechanisms for fairness and accountability. Employees have the right to appeal their performance assessments, and companies that fail to comply with the regulations face penalties of RO 50 per violation. This is not a symbolic gesture; it is a strong indication that the Ministry of Labour is serious about implementation, compliance, and protecting the rights of workers. This reform is about more than financial reward. It is about restoring fairness, recognising individual contribution, and building a performance-driven culture. When rules are clear and consistently applied, trust grows. Motivation improves. Retention increases. The private sector becomes a place where ambition is not just tolerated, but rewarded. The new system sends a strong message to employers: performance matters. Those who invest in transparent evaluation systems, train their managers effectively, and build a culture of merit will be better equipped to retain talent and compete in the evolving economic landscape. This policy also aligns closely with the national goals of Oman Vision 2040, which places human capital at the centre of development. The Vision calls for a dynamic, competitive private sector led by skilled Omanis who are recognised and empowered. A performance-based allowance system supports that goal by rewarding excellence and encouraging continuous improvement. Of course, no reform can succeed by decree alone. Implementation will be the true test. Performance evaluations must be fair, consistent, and transparent. Employers need to ensure that the system uplifts rather than discourages — that it is used to support growth, not to punish. Managers must be trained to apply standards objectively. Employees, in turn, should be guided and motivated to achieve higher outcomes, not merely ranked in a system they do not trust. If implemented well, this reform could mark the beginning of a new chapter in Oman's private sector — one defined by recognition, accountability, and ambition. If poorly applied, however, it risks becoming another box-ticking exercise with little real effect. The responsibility now lies with all of us: policymakers, employers, and employees alike. Oman has taken a bold and necessary step toward building a smarter, more equitable labour market. Let us ensure this reform delivers not only on paper — but in practice, across workplaces, industries, and careers.
Observer
4 days ago
- Observer
Omani-Chinese Friendship Forum discusses strengthening partnership
SALALAH: The third session of the Omani-Chinese Friendship Forum 2025, which began on Thursday in Salalah, discussed strengthening the comprehensive strategic partnership and expanding cooperation and investment between the Sultanate of Oman and the People's Republic of China. The forum was organised under the theme: "Chinese Modernisation and Oman Vision 2040: Our Work and Proposals." It was an initiative by Al Roya newspaper, the Embassy of the People's Republic of China in Oman, and the Oman-China Friendship Association, with the participation of a number of officials, experts and specialists from both sides. The forum was inaugurated by HH Sayyid Marwan bin Turki al Said, Governor of Dhofar, who felicitated a number of speakers and participants. Hatim bin Hamad al Tai, Secretary-General of the forum and Editor-in-Chief of Al Roya newspaper, affirmed that the forum serves as a platform to deepen dialogue, enhance mutual trust between the two countries and explore new avenues for cooperation, in line with the shared potential and aspirations of Oman and China. Dr Saleh bin Said Masan, Under-Secretary of the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Investment Promotion for Commerce and Industry, delivered a speech in which he said that the forum is a unique opportunity to exchange expertise and explore promising investment areas that serve the development priorities of both countries. He pointed out that Oman Vision 2040 represents a road map for a comprehensive economic and structural transformation. Lyu Jian, Ambassador of the People's Republic of China to the Sultanate of Oman, praised the strength of the historical relations between the two countries, which span over 1,200 years. He noted that diplomatic relations, since their establishment in 1978, have witnessed stable and fruitful cooperation based on equality and mutual respect. He clarified that the People's Republic of China is Oman's first trade partner with trade volume between the two countries reaching $36.7 billion in 2024. The People's Republic of China is also the third-largest investor in Oman. The ambassador highlighted prominent joint projects, including the launch of the first Omani satellite, investments in the energy sector and training programmes that have benefited over 1,200 Omanis. He also mentioned that the trade volume between the People's Republic of China and GCC countries reached $288 billion in 2024, with Chinese investments growing by over 30 per cent in the first half of 2025. He called for expanding cultural and humanitarian cooperation and launching direct flights between the two countries. Dr Khalid bin Salim al Saidi, Chairman of the Oman-China Friendship Association, said that the association is a vital link in strengthening relations between the two countries. He emphasised that its role has gone beyond organising meetings to building cultural bridges, humanitarian understandings, and informal cooperation initiatives based on shared values and mutual interests. The forum included discussions on four main themes: "Chinese Modernisation and Oman Vision 2040," "Cooperation in the Energy Sector," "Partnership in Innovation and Technology," and "Cultural and Humanitarian Exchange." The forum also featured a photo exhibition in cooperation with the Chinese Embassy in Oman, in addition to direct bilateral meetings (B2B) between business representatives from both countries to enhance partnership and investment opportunities. Over 30 business owners and representatives of Omani and Chinese companies participated in the forum, which also included a special exhibition for the participating Chinese companies. The current session of the forum sought to solidify the strategic partnership between the two countries and explore new avenues of cooperation that support the priorities of Oman Vision 2040, leveraging the People's Republic of China's experience in economic and social modernisation. - ONA
Observer
5 days ago
- Observer
Climate justice is now a legal duty
The sun streamed into my office last Wednesday afternoon as I watched history unfold from thousands of miles away. At the Peace Palace in The Hague, the International Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited advisory opinion on the obligations of states in respect of climate change. This ruling didn't come from nowhere. It followed a youth-led campaign that began in the Pacific with law students from the University of the South Pacific, young people from islands confronting rising seas and disappearing coastlines. Their vision was to use international law to clarify the duties of governments to respond to the climate crisis, giving the issue legal teeth. From Fiji to France, Kampala to Kuwait, young people organised. Toolkits were shared. Letters were sent. Side events, workshops and diplomatic meetings unfolded across regions. I joined in the final stretch, working to rally support from the Arab League, briefing decision-makers and reminding them that climate change does not respect borders, wealth, or distance. From the bench, the Court made clear: climate change poses an 'urgent and existential threat', and states are obligated to not only curb emissions but also regulate private industry, fund adaptation and ensure remedies for those harmed. Inaction could now amount to an internationally wrongful act, grounded in human rights and customary international law. Basically, preventing significant environmental harm and safeguarding human rights are two sides of the same coin. This translates into four immediate implications. First, national climate plans must be robust, transparent and grounded in historical responsibility. Second, governments must deliver financial and technical support to vulnerable communities. Third, people displaced by climate impacts must not be denied refuge and nations threatened by rising seas continue to retain legal recognition. Fourth, any government that drags its feet now faces potential legal challenges at home or abroad. Already, lawyers are citing the opinion in litigation in Europe and in challenges to regulatory rollbacks in the United States. This legal precedent equips activists and policymakers with a powerful tool: climate justice is no longer a moral appeal alone. It is written into international jurisprudence. As I watched the judgment stream in, I thought of home. I thought of the longer summers, the failing rains and the conversations I have had with young Omanis eager to act. Although the decision was delivered in The Hague, its heartbeat belongs to young islanders who refused to wait for systems to catch up. Their government stood beside them and soon the world listened. This model of youth-led strategy, supported by institutions, offers a lesson that transcends geography. A similar spark is already present here. In a regional survey I co-led during my time at the Arab Youth Council for Climate Change, 77 per cent of young Omanis said our country must do more to address the climate crisis. This is a generation that wants to restore ecosystems, rethink building codes and design careers that serve both people and planet. Their potential is not limited to the local. What they need are institutions that listen, partners that invest in their vision, and leadership that sees them as allies in shaping the future. The advisory opinion affirms what science and lived experience have long suggested. Delay is no longer defensible. The law now supports the urgency that young people have carried for years. As we turn from international courts back to our classrooms, council halls and boardrooms, we do so with a responsibility that cannot be ignored. Oman's net-zero 2050 target must now shift from aspiration to action. Our future, like that of every nation, depends on whether we can transform legal obligation into real progress.
